Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Danimal....

13

Comments

  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,566
    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    flatus said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    If this Oregon ship goes down this Dillingham clown is going to be fun to laugh at.

    Chip Kelly has ruined Oregon after his first game

    The lucky ducks will probably do it again
    The Boise debacle was his first game. That night I said, "we hired the wrong F'n guy." Then a few weeks later he dismantled No. 6 Cal. It would be game 7 against No. 5 SC in Autzen where he sent Pete packing to Seattle after a Halloween night slaughter.
    That SC game was one of the most exhilarating in my Duck football memory.
    I hear the Montana game was equally exhilarating for gHaie.
    It's funny to me that you're too stupid to even understand that situation.

    You know how hard it would be to fire Jimmy if he wins that game 7-0 or some dumb shit?

    Quooks love to celebrate 70-21 as the moment that got Helfrich fired but bring up the Montana game as a victory to them. They needed Yimmy to squeak that game out as well as the beavlet game.

    While they struggle with Stoney Brook and barely beat Fresno at home (another ironic quookism)

    This is the problem with stupid people. They aren't aware that they're stupid.

    What do you do for a living in Battle ground again?
    If Jimmy hadn’t gone Woody Hayes on his own player, he’d have another year to turn things around.
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,422 Founders Club

    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    flatus said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    If this Oregon ship goes down this Dillingham clown is going to be fun to laugh at.

    Chip Kelly has ruined Oregon after his first game

    The lucky ducks will probably do it again
    The Boise debacle was his first game. That night I said, "we hired the wrong F'n guy." Then a few weeks later he dismantled No. 6 Cal. It would be game 7 against No. 5 SC in Autzen where he sent Pete packing to Seattle after a Halloween night slaughter.
    That SC game was one of the most exhilarating in my Duck football memory.
    I hear the Montana game was equally exhilarating for gHaie.
    It's funny to me that you're too stupid to even understand that situation.

    You know how hard it would be to fire Jimmy if he wins that game 7-0 or some dumb shit?

    Quooks love to celebrate 70-21 as the moment that got Helfrich fired but bring up the Montana game as a victory to them. They needed Yimmy to squeak that game out as well as the beavlet game.

    While they struggle with Stoney Brook and barely beat Fresno at home (another ironic quookism)

    This is the problem with stupid people. They aren't aware that they're stupid.

    What do you do for a living in Battle ground again?
    If Jimmy hadn’t gone Woody Hayes on his own player, he’d have another year to turn things around.
    He shoved a player. They couldn't even get out of his buyout.

    They didn't fire him the next Sunday because he wouldn't promise to never shove a player again.
  • trublue
    trublue Member Posts: 3,042
    The second paragraph makes absolutely no sense.

    Drinking at 10:40 a.m., 4-Win Gaie?
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,422 Founders Club
    trublue said:

    The second paragraph makes absolutely no sense.

    Drinking at 10:40 a.m., 4-Win Gaie?

    Paragraph? Holy fuck you are dumb.
  • trublue
    trublue Member Posts: 3,042
    edited April 2022
    3 sentences. Those are two short paragraphs. The three sentences run consecutively would be one paragraph. You’re the genius that separated them.

    Stick to STEM, Ghaie.

    I don’t speak gibberish. Try explaining in English what you were trying to convey when you posted this: “They didn’t fire him the next Sunday because he wouldn’t promise to never shove a player again.”

    How about a link to what you meant to say?
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,422 Founders Club
    edited April 2022
    trublue said:

    3 sentences. Those are two short paragraphs. The three sentences run consecutively would be one paragraph. You’re the genius that separated them.

    Stick to STEM, Ghaie.

    I don’t speak gibberish. Try explaining in English what you were trying to convey when you posted this: “They didn’t fire him the next Sunday because he wouldn’t promise to never shove a player again.”

    How about a link to what you meant to say?

    You and pinkQuook are so fucking lost, and it's obvious when everything turns into page after page of gibberish.

    The meeting they had with him the following Sunday was to serve up an ultimatum to do a 180 on pretty much every aspect of the program. The 1980's NFL offense, being a dickhead to recruits and coaches, the entire philosophy of his program. He obviously told them to fuck off.

    This story that he was fired for shoving a player as the only catalyst and that he would be back is bullshit. They knew they couldn't afford to give Ty a 4th year this time with covid hurting their cash flow.
  • trublue
    trublue Member Posts: 3,042
    “They didn’t fire him the next Sunday because he wouldn’t promise to never shove a player again.”

    Genius.
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,422 Founders Club
    trublue said:

    “They didn’t fire him the next Sunday because he wouldn’t promise to never shove a player again.”

    Genius.

    That's the narrative. That they fired him because he was supposed to apologize for "hitting" a player, and promise not to put his hands on them anymore. It's not true.

    They just get him to apologize, give the kid a scholarship, and get at least a third year to not burn the money because UW optics if it was just about that.
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    haie said:

    trublue said:

    3 sentences. Those are two short paragraphs. The three sentences run consecutively would be one paragraph. You’re the genius that separated them.

    Stick to STEM, Ghaie.

    I don’t speak gibberish. Try explaining in English what you were trying to convey when you posted this: “They didn’t fire him the next Sunday because he wouldn’t promise to never shove a player again.”

    How about a link to what you meant to say?

    You and pinkQuook are so fucking lost, and it's obvious when everything turns into page after page of gibberish.

    The meeting they had with him the following Sunday was to serve up an ultimatum to do a 180 on pretty much every aspect of the program. The 1980's NFL offense, being a dickhead to recruits and coaches, the entire philosophy of his program. He obviously told them to fuck off.

    This story that he was fired for shoving a player as the only catalyst and that he would be back is bullshit. They knew they couldn't afford to give Ty a 4th year this time with covid hurting their cash flow.
    Come watch Gaie struggle. Lol.
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    haie said:

    trublue said:

    “They didn’t fire him the next Sunday because he wouldn’t promise to never shove a player again.”

    Genius.

    That's the narrative. That they fired him because he was supposed to apologize for "hitting" a player, and promise not to put his hands on them anymore. It's not true.

    They just get him to apologize, give the kid a scholarship, and get at least a third year to not burn the money because UW optics if it was just about that.
    OK Aspie!