Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
State media
Comments
-
If only C. Wallace were willing to give Hannity his debate questions so he could slip them to Trump. Hannity isn't a "journalist" he states that regularly. The campaign contributions from actual journalists in 2016 went 96% to Clinton. I'm sure they never wrote a favorable story fed to them by her campaign. "But Hannity took direct orders." Yup, just like the Clinton campaign knowing which "journalists" will give them favorable coverage and feeding them their talking points. Only a moron like you Dazzler would find this shocking. Putin Stooge.
-
How many years in a row now have we seen Presidential debate "moderators" who completely in the tank for the Rat party candidate? Fuck off Dazzler.
-
So CNN, MSLSD, the New York Times and Washington Post shilled/shill for the dem White House and Congress, but Hannity is the problem. Hannity's track record is a lot better than the aforementioned. He for one didn't swallow like a $5 hooker the Russian collusion lies or that the chicom crud was a natural mutation and came from some unknown animal.HHusky said: -
Only Dazzler would not see the irony of this thread. Good grief.
-
How many of the current "journalists" are "former" Rat party operatives? George Stephanopoulos, Chuck Todd, Jake Tapper, that's just off the top of my head I know there are a bunch more.WestlinnDuck said:
So CNN, MSLSD, the New York Times and Washington Post shilled/shill for the dem White House and Congress, but Hannity is the problem. Hannity's track record is a lot better than the aforementioned. He for one didn't swallow like a $5 hooker the Russian collusion lies or that the chicom crud was a natural mutation and came from some unknown animal.HHusky said: -
Just think of all the Russian collusion criminals that got gigs with the Fake News.SFGbob said:
How many of the current "journalists" are "former" Rat party operatives? George Stephanopoulos, Chuck Todd, Jake Tapper, that's just off the top of my head I know there are a bunch more.WestlinnDuck said:
So CNN, MSLSD, the New York Times and Washington Post shilled/shill for the dem White House and Congress, but Hannity is the problem. Hannity's track record is a lot better than the aforementioned. He for one didn't swallow like a $5 hooker the Russian collusion lies or that the chicom crud was a natural mutation and came from some unknown animal.HHusky said: -
I for sure blame the republicans on allowing Chris Wallace to be the "right wing" rep. Fucking ridiculous lol. You basically deserve to lose after that one
-
Zzzzzzzzzzzz
😴 -
-
Hannity openly proclaims that he's not a journalist. He's not even a registered republican in NY. The corrupt news orgs like MSNBC and CNN in particular claim to be non-partisan real news orgs. That's why their on air personalities cried when Obama and Trump were elected, for different reason of course.WestlinnDuck said:
So CNN, MSLSD, the New York Times and Washington Post shilled/shill for the dem White House and Congress, but Hannity is the problem. Hannity's track record is a lot better than the aforementioned. He for one didn't swallow like a $5 hooker the Russian collusion lies or that the chicom crud was a natural mutation and came from some unknown animal.HHusky said: -
-
Hannity is a mouthpiece, this is known.
-
Apparently Dazzler was unaware.GrundleStiltzkin said:Hannity is a mouthpiece, this is known.
-
-
Selective and partisan outrage is the best kindSFGbob said:I await the Dazzler's OUTRAGE
-
Apparently Dazzler was unaware.GrundleStiltzkin said:Hannity is a mouthpiece, this is known.
Devin Nunes said that as soon as their committee would take a break, you could turn on CNN and learn about what had gone on. It was Schiff leaking and everyone knew it.hardhat said:
Selective and partisan outrage is the best kindSFGbob said:I await the Dazzler's OUTRAGE
-
And you don't think the left doesn't ? They all parrot the same talking pointsHHusky said:
