Naw, they’re not corrupt
Weird. It’s almost like the corrupt officials cared about who was signing this time. They also would NOT allow independent monitors during the signature verification process. Sound familiar.
Comments
-
-
Do you think it’s going to be easy to cast off these chains?
-
It's not unusual to reject over 10%. 30% is a lot.
-
* poof *RaceBannon said:
It's almost like we? need to get in the habit of 'all the screen shots I need' prior to poasting twats
-
Maybe now was the time the lib-fascists decided to reject ballots from illegals?46XiJCAB said:The recall effort of Soros puppet LA DA G. Gascon fails. They’ve rejected 30% of the signatures. Imagine if they rejected 30% of the signatures on Mail in ballots?
Weird. It’s almost like the corrupt officials cared about who was signing this time. They also would NOT allow independent monitors during the signature verification process. Sound familiar. -
-
Let LA burn.
-
UW_Doog_Bot said:
Let LA SF PDX and SEA burn.
-
30% is corruption by one side or stupidity on the other. We know rats cheat and lie so my money is on corruption.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:It's not unusual to reject over 10%. 30% is a lot.
-
Wow, this country has truly devolved into Jack Ryan Venezuela. Tucker's opening went on for almost 30 uninterrupted minutes last night and painted a sobering reality. Patriots opposing this tyranny with words are bing economically and socially tortured. All of this is illegal but the only hope for liberty are cucks wanting their little piece of the grift.46XiJCAB said:The recall effort of Soros puppet LA DA G. Gascon fails. They’ve rejected 30% of the signatures. Imagine if they rejected 30% of the signatures on Mail in ballots?
Weird. It’s almost like the corrupt officials cared about who was signing this time. They also would NOT allow independent monitors during the signature verification process. Sound familiar.
