Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Still can't get a yard

13

Comments

  • UW_Doog_Bot
    UW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,551 Founders Club
    RaceBannon said:

    Gosh it's almost like the passing was addressed and isn't the problem

    The cult of Huff is bizarre

    Ignore getting stuffed 3 times and being unable to run the clock but go on

    When it costs games don't cry to me



    I saw a lot of role outs and moving the pocket to help the o-line not give up sacks.

    I was pretty drunk though trying to deal with the fear of inevitably blowing the lead.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,422 Founders Club
    edited September 2022
    DerekJohnson said:

    haie said:

    Goal line running isn't creative and we're probably using the wrong rb's for it.

    As I was texting to somebody during the game, if we can't run straight ahead (and we knew we couldn't against good defenses after the Kent State game), why play into the opponent's hands by lining up in the goal line offense? Why not spread things out at the goal line? Don't paint yourself into a corner.
    Exactly. I don't know what they're seeing on film.

    Or I think it was Greg Lewis suggesting at least trying wildcat with Newton/Taulapapa. It's a better idea than sneaking it with Penix.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,495 Founders Club
    DerekJohnson said:

    haie said:

    Goal line running isn't creative and we're probably using the wrong rb's for it.

    As I was texting to somebody during the game, if we can't run straight ahead (and we knew we couldn't against good defenses after the Kent State game), why play into the opponent's hands by lining up in the goal line offense? Why not spread things out at the goal line? Don't paint yourself into a corner.
    The first time was an attempt to prove how tuff they were with 4 runs. Didn't mind

    However after proving they still can't get a yard the next two goal line failures were bad

    If you need to run your all out deep passing attack to burn clock you might have a problem

    But no sacks
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Baseman
    Baseman Member Posts: 12,379
    edited September 2022
    RaceBannon said:

    DerekJohnson said:

    haie said:

    Goal line running isn't creative and we're probably using the wrong rb's for it.

    As I was texting to somebody during the game, if we can't run straight ahead (and we knew we couldn't against good defenses after the Kent State game), why play into the opponent's hands by lining up in the goal line offense? Why not spread things out at the goal line? Don't paint yourself into a corner.
    The first time was an attempt to prove how tuff they were with 4 runs. Didn't mind

    However after proving they still can't get a yard the next two goal line failures were bad

    If you need to run your all out deep passing attack to burn clock you might have a problem

    But no sacks
    3-0.

    The run game needs improvement. I don't see the fuckups and vulnerability on delayed blitzes.

    #1 offense so far. No sacks, no pressures. Progress with an unblemished record. Michigan State has some dudes on their interior. Opponents down 3 td's expect run.

    Would have liked to see Dick Newton on the goal line. Talapapa is a JAG. LIPO...i know it's hard





    #NoSacks
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Canadawg
    Canadawg Member Posts: 5,898
    RaceBannon said:

    DerekJohnson said:

    haie said:

    Goal line running isn't creative and we're probably using the wrong rb's for it.

    As I was texting to somebody during the game, if we can't run straight ahead (and we knew we couldn't against good defenses after the Kent State game), why play into the opponent's hands by lining up in the goal line offense? Why not spread things out at the goal line? Don't paint yourself into a corner.
    The first time was an attempt to prove how tuff they were with 4 runs. Didn't mind

    However after proving they still can't get a yard the next two goal line failures were bad

    If you need to run your all out deep passing attack to burn clock you might have a problem

    But no sacks
    The second touchdown was a 1 yard run by Davis
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,495 Founders Club
    Baseman said:

    RaceBannon said:

    DerekJohnson said:

    haie said:

    Goal line running isn't creative and we're probably using the wrong rb's for it.

    As I was texting to somebody during the game, if we can't run straight ahead (and we knew we couldn't against good defenses after the Kent State game), why play into the opponent's hands by lining up in the goal line offense? Why not spread things out at the goal line? Don't paint yourself into a corner.
    The first time was an attempt to prove how tuff they were with 4 runs. Didn't mind

    However after proving they still can't get a yard the next two goal line failures were bad

    If you need to run your all out deep passing attack to burn clock you might have a problem

    But no sacks
    3-0.

    The run game needs improvement. I don't see the fuckups and vulnerability on delayed blitzes.

    #1 offense so far. No sacks, no pressures. Progress with an unblemished record. Michigan State has some dudes on their interior. Opponents down 3 td's expect run.

    Would have liked to see Dick Newton on the goal line. Talapapa is a JAG. LIPO...i know it's hard





    #NoSacks
    Well everything is just skippy then

    Dawgman might be more your speed
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,672
    Canadawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    DerekJohnson said:

    haie said:

    Goal line running isn't creative and we're probably using the wrong rb's for it.

    As I was texting to somebody during the game, if we can't run straight ahead (and we knew we couldn't against good defenses after the Kent State game), why play into the opponent's hands by lining up in the goal line offense? Why not spread things out at the goal line? Don't paint yourself into a corner.
    The first time was an attempt to prove how tuff they were with 4 runs. Didn't mind

    However after proving they still can't get a yard the next two goal line failures were bad

    If you need to run your all out deep passing attack to burn clock you might have a problem

    But no sacks
    The second touchdown was a 1 yard run by Davis
    Not that yard
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,807 Swaye's Wigwam
    Improvement is needed but I also feel like it's coming but for one thing...a quality RB ain't walking through that door. These guys leave a lot of yards out there. Talapapa left two touchdowns out there that Davis, I think, would've punched in. He is a good receiver but horrible ball carrier. I think he may.be the worst I've seen at UW since the Ty days. He has no burst, no top end, and no power. His cuts aren't sharp. I don't see a legit FBS ball carrier there at all.

    Not that Davis is good. It takes him forever to get upfield and he gets tripped by anyone within 10' of him when he does turn up.

    I'm not a fan, and he has his own issuea unless they're gone now but I'm ready to see Dick Newt.

    Is Javeon Sunday still there? What about him? Sam Adams?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter