Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

SUC & UCLA leaving hurting recruiting

2

Comments

  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,437 Founders Club
    lol look at all these fucking qucks.
  • DucksFC
    DucksFC Member Posts: 4,460
    haie said:

    lol look at all these fucking qucks.

    talk better shit doog. landing a 3* cousin kisser from Bumfucksville after a 4-8 season isn't the best smack material when your rival lands a 5*.
  • trublue
    trublue Member Posts: 3,042
    It’s Haie’s wheelhouse.
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    DucksFC said:

    haie said:

    His film is terrible. Front runner that will take himself out of the Stanford game.

    When Kienholtz cranks out a 13-10 win over scrappy UC Davis in 2025 (fresh off a 7-point loss against Colorado State that's acceptable because DeBoner needs more tim), will he kiss his sister or his mom first? I don't know how they do it in South Dakota, but he looks like he can raise the bar that Jack Lockner set.
    Have you seen him dunk a BB? Do they play 8 man or 11 in S. Dakota?

    If fucking NDSU wanted him then start the HT campaign now.
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    trublue said:

    It’s Haie’s wheelhouse.

    Who’s Haie?
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    DucksFC said:

    my real question is which RB Doogs will claim is better than Richard Young when he commits to Oregon

    When they land some obscure .8347 3* trust the film evaluators here, his will be impressive

    But because he didn’t attend any camps, wasn’t invited, he’s undervalued.

    And DeB found another hidden gem. AKA another MWC JAG.
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,437 Founders Club
    46XiJCAB said:

    DucksFC said:

    my real question is which RB Doogs will claim is better than Richard Young when he commits to Oregon

    When they land some obscure .8347 3* trust the film evaluators here, his will be impressive

    But because he didn’t attend any camps, wasn’t invited, he’s undervalued.

    And DeB found another hidden gem. AKA another MWC JAG.
    Imagine caring about 11 on 11 camps and the fat recruiting dipshits who write about them.
  • DucksFC
    DucksFC Member Posts: 4,460
    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    DucksFC said:

    my real question is which RB Doogs will claim is better than Richard Young when he commits to Oregon

    When they land some obscure .8347 3* trust the film evaluators here, his will be impressive

    But because he didn’t attend any camps, wasn’t invited, he’s undervalued.

    And DeB found another hidden gem. AKA another MWC JAG.
    Imagine caring about 11 on 11 camps and the fat recruiting dipshits who write about them.
    Ballz, is that you?
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,437 Founders Club
    DucksFC said:

    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    DucksFC said:

    my real question is which RB Doogs will claim is better than Richard Young when he commits to Oregon

    When they land some obscure .8347 3* trust the film evaluators here, his will be impressive

    But because he didn’t attend any camps, wasn’t invited, he’s undervalued.

    And DeB found another hidden gem. AKA another MWC JAG.
    Imagine caring about 11 on 11 camps and the fat recruiting dipshits who write about them.
    Ballz, is that you?
    Sorry about the fat comment. I don't mean to insult all the quck posters here. But the recruiting 'experts' are dipshits and always have been.
  • dtd
    dtd Member Posts: 5,599 Standard Supporter
    haie said:

    DucksFC said:

    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    DucksFC said:

    my real question is which RB Doogs will claim is better than Richard Young when he commits to Oregon

    When they land some obscure .8347 3* trust the film evaluators here, his will be impressive

    But because he didn’t attend any camps, wasn’t invited, he’s undervalued.

    And DeB found another hidden gem. AKA another MWC JAG.
    Imagine caring about 11 on 11 camps and the fat recruiting dipshits who write about them.
    Ballz, is that you?
    Sorry about the fat comment. I don't mean to insult all the quck posters here. But the recruiting 'experts' are dipshits and always have been.
    Which is why a 5 star recruit is something like 20 times more likely to be a 1st round draft pick or win a national award than a 3 star.