Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

SEC defense purplej

Lets put 2 sec teams in the playoff
«1

Comments

  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    FREE PUB!!!!!!!
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 25,659 Standard Supporter

    3 years in-a-row ive called South Carolina's shit show for what it is and its top 10 preseason ranking. No fucking change and blatant SEC bias at work. Oh, ive been calling bullshit on the "SEC defense" myth too. This for decades. Sure theyve been good butt the SEC offense was extinct as any player with ability went over to play defense.

    The pac on the other hand split the difference. The entire SEC replaces qb's (not all but close) and with garbage defenses should be an interesting year. So far the returns look as usual.

    The rankings are a big problem. They literally put 7-9 teams in the top 25. Yeah, I get it, Florida and Bammer were really good from 2006-2012, and they had top five coaches. THAT DOESN'T MEAN THE FOURTH BEST TEAM SHOULD AUTOMATICALLY BE RANKED SEVENTH.
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    Explain the conference records in BCS bowls.
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    Ole Miss looks good on D but they bought an NFL front 7. Nobody in the country has paid more for talent than hugh freeze yet they're up only 7-3 vs. Free OKG'S. The SEC is a fucking joke. Alabama, with 11 returning starters is #2 in the country preseason, and with Casey Paus' s QB pupil at QB (0 starts for Bambi) is WAY FARGIN OVERRATED (just like the head ball coach's squad is)

    Saban has 2 difficult games this year, if they had more they would actually lose 1 or 2 so of course they'll finish undefeated.You twats startin to see where Im coming from yet?
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club

    Saban has 2 difficult games this year, if they had more they would actually lose 1 or 2 so of course they'll finish undefeated.You twats startin to see where Im coming from yet?

    Disagree. He has 8 SEC games, a conference championship, and 2 playoff games. I think that adds up to 11.
  • AZDuck
    AZDuck Member Posts: 15,381
    SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    PurpleJ said:

    Saban has 2 difficult games this year, if they had more they would actually lose 1 or 2 so of course they'll finish undefeated.You twats startin to see where Im coming from yet?

    Disagree. He has 8 SEC games, a conference championship, and 2 playoff games. I think that adds up to 11.
    Uh the SEC isnt good this year dummy, hence the 2 difficult games...one being the conference championship game. Understand little purplej
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club

    PurpleJ said:

    Saban has 2 difficult games this year, if they had more they would actually lose 1 or 2 so of course they'll finish undefeated.You twats startin to see where Im coming from yet?

    Disagree. He has 8 SEC games, a conference championship, and 2 playoff games. I think that adds up to 11.
    Uh the SEC isnt good this year dummy, hence the 2 difficult games...one being the conference championship game. Understand little purplej
    The obsession continues...


    Also.. WHOOOOOOOOSHHHHH
  • AZDuck
    AZDuck Member Posts: 15,381
    Just so long as everyone is clear that where me and Marty are concerned, I'm the top
  • Doogles
    Doogles Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,728 Founders Club

    And duck youre just fortunate sugar took the time to attempt to respond to your loose ass. This as far as attempt goes. Back to humping Marty with ya.

    This might be the first time puppy has referenced himself as sugar.

    It's good to see he's clearly feelin' himself with meds dialed in as the season arrives.
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 25,659 Standard Supporter
    PurpleJ said:

    Explain the conference records in BCS bowls.

    Explain these records from 1998 through 2011:

    SEC vs. PAC-12 regular season: 10-12

    SEC vs. PAC-12 bowl games: 1-0

    SEC vs. Big 12 regular season: 6-10

    SEC vs. Big 12 bowl games: 21-8

    SEC vs. ACC regular season: 42-36

    SEC vs. ACC bowl games: 16-9

    SEC vs. Big 10 regular season: 7-4

    SEC vs. Big 10 bowl games: 19-19

    SEC vs. Big East regular season: 16-15

    SEC vs. Big East bowl game: 3-8

    BOOM
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    Embarrassing.
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    3 years in-a-row ive called South Carolina's shit show for what it is and its top 10 preseason ranking. No fucking change and blatant SEC bias at work. Oh, ive been calling bullshit on the "SEC defense" myth too. This for decades. Sure theyve been good butt the SEC offense was extinct as any player with ability went over to play defense.

    The pac on the other hand split the difference. The entire SEC replaces qb's (not all but close) and with garbage defenses should be an interesting year. So far the returns look as usual.

    You're the moron that cares about rankings.
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,143
    edited August 2014

    PurpleJ said:

    Explain the conference records in BCS bowls.

    Explain these records from 1998 through 2011:

    SEC vs. PAC-12 regular season: 10-12

    SEC vs. PAC-12 bowl games: 1-0

    SEC vs. Big 12 regular season: 6-10

    SEC vs. Big 12 bowl games: 21-8

    SEC vs. ACC regular season: 42-36

    SEC vs. ACC bowl games: 16-9

    SEC vs. Big 10 regular season: 7-4

    SEC vs. Big 10 bowl games: 19-19

    SEC vs. Big East regular season: 16-15

    SEC vs. Big East bowl game: 3-8

    BOOM
    Good stuff Billy. They have had dominant teams at the top, but after the top 2 or 3 teams, the conference is no different from any other. Every year teams like South Carolina, Georgia, Texas A&M, Ole Miss, and whatever other team backs into a 9-4 season get overrated solely because they are in the SEC. I've never seen a team get as lucky as Auburn did last year and Missouri making the SEC title game last year spoke volumes.

    Alabama will always be great with Saban, LSU is always one of the most talented teams, and Florida was great under Urban Meyer. Auburn might be able to get into the conversation with Malzahn. The rest of the teams pretty much suck.
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    PurpleJ said:

    Explain the conference records in BCS bowls.

    Explain these records from 1998 through 2011:

    SEC vs. PAC-12 regular season: 10-12

    SEC vs. PAC-12 bowl games: 1-0

    SEC vs. Big 12 regular season: 6-10

    SEC vs. Big 12 bowl games: 21-8

    SEC vs. ACC regular season: 42-36

    SEC vs. ACC bowl games: 16-9

    SEC vs. Big 10 regular season: 7-4

    SEC vs. Big 10 bowl games: 19-19

    SEC vs. Big East regular season: 16-15

    SEC vs. Big East bowl game: 3-8

    BOOM
    Good stuff Billy. They have had dominant teams at the top, but after the top 2-3, the conference is no different from any other. Every year teams like South Carolina, Georgia, Texas A&M, Ole Miss, and whatever other team backs into a 9-4 season get overrated. I've never seen a team get as lucky as Auburn did last year and Missouri making the SEC title game last year spoke volumes.

    Alabama will always be great with Saban, LSU is always one of the most talented teams, and Florida was great under Urban Meyer. Auburn might be able to get into the conversation with Malzahn. The rest of the teams pretty much suck.
    Other than Seattle and San Francisco, the NFC West was just like every other NFL division last year.

    It's the top end of the SEC that makes the difference. We all know the bottom half sucks, but no one cares.
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    It's funny how all the Pac Twoolves suddenly grow bolder the year that the SEC doesn't win the title.
  • EsophagealFeces
    EsophagealFeces Member Posts: 13,167

    PurpleJ said:

    Explain the conference records in BCS bowls.

    Explain these records from 1998 through 2011:

    SEC vs. PAC-12 regular season: 10-12

    SEC vs. PAC-12 bowl games: 1-0

    SEC vs. Big 12 regular season: 6-10

    SEC vs. Big 12 bowl games: 21-8

    SEC vs. ACC regular season: 42-36

    SEC vs. ACC bowl games: 16-9

    SEC vs. Big 10 regular season: 7-4

    SEC vs. Big 10 bowl games: 19-19

    SEC vs. Big East regular season: 16-15

    SEC vs. Big East bowl game: 3-8

    BOOM
    Good stuff Billy. They have had dominant teams at the top, but after the top 2-3, the conference is no different from any other. Every year teams like South Carolina, Georgia, Texas A&M, Ole Miss, and whatever other team backs into a 9-4 season get overrated. I've never seen a team get as lucky as Auburn did last year and Missouri making the SEC title game last year spoke volumes.

    Alabama will always be great with Saban, LSU is always one of the most talented teams, and Florida was great under Urban Meyer. Auburn might be able to get into the conversation with Malzahn. The rest of the teams pretty much suck.
    Other than Seattle and San Francisco, the NFC West was just like every other NFL division last year.

    It's the top end of the SEC that makes the difference. We all know the bottom half sucks, but no one cares.
    Disagree. You're discounting how good the Cardinals are. They would have won the NFC North and had a shot at the East and South. The Rams were dreck on offense, but their defense is outstanding. The NFL-NCAA comparison doesn't really work there because conference play is 9/12 of your games in college, but only 6/16 in the NFL. The strength of your division/conference makes a bigger difference in college than the NFL, good or bad.
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    PurpleJ said:

    Explain the conference records in BCS bowls.

    Explain these records from 1998 through 2011:

    SEC vs. PAC-12 regular season: 10-12

    SEC vs. PAC-12 bowl games: 1-0

    SEC vs. Big 12 regular season: 6-10

    SEC vs. Big 12 bowl games: 21-8

    SEC vs. ACC regular season: 42-36

    SEC vs. ACC bowl games: 16-9

    SEC vs. Big 10 regular season: 7-4

    SEC vs. Big 10 bowl games: 19-19

    SEC vs. Big East regular season: 16-15

    SEC vs. Big East bowl game: 3-8

    BOOM
    Good stuff Billy. They have had dominant teams at the top, but after the top 2-3, the conference is no different from any other. Every year teams like South Carolina, Georgia, Texas A&M, Ole Miss, and whatever other team backs into a 9-4 season get overrated. I've never seen a team get as lucky as Auburn did last year and Missouri making the SEC title game last year spoke volumes.

    Alabama will always be great with Saban, LSU is always one of the most talented teams, and Florida was great under Urban Meyer. Auburn might be able to get into the conversation with Malzahn. The rest of the teams pretty much suck.
    Other than Seattle and San Francisco, the NFC West was just like every other NFL division last year.

    It's the top end of the SEC that makes the difference. We all know the bottom half sucks, but no one cares.
    Disagree. You're discounting how good the Cardinals are. They would have won the NFC North and had a shot at the East and South. The Rams were dreck on offense, but their defense is outstanding. The NFL-NCAA comparison doesn't really work there because conference play is 9/12 of your games in college, but only 6/16 in the NFL. The strength of your division/conference makes a bigger difference in college than the NFL, good or bad.
    Holy crap Tequilla, you took that Sarkasm way too seriously.
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 25,659 Standard Supporter
    edited August 2014
    PurpleJ said:

    It's funny how all the Pac Twoolves suddenly grow bolder the year that the SEC doesn't win the title.

    Another whoosh

    I've been watching the SEC since they had ten teams and TBS (as in the TV station) showed their gaymes on Sat. mornings in the 80s. They were a respectable conference, nothing more. In fact I remember some Bammer v. LSU games for the conference lead in which both teams were ranked in the teens. 1988 or thereabouts. Even in the late 90s Bammer was terrible, and I remember Danny Waffle (a worse Heisman than Gino Torretta) and the Gaytors getting drilled by Tommy Frazier in the party bowel.

    This "success" is a recent, ovehyped, and short-lived phenomenon. Don't act like CBS and ESPN's multi billion dollar deals have nothing to do with it either. It's already fading fast. Look at how South Carolina was absolutely annihilated. Real Top 10 teams rarely play like that... Maybe once out of every 40 times.
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,143

    PurpleJ said:

    Explain the conference records in BCS bowls.

    Explain these records from 1998 through 2011:

    SEC vs. PAC-12 regular season: 10-12

    SEC vs. PAC-12 bowl games: 1-0

    SEC vs. Big 12 regular season: 6-10

    SEC vs. Big 12 bowl games: 21-8

    SEC vs. ACC regular season: 42-36

    SEC vs. ACC bowl games: 16-9

    SEC vs. Big 10 regular season: 7-4

    SEC vs. Big 10 bowl games: 19-19

    SEC vs. Big East regular season: 16-15

    SEC vs. Big East bowl game: 3-8

    BOOM
    Good stuff Billy. They have had dominant teams at the top, but after the top 2-3, the conference is no different from any other. Every year teams like South Carolina, Georgia, Texas A&M, Ole Miss, and whatever other team backs into a 9-4 season get overrated. I've never seen a team get as lucky as Auburn did last year and Missouri making the SEC title game last year spoke volumes.

    Alabama will always be great with Saban, LSU is always one of the most talented teams, and Florida was great under Urban Meyer. Auburn might be able to get into the conversation with Malzahn. The rest of the teams pretty much suck.
    Other than Seattle and San Francisco, the NFC West was just like every other NFL division last year.

    It's the top end of the SEC that makes the difference. We all know the bottom half sucks, but no one cares.
    No, all four teams in the NFC West were good. Arizona went 10-6. That wins the division in some other divisions.

    I don't agree with PLSS or Billy. I think and have always said the SEC has been the best conference in recent years. Bill's numbers show that it's not as great as Purple J thinks either. The answer is in the middle.
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club

    PurpleJ said:

    Explain the conference records in BCS bowls.

    Explain these records from 1998 through 2011:

    SEC vs. PAC-12 regular season: 10-12

    SEC vs. PAC-12 bowl games: 1-0

    SEC vs. Big 12 regular season: 6-10

    SEC vs. Big 12 bowl games: 21-8

    SEC vs. ACC regular season: 42-36

    SEC vs. ACC bowl games: 16-9

    SEC vs. Big 10 regular season: 7-4

    SEC vs. Big 10 bowl games: 19-19

    SEC vs. Big East regular season: 16-15

    SEC vs. Big East bowl game: 3-8

    BOOM
    Good stuff Billy. They have had dominant teams at the top, but after the top 2-3, the conference is no different from any other. Every year teams like South Carolina, Georgia, Texas A&M, Ole Miss, and whatever other team backs into a 9-4 season get overrated. I've never seen a team get as lucky as Auburn did last year and Missouri making the SEC title game last year spoke volumes.

    Alabama will always be great with Saban, LSU is always one of the most talented teams, and Florida was great under Urban Meyer. Auburn might be able to get into the conversation with Malzahn. The rest of the teams pretty much suck.
    Other than Seattle and San Francisco, the NFC West was just like every other NFL division last year.

    It's the top end of the SEC that makes the difference. We all know the bottom half sucks, but no one cares.
    No, all four teams in the NFC West were good. Arizona went 10-6. That wins the division in some other divisions.

    I don't agree with PLSS or Billy. I think and have always said the SEC has been the best conference in recent years. Bill's numbers show that it's not as great as Purple J thinks either. The answer is in the middle.
    Obviously I've been going wayyyyy over the top to fuck with certain poasters. HTH
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 25,659 Standard Supporter
    PurpleJ said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Explain the conference records in BCS bowls.

    Explain these records from 1998 through 2011:

    SEC vs. PAC-12 regular season: 10-12

    SEC vs. PAC-12 bowl games: 1-0

    SEC vs. Big 12 regular season: 6-10

    SEC vs. Big 12 bowl games: 21-8

    SEC vs. ACC regular season: 42-36

    SEC vs. ACC bowl games: 16-9

    SEC vs. Big 10 regular season: 7-4

    SEC vs. Big 10 bowl games: 19-19

    SEC vs. Big East regular season: 16-15

    SEC vs. Big East bowl game: 3-8

    BOOM
    Good stuff Billy. They have had dominant teams at the top, but after the top 2-3, the conference is no different from any other. Every year teams like South Carolina, Georgia, Texas A&M, Ole Miss, and whatever other team backs into a 9-4 season get overrated. I've never seen a team get as lucky as Auburn did last year and Missouri making the SEC title game last year spoke volumes.

    Alabama will always be great with Saban, LSU is always one of the most talented teams, and Florida was great under Urban Meyer. Auburn might be able to get into the conversation with Malzahn. The rest of the teams pretty much suck.
    Other than Seattle and San Francisco, the NFC West was just like every other NFL division last year.

    It's the top end of the SEC that makes the difference. We all know the bottom half sucks, but no one cares.
    No, all four teams in the NFC West were good. Arizona went 10-6. That wins the division in some other divisions.

    I don't agree with PLSS or Billy. I think and have always said the SEC has been the best conference in recent years. Bill's numbers show that it's not as great as Purple J thinks either. The answer is in the middle.
    Obviously I've been going wayyyyy over the top to fuck with certain poasters. HTH
    Things people say when they get owned in arguments
  • EsophagealFeces
    EsophagealFeces Member Posts: 13,167

    PurpleJ said:

    Explain the conference records in BCS bowls.

    Explain these records from 1998 through 2011:

    SEC vs. PAC-12 regular season: 10-12

    SEC vs. PAC-12 bowl games: 1-0

    SEC vs. Big 12 regular season: 6-10

    SEC vs. Big 12 bowl games: 21-8

    SEC vs. ACC regular season: 42-36

    SEC vs. ACC bowl games: 16-9

    SEC vs. Big 10 regular season: 7-4

    SEC vs. Big 10 bowl games: 19-19

    SEC vs. Big East regular season: 16-15

    SEC vs. Big East bowl game: 3-8

    BOOM
    Good stuff Billy. They have had dominant teams at the top, but after the top 2-3, the conference is no different from any other. Every year teams like South Carolina, Georgia, Texas A&M, Ole Miss, and whatever other team backs into a 9-4 season get overrated. I've never seen a team get as lucky as Auburn did last year and Missouri making the SEC title game last year spoke volumes.

    Alabama will always be great with Saban, LSU is always one of the most talented teams, and Florida was great under Urban Meyer. Auburn might be able to get into the conversation with Malzahn. The rest of the teams pretty much suck.
    Other than Seattle and San Francisco, the NFC West was just like every other NFL division last year.

    It's the top end of the SEC that makes the difference. We all know the bottom half sucks, but no one cares.
    Disagree. You're discounting how good the Cardinals are. They would have won the NFC North and had a shot at the East and South. The Rams were dreck on offense, but their defense is outstanding. The NFL-NCAA comparison doesn't really work there because conference play is 9/12 of your games in college, but only 6/16 in the NFL. The strength of your division/conference makes a bigger difference in college than the NFL, good or bad.
    Holy crap Tequilla, you took that Sarkasm way too seriously.
    I missed that you bolded part of the poast you responded to, so I missed the Sarkasm. I have to give myself credit, I made a very good argument on why water is wet.
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club

    PurpleJ said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Explain the conference records in BCS bowls.

    Explain these records from 1998 through 2011:

    SEC vs. PAC-12 regular season: 10-12

    SEC vs. PAC-12 bowl games: 1-0

    SEC vs. Big 12 regular season: 6-10

    SEC vs. Big 12 bowl games: 21-8

    SEC vs. ACC regular season: 42-36

    SEC vs. ACC bowl games: 16-9

    SEC vs. Big 10 regular season: 7-4

    SEC vs. Big 10 bowl games: 19-19

    SEC vs. Big East regular season: 16-15

    SEC vs. Big East bowl game: 3-8

    BOOM
    Good stuff Billy. They have had dominant teams at the top, but after the top 2-3, the conference is no different from any other. Every year teams like South Carolina, Georgia, Texas A&M, Ole Miss, and whatever other team backs into a 9-4 season get overrated. I've never seen a team get as lucky as Auburn did last year and Missouri making the SEC title game last year spoke volumes.

    Alabama will always be great with Saban, LSU is always one of the most talented teams, and Florida was great under Urban Meyer. Auburn might be able to get into the conversation with Malzahn. The rest of the teams pretty much suck.
    Other than Seattle and San Francisco, the NFC West was just like every other NFL division last year.

    It's the top end of the SEC that makes the difference. We all know the bottom half sucks, but no one cares.
    No, all four teams in the NFC West were good. Arizona went 10-6. That wins the division in some other divisions.

    I don't agree with PLSS or Billy. I think and have always said the SEC has been the best conference in recent years. Bill's numbers show that it's not as great as Purple J thinks either. The answer is in the middle.
    Obviously I've been going wayyyyy over the top to fuck with certain poasters. HTH
    Things people say when they get owned in arguments
    Top tier of SEC > Top tier of every other conference

    The top to bottom argument is for losers. The only thing that matters is winning championships, and it's embarrassing that you still don't get it.
  • no_uh
    no_uh Member Posts: 769
    edited August 2014

    PurpleJ said:

    Explain the conference records in BCS bowls.

    Explain these records from 1998 through 2011:

    SEC vs. PAC-12 regular season: 10-12

    SEC vs. PAC-12 bowl games: 1-0

    SEC vs. Big 12 regular season: 6-10

    SEC vs. Big 12 bowl games: 21-8

    SEC vs. ACC regular season: 42-36

    SEC vs. ACC bowl games: 16-9

    SEC vs. Big 10 regular season: 7-4

    SEC vs. Big 10 bowl games: 19-19

    SEC vs. Big East regular season: 16-15

    SEC vs. Big East bowl game: 3-8

    BOOM
    QUIT LIVING IN THE PAST!!!!!
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,067 Founders Club
    Football stopped in 2011