Dazzler is this another issue you don't support but vote for anyway?
Comments
-
Pawz is onboard
-
"49 Democrat senators just voted that it should be lawful to kill it the moment before this while it was still inside its mother."
No they didn't. But I can understand why a liar would quote a liar. -
Yes, they did…
a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
requirements:
9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
the pregnant patient's life or health.
Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.
Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?
“If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed” -
Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.MikeDamone said:Yes, they did…
a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
requirements:
9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
the pregnant patient's life or health.
Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.
Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?
“If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed” -
What was stated in the tweet is 100% accurate, ma'am.HHusky said:
Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.MikeDamone said:Yes, they did…
a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
requirements:
9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
the pregnant patient's life or health.
Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.
Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?
“If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed” -
So now we should trust doctors instead of bureaucrats and pharmacists for personnel health decisions?HHusky said:
Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.MikeDamone said:Yes, they did…
a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
requirements:
9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
the pregnant patient's life or health.
Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.
Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?
“If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed” -
That's the kind of "accuracy" we've grown to expect from you and blob.MikeDamone said:
What was stated in the tweet is 100% accurate, ma'am.HHusky said:
Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.MikeDamone said:Yes, they did…
a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
requirements:
9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
the pregnant patient's life or health.
Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.
Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?
“If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed” -
Gosnell says hold my beer.HHusky said:
Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.MikeDamone said:Yes, they did…
a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
requirements:
9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
the pregnant patient's life or health.
Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.
Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?
“If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed”
Fuck off -
Muh horse paste!Bob_C said:
So now we should trust doctors instead of bureaucrats and pharmacists for personnel health decisions?HHusky said:
Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.MikeDamone said:Yes, they did…
a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
requirements:
9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
the pregnant patient's life or health.
Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.
Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?
“If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed” -
Inslee says hold my beer.
Dazzler, fuck off. -
He's in prison. If your doctor has his moral compass, get a new doctor.46XiJCAB said:
Gosnell says hold my beer.HHusky said:
Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.MikeDamone said:Yes, they did…
a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
requirements:
9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
the pregnant patient's life or health.
Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.
Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?
“If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed”
Fuck off -
Tell us how it's inaccurate, ladyHHusky said:
That's the kind of "accuracy" we've grown to expect from you and blob.MikeDamone said:
What was stated in the tweet is 100% accurate, ma'am.HHusky said:
Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.MikeDamone said:Yes, they did…
a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
requirements:
9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
the pregnant patient's life or health.
Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.
Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?
“If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed” -
Gosnell says hold my beer, I'm a doc not a politician.HHusky said:
He's in prison. If your doctor has his moral compass, get a new doctor.46XiJCAB said:
Gosnell says hold my beer.HHusky said:
Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.MikeDamone said:Yes, they did…
a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
requirements:
9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
the pregnant patient's life or health.
Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.
Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?
“If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed”
Fuck off
Dazzler, fuck off. -
His victims are still dead.HHusky said:
He's in prison. If your doctor has his moral compass, get a new doctor.46XiJCAB said:
Gosnell says hold my beer.HHusky said:
Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.MikeDamone said:Yes, they did…
a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
requirements:
9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
the pregnant patient's life or health.
Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.
Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?
“If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed”
Fuck off
Dazzler, fuck off. -
PDX wants to ban abortion to stop doctors from committing felonies.46XiJCAB said:
Gosnell says hold my beer, I'm a doc not a politician.HHusky said:
He's in prison. If your doctor has his moral compass, get a new doctor.46XiJCAB said:
Gosnell says hold my beer.HHusky said:
Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.MikeDamone said:Yes, they did…
a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
requirements:
9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
the pregnant patient's life or health.
Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.
Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?
“If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed”
Fuck off
Dazzler, fuck off.
That's TugCon logic. -
It's your most frequent technique for lying. Lying by omission.MikeDamone said:
Tell us how it's inaccurate, ladyHHusky said:
That's the kind of "accuracy" we've grown to expect from you and blob.MikeDamone said:
What was stated in the tweet is 100% accurate, ma'am.HHusky said:
Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.MikeDamone said:Yes, they did…
a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
requirements:
9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
the pregnant patient's life or health.
Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.
Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?
“If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed” -
At least we established that the bill allows for abortion up to birth.
-
Quote where I've ever called for a ban, Liar. Gosnell's taint will always be on you and I'm here to remind you of that each and every single time you open your sewer hole regarding abortion.HHusky said:
PDX wants to ban abortion to stop doctors from committing felonies.46XiJCAB said:
Gosnell says hold my beer, I'm a doc not a politician.HHusky said:
He's in prison. If your doctor has his moral compass, get a new doctor.46XiJCAB said:
Gosnell says hold my beer.HHusky said:
Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.MikeDamone said:Yes, they did…
a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
requirements:
9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
the pregnant patient's life or health.
Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.
Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?
“If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed”
Fuck off
Dazzler, fuck off.
That's TugCon logic. -
What did I omit? I posted the exact language of the bill, sally.HHusky said:
It's your most frequent technique for lying. Lying by omission.MikeDamone said:
Tell us how it's inaccurate, ladyHHusky said:
That's the kind of "accuracy" we've grown to expect from you and blob.MikeDamone said:
What was stated in the tweet is 100% accurate, ma'am.HHusky said:
Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.MikeDamone said:Yes, they did…
a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
requirements:
9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
the pregnant patient's life or health.
Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.
Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?
“If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed” -
No we wnat them to stop murdering children you feckless cunt!HHusky said:
PDX wants to ban abortion to stop doctors from committing felonies.46XiJCAB said:
Gosnell says hold my beer, I'm a doc not a politician.HHusky said:
He's in prison. If your doctor has his moral compass, get a new doctor.46XiJCAB said:
Gosnell says hold my beer.HHusky said:
Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.MikeDamone said:Yes, they did…
a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
requirements:
9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
the pregnant patient's life or health.
Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.
Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?
“If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed”
Fuck off
Dazzler, fuck off.
That's TugCon logic. -
In a hypothetical extreme case. With a doctor having to make that judgment.MikeDamone said:At least we established that the bill allows for abortion up to birth.
Late term abortions aren't really happening right at the moment before birth, and only in tragic cases. Not your stupid hypothetical.
-
Gosnell says hold my beer. I'm sure he was/is the lone wolf.HHusky said:
In a hypothetical extreme case. With a doctor having to make that judgment.MikeDamone said:At least we established that the bill allows for abortion up to birth.
Late term abortions aren't really happening right at the moment before birth, and only in tragic cases. Not your stupid hypothetical.
Dazzler, fuck off. -
You said the tweet wasn't inaccurate. It was grossly inaccurate, by omission, the technique of all studied liars.MikeDamone said:
What did I omit? I posted the exact language of the bill, sally.HHusky said:
It's your most frequent technique for lying. Lying by omission.MikeDamone said:
Tell us how it's inaccurate, ladyHHusky said:
That's the kind of "accuracy" we've grown to expect from you and blob.MikeDamone said:
What was stated in the tweet is 100% accurate, ma'am.HHusky said:
Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.MikeDamone said:Yes, they did…
a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
requirements:
9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
the pregnant patient's life or health.
Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.
Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?
“If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed”
-
What are the penalties for a doctor not acting in good faith and who decides if the doctor acted in good faith?HHusky said:
In a hypothetical extreme case. With a doctor having to make that judgment.MikeDamone said:At least we established that the bill allows for abortion up to birth.
Late term abortions aren't really happening right at the moment before birth, and only in tragic cases. Not your stupid hypothetical.
This bill allows for abortion up to birth for any reason and you trying to suggest it doesn't by hiding behind non specific and flimsy language is embarrassing, even for you, lady. -
It's very accurate. Your typical mental convulsions don't change that, Mary.HHusky said:
You said the tweet wasn't inaccurate. It was grossly inaccurate, by omission, the technique of all studied liars.MikeDamone said:
What did I omit? I posted the exact language of the bill, sally.HHusky said:
It's your most frequent technique for lying. Lying by omission.MikeDamone said:
Tell us how it's inaccurate, ladyHHusky said:
That's the kind of "accuracy" we've grown to expect from you and blob.MikeDamone said:
What was stated in the tweet is 100% accurate, ma'am.HHusky said:
Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.MikeDamone said:Yes, they did…
a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
requirements:
9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
the pregnant patient's life or health.
Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.
Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?
“If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed” -
You don't give a shit about children.Sledog said:
No we wnat them to stop murdering children you feckless cunt!HHusky said:
PDX wants to ban abortion to stop doctors from committing felonies.46XiJCAB said:
Gosnell says hold my beer, I'm a doc not a politician.HHusky said:
He's in prison. If your doctor has his moral compass, get a new doctor.46XiJCAB said:
Gosnell says hold my beer.HHusky said:
Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.MikeDamone said:Yes, they did…
a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
requirements:
9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
the pregnant patient's life or health.
Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.
Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?
“If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed”
Fuck off
Dazzler, fuck off.
That's TugCon logic.
It's fetuses you fetishize. -
My children would say otherwise.HHusky said:
You don't give a shit about children.Sledog said:
No we wnat them to stop murdering children you feckless cunt!HHusky said:
PDX wants to ban abortion to stop doctors from committing felonies.46XiJCAB said:
Gosnell says hold my beer, I'm a doc not a politician.HHusky said:
He's in prison. If your doctor has his moral compass, get a new doctor.46XiJCAB said:
Gosnell says hold my beer.HHusky said:
Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.MikeDamone said:Yes, they did…
a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
requirements:
9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
the pregnant patient's life or health.
Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.
Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?
“If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed”
Fuck off
Dazzler, fuck off.
That's TugCon logic.
It's fetuses you fetishize. -
There's the white flag. Sooner than usual.HHusky said:
You don't give a shit about children.Sledog said:
No we wnat them to stop murdering children you feckless cunt!HHusky said:
PDX wants to ban abortion to stop doctors from committing felonies.46XiJCAB said:
Gosnell says hold my beer, I'm a doc not a politician.HHusky said:
He's in prison. If your doctor has his moral compass, get a new doctor.46XiJCAB said:
Gosnell says hold my beer.HHusky said:
Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.MikeDamone said:Yes, they did…
a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
requirements:
9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
the pregnant patient's life or health.
Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.
Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?
“If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed”
Fuck off
Dazzler, fuck off.
That's TugCon logic.
It's fetuses you fetishize.
Trite talking point. -
So you lied and Damone is rightHHusky said:
In a hypothetical extreme case. With a doctor having to make that judgment.MikeDamone said:At least we established that the bill allows for abortion up to birth.
Late term abortions aren't really happening right at the moment before birth, and only in tragic cases. Not your stupid hypothetical.
Got it -
Now that we've clarified that the democrats want to kill viable babies up to birth time to make the commercials
