Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Most secure in history
Comments
-
It's the Gateway Pundit, not the ever reliable Washington Post. Are you going to believe your lying eyes?
-
2000 Mules 2: 2001 Mules.
This time, it’s personal. -
Downvoting faggot shill probably earned extra money running ballots for the DNC.
-
Add banana republic supporting to big pharma downvoting faggot shill moniker.MelloDawg said:2000 Mules 2: 2001 Mules.
This time, it’s personal.
-
Some of us are old enough to remember the outrage from the left after the 2000 and 2016 elections, where media types, politicians, and dem voters were convinced the election had been stolen from them, despite no video evidence of such…MelloDawg said:2000 Mules 2: 2001 Mules.
This time, it’s personal.
So you’ll have to excuse me for finding your snark a little off putting. -
I’m hearing that 2016 is different than 2020.thechatch said:
Some of us are old enough to remember the outrage from the left after the 2000 and 2016 elections, where media types, politicians, and dem voters were convinced the election had been stolen from them, despite no video evidence of such…MelloDawg said:2000 Mules 2: 2001 Mules.
This time, it’s personal.
So you’ll have to excuse me for finding your snark a little off putting. -
No credible evidence has been found. None. Nadda. Zip. Zilch. Zero.
-
And 2004thechatch said:
Some of us are old enough to remember the outrage from the left after the 2000 and 2016 elections, where media types, politicians, and dem voters were convinced the election had been stolen from them, despite no video evidence of such…MelloDawg said:2000 Mules 2: 2001 Mules.
This time, it’s personal.
So you’ll have to excuse me for finding your snark a little off putting. -
DIM Rep. Raskin said this weekend that questioning the results of an election is one indication that you're a fascist. He said the 2000 election was stolen from Gore. He objected to the certification of Trump electors in 2016.
Raskin is a fascist by his own definition. -
@DinoRossiDawg, true?Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
And 2004thechatch said:
Some of us are old enough to remember the outrage from the left after the 2000 and 2016 elections, where media types, politicians, and dem voters were convinced the election had been stolen from them, despite no video evidence of such…MelloDawg said:2000 Mules 2: 2001 Mules.
This time, it’s personal.
So you’ll have to excuse me for finding your snark a little off putting.
-
Yes. Have confirmed with him in the flesh.PurpleThrobber said:
@DinoRossiDawg, true?Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
And 2004thechatch said:
Some of us are old enough to remember the outrage from the left after the 2000 and 2016 elections, where media types, politicians, and dem voters were convinced the election had been stolen from them, despite no video evidence of such…MelloDawg said:2000 Mules 2: 2001 Mules.
This time, it’s personal.
So you’ll have to excuse me for finding your snark a little off putting. -
Glad we’re on the same page regarding widespread fraud, finally.46XiJCAB said:No credible evidence has been found. None. Nadda. Zip. Zilch. Zero.
-
People forget in 2004 the left claimed the election was stolen as well. They forget that.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
And 2004thechatch said:
Some of us are old enough to remember the outrage from the left after the 2000 and 2016 elections, where media types, politicians, and dem voters were convinced the election had been stolen from them, despite no video evidence of such…MelloDawg said:2000 Mules 2: 2001 Mules.
This time, it’s personal.
So you’ll have to excuse me for finding your snark a little off putting.
But Trump is so bad even if it was stolen the end justifies the means. Would you have cheated to keep Hitler out of power? That’s what I thought.
https://www.aei.org/op-eds/being-a-democrat-means-never-having-to-accept-an-election-loss/ -
When the election is decided by 130 votes out of 2.7 million the fraud doesn’t have to be widespread. Dino Rossi knows this.Bob_C said: