This was the beginning of the end of Don James at UW

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

trublue said:

HHusky said:

James heard the talk that he'd likely never get back after losing consecutive bids with consecutive losses to Washington State in 1982 and 1983. The talk grew louder and more persistent through the 80s.

``One of our former players in Tacoma was talking to a booster who said I'd never take a team to the Rose Bowl again,'' James said yesterday. ``Well, the player told him I would. I have pride, I'm a competitor. I was discouraged, but I was still determined. It feels so great to know we're going back.''


Seattle Times, November 4, 1990

My witness is Don James.

Fuck you, Race.

I was right again.

“A booster said . . .”

Take it to the bank, Herr HH.

The talk grew louder and more persistent through the 80s.


It did.

#Of_All_TIME!

If only you would have a fraction of this effort and critical thinking when looking at things like russiagate, you might be better off.

Better off?

I don't know. If I got any richer, I might become arrogant.

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

trublue said:

HHusky said:

James heard the talk that he'd likely never get back after losing consecutive bids with consecutive losses to Washington State in 1982 and 1983. The talk grew louder and more persistent through the 80s.

``One of our former players in Tacoma was talking to a booster who said I'd never take a team to the Rose Bowl again,'' James said yesterday. ``Well, the player told him I would. I have pride, I'm a competitor. I was discouraged, but I was still determined. It feels so great to know we're going back.''


Seattle Times, November 4, 1990

My witness is Don James.

Fuck you, Race.

I was right again.

“A booster said . . .”

Take it to the bank, Herr HH.

The talk grew louder and more persistent through the 80s.


It did.

#Of_All_TIME!

If only you would have a fraction of this effort and critical thinking when looking at things like russiagate, you might be better off.

Better off?

I don't know. If I got any richer, I might become arrogant.

You fell for the hoax without any critical thinking because it fit your narrative.

"hoax"

"critical thinking"

sure

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

trublue said:

HHusky said:

James heard the talk that he'd likely never get back after losing consecutive bids with consecutive losses to Washington State in 1982 and 1983. The talk grew louder and more persistent through the 80s.

``One of our former players in Tacoma was talking to a booster who said I'd never take a team to the Rose Bowl again,'' James said yesterday. ``Well, the player told him I would. I have pride, I'm a competitor. I was discouraged, but I was still determined. It feels so great to know we're going back.''


Seattle Times, November 4, 1990

My witness is Don James.

Fuck you, Race.

I was right again.

“A booster said . . .”

Take it to the bank, Herr HH.

The talk grew louder and more persistent through the 80s.


It did.

#Of_All_TIME!

If only you would have a fraction of this effort and critical thinking when looking at things like russiagate, you might be better off.

Better off?

I don't know. If I got any richer, I might become arrogant.

You fell for the hoax without any critical thinking because it fit your narrative.

"hoax"

"critical thinking"

sure

See? You're only skeptical 50% of the time, and gullible when it supports your team. That still gets you an F. It's better to hate both teams and not trust in their little narratives.

Critical thinking isn't simply landing at one of two polar opposite extremes and disbelieving your own senses at every turn.

That's not Rider ball.

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

trublue said:

HHusky said:

James heard the talk that he'd likely never get back after losing consecutive bids with consecutive losses to Washington State in 1982 and 1983. The talk grew louder and more persistent through the 80s.

``One of our former players in Tacoma was talking to a booster who said I'd never take a team to the Rose Bowl again,'' James said yesterday. ``Well, the player told him I would. I have pride, I'm a competitor. I was discouraged, but I was still determined. It feels so great to know we're going back.''


Seattle Times, November 4, 1990

My witness is Don James.

Fuck you, Race.

I was right again.

“A booster said . . .”

Take it to the bank, Herr HH.

The talk grew louder and more persistent through the 80s.


It did.

#Of_All_TIME!

If only you would have a fraction of this effort and critical thinking when looking at things like russiagate, you might be better off.

Better off?

I don't know. If I got any richer, I might become arrogant.

You fell for the hoax without any critical thinking because it fit your narrative.

"hoax"

"critical thinking"

sure

See? You're only skeptical 50% of the time, and gullible when it supports your team. That still gets you an F. It's better to hate both teams and not trust in their little narratives.

Critical thinking isn't simply landing at one of two polar opposite extremes and disbelieving your own senses at every turn.

That's not Rider ball.

That gets you an F+. Congratulations.
And we're not talking about binary opposite extremes, that's just another lame talking point. The case for russia gate was always weak. You don't have to be a trumper to see that.

pawz said:

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

trublue said:

HHusky said:

James heard the talk that he'd likely never get back after losing consecutive bids with consecutive losses to Washington State in 1982 and 1983. The talk grew louder and more persistent through the 80s.

``One of our former players in Tacoma was talking to a booster who said I'd never take a team to the Rose Bowl again,'' James said yesterday. ``Well, the player told him I would. I have pride, I'm a competitor. I was discouraged, but I was still determined. It feels so great to know we're going back.''


Seattle Times, November 4, 1990

My witness is Don James.

Fuck you, Race.

I was right again.

“A booster said . . .”

Take it to the bank, Herr HH.

The talk grew louder and more persistent through the 80s.


It did.

#Of_All_TIME!

If only you would have a fraction of this effort and critical thinking when looking at things like russiagate, you might be better off.

Better off?

I don't know. If I got any richer, I might become arrogant.

You fell for the hoax without any critical thinking because it fit your narrative.

"hoax"

"critical thinking"

sure

See? You're only skeptical 50% of the time, and gullible when it supports your team. That still gets you an F. It's better to hate both teams and not trust in their little narratives.

Critical thinking isn't simply landing at one of two polar opposite extremes and disbelieving your own senses at every turn.

That's not Rider ball.

Critical thinking also is not what you do. By any stretch of the imagination.

Hope the manager doesn't have you on a poast count, 'cuz that didn't add much.

pawz said:

HHusky said:

pawz said:

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

trublue said:

HHusky said:

James heard the talk that he'd likely never get back after losing consecutive bids with consecutive losses to Washington State in 1982 and 1983. The talk grew louder and more persistent through the 80s.

``One of our former players in Tacoma was talking to a booster who said I'd never take a team to the Rose Bowl again,'' James said yesterday. ``Well, the player told him I would. I have pride, I'm a competitor. I was discouraged, but I was still determined. It feels so great to know we're going back.''


Seattle Times, November 4, 1990

My witness is Don James.

Fuck you, Race.

I was right again.

“A booster said . . .”

Take it to the bank, Herr HH.

The talk grew louder and more persistent through the 80s.


It did.

#Of_All_TIME!

If only you would have a fraction of this effort and critical thinking when looking at things like russiagate, you might be better off.

Better off?

I don't know. If I got any richer, I might become arrogant.

You fell for the hoax without any critical thinking because it fit your narrative.

"hoax"

"critical thinking"

sure

See? You're only skeptical 50% of the time, and gullible when it supports your team. That still gets you an F. It's better to hate both teams and not trust in their little narratives.

Critical thinking isn't simply landing at one of two polar opposite extremes and disbelieving your own senses at every turn.

That's not Rider ball.

Critical thinking also is not what you do. By any stretch of the imagination.

Hope the manager doesn't have you on a poast count, 'cuz that didn't add much.

Quality over quantity.

I'm right.

You're a fucking loser.

So I'm off your Christmas card list?

#harsh

pawz said:

HHusky said:

pawz said:

HHusky said:

pawz said:

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

trublue said:

HHusky said:

James heard the talk that he'd likely never get back after losing consecutive bids with consecutive losses to Washington State in 1982 and 1983. The talk grew louder and more persistent through the 80s.

``One of our former players in Tacoma was talking to a booster who said I'd never take a team to the Rose Bowl again,'' James said yesterday. ``Well, the player told him I would. I have pride, I'm a competitor. I was discouraged, but I was still determined. It feels so great to know we're going back.''


Seattle Times, November 4, 1990

My witness is Don James.

Fuck you, Race.

I was right again.

“A booster said . . .”

Take it to the bank, Herr HH.

The talk grew louder and more persistent through the 80s.


It did.

#Of_All_TIME!

If only you would have a fraction of this effort and critical thinking when looking at things like russiagate, you might be better off.

Better off?

I don't know. If I got any richer, I might become arrogant.

You fell for the hoax without any critical thinking because it fit your narrative.

"hoax"

"critical thinking"

sure

See? You're only skeptical 50% of the time, and gullible when it supports your team. That still gets you an F. It's better to hate both teams and not trust in their little narratives.

Critical thinking isn't simply landing at one of two polar opposite extremes and disbelieving your own senses at every turn.

That's not Rider ball.

Critical thinking also is not what you do. By any stretch of the imagination.

Hope the manager doesn't have you on a poast count, 'cuz that didn't add much.

Quality over quantity.

I'm right.

You're a fucking loser.

So I'm off your Christmas card list?

#harsh

I don't have a Christmas card list. I'm not a faggot.

oy vey

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

trublue said:

HHusky said:

James heard the talk that he'd likely never get back after losing consecutive bids with consecutive losses to Washington State in 1982 and 1983. The talk grew louder and more persistent through the 80s.

``One of our former players in Tacoma was talking to a booster who said I'd never take a team to the Rose Bowl again,'' James said yesterday. ``Well, the player told him I would. I have pride, I'm a competitor. I was discouraged, but I was still determined. It feels so great to know we're going back.''


Seattle Times, November 4, 1990

My witness is Don James.

Fuck you, Race.

I was right again.

“A booster said . . .”

Take it to the bank, Herr HH.

The talk grew louder and more persistent through the 80s.


It did.

#Of_All_TIME!

If only you would have a fraction of this effort and critical thinking when looking at things like russiagate, you might be better off.

Better off?

I don't know. If I got any richer, I might become arrogant.

You fell for the hoax without any critical thinking because it fit your narrative.

"hoax"

"critical thinking"

sure

See? You're only skeptical 50% of the time, and gullible when it supports your team. That still gets you an F. It's better to hate both teams and not trust in their little narratives.

Critical thinking isn't simply landing at one of two polar opposite extremes and disbelieving your own senses at every turn.

That's not Rider ball.

The case for russia gate was always weak. You don't have to be a trumper to see that.

What does that even mean?