When you've lost Butterball . . .
Comments
-
You’re soft in the head Dazzler. And a little Stooge slurper.HHusky said:
“insufficient evidence to charge a broader conspiracy” superiority guy heard from.SFGbob said:
Dazzle watched the Meuller hearing and then just lied about what Meuller and his report actually said.46XiJCAB said:
Dazzler wasted his life on the Mueller hearings too. Then he cried.TurdBomber said:
Some of us aren't fat girls who watch TV all day, like you @HHusky.HHusky said:
Barr's testimony about ballot harvesting was featured today. You should have watched.SFGbob said:Did ballot harvesting take place in the 2020 election in states where it isn't legal? Is it easier to engage in ballot havesting with mail in ballots? The election was lost when the decision was made to paper the states with mail in ballots. My opinion on mail in ballots and Barr's opinion on mail in ballots is the same. So is Barr telling the truth here Dazzler or is he a corrupt liar again?
https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2020/09/02/bill-barr-intv-playing-with-fire-absentee-mail-in-voting-election-tsr-sot-vpx.cnn -
You voted for Joe Biden. Sit down and STFU.HHusky said:
I remember Maricopa County Republicans finally saying enough is enough and a farcical cyber-ninja exam.WestlinnDuck said:Remember the total cooperation of Maricopa County that facilitated the investigation into voter fraud? I don't. Fulton County? The illegal move to vote by mail against state statutes and constitutions? Remember the dazzler's promotion of honest and verifiable elections? That is the real tell.
HHusky said:
There were 60+ cases. Many were decided on standing; many were decided on "the merits".WestlinnDuck said:Well, when the Court said that voter's had no standing to sue, and then after the election said the issue was moot, then it is tough to get a court case. When POS like mello and the dazzler and the dem party have no interest in honest elections, that is sort of a tell. They have the same mad poker skillz as barry and the dementia patient (hey, a minor invasion would be ok).
MelloDawg said:
Well, when they ARE proved, you let us know. Maybe a court case or something would help clear it up.WestlinnDuck said:The truth was that Trump couldn't prove anything without the support of either the House or the Supreme Court. He had the support of neither and Barr realized that. Trump eventually realized it and he isn't president. The allegations of massive fraud have not been disproved. There were illegal changes to state election laws. That was a fact. Hundreds of millions were dumped into states to support ballot harvesting. That is a fact. The dems don't want honest elections. That is a fact. Just like the dems don't want to hear anything from Ray Epps and still, like your, lie about Russian collusion.
HHusky said:
Butterball's testimony is corroborated by others who were advising Daddy. It appears he told Daddy the truth while paying lip service to fraud allegations publicly. We don't have to take his word for the fact that Daddy was informed his stolen election claims were bullshit. You could have seen a parade of witnesses who told Daddy that. But you were afraid to watch.SFGbob said:Why wasn't Barr willing to lie to Trump about voter fraud Dazzler? He is a corrupt liar according to you. So why has he been saying what he is saying now for the past 2 years? He wasn't under oath for all of these past two years. Your claim is that Barr is only telling the truth now because he is under oath.
Honesty appears to be in short supply at the nursing home today.
You girls are banana republic apologists. -
Explains why you still defend the Mueller investigation. I've never defended or claimed that there was any evidence of computer election machine fraud. But Dazzler has fully backed all the Russian collusion stories. Hell he still claims that Mueller's report proved that Trump really did collude with the Russians.HHusky said:
I remember Maricopa County Republicans finally saying enough is enough and a farcical cyber-ninja exam.WestlinnDuck said:Remember the total cooperation of Maricopa County that facilitated the investigation into voter fraud? I don't. Fulton County? The illegal move to vote by mail against state statutes and constitutions? Remember the dazzler's promotion of honest and verifiable elections? That is the real tell.
HHusky said:
There were 60+ cases. Many were decided on standing; many were decided on "the merits".WestlinnDuck said:Well, when the Court said that voter's had no standing to sue, and then after the election said the issue was moot, then it is tough to get a court case. When POS like mello and the dazzler and the dem party have no interest in honest elections, that is sort of a tell. They have the same mad poker skillz as barry and the dementia patient (hey, a minor invasion would be ok).
MelloDawg said:
Well, when they ARE proved, you let us know. Maybe a court case or something would help clear it up.WestlinnDuck said:The truth was that Trump couldn't prove anything without the support of either the House or the Supreme Court. He had the support of neither and Barr realized that. Trump eventually realized it and he isn't president. The allegations of massive fraud have not been disproved. There were illegal changes to state election laws. That was a fact. Hundreds of millions were dumped into states to support ballot harvesting. That is a fact. The dems don't want honest elections. That is a fact. Just like the dems don't want to hear anything from Ray Epps and still, like your, lie about Russian collusion.
HHusky said:
Butterball's testimony is corroborated by others who were advising Daddy. It appears he told Daddy the truth while paying lip service to fraud allegations publicly. We don't have to take his word for the fact that Daddy was informed his stolen election claims were bullshit. You could have seen a parade of witnesses who told Daddy that. But you were afraid to watch.SFGbob said:Why wasn't Barr willing to lie to Trump about voter fraud Dazzler? He is a corrupt liar according to you. So why has he been saying what he is saying now for the past 2 years? He wasn't under oath for all of these past two years. Your claim is that Barr is only telling the truth now because he is under oath.
Honesty appears to be in short supply at the nursing home today.
You girls are banana republic apologists.
Here's what we know for a fact about the 2020 election. Mail in ballots in many states were sent out to every registered voter on the voter rolls. Many of these registered voters hadn't voted in years. Many of the people who were sent ballots wouldn't have voted in 2020. Rat party supporters like Zuckerberg spent hundreds of millions of dollars to pay people to make sure that as many of those ballots as possible that were sent out to certain zip codes and neighborhoods in certain key states were returned. For many of these states there was no effort made to verify any signatures on the ballot and an unknown number of these ballots were harvested illegally by people who were being paid with the money Zuckerberg provided.
If people were still required to vote the way nearly all us here started voting and all of our parents did vote, Trump would have won in a landslide. -
Cell phone GPS data is important if you want to find out who was where in January 6, 2021. It is useless if used to track vote harvesters in November of 2020 and clearly Russian disinformation.SFGbob said:
Explains why you still defend the Mueller investigation. I've never defended or claimed that there was any evidence of computer election machine fraud. But Dazzler has fully backed all the Russian collusion stories. Hell he still claims that Mueller's report proved that Trump really did collude with the Russians.HHusky said:
I remember Maricopa County Republicans finally saying enough is enough and a farcical cyber-ninja exam.WestlinnDuck said:Remember the total cooperation of Maricopa County that facilitated the investigation into voter fraud? I don't. Fulton County? The illegal move to vote by mail against state statutes and constitutions? Remember the dazzler's promotion of honest and verifiable elections? That is the real tell.
HHusky said:
There were 60+ cases. Many were decided on standing; many were decided on "the merits".WestlinnDuck said:Well, when the Court said that voter's had no standing to sue, and then after the election said the issue was moot, then it is tough to get a court case. When POS like mello and the dazzler and the dem party have no interest in honest elections, that is sort of a tell. They have the same mad poker skillz as barry and the dementia patient (hey, a minor invasion would be ok).
MelloDawg said:
Well, when they ARE proved, you let us know. Maybe a court case or something would help clear it up.WestlinnDuck said:The truth was that Trump couldn't prove anything without the support of either the House or the Supreme Court. He had the support of neither and Barr realized that. Trump eventually realized it and he isn't president. The allegations of massive fraud have not been disproved. There were illegal changes to state election laws. That was a fact. Hundreds of millions were dumped into states to support ballot harvesting. That is a fact. The dems don't want honest elections. That is a fact. Just like the dems don't want to hear anything from Ray Epps and still, like your, lie about Russian collusion.
HHusky said:
Butterball's testimony is corroborated by others who were advising Daddy. It appears he told Daddy the truth while paying lip service to fraud allegations publicly. We don't have to take his word for the fact that Daddy was informed his stolen election claims were bullshit. You could have seen a parade of witnesses who told Daddy that. But you were afraid to watch.SFGbob said:Why wasn't Barr willing to lie to Trump about voter fraud Dazzler? He is a corrupt liar according to you. So why has he been saying what he is saying now for the past 2 years? He wasn't under oath for all of these past two years. Your claim is that Barr is only telling the truth now because he is under oath.
Honesty appears to be in short supply at the nursing home today.
You girls are banana republic apologists.
Here's what we know for a fact about the 2020 election. Mail in ballots in many states were sent out to every registered voter on the voter rolls. Many of these registered voters hadn't voted in years. Many of the people who were sent ballots wouldn't have voted in 2020. Rat party supporters like Zuckerberg spent hundreds of millions of dollars to pay people to make sure that as many of those ballots as possible that were sent out to certain zip codes and neighborhoods in certain key states were returned. For many of these states there was no effort made to verify any signatures on the ballot and an unknown number of these ballots were harvested illegally by people who were being paid with the money Zuckerberg provided.
If people were still required to vote the way nearly all us here started voting and all of our parents did vote, Trump would have won in a landslide. -
I think the cell phone data resonates with people who look at it
Too late to matter and most people don't look at it but one day Biden will go down as an illegitimate cheater as well as the worst president ever
So there's that -
Imagine the data showing the same people hitting ballot drop boxes many times at many locations in multiple states in the middle of the night. I'm sure they were just dropping family ballots.
-
Think of the incentive for fraud that you have when you're paying people to gather and return as many mail in ballots as possible. Hey did you get a ballot? Yeah. Did you vote? No, I'm not going to vote. Well let me fill it out for you and I'll give you 20 bucks.
That exact scenerio could have played out thousands of times and there would be zero evidence of any voter fraud. -
Same with photocopying ballots with only the president and/or Senator or Congressman ballots filled in. No signature verification. Showing up at the Alzheimer unit and paying off some clearly overpaid clerk for the raw mail in ballots. Like I said, the tell is that these voting procedures without proper chain of custody and segregation of duty requirements were to be instituted under federal law all over the country. The dazzler has no interest in instituting clean voting rolls and auditable votes. Once a dirty ballot is in the system, you can recount the vote all you want and it still a dirty vote. The dazzler with his mythical MBA calls this a clean election and a clean recount that proves it was a clean election.SFGbob said:Think of the incentive for fraud that you have when you're paying people to gather and return as many mail in ballots as possible. Hey did you get a ballot? Yeah. Did you vote? No, I'm not going to vote. Well let me fill it out for you and I'll give you 20 bucks.
That exact scenerio could have played out thousands of times and there would be zero evidence of any voter fraud. -
But as you well know from your thorough reading of the report and your examination of Mueller's testimony, that isn't what "insufficient" meant in this case.Sledog said:
Insufficient could also be NO EVIDENCE. Thanks for proving yourself as usual dipshit.HHusky said:
“insufficient evidence to charge a broader conspiracy” superiority guy heard from.SFGbob said:
Dazzle watched the Meuller hearing and then just lied about what Meuller and his report actually said.46XiJCAB said:
Dazzler wasted his life on the Mueller hearings too. Then he cried.TurdBomber said:
Some of us aren't fat girls who watch TV all day, like you @HHusky.HHusky said:
Barr's testimony about ballot harvesting was featured today. You should have watched.SFGbob said:Did ballot harvesting take place in the 2020 election in states where it isn't legal? Is it easier to engage in ballot havesting with mail in ballots? The election was lost when the decision was made to paper the states with mail in ballots. My opinion on mail in ballots and Barr's opinion on mail in ballots is the same. So is Barr telling the truth here Dazzler or is he a corrupt liar again?
https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2020/09/02/bill-barr-intv-playing-with-fire-absentee-mail-in-voting-election-tsr-sot-vpx.cnn -
You see he couldn't find any type of a crime in 2 years of investigation including taxes because that's the first place shitty lawyers head. You know that's what you'd do as your shitty.HHusky said:
But as you well know from your thorough reading of the report and your examination of Mueller's testimony, that isn't what "insufficient" meant in this case.Sledog said:
Insufficient could also be NO EVIDENCE. Thanks for proving yourself as usual dipshit.HHusky said:
“insufficient evidence to charge a broader conspiracy” superiority guy heard from.SFGbob said:
Dazzle watched the Meuller hearing and then just lied about what Meuller and his report actually said.46XiJCAB said:
Dazzler wasted his life on the Mueller hearings too. Then he cried.TurdBomber said:
Some of us aren't fat girls who watch TV all day, like you @HHusky.HHusky said:
Barr's testimony about ballot harvesting was featured today. You should have watched.SFGbob said:Did ballot harvesting take place in the 2020 election in states where it isn't legal? Is it easier to engage in ballot havesting with mail in ballots? The election was lost when the decision was made to paper the states with mail in ballots. My opinion on mail in ballots and Barr's opinion on mail in ballots is the same. So is Barr telling the truth here Dazzler or is he a corrupt liar again?
https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2020/09/02/bill-barr-intv-playing-with-fire-absentee-mail-in-voting-election-tsr-sot-vpx.cnn
To say insufficient is hilarious. None, bupkis or a little bullshit is all he could find with 32 million dollars and over 2 years and a team of crack investigators.
You're stupidity truly is boundless! -
With the exception of:Sledog said:
You see he couldn't find any type of a crime in 2 years of investigation including taxes because that's the first place shitty lawyers head. You know that's what you'd do as your shitty.HHusky said:
But as you well know from your thorough reading of the report and your examination of Mueller's testimony, that isn't what "insufficient" meant in this case.Sledog said:
Insufficient could also be NO EVIDENCE. Thanks for proving yourself as usual dipshit.HHusky said:
“insufficient evidence to charge a broader conspiracy” superiority guy heard from.SFGbob said:
Dazzle watched the Meuller hearing and then just lied about what Meuller and his report actually said.46XiJCAB said:
Dazzler wasted his life on the Mueller hearings too. Then he cried.TurdBomber said:
Some of us aren't fat girls who watch TV all day, like you @HHusky.HHusky said:
Barr's testimony about ballot harvesting was featured today. You should have watched.SFGbob said:Did ballot harvesting take place in the 2020 election in states where it isn't legal? Is it easier to engage in ballot havesting with mail in ballots? The election was lost when the decision was made to paper the states with mail in ballots. My opinion on mail in ballots and Barr's opinion on mail in ballots is the same. So is Barr telling the truth here Dazzler or is he a corrupt liar again?
https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2020/09/02/bill-barr-intv-playing-with-fire-absentee-mail-in-voting-election-tsr-sot-vpx.cnn
To say insufficient is hilarious. None, bupkis or a little bullshit is all he could find with 32 million dollars and over 2 years and a team of crack investigators.
You're stupidity truly is boundless!
1. Trump was receptive to a Campaign national security adviser’s (George Papadopoulos) pursuit of a back channel to Putin.
2. Kremlin operatives provided the Campaign a preview of the Russian plan to distribute stolen emails.
3. The Trump Campaign chairman and deputy chairman (Paul Manafort and Rick Gates) knowingly shared internal polling data and information on battleground states with a Russian spy; and the Campaign chairman worked with the Russian spy on a pro-Russia “peace” plan for Ukraine.
4. The Trump Campaign chairman periodically shared internal polling data with the Russian spy with the expectation it would be shared with Putin-linked oligarch, Oleg Deripaska.
5. Trump Campaign chairman Manafort expected Trump’s winning the presidency would mean Deripaska would want to use Manafort to advance Deripaska’s interests in the United States and elsewhere.
6. Trump Tower meeting: (1) On receiving an email offering derogatory information on Clinton coming from a Russian government official, Donald Trump Jr. “appears to have accepted that offer;” (2) members of the Campaign discussed the Trump Tower meeting beforehand; (3) Donald Trump Jr. told the Russians during the meeting that Trump could revisit the issue of the Magnitsky Act if elected.
7. A Trump Campaign official told the Special Counsel he “felt obliged to object” to a GOP Platform change on Ukraine because it contradicted Trump’s wishes; however, the investigation did not establish that Gordon was directed by Trump.
8. Russian military hackers may have followed Trump’s July 27, 2016 public statement “Russia if you’re listening …” within hours by targeting Clinton’s personal office for the first time.
9. Trump requested campaign affiliates to get Clinton’s emails, which resulted in an individual apparently acting in coordination with the Campaign claiming to have successfully contacted Russian hackers.
10. The Trump Campaign—and Trump personally—appeared to have advanced knowledge of future WikiLeaks releases.
11. The Trump Campaign coordinated campaign-related public communications based on future WikiLeaks releases.
12. Michael Cohen, on behalf of the Trump Organization, brokered a secret deal for a Trump Tower Moscow project directly involving Putin’s inner circle, at least until June 2016.
13. During the presidential transition, Jared Kushner and Eric Prince engaged in secret back channel communications with Russian agents. (1) Kushner suggested to the Russian Ambassador that they use a secure communication line from within the Russian Embassy to speak with Russian Generals; and (2) Prince and Kushner’s friend Rick Gerson conducted secret back channel meetings with a Putin agent to develop a plan for U.S.-Russian relations.
14. During the presidential transition, in coordination with other members of the Transition Team, Michael Flynn spoke with the Russian Ambassador to prevent a tit for tat Russian response to the Obama administration’s imposition of sanctions for election interference; the Russians agreed not to retaliate saying they wanted a good relationship with the incoming administration.
But other than that, absolutely no evidence. -
Also love the "internal polling data."
During the presidential transition, in coordination with other members of the Transition Team, Michael Flynn spoke with the Russian Ambassador to prevent a tit for tat Russian response to the Obama administration’s imposition of sanctions for election interference; the Russians agreed not to retaliate saying they wanted a good relationship with the incoming administration.
Wow!!!! Bombshell, the incoming National Security director spoke to his counterpart before taking office just like Obama's did when he was elected and Biden's did after he was elected. Meanwhile John Kerry was talking with the Iranians when he wasn't an incumbent to anything when Trump was in office and you didn't give a flying fuck Dazzler. -
Lol what a stupid fuckHHusky said:
With the exception of:Sledog said:
You see he couldn't find any type of a crime in 2 years of investigation including taxes because that's the first place shitty lawyers head. You know that's what you'd do as your shitty.HHusky said:
But as you well know from your thorough reading of the report and your examination of Mueller's testimony, that isn't what "insufficient" meant in this case.Sledog said:
Insufficient could also be NO EVIDENCE. Thanks for proving yourself as usual dipshit.HHusky said:
“insufficient evidence to charge a broader conspiracy” superiority guy heard from.SFGbob said:
Dazzle watched the Meuller hearing and then just lied about what Meuller and his report actually said.46XiJCAB said:
Dazzler wasted his life on the Mueller hearings too. Then he cried.TurdBomber said:
Some of us aren't fat girls who watch TV all day, like you @HHusky.HHusky said:
Barr's testimony about ballot harvesting was featured today. You should have watched.SFGbob said:Did ballot harvesting take place in the 2020 election in states where it isn't legal? Is it easier to engage in ballot havesting with mail in ballots? The election was lost when the decision was made to paper the states with mail in ballots. My opinion on mail in ballots and Barr's opinion on mail in ballots is the same. So is Barr telling the truth here Dazzler or is he a corrupt liar again?
https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2020/09/02/bill-barr-intv-playing-with-fire-absentee-mail-in-voting-election-tsr-sot-vpx.cnn
To say insufficient is hilarious. None, bupkis or a little bullshit is all he could find with 32 million dollars and over 2 years and a team of crack investigators.
You're stupidity truly is boundless!
1. Trump was receptive to a Campaign national security adviser’s (George Papadopoulos) pursuit of a back channel to Putin.
2. Kremlin operatives provided the Campaign a preview of the Russian plan to distribute stolen emails.
3. The Trump Campaign chairman and deputy chairman (Paul Manafort and Rick Gates) knowingly shared internal polling data and information on battleground states with a Russian spy; and the Campaign chairman worked with the Russian spy on a pro-Russia “peace” plan for Ukraine.
4. The Trump Campaign chairman periodically shared internal polling data with the Russian spy with the expectation it would be shared with Putin-linked oligarch, Oleg Deripaska.
5. Trump Campaign chairman Manafort expected Trump’s winning the presidency would mean Deripaska would want to use Manafort to advance Deripaska’s interests in the United States and elsewhere.
6. Trump Tower meeting: (1) On receiving an email offering derogatory information on Clinton coming from a Russian government official, Donald Trump Jr. “appears to have accepted that offer;” (2) members of the Campaign discussed the Trump Tower meeting beforehand; (3) Donald Trump Jr. told the Russians during the meeting that Trump could revisit the issue of the Magnitsky Act if elected.
7. A Trump Campaign official told the Special Counsel he “felt obliged to object” to a GOP Platform change on Ukraine because it contradicted Trump’s wishes; however, the investigation did not establish that Gordon was directed by Trump.
8. Russian military hackers may have followed Trump’s July 27, 2016 public statement “Russia if you’re listening …” within hours by targeting Clinton’s personal office for the first time.
9. Trump requested campaign affiliates to get Clinton’s emails, which resulted in an individual apparently acting in coordination with the Campaign claiming to have successfully contacted Russian hackers.
10. The Trump Campaign—and Trump personally—appeared to have advanced knowledge of future WikiLeaks releases.
11. The Trump Campaign coordinated campaign-related public communications based on future WikiLeaks releases.
12. Michael Cohen, on behalf of the Trump Organization, brokered a secret deal for a Trump Tower Moscow project directly involving Putin’s inner circle, at least until June 2016.
13. During the presidential transition, Jared Kushner and Eric Prince engaged in secret back channel communications with Russian agents. (1) Kushner suggested to the Russian Ambassador that they use a secure communication line from within the Russian Embassy to speak with Russian Generals; and (2) Prince and Kushner’s friend Rick Gerson conducted secret back channel meetings with a Putin agent to develop a plan for U.S.-Russian relations.
14. During the presidential transition, in coordination with other members of the Transition Team, Michael Flynn spoke with the Russian Ambassador to prevent a tit for tat Russian response to the Obama administration’s imposition of sanctions for election interference; the Russians agreed not to retaliate saying they wanted a good relationship with the incoming administration.
But other than that, absolutely no evidence.
Nothing
Absolutely nothing -
Sounds bad. Is Trump in prison yet?HHusky said:
With the exception of:Sledog said:
You see he couldn't find any type of a crime in 2 years of investigation including taxes because that's the first place shitty lawyers head. You know that's what you'd do as your shitty.HHusky said:
But as you well know from your thorough reading of the report and your examination of Mueller's testimony, that isn't what "insufficient" meant in this case.Sledog said:
Insufficient could also be NO EVIDENCE. Thanks for proving yourself as usual dipshit.HHusky said:
“insufficient evidence to charge a broader conspiracy” superiority guy heard from.SFGbob said:
Dazzle watched the Meuller hearing and then just lied about what Meuller and his report actually said.46XiJCAB said:
Dazzler wasted his life on the Mueller hearings too. Then he cried.TurdBomber said:
Some of us aren't fat girls who watch TV all day, like you @HHusky.HHusky said:
Barr's testimony about ballot harvesting was featured today. You should have watched.SFGbob said:Did ballot harvesting take place in the 2020 election in states where it isn't legal? Is it easier to engage in ballot havesting with mail in ballots? The election was lost when the decision was made to paper the states with mail in ballots. My opinion on mail in ballots and Barr's opinion on mail in ballots is the same. So is Barr telling the truth here Dazzler or is he a corrupt liar again?
https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2020/09/02/bill-barr-intv-playing-with-fire-absentee-mail-in-voting-election-tsr-sot-vpx.cnn
To say insufficient is hilarious. None, bupkis or a little bullshit is all he could find with 32 million dollars and over 2 years and a team of crack investigators.
You're stupidity truly is boundless!
1. Trump was receptive to a Campaign national security adviser’s (George Papadopoulos) pursuit of a back channel to Putin.
2. Kremlin operatives provided the Campaign a preview of the Russian plan to distribute stolen emails.
3. The Trump Campaign chairman and deputy chairman (Paul Manafort and Rick Gates) knowingly shared internal polling data and information on battleground states with a Russian spy; and the Campaign chairman worked with the Russian spy on a pro-Russia “peace” plan for Ukraine.
4. The Trump Campaign chairman periodically shared internal polling data with the Russian spy with the expectation it would be shared with Putin-linked oligarch, Oleg Deripaska.
5. Trump Campaign chairman Manafort expected Trump’s winning the presidency would mean Deripaska would want to use Manafort to advance Deripaska’s interests in the United States and elsewhere.
6. Trump Tower meeting: (1) On receiving an email offering derogatory information on Clinton coming from a Russian government official, Donald Trump Jr. “appears to have accepted that offer;” (2) members of the Campaign discussed the Trump Tower meeting beforehand; (3) Donald Trump Jr. told the Russians during the meeting that Trump could revisit the issue of the Magnitsky Act if elected.
7. A Trump Campaign official told the Special Counsel he “felt obliged to object” to a GOP Platform change on Ukraine because it contradicted Trump’s wishes; however, the investigation did not establish that Gordon was directed by Trump.
8. Russian military hackers may have followed Trump’s July 27, 2016 public statement “Russia if you’re listening …” within hours by targeting Clinton’s personal office for the first time.
9. Trump requested campaign affiliates to get Clinton’s emails, which resulted in an individual apparently acting in coordination with the Campaign claiming to have successfully contacted Russian hackers.
10. The Trump Campaign—and Trump personally—appeared to have advanced knowledge of future WikiLeaks releases.
11. The Trump Campaign coordinated campaign-related public communications based on future WikiLeaks releases.
12. Michael Cohen, on behalf of the Trump Organization, brokered a secret deal for a Trump Tower Moscow project directly involving Putin’s inner circle, at least until June 2016.
13. During the presidential transition, Jared Kushner and Eric Prince engaged in secret back channel communications with Russian agents. (1) Kushner suggested to the Russian Ambassador that they use a secure communication line from within the Russian Embassy to speak with Russian Generals; and (2) Prince and Kushner’s friend Rick Gerson conducted secret back channel meetings with a Putin agent to develop a plan for U.S.-Russian relations.
14. During the presidential transition, in coordination with other members of the Transition Team, Michael Flynn spoke with the Russian Ambassador to prevent a tit for tat Russian response to the Obama administration’s imposition of sanctions for election interference; the Russians agreed not to retaliate saying they wanted a good relationship with the incoming administration.
But other than that, absolutely no evidence.
Fuck off. You voted for Joe Biden. Loser. You'll never wash that stank off. -
8. Russian military hackers may have followed Trump’s July 27, 2016 public statement “Russia if you’re listening …” within hours by targeting Clinton’s personal office for the first time.
But for the fact that the "Russian" hack on the DNC supposedly happened prior to May 2016 you fucking nailed it Dazzler. -
Dazzler is fine that Clinton signed off on the fake Russian produced Dossier on Trump. Fuck him, he's not an intellectually honest person. Mocking is the only response he deserves.SFGbob said:8. Russian military hackers may have followed Trump’s July 27, 2016 public statement “Russia if you’re listening …” within hours by targeting Clinton’s personal office for the first time.
But for the fact that the "Russian" hack on the DNC supposedly happened prior to May 2016 you fucking nailed it Dazzler. -
at least it drives traffic46XiJCAB said:
Dazzler is fine that Clinton signed off on the fake Russian produced Dossier on Trump. Fuck him, he's not an intellectually honest person. Mocking is the only response he deserves.SFGbob said:8. Russian military hackers may have followed Trump’s July 27, 2016 public statement “Russia if you’re listening …” within hours by targeting Clinton’s personal office for the first time.
But for the fact that the "Russian" hack on the DNC supposedly happened prior to May 2016 you fucking nailed it Dazzler.
Stalin? -
Putin Stooge weighs in. You're probably the most dishonest poster in the history of this bored. But then you are a "lawyer" so.HHusky said:
at least it drives traffic46XiJCAB said:
Dazzler is fine that Clinton signed off on the fake Russian produced Dossier on Trump. Fuck him, he's not an intellectually honest person. Mocking is the only response he deserves.SFGbob said:8. Russian military hackers may have followed Trump’s July 27, 2016 public statement “Russia if you’re listening …” within hours by targeting Clinton’s personal office for the first time.
But for the fact that the "Russian" hack on the DNC supposedly happened prior to May 2016 you fucking nailed it Dazzler.
Stalin? -
Sounds bad. They really got him this time. I’m sure charges are coming any minute now.HHusky said:
With the exception of:Sledog said:
You see he couldn't find any type of a crime in 2 years of investigation including taxes because that's the first place shitty lawyers head. You know that's what you'd do as your shitty.HHusky said:
But as you well know from your thorough reading of the report and your examination of Mueller's testimony, that isn't what "insufficient" meant in this case.Sledog said:
Insufficient could also be NO EVIDENCE. Thanks for proving yourself as usual dipshit.HHusky said:
“insufficient evidence to charge a broader conspiracy” superiority guy heard from.SFGbob said:
Dazzle watched the Meuller hearing and then just lied about what Meuller and his report actually said.46XiJCAB said:
Dazzler wasted his life on the Mueller hearings too. Then he cried.TurdBomber said:
Some of us aren't fat girls who watch TV all day, like you @HHusky.HHusky said:
Barr's testimony about ballot harvesting was featured today. You should have watched.SFGbob said:Did ballot harvesting take place in the 2020 election in states where it isn't legal? Is it easier to engage in ballot havesting with mail in ballots? The election was lost when the decision was made to paper the states with mail in ballots. My opinion on mail in ballots and Barr's opinion on mail in ballots is the same. So is Barr telling the truth here Dazzler or is he a corrupt liar again?
https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2020/09/02/bill-barr-intv-playing-with-fire-absentee-mail-in-voting-election-tsr-sot-vpx.cnn
To say insufficient is hilarious. None, bupkis or a little bullshit is all he could find with 32 million dollars and over 2 years and a team of crack investigators.
You're stupidity truly is boundless!
1. Trump was receptive to a Campaign national security adviser’s (George Papadopoulos) pursuit of a back channel to Putin.
2. Kremlin operatives provided the Campaign a preview of the Russian plan to distribute stolen emails.
3. The Trump Campaign chairman and deputy chairman (Paul Manafort and Rick Gates) knowingly shared internal polling data and information on battleground states with a Russian spy; and the Campaign chairman worked with the Russian spy on a pro-Russia “peace” plan for Ukraine.
4. The Trump Campaign chairman periodically shared internal polling data with the Russian spy with the expectation it would be shared with Putin-linked oligarch, Oleg Deripaska.
5. Trump Campaign chairman Manafort expected Trump’s winning the presidency would mean Deripaska would want to use Manafort to advance Deripaska’s interests in the United States and elsewhere.
6. Trump Tower meeting: (1) On receiving an email offering derogatory information on Clinton coming from a Russian government official, Donald Trump Jr. “appears to have accepted that offer;” (2) members of the Campaign discussed the Trump Tower meeting beforehand; (3) Donald Trump Jr. told the Russians during the meeting that Trump could revisit the issue of the Magnitsky Act if elected.
7. A Trump Campaign official told the Special Counsel he “felt obliged to object” to a GOP Platform change on Ukraine because it contradicted Trump’s wishes; however, the investigation did not establish that Gordon was directed by Trump.
8. Russian military hackers may have followed Trump’s July 27, 2016 public statement “Russia if you’re listening …” within hours by targeting Clinton’s personal office for the first time.
9. Trump requested campaign affiliates to get Clinton’s emails, which resulted in an individual apparently acting in coordination with the Campaign claiming to have successfully contacted Russian hackers.
10. The Trump Campaign—and Trump personally—appeared to have advanced knowledge of future WikiLeaks releases.
11. The Trump Campaign coordinated campaign-related public communications based on future WikiLeaks releases.
12. Michael Cohen, on behalf of the Trump Organization, brokered a secret deal for a Trump Tower Moscow project directly involving Putin’s inner circle, at least until June 2016.
13. During the presidential transition, Jared Kushner and Eric Prince engaged in secret back channel communications with Russian agents. (1) Kushner suggested to the Russian Ambassador that they use a secure communication line from within the Russian Embassy to speak with Russian Generals; and (2) Prince and Kushner’s friend Rick Gerson conducted secret back channel meetings with a Putin agent to develop a plan for U.S.-Russian relations.
14. During the presidential transition, in coordination with other members of the Transition Team, Michael Flynn spoke with the Russian Ambassador to prevent a tit for tat Russian response to the Obama administration’s imposition of sanctions for election interference; the Russians agreed not to retaliate saying they wanted a good relationship with the incoming administration.
But other than that, absolutely no evidence.
You’re a dumbshit. -
Hey Dazzler, you good with Clinton's team working with the Russians to derail Trump's campaign? I thought they wanted him to win?
Puty Stooge paid in ? -
How did you make it past 'evidentiary standard' in law school?HHusky said:
With the exception of:Sledog said:
You see he couldn't find any type of a crime in 2 years of investigation including taxes because that's the first place shitty lawyers head. You know that's what you'd do as your shitty.HHusky said:
But as you well know from your thorough reading of the report and your examination of Mueller's testimony, that isn't what "insufficient" meant in this case.Sledog said:
Insufficient could also be NO EVIDENCE. Thanks for proving yourself as usual dipshit.HHusky said:
“insufficient evidence to charge a broader conspiracy” superiority guy heard from.SFGbob said:
Dazzle watched the Meuller hearing and then just lied about what Meuller and his report actually said.46XiJCAB said:
Dazzler wasted his life on the Mueller hearings too. Then he cried.TurdBomber said:
Some of us aren't fat girls who watch TV all day, like you @HHusky.HHusky said:
Barr's testimony about ballot harvesting was featured today. You should have watched.SFGbob said:Did ballot harvesting take place in the 2020 election in states where it isn't legal? Is it easier to engage in ballot havesting with mail in ballots? The election was lost when the decision was made to paper the states with mail in ballots. My opinion on mail in ballots and Barr's opinion on mail in ballots is the same. So is Barr telling the truth here Dazzler or is he a corrupt liar again?
https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2020/09/02/bill-barr-intv-playing-with-fire-absentee-mail-in-voting-election-tsr-sot-vpx.cnn
To say insufficient is hilarious. None, bupkis or a little bullshit is all he could find with 32 million dollars and over 2 years and a team of crack investigators.
You're stupidity truly is boundless!
1. Trump was receptive to a Campaign national security adviser’s (George Papadopoulos) pursuit of a back channel to Putin.
2. Kremlin operatives provided the Campaign a preview of the Russian plan to distribute stolen emails.
3. The Trump Campaign chairman and deputy chairman (Paul Manafort and Rick Gates) knowingly shared internal polling data and information on battleground states with a Russian spy; and the Campaign chairman worked with the Russian spy on a pro-Russia “peace” plan for Ukraine.
4. The Trump Campaign chairman periodically shared internal polling data with the Russian spy with the expectation it would be shared with Putin-linked oligarch, Oleg Deripaska.
5. Trump Campaign chairman Manafort expected Trump’s winning the presidency would mean Deripaska would want to use Manafort to advance Deripaska’s interests in the United States and elsewhere.
6. Trump Tower meeting: (1) On receiving an email offering derogatory information on Clinton coming from a Russian government official, Donald Trump Jr. “appears to have accepted that offer;” (2) members of the Campaign discussed the Trump Tower meeting beforehand; (3) Donald Trump Jr. told the Russians during the meeting that Trump could revisit the issue of the Magnitsky Act if elected.
7. A Trump Campaign official told the Special Counsel he “felt obliged to object” to a GOP Platform change on Ukraine because it contradicted Trump’s wishes; however, the investigation did not establish that Gordon was directed by Trump.
8. Russian military hackers may have followed Trump’s July 27, 2016 public statement “Russia if you’re listening …” within hours by targeting Clinton’s personal office for the first time.
9. Trump requested campaign affiliates to get Clinton’s emails, which resulted in an individual apparently acting in coordination with the Campaign claiming to have successfully contacted Russian hackers.
10. The Trump Campaign—and Trump personally—appeared to have advanced knowledge of future WikiLeaks releases.
11. The Trump Campaign coordinated campaign-related public communications based on future WikiLeaks releases.
12. Michael Cohen, on behalf of the Trump Organization, brokered a secret deal for a Trump Tower Moscow project directly involving Putin’s inner circle, at least until June 2016.
13. During the presidential transition, Jared Kushner and Eric Prince engaged in secret back channel communications with Russian agents. (1) Kushner suggested to the Russian Ambassador that they use a secure communication line from within the Russian Embassy to speak with Russian Generals; and (2) Prince and Kushner’s friend Rick Gerson conducted secret back channel meetings with a Putin agent to develop a plan for U.S.-Russian relations.
14. During the presidential transition, in coordination with other members of the Transition Team, Michael Flynn spoke with the Russian Ambassador to prevent a tit for tat Russian response to the Obama administration’s imposition of sanctions for election interference; the Russians agreed not to retaliate saying they wanted a good relationship with the incoming administration.
But other than that, absolutely no evidence.
Serious question.
-
Dazzler?pawz said:
How did you make it past 'evidentiary standard' in law school?HHusky said:
With the exception of:Sledog said:
You see he couldn't find any type of a crime in 2 years of investigation including taxes because that's the first place shitty lawyers head. You know that's what you'd do as your shitty.HHusky said:
But as you well know from your thorough reading of the report and your examination of Mueller's testimony, that isn't what "insufficient" meant in this case.Sledog said:
Insufficient could also be NO EVIDENCE. Thanks for proving yourself as usual dipshit.HHusky said:
“insufficient evidence to charge a broader conspiracy” superiority guy heard from.SFGbob said:
Dazzle watched the Meuller hearing and then just lied about what Meuller and his report actually said.46XiJCAB said:
Dazzler wasted his life on the Mueller hearings too. Then he cried.TurdBomber said:
Some of us aren't fat girls who watch TV all day, like you @HHusky.HHusky said:
Barr's testimony about ballot harvesting was featured today. You should have watched.SFGbob said:Did ballot harvesting take place in the 2020 election in states where it isn't legal? Is it easier to engage in ballot havesting with mail in ballots? The election was lost when the decision was made to paper the states with mail in ballots. My opinion on mail in ballots and Barr's opinion on mail in ballots is the same. So is Barr telling the truth here Dazzler or is he a corrupt liar again?
https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2020/09/02/bill-barr-intv-playing-with-fire-absentee-mail-in-voting-election-tsr-sot-vpx.cnn
To say insufficient is hilarious. None, bupkis or a little bullshit is all he could find with 32 million dollars and over 2 years and a team of crack investigators.
You're stupidity truly is boundless!
1. Trump was receptive to a Campaign national security adviser’s (George Papadopoulos) pursuit of a back channel to Putin.
2. Kremlin operatives provided the Campaign a preview of the Russian plan to distribute stolen emails.
3. The Trump Campaign chairman and deputy chairman (Paul Manafort and Rick Gates) knowingly shared internal polling data and information on battleground states with a Russian spy; and the Campaign chairman worked with the Russian spy on a pro-Russia “peace” plan for Ukraine.
4. The Trump Campaign chairman periodically shared internal polling data with the Russian spy with the expectation it would be shared with Putin-linked oligarch, Oleg Deripaska.
5. Trump Campaign chairman Manafort expected Trump’s winning the presidency would mean Deripaska would want to use Manafort to advance Deripaska’s interests in the United States and elsewhere.
6. Trump Tower meeting: (1) On receiving an email offering derogatory information on Clinton coming from a Russian government official, Donald Trump Jr. “appears to have accepted that offer;” (2) members of the Campaign discussed the Trump Tower meeting beforehand; (3) Donald Trump Jr. told the Russians during the meeting that Trump could revisit the issue of the Magnitsky Act if elected.
7. A Trump Campaign official told the Special Counsel he “felt obliged to object” to a GOP Platform change on Ukraine because it contradicted Trump’s wishes; however, the investigation did not establish that Gordon was directed by Trump.
8. Russian military hackers may have followed Trump’s July 27, 2016 public statement “Russia if you’re listening …” within hours by targeting Clinton’s personal office for the first time.
9. Trump requested campaign affiliates to get Clinton’s emails, which resulted in an individual apparently acting in coordination with the Campaign claiming to have successfully contacted Russian hackers.
10. The Trump Campaign—and Trump personally—appeared to have advanced knowledge of future WikiLeaks releases.
11. The Trump Campaign coordinated campaign-related public communications based on future WikiLeaks releases.
12. Michael Cohen, on behalf of the Trump Organization, brokered a secret deal for a Trump Tower Moscow project directly involving Putin’s inner circle, at least until June 2016.
13. During the presidential transition, Jared Kushner and Eric Prince engaged in secret back channel communications with Russian agents. (1) Kushner suggested to the Russian Ambassador that they use a secure communication line from within the Russian Embassy to speak with Russian Generals; and (2) Prince and Kushner’s friend Rick Gerson conducted secret back channel meetings with a Putin agent to develop a plan for U.S.-Russian relations.
14. During the presidential transition, in coordination with other members of the Transition Team, Michael Flynn spoke with the Russian Ambassador to prevent a tit for tat Russian response to the Obama administration’s imposition of sanctions for election interference; the Russians agreed not to retaliate saying they wanted a good relationship with the incoming administration.
But other than that, absolutely no evidence.
Serious question. -
He's busy working on his Russian state narrative homework.46XiJCAB said:
Dazzler?pawz said:
How did you make it past 'evidentiary standard' in law school?HHusky said:
With the exception of:Sledog said:
You see he couldn't find any type of a crime in 2 years of investigation including taxes because that's the first place shitty lawyers head. You know that's what you'd do as your shitty.HHusky said:
But as you well know from your thorough reading of the report and your examination of Mueller's testimony, that isn't what "insufficient" meant in this case.Sledog said:
Insufficient could also be NO EVIDENCE. Thanks for proving yourself as usual dipshit.HHusky said:
“insufficient evidence to charge a broader conspiracy” superiority guy heard from.SFGbob said:
Dazzle watched the Meuller hearing and then just lied about what Meuller and his report actually said.46XiJCAB said:
Dazzler wasted his life on the Mueller hearings too. Then he cried.TurdBomber said:
Some of us aren't fat girls who watch TV all day, like you @HHusky.HHusky said:
Barr's testimony about ballot harvesting was featured today. You should have watched.SFGbob said:Did ballot harvesting take place in the 2020 election in states where it isn't legal? Is it easier to engage in ballot havesting with mail in ballots? The election was lost when the decision was made to paper the states with mail in ballots. My opinion on mail in ballots and Barr's opinion on mail in ballots is the same. So is Barr telling the truth here Dazzler or is he a corrupt liar again?
https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2020/09/02/bill-barr-intv-playing-with-fire-absentee-mail-in-voting-election-tsr-sot-vpx.cnn
To say insufficient is hilarious. None, bupkis or a little bullshit is all he could find with 32 million dollars and over 2 years and a team of crack investigators.
You're stupidity truly is boundless!
1. Trump was receptive to a Campaign national security adviser’s (George Papadopoulos) pursuit of a back channel to Putin.
2. Kremlin operatives provided the Campaign a preview of the Russian plan to distribute stolen emails.
3. The Trump Campaign chairman and deputy chairman (Paul Manafort and Rick Gates) knowingly shared internal polling data and information on battleground states with a Russian spy; and the Campaign chairman worked with the Russian spy on a pro-Russia “peace” plan for Ukraine.
4. The Trump Campaign chairman periodically shared internal polling data with the Russian spy with the expectation it would be shared with Putin-linked oligarch, Oleg Deripaska.
5. Trump Campaign chairman Manafort expected Trump’s winning the presidency would mean Deripaska would want to use Manafort to advance Deripaska’s interests in the United States and elsewhere.
6. Trump Tower meeting: (1) On receiving an email offering derogatory information on Clinton coming from a Russian government official, Donald Trump Jr. “appears to have accepted that offer;” (2) members of the Campaign discussed the Trump Tower meeting beforehand; (3) Donald Trump Jr. told the Russians during the meeting that Trump could revisit the issue of the Magnitsky Act if elected.
7. A Trump Campaign official told the Special Counsel he “felt obliged to object” to a GOP Platform change on Ukraine because it contradicted Trump’s wishes; however, the investigation did not establish that Gordon was directed by Trump.
8. Russian military hackers may have followed Trump’s July 27, 2016 public statement “Russia if you’re listening …” within hours by targeting Clinton’s personal office for the first time.
9. Trump requested campaign affiliates to get Clinton’s emails, which resulted in an individual apparently acting in coordination with the Campaign claiming to have successfully contacted Russian hackers.
10. The Trump Campaign—and Trump personally—appeared to have advanced knowledge of future WikiLeaks releases.
11. The Trump Campaign coordinated campaign-related public communications based on future WikiLeaks releases.
12. Michael Cohen, on behalf of the Trump Organization, brokered a secret deal for a Trump Tower Moscow project directly involving Putin’s inner circle, at least until June 2016.
13. During the presidential transition, Jared Kushner and Eric Prince engaged in secret back channel communications with Russian agents. (1) Kushner suggested to the Russian Ambassador that they use a secure communication line from within the Russian Embassy to speak with Russian Generals; and (2) Prince and Kushner’s friend Rick Gerson conducted secret back channel meetings with a Putin agent to develop a plan for U.S.-Russian relations.
14. During the presidential transition, in coordination with other members of the Transition Team, Michael Flynn spoke with the Russian Ambassador to prevent a tit for tat Russian response to the Obama administration’s imposition of sanctions for election interference; the Russians agreed not to retaliate saying they wanted a good relationship with the incoming administration.
But other than that, absolutely no evidence.
Serious question.
-
I wonder what lunatic leftist site Dazzler copied that screed from?
-
https://www.messagemedia.co/aitkin/opinion/other_opinions/the-truth-about-the-mueller-report/article_9166ee18-afbb-11e9-860f-e3fbf323c0fe.html46XiJCAB said:I wonder what lunatic leftist site Dazzler copied that screed from?
-
"The evidence is what I say it is". The Dazzler in law school.
-
"if it wasn't at Nuremberg, it doesn't count"Sledog said:"The evidence is what I say it is". The Dazzler in law school.
- The Dazzler. -
But it's his gullibility that takes the cake. Stratospheric.Sledog said:
You see he couldn't find any type of a crime in 2 years of investigation including taxes because that's the first place shitty lawyers head. You know that's what you'd do as your shitty.HHusky said:
But as you well know from your thorough reading of the report and your examination of Mueller's testimony, that isn't what "insufficient" meant in this case.Sledog said:
Insufficient could also be NO EVIDENCE. Thanks for proving yourself as usual dipshit.HHusky said:
“insufficient evidence to charge a broader conspiracy” superiority guy heard from.SFGbob said:
Dazzle watched the Meuller hearing and then just lied about what Meuller and his report actually said.46XiJCAB said:
Dazzler wasted his life on the Mueller hearings too. Then he cried.TurdBomber said:
Some of us aren't fat girls who watch TV all day, like you @HHusky.HHusky said:
Barr's testimony about ballot harvesting was featured today. You should have watched.SFGbob said:Did ballot harvesting take place in the 2020 election in states where it isn't legal? Is it easier to engage in ballot havesting with mail in ballots? The election was lost when the decision was made to paper the states with mail in ballots. My opinion on mail in ballots and Barr's opinion on mail in ballots is the same. So is Barr telling the truth here Dazzler or is he a corrupt liar again?
https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2020/09/02/bill-barr-intv-playing-with-fire-absentee-mail-in-voting-election-tsr-sot-vpx.cnn
To say insufficient is hilarious. None, bupkis or a little bullshit is all he could find with 32 million dollars and over 2 years and a team of crack investigators.
You're stupidity truly is boundless! -
Rent freeHHusky said:
With the exception of:Sledog said:
You see he couldn't find any type of a crime in 2 years of investigation including taxes because that's the first place shitty lawyers head. You know that's what you'd do as your shitty.HHusky said:
But as you well know from your thorough reading of the report and your examination of Mueller's testimony, that isn't what "insufficient" meant in this case.Sledog said:
Insufficient could also be NO EVIDENCE. Thanks for proving yourself as usual dipshit.HHusky said:
“insufficient evidence to charge a broader conspiracy” superiority guy heard from.SFGbob said:
Dazzle watched the Meuller hearing and then just lied about what Meuller and his report actually said.46XiJCAB said:
Dazzler wasted his life on the Mueller hearings too. Then he cried.TurdBomber said:
Some of us aren't fat girls who watch TV all day, like you @HHusky.HHusky said:
Barr's testimony about ballot harvesting was featured today. You should have watched.SFGbob said:Did ballot harvesting take place in the 2020 election in states where it isn't legal? Is it easier to engage in ballot havesting with mail in ballots? The election was lost when the decision was made to paper the states with mail in ballots. My opinion on mail in ballots and Barr's opinion on mail in ballots is the same. So is Barr telling the truth here Dazzler or is he a corrupt liar again?
https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2020/09/02/bill-barr-intv-playing-with-fire-absentee-mail-in-voting-election-tsr-sot-vpx.cnn
To say insufficient is hilarious. None, bupkis or a little bullshit is all he could find with 32 million dollars and over 2 years and a team of crack investigators.
You're stupidity truly is boundless!
1. Trump was receptive to a Campaign national security adviser’s (George Papadopoulos) pursuit of a back channel to Putin.
2. Kremlin operatives provided the Campaign a preview of the Russian plan to distribute stolen emails.
3. The Trump Campaign chairman and deputy chairman (Paul Manafort and Rick Gates) knowingly shared internal polling data and information on battleground states with a Russian spy; and the Campaign chairman worked with the Russian spy on a pro-Russia “peace” plan for Ukraine.
4. The Trump Campaign chairman periodically shared internal polling data with the Russian spy with the expectation it would be shared with Putin-linked oligarch, Oleg Deripaska.
5. Trump Campaign chairman Manafort expected Trump’s winning the presidency would mean Deripaska would want to use Manafort to advance Deripaska’s interests in the United States and elsewhere.
6. Trump Tower meeting: (1) On receiving an email offering derogatory information on Clinton coming from a Russian government official, Donald Trump Jr. “appears to have accepted that offer;” (2) members of the Campaign discussed the Trump Tower meeting beforehand; (3) Donald Trump Jr. told the Russians during the meeting that Trump could revisit the issue of the Magnitsky Act if elected.
7. A Trump Campaign official told the Special Counsel he “felt obliged to object” to a GOP Platform change on Ukraine because it contradicted Trump’s wishes; however, the investigation did not establish that Gordon was directed by Trump.
8. Russian military hackers may have followed Trump’s July 27, 2016 public statement “Russia if you’re listening …” within hours by targeting Clinton’s personal office for the first time.
9. Trump requested campaign affiliates to get Clinton’s emails, which resulted in an individual apparently acting in coordination with the Campaign claiming to have successfully contacted Russian hackers.
10. The Trump Campaign—and Trump personally—appeared to have advanced knowledge of future WikiLeaks releases.
11. The Trump Campaign coordinated campaign-related public communications based on future WikiLeaks releases.
12. Michael Cohen, on behalf of the Trump Organization, brokered a secret deal for a Trump Tower Moscow project directly involving Putin’s inner circle, at least until June 2016.
13. During the presidential transition, Jared Kushner and Eric Prince engaged in secret back channel communications with Russian agents. (1) Kushner suggested to the Russian Ambassador that they use a secure communication line from within the Russian Embassy to speak with Russian Generals; and (2) Prince and Kushner’s friend Rick Gerson conducted secret back channel meetings with a Putin agent to develop a plan for U.S.-Russian relations.
14. During the presidential transition, in coordination with other members of the Transition Team, Michael Flynn spoke with the Russian Ambassador to prevent a tit for tat Russian response to the Obama administration’s imposition of sanctions for election interference; the Russians agreed not to retaliate saying they wanted a good relationship with the incoming administration.
But other than that, absolutely no evidence.
-
Odd no specific criminal charges connected to any of your items. Oh yeah it's all bullshit! Nothing like I said.
You sure can swallow though! The guys down at the Glory Hole bar are happy.
