Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

Charles Barkley not a fan of NIL (Reno Gazette)

DerekJohnsonDerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 59,910
First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
Founders Club
Barkley is not a fan of the NIL (name, image, likeness) deals college athletes can sign to make money while playing sports.

He also dislikes the transfer portal, which allows college athletes to change schools every year.

“I hate NIL because, No. 1, I think it’s going to have tremendous resentment among teammates. They’re going to be comparing who makes the most,” he said. “The transfer portal is going to be, they’re going to be cherry picking guys every single year now, like, how much are they paying you at this school? We need to give you more to come here.”

He said the NCAA is at fault for overly enforcing minor rules infractions in past years, such as coaches taking payers out to eat.

“The NCAA has nobody to blame but themselves because they’ve been boneheads forever. Suspending guys for getting a free meal, suspending guys for getting an extra pair of sneakers and stupid stuff like that. And now you’ve got the toothpaste out of the tube where every kid is going to the highest bidder,” he said. “These little schools, they got no chance going forward. They’ve got zero chance, because they’re not going to be able to pay what these big schools are going to pay.”

He also dislikes politicians and said they should be more concerned about gun and abortion laws than the NIL.

In Texas, legislators are discussing whether high school athletes should be allowed to also get NIL deals, like college athletes.

“Instead of passing sensible gun resolutions, they’re out here worrying about the NIL. Are you kidding me? They’re out here talking about abortion in 2022. They won’t pass not one single (law) making it hard to get an assault weapon, but they’re worried about the NIL? And they want to talk about abortion in 2022? That’s only because we’re just fools, the public,” he said.

“They know they’ve just got to say a couple of words to get your vote. They throw the word ‘conservative,’ ‘liberal,’ they throw it around. Those words should be outlawed, liberal, conservative. What are you actually going to do? We’ve got to realize these politicians, both parties, both parties are full of s***.”

Comments

  • Options
    CFetters_Nacho_LoverCFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 28,832
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker
    Founders Club
  • Options
    FireCohenFireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes Combo Breaker 5 Up Votes
    Barkley better be careful, NRA is not to be fucked with.
  • Options
    1to392831weretaken1to392831weretaken Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,296
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    I think he's right about the NCAA having themselves to blame, but for the wrong reason. I don't know who he's talking about getting busted for shoes and meals, as my impression of the pre-NIL NCAA was that (self-reporting-for-a-wrist-slap aside) the NCAA wanted to part of doing anything about--or even knowing about--violations. The going rate for a 5-star QB in SEC country was mid-six figures cold hard cash, and the parking lot at Alabama's practice facility looked like an exotic car lot (the "pictures of Alabama football players' rides" Reddit thread was quite entertaining).

    It wasn't an overly-aggressive NCAA that pushed players and their families into demanding NIL rights, it was a limp-dick NCAA that let anything go, which gave a small handful of schools a massive advantage and left every other player in the country asking, "What the fuck!?" All of this while announcements of insane TV money roll in, and the players get no part of it.

    Some kind of pay-for-play deal needed to happen sooner so that the NCAA wasn't completely unprepared for it. They should have grown some balls when the TV money got big and challenged Title IX for some kind of revenue sharing agreement. Instead of creating a set of player-forward (in terms of cash in pockets) rules designed to somewhat level the playing field (and actually enforcing them), the NCAA went from having a ridiculously strict and complicated rules structure that was completely ignored and unenforced to having essentially zero rules overnight. For all intents and purposes, the NCAA is now dead. Might officially be so soon, at least when it comes to revenue sports. What's been left behind is a total shitshow that's somehow even worse than when they were "in charge."
  • Options
    rodmansragerodmansrage Member Posts: 6,015
    5 Up Votes First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes
    the reno gazette is your source?!?!?!
  • Options
    whatshouldicareaboutwhatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 12,431
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    I like that Barkley hates and criticizes everyone
  • Options
    TheHBTheHB Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 5,300
    First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Anniversary
    Swaye's Wigwam

    the reno gazette is your source?!?!?!

    Is that a euphemism?

  • Options
    rodmansragerodmansrage Member Posts: 6,015
    5 Up Votes First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes
    TheHB said:

    the reno gazette is your source?!?!?!

    Is that a euphemism?

    feels like we crossed a few hhc memes there and im hearin that crossing the streams is bad, very bad.
  • Options
    Pitchfork51Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 26,572
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker
    It's pretty much the argument I have. by being super lame over small shit they opened up the can of worms and destroyed themselves in the process
  • Options
    CFetters_Nacho_LoverCFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 28,832
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker
    Founders Club
    TheHB said:

    the reno gazette is your source?!?!?!

    Is that a euphemism?

    Is Janet Reno related to Mark Emmert?
  • Options
    BleachedAnusDawgBleachedAnusDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 10,472
    First Comment First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Founders Club
    Sounds like Chuck's politics suck, but his NIL take is good.
  • Options
    EwaDawgEwaDawg Member Posts: 3,992
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    Chuck has a good and supportable take on the only two political issues in his quote.

    If you disagree with chuck on this take of his, regarding abortion and reasonable gun control, YOU are the current problem with America.

    Its not even open for debate.
  • Options
    PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 41,775
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    edited June 2022
    EwaDawg said:

    Chuck has a good and supportable take on the only two political issues in his quote.

    If you disagree with chuck on this take of his, regarding abortion and reasonable gun control, YOU are the current problem with America.

    Its not even open for debate.

    That you actually wrote that indicates YOU are the current problem with America.


  • Options
    greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,277
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment Combo Breaker
    EwaDawg said:

    Chuck has a good and supportable take on the only two political issues in his quote.

    If you disagree with chuck on this take of his, regarding abortion and reasonable gun control, YOU are the current problem with America.

    Its not even open for debate.

    Go play in traffic
  • Options
    TXDawgTXDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 818
    5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Anniversary First Comment
    Founders Club
    Chuck is entertaining, but not the best prognosticator.

Sign In or Register to comment.