Well aren't public statements just that; public? Isn't content public unless one is using that content for financial gain or passing off as ones' own content? I dont see the problem, could you please explain Derek instead of just saying "dont do it ?
I really dont care to paste that shit, I just want to know the issues of legality as it pertains to a fucking hobby bored. Anybody? Derek? I completely respect what youre asking, just curious dude.
Well aren't public statements just that; public? Isn't content public unless one is using that content for financial gain or passing off as ones' own content? I dont see the problem, could you please explain Derek instead of just saying "dont do it ?
I really dont care to paste that shit, I just want to know the issues of legality as it pertains to a fucking hobby bored. Anybody? Derek? I completely respect what youre asking, just curious dude.
Well aren't public statements just that; public? Isn't content public unless one is using that content for financial gain or passing off as ones' own content? I dont see the problem, could you please explain Derek instead of just saying "dont do it ?
I really dont care to paste that shit, I just want to know the issues of legality as it pertains to a fucking hobby bored. Anybody? Derek? I completely respect what youre asking, just curious dude.
So you're saying we can copy/paste content as long as we treat it as educational material and make sure it's not for profit?
It also says it's ok as long as you're using it for parody, which definitely happens here. Poast those fucking screenshots!!!!!!!!!!11!!!!!one!!!!eleven!!!!!!!!
Be it Dawgman or anybody else. I've had to delete 3 threads since yesterday with people posting other people's content. If you wish to address something, summarize it in your own words.
The only premium content that should be posted here is Kate Upton and Jennifer Lawrence's Premium Content.
Well aren't public statements just that; public? Isn't content public unless one is using that content for financial gain or passing off as ones' own content? I dont see the problem, could you please explain Derek instead of just saying "dont do it ?
I really dont care to paste that shit, I just want to know the issues of legality as it pertains to a fucking hobby bored. Anybody? Derek? I completely respect what youre asking, just curious dude.
So you're saying we can copy/paste content as long as we treat it as educational material and make sure it's not for profit?
Just don't cut/paste whole articles. You can copy a few sentences so long as you make comments or criticisms on it. The idea behind fair use is to further society by making it legal to criticize the works of others. If scientists could not report the findings of others they could not disprove anything, and no progress would happen. Just because somebody has paywalled or copyright all over their material, IT IS NO FUCKING BLOCK TO FAIR USE. They can say, "Copyright xxxx, all rights reserved, do not reproduce etc etc etc" Fuck that shit. You can STILL use parts of it under the fair use clause. Learn it, know it, live it...
Just don't cut/paste whole articles. You can copy a few sentences so long as you make comments or criticisms on it. The idea behind fair use is to further society by making it legal to criticize the works of others. If scientists could not report the findings of others they could not disprove anything, and no progress would happen. Just because somebody has paywalled or copyright all over their material, IT IS NO FUCKING BLOCK TO FAIR USE. They can say, "Copyright xxxx, all rights reserved, do not reproduce etc etc etc" Fuck that shit. You can STILL use parts of it under the fair use clause. Learn it, know it, live it...
Pretty sure everything that's ever been copy & pasted on here falls under the satire exemption. Now, DJ may not want to deal with the hassle of FOX lawyers breathing down his neck, but that's a different story.
Pretty sure everything that's ever been copy & pasted on here falls under the satire exemption. Now, DJ may not want to deal with the hassle of FOX lawyers breathing down his neck, but that's a different story.
Well aren't public statements just that; public? Isn't content public unless one is using that content for financial gain or passing off as ones' own content? I dont see the problem, could you please explain Derek instead of just saying "dont do it ?
I really dont care to paste that shit, I just want to know the issues of legality as it pertains to a fucking hobby bored. Anybody? Derek? I completely respect what youre asking, just curious dude.
So you're saying we can copy/paste content as long as we treat it as educational material and make sure it's not for profit?
Just don't cut/paste whole articles. You can copy a few sentences so long as you make comments or criticisms on it. The idea behind fair use is to further society by making it legal to criticize the works of others. If scientists could not report the findings of others they could not disprove anything, and no progress would happen. Just because somebody has paywalled or copyright all over their material, IT IS NO FUCKING BLOCK TO FAIR USE. They can say, "Copyright xxxx, all rights reserved, do not reproduce etc etc etc" Fuck that shit. You can STILL use parts of it under the fair use clause. Learn it, know it, live it...
this must be how the debate was ended over global warming.
Be it Dawgman or anybody else. I've had to delete 3 threads since yesterday with people posting other people's content. If you wish to address something, summarize it in your own words.
The only premium content that should be posted here is Kate Upton and Jennifer Lawrence's Premium
I believe the law allows up to a paragraph to be posted as fair use. But, like NWA before me, Fuck Tha Polease!
Just don't cut/paste whole articles. You can copy a few sentences so long as you make comments or criticisms on it. The idea behind fair use is to further society by making it legal to criticize the works of others. If scientists could not report the findings of others they could not disprove anything, and no progress would happen. Just because somebody has paywalled or copyright all over their material, IT IS NO FUCKING BLOCK TO FAIR USE. They can say, "Copyright xxxx, all rights reserved, do not reproduce etc etc etc" Fuck that shit. You can STILL use parts of it under the fair use clause. Learn it, know it, live it...
Just don't cut/paste whole articles. You can copy a few sentences so long as you make comments or criticisms on it. The idea behind fair use is to further society by making it legal to criticize the works of others. If scientists could not report the findings of others they could not disprove anything, and no progress would happen. Just because somebody has paywalled or copyright all over their material, IT IS NO FUCKING BLOCK TO FAIR USE. They can say, "Copyright xxxx, all rights reserved, do not reproduce etc etc etc" Fuck that shit. You can STILL use parts of it under the fair use clause. Learn it, know it, live it...
Comments
More Jennifer Lawrence shots, less what I'm hearing shit.
Just don't cut/paste whole articles. You can copy a few sentences so long as you make comments or criticisms on it. The idea behind fair use is to further society by making it legal to criticize the works of others. If scientists could not report the findings of others they could not disprove anything, and no progress would happen. Just because somebody has paywalled or copyright all over their material, IT IS NO FUCKING BLOCK TO FAIR USE. They can say, "Copyright xxxx, all rights reserved, do not reproduce etc etc etc" Fuck that shit. You can STILL use parts of it under the fair use clause. Learn it, know it, live it...
Just don't cut/paste whole articles. You can copy a few sentences so long as you make comments or criticisms on it. The idea behind fair use is to further society by making it legal to criticize the works of others. If scientists could not report the findings of others they could not disprove anything, and no progress would happen. Just because somebody has paywalled or copyright all over their material, IT IS NO FUCKING BLOCK TO FAIR USE. They can say, "Copyright xxxx, all rights reserved, do not reproduce etc etc etc" Fuck that shit. You can STILL use parts of it under the fair use clause. Learn it, know it, live it...