Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

USC/UCLA Wants to Shut the Door

12346»

Comments

  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967

    Lol truly a golden era to glory in.

    Too easy quook.
    You’re free to pick a 22 year stretch in UW history that’s better. You can even throw in the 1/2 championship.
  • haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,514 Founders Club
    46XiJCAB said:

    You’re free to pick a 22 year stretch in UW history that’s better. You can even throw in the 1/2 championship.
    Omg. You are so fucking stupid. And clearly unemployed.
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    Coaches poll good in 1991. Coaches poll bad in 1984. Makes sense.
  • haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,514 Founders Club
    46XiJCAB said:

    Coaches poll good in 1991. Coaches poll bad in 1984. Makes sense.

    Just because a bunch of coaches were stupid cunts in 1984 doesn't mean there wasn't an obvious champion that wasn't BYU. You would be the kind of loser quck to ignore Barry Switzer.
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    Since 1990.

    UO 9 conference titles and 6 division titles.

    UW 7-4.

    National titles.

    UO-0
    UW- 1/2

    I made sure to include the glory years. 1990-1992.
  • BleachedAnusDawgBleachedAnusDawg Member Posts: 13,016
    46XiJCAB said:

    I guess for fans of some of these schools being able to cuddle up with their glory days at bedtime is nice.
    Remember the Duck glory days that resulted in no Natties?
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,149 Founders Club
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967

    Remember the Duck glory days that resulted in no Natties?
    I pointed out that the Ducks have yet to win a 1/2 natty.
  • CFetters_Nacho_LoverCFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 32,058 Founders Club
    46XiJCAB said:

    Since 1990.

    UO 9 conference titles and 6 division titles.

    UW 7-4.

    National titles.

    UO-0
    UW- 1/2

    I made sure to include the glory years. 1990-1992.

    1/2 a natty but it’s still a complete trophy.
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
  • haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,514 Founders Club
    46XiJCAB said:

    I pointed out that the Ducks have yet to win a 1/2 natty.
    46XiJCAB said:
    You're horrible at this.
  • CanadawgCanadawg Member Posts: 5,206
    https://tiptop25.com/fixing1984.html

    "BYU '84 differs from those other teams in another way too: they did not play a single ranked opponent. The only so-called "national champion" that didn't (though Oklahoma came very close in 1956).

    BYU's 1984 opponents went 61-85-3, placing their schedule 96th amongst 98 division 1A schools. And yet their performance was as weak as their schedule. They won five games by a touchdown or less, from a 20-14 win at 3-7-1 Pitt in their opener to a 24-17 win against 6-6 Michigan in the Holiday Bowl-- by far the worst bowl opponent ever faced by a so-called "national champion." How bad was Michigan? They finished 6th in the Big Ten, and the Big Ten was a horrid 12-15 against nonconference opponents and 1-5 in bowl games.

    Let's start by comparing them to #2 Washington (11-1). Washington took a 16-7 upset loss at #10 Southern Cal (9-3), but since BYU did not play a team ranked so highly (or ranked at all), we can't fairly compare that result to any of BYU's. Washington's schedule was weak, and the only rated team they defeated was #6 Oklahoma (9-2-1) 28-17 in the Orange Bowl. Still, that is of course far more than BYU accomplished. And Washington's performance was very strong too. All but one of their 11 wins was by more than a touchdown (the only close game was 17-10 over 6-5 Oregon). That's 4 fewer close wins than BYU. This comparison is a blowout for Washington, and should not even be a debate at all. Washington even dominated BYU's bowl opponent, Michigan, in Ann Arbor. The final score was 20-11, but Michigan scored a touchdown and a 2-pointer in the closing seconds to make it look closer than it was. BYU, on the other hand, had to rally for 2 4th quarter touchdowns to beat Michigan on a neutral field, scoring the winner with under 2 minutes left."

    Sorry for the text wall but I don't understand why UW doesn't claim '84. Blatant.
  • TheHBTheHB Member Posts: 6,457
    Bottom line: Seattle TV market is coveted and networks want it. Is it really still a question that money informs these decisions?
  • trubluetrublue Member Posts: 3,042
    edited July 2022
    Canadawg said:

    https://tiptop25.com/fixing1984.html

    "BYU '84 differs from those other teams in another way too: they did not play a single ranked opponent. The only so-called "national champion" that didn't (though Oklahoma came very close in 1956).

    BYU's 1984 opponents went 61-85-3, placing their schedule 96th amongst 98 division 1A schools. And yet their performance was as weak as their schedule. They won five games by a touchdown or less, from a 20-14 win at 3-7-1 Pitt in their opener to a 24-17 win against 6-6 Michigan in the Holiday Bowl-- by far the worst bowl opponent ever faced by a so-called "national champion." How bad was Michigan? They finished 6th in the Big Ten, and the Big Ten was a horrid 12-15 against nonconference opponents and 1-5 in bowl games.

    Let's start by comparing them to #2 Washington (11-1). Washington took a 16-7 upset loss at #10 Southern Cal (9-3), but since BYU did not play a team ranked so highly (or ranked at all), we can't fairly compare that result to any of BYU's. Washington's schedule was weak, and the only rated team they defeated was #6 Oklahoma (9-2-1) 28-17 in the Orange Bowl. Still, that is of course far more than BYU accomplished. And Washington's performance was very strong too. All but one of their 11 wins was by more than a touchdown (the only close game was 17-10 over 6-5 Oregon). That's 4 fewer close wins than BYU. This comparison is a blowout for Washington, and should not even be a debate at all. Washington even dominated BYU's bowl opponent, Michigan, in Ann Arbor. The final score was 20-11, but Michigan scored a touchdown and a 2-pointer in the closing seconds to make it look closer than it was. BYU, on the other hand, had to rally for 2 4th quarter touchdowns to beat Michigan on a neutral field, scoring the winner with under 2 minutes left."

    Sorry for the text wall but I don't understand why UW doesn't claim '84. Blatant.

    Do what Washington did with the 1960 Helms Bakery Natty.

    Announce it approx. 47 years later and raise that banner in Husky Stadium.

    BTW: UW finished No. 5 in the coaches poll (UPI) and No. 6 in the AP poll at the end of the season.

    You make a more compelling case than for the 1984 Title than for the1960 Helms Bakery Natty. Wasn’t that when virtually all of the football players were white?


  • trubluetrublue Member Posts: 3,042
    Canadawg said:

    https://tiptop25.com/fixing1984.html

    "BYU '84 differs from those other teams in another way too: they did not play a single ranked opponent. The only so-called "national champion" that didn't (though Oklahoma came very close in 1956).

    BYU's 1984 opponents went 61-85-3, placing their schedule 96th amongst 98 division 1A schools. And yet their performance was as weak as their schedule. They won five games by a touchdown or less, from a 20-14 win at 3-7-1 Pitt in their opener to a 24-17 win against 6-6 Michigan in the Holiday Bowl-- by far the worst bowl opponent ever faced by a so-called "national champion." How bad was Michigan? They finished 6th in the Big Ten, and the Big Ten was a horrid 12-15 against nonconference opponents and 1-5 in bowl games.

    Let's start by comparing them to #2 Washington (11-1). Washington took a 16-7 upset loss at #10 Southern Cal (9-3), but since BYU did not play a team ranked so highly (or ranked at all), we can't fairly compare that result to any of BYU's. Washington's schedule was weak, and the only rated team they defeated was #6 Oklahoma (9-2-1) 28-17 in the Orange Bowl. Still, that is of course far more than BYU accomplished. And Washington's performance was very strong too. All but one of their 11 wins was by more than a touchdown (the only close game was 17-10 over 6-5 Oregon). That's 4 fewer close wins than BYU. This comparison is a blowout for Washington, and should not even be a debate at all. Washington even dominated BYU's bowl opponent, Michigan, in Ann Arbor. The final score was 20-11, but Michigan scored a touchdown and a 2-pointer in the closing seconds to make it look closer than it was. BYU, on the other hand, had to rally for 2 4th quarter touchdowns to beat Michigan on a neutral field, scoring the winner with under 2 minutes left."

    Sorry for the text wall but I don't understand why UW doesn't claim '84. Blatant.

    “Just Do It”
  • theknowledgetheknowledge Member Posts: 5,555

    He’s got enough acid saved up in his disintegrating bones to do the same shit he always does.


    Walton is actually really insightful, loyal, and a super nice guy if you read his quotes instead of hearing them. But he’ll get over the loss of his beloved conference.

    A couple of months ago I was smoking outside of a Lucille’s in Orange and I see a tall, like seven feet, gray haired old man talking or arguing with a woman in the parking lot. He’s wearing a powder blue UCLA polo. It’s Bill Fucking Walton. It’s gotta be. Is his wife Asian? Look it up. Yup. Gotta be Bill Walton. How many seven foot tall old men wearing UCLA polos could there be? I fake cough *Bill. Bill* and no reaction. He’s probably nearly deaf from all the shitty jam band concerts. Why is a vegetarian arguing with his wife outside of a shitty chain BBQ restaurant? No idea, but I don’t judge people for where they have their domestic squabbles.
    His autobiography is great. His youth playing with ABA players, his time at UCLA, his early career, the FBI wire taps, the relationship with the Dead, his time with the Celtics and the nuclear destruction of his back and feet. I listened to him read it on my commutes to work. Amazing.
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 47,893
    Walton is god.

    Love that crazy red headed motherfucker.

Sign In or Register to comment.