Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Michigan Kidnapping case blows up in the Government's face
Comments
-
Being enticed into a plot planned by the FBI?HHusky said:
You do know an entrapment defense means they admit they did what they were accused of, right?UW_Doog_Bot said:In other words, H believes they are guilty despite being acquitted.
You know, in contrast to the burden of evidence he desires for the Biden corruption case.
Is that where you want to go with this? Think hard about it now. -
The Governor was never kidnapped you lying speed limit IQ pedophile apologist. The FBI came up with the idea, these morons said they didn’t want to proceed, the FBI pushed the idea anyway and then arrested these schmoes for the FBI’s idea.HHusky said:
"Entrapment" means you did it. Whether allowing people to excuse their crimes on the basis that someone talked them into committing said crimes is a good or a bad thing is a philosophical debate.TurdBomber said:
In other words, H still believes they're guilty and it wasn't a load of shit from the get-go. Got it.HHusky said:OJ was acquitted.
It's okay for the jury to say it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they were guilty.
That's our system.
Keep lying.
in criminal law, the act of law enforcement officers or government agents to induce or encourage a person to commit a crime when the potential criminal expresses a desire not to go ahead. The key to entrapment is whether the idea for the commission or encouragement of the criminal act originated with the police or government agents instead of with the "criminal."
-
The FBI came up with the plan, provided the money, equipment, and the personnel to carry out the plan that they had hatched. The people they had entrapped were pathetic losers who liked smoking dope and running their mouths. One of the "terrorists" lived in the basement of a vacuum cleaner store and had to use the bathroom at the Mexican restaurant next door every time he needed to take a dump. The only reason the left isn't OUTRAGED over what the government did to these guys is because they're white. If they had done this to BLM members Dazzler would be screaming.HoustonHusky said:
The Governor was never kidnapped you lying speed limit IQ pedophile apologist. The FBI came up with the idea, these morons said they didn’t want to proceed, the FBI pushed the idea anyway and then arrested these schmoes for the FBI’s idea.HHusky said:
"Entrapment" means you did it. Whether allowing people to excuse their crimes on the basis that someone talked them into committing said crimes is a good or a bad thing is a philosophical debate.TurdBomber said:
In other words, H still believes they're guilty and it wasn't a load of shit from the get-go. Got it.HHusky said:OJ was acquitted.
It's okay for the jury to say it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they were guilty.
That's our system.
Keep lying.
in criminal law, the act of law enforcement officers or government agents to induce or encourage a person to commit a crime when the potential criminal expresses a desire not to go ahead. The key to entrapment is whether the idea for the commission or encouragement of the criminal act originated with the police or government agents instead of with the "criminal." -
pathetic losers = Daddy's baseSFGbob said:
The FBI came up with the plan, provided the money, equipment, and the personnel to carry out the plan that they had hatched. The people they had entrapped were pathetic losers who liked smoking dope and running their mouths. One of the "terrorists" lived in the basement of a vacuum cleaner store and had to use the bathroom at the Mexican restaurant next door every time he needed to take a dump. The only reason the left isn't OUTRAGED over what the government did to these guys is because they're white. If they had done this to BLM members Dazzler would be screaming.HoustonHusky said:
The Governor was never kidnapped you lying speed limit IQ pedophile apologist. The FBI came up with the idea, these morons said they didn’t want to proceed, the FBI pushed the idea anyway and then arrested these schmoes for the FBI’s idea.HHusky said:
"Entrapment" means you did it. Whether allowing people to excuse their crimes on the basis that someone talked them into committing said crimes is a good or a bad thing is a philosophical debate.TurdBomber said:
In other words, H still believes they're guilty and it wasn't a load of shit from the get-go. Got it.HHusky said:OJ was acquitted.
It's okay for the jury to say it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they were guilty.
That's our system.
Keep lying.
in criminal law, the act of law enforcement officers or government agents to induce or encourage a person to commit a crime when the potential criminal expresses a desire not to go ahead. The key to entrapment is whether the idea for the commission or encouragement of the criminal act originated with the police or government agents instead of with the "criminal."
I still have no problem with the verdict, but I think you girls seizing on every reasonable doubt as an affirmative finding in favor of these pathetic losers, as we agree they are, takes it way too far.
And suggesting that I have some allegiance to BLM is your patented dishonesty at work. -
Entrapment is a situation where a "normally law abiding person” is induced to commit a crime that he/she otherwise would not have committed.HHusky said:
So you endorse a defense which was rejected prior to the 20th Century.WestlinnDuck said:
Unlike the fascist blue governors and the dementia patient that aren't playing in the woods but are actively destroying American lives. Playing in the woods isnt' costing me a dime unlike your fascist base.HHusky said:
It is the law, for the most part, today. It has not been the law for most of this country's history. It is very much a philosophical debate whether and when the defense should apply. Your suggestion to the contrary hints at your mental decline.WestlinnDuck said:
It isn't a "philosophical debate". It's called the law, and the debate occurred a long-time ago and if you want to allow the government to entrap people, let us know. You approve of entrapment, the law does not. Feel to get entrapment approved as an appropriate use of government resources. Scratch a leftist, find a fascist.HHusky said:
"Entrapment" means you did it. Whether allowing people to excuse their crimes on the basis that someone talked them into committing said crimes is a good or a bad thing is a philosophical debate.TurdBomber said:
In other words, H still believes they're guilty and it wasn't a load of shit from the get-go. Got it.HHusky said:OJ was acquitted.
It's okay for the jury to say it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they were guilty.
That's our system.
But your sympathies for mouth breathing militia types who play soldier and plot felonies in the woods is noted.
I have no problem with the verdict. The suggestible creatures acquitted are your base.
It's like you see a living, breathing Constitution or something. -
Like Eve.Sledog said:
Entrapment is a situation where a "normally law abiding person” is induced to commit a crime that he/she otherwise would not have committed.HHusky said:
So you endorse a defense which was rejected prior to the 20th Century.WestlinnDuck said:
Unlike the fascist blue governors and the dementia patient that aren't playing in the woods but are actively destroying American lives. Playing in the woods isnt' costing me a dime unlike your fascist base.HHusky said:
It is the law, for the most part, today. It has not been the law for most of this country's history. It is very much a philosophical debate whether and when the defense should apply. Your suggestion to the contrary hints at your mental decline.WestlinnDuck said:
It isn't a "philosophical debate". It's called the law, and the debate occurred a long-time ago and if you want to allow the government to entrap people, let us know. You approve of entrapment, the law does not. Feel to get entrapment approved as an appropriate use of government resources. Scratch a leftist, find a fascist.HHusky said:
"Entrapment" means you did it. Whether allowing people to excuse their crimes on the basis that someone talked them into committing said crimes is a good or a bad thing is a philosophical debate.TurdBomber said:
In other words, H still believes they're guilty and it wasn't a load of shit from the get-go. Got it.HHusky said:OJ was acquitted.
It's okay for the jury to say it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they were guilty.
That's our system.
But your sympathies for mouth breathing militia types who play soldier and plot felonies in the woods is noted.
I have no problem with the verdict. The suggestible creatures acquitted are your base.
It's like you see a living, breathing Constitution or something. -
But trust him, he'd never pad his legal bills. Wouldn't be ethical.HHusky said:
pathetic losers = Daddy's baseSFGbob said:
The FBI came up with the plan, provided the money, equipment, and the personnel to carry out the plan that they had hatched. The people they had entrapped were pathetic losers who liked smoking dope and running their mouths. One of the "terrorists" lived in the basement of a vacuum cleaner store and had to use the bathroom at the Mexican restaurant next door every time he needed to take a dump. The only reason the left isn't OUTRAGED over what the government did to these guys is because they're white. If they had done this to BLM members Dazzler would be screaming.HoustonHusky said:
The Governor was never kidnapped you lying speed limit IQ pedophile apologist. The FBI came up with the idea, these morons said they didn’t want to proceed, the FBI pushed the idea anyway and then arrested these schmoes for the FBI’s idea.HHusky said:
"Entrapment" means you did it. Whether allowing people to excuse their crimes on the basis that someone talked them into committing said crimes is a good or a bad thing is a philosophical debate.TurdBomber said:
In other words, H still believes they're guilty and it wasn't a load of shit from the get-go. Got it.HHusky said:OJ was acquitted.
It's okay for the jury to say it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they were guilty.
That's our system.
Keep lying.
in criminal law, the act of law enforcement officers or government agents to induce or encourage a person to commit a crime when the potential criminal expresses a desire not to go ahead. The key to entrapment is whether the idea for the commission or encouragement of the criminal act originated with the police or government agents instead of with the "criminal."
I still have no problem with the verdict, but I think you girls seizing on every reasonable doubt as an affirmative finding in favor of these pathetic losers, as we agree they are, takes it way too far.
And suggesting that I have some allegiance to BLM is your patented dishonesty at work. -
No like waving them in to the capitol.HHusky said:
Like Eve.Sledog said:
Entrapment is a situation where a "normally law abiding person” is induced to commit a crime that he/she otherwise would not have committed.HHusky said:
So you endorse a defense which was rejected prior to the 20th Century.WestlinnDuck said:
Unlike the fascist blue governors and the dementia patient that aren't playing in the woods but are actively destroying American lives. Playing in the woods isnt' costing me a dime unlike your fascist base.HHusky said:
It is the law, for the most part, today. It has not been the law for most of this country's history. It is very much a philosophical debate whether and when the defense should apply. Your suggestion to the contrary hints at your mental decline.WestlinnDuck said:
It isn't a "philosophical debate". It's called the law, and the debate occurred a long-time ago and if you want to allow the government to entrap people, let us know. You approve of entrapment, the law does not. Feel to get entrapment approved as an appropriate use of government resources. Scratch a leftist, find a fascist.HHusky said:
"Entrapment" means you did it. Whether allowing people to excuse their crimes on the basis that someone talked them into committing said crimes is a good or a bad thing is a philosophical debate.TurdBomber said:
In other words, H still believes they're guilty and it wasn't a load of shit from the get-go. Got it.HHusky said:OJ was acquitted.
It's okay for the jury to say it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they were guilty.
That's our system.
But your sympathies for mouth breathing militia types who play soldier and plot felonies in the woods is noted.
I have no problem with the verdict. The suggestible creatures acquitted are your base.
It's like you see a living, breathing Constitution or something. -
Yeah, riiiigghhht.Sledog said:
No like waving them in to the capitol.HHusky said:
Like Eve.Sledog said:
Entrapment is a situation where a "normally law abiding person” is induced to commit a crime that he/she otherwise would not have committed.HHusky said:
So you endorse a defense which was rejected prior to the 20th Century.WestlinnDuck said:
Unlike the fascist blue governors and the dementia patient that aren't playing in the woods but are actively destroying American lives. Playing in the woods isnt' costing me a dime unlike your fascist base.HHusky said:
It is the law, for the most part, today. It has not been the law for most of this country's history. It is very much a philosophical debate whether and when the defense should apply. Your suggestion to the contrary hints at your mental decline.WestlinnDuck said:
It isn't a "philosophical debate". It's called the law, and the debate occurred a long-time ago and if you want to allow the government to entrap people, let us know. You approve of entrapment, the law does not. Feel to get entrapment approved as an appropriate use of government resources. Scratch a leftist, find a fascist.HHusky said:
"Entrapment" means you did it. Whether allowing people to excuse their crimes on the basis that someone talked them into committing said crimes is a good or a bad thing is a philosophical debate.TurdBomber said:
In other words, H still believes they're guilty and it wasn't a load of shit from the get-go. Got it.HHusky said:OJ was acquitted.
It's okay for the jury to say it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they were guilty.
That's our system.
But your sympathies for mouth breathing militia types who play soldier and plot felonies in the woods is noted.
I have no problem with the verdict. The suggestible creatures acquitted are your base.
It's like you see a living, breathing Constitution or something.
-
Yeah right!
https://nypost.com/2021/01/07/capitol-police-hold-door-for-pro-trump-protesters-video-shows/
Oh and let me know who unlocked the magnetically sealed doors. Special high tech shit didn't unlock itself! -
A Capitol Police officer was seen politely holding the door for the pro-President Trump protesters to walk out of the building after they caused mayhem that forced lawmakers to barricade themselves inside.Sledog said:Yeah right!
https://nypost.com/2021/01/07/capitol-police-hold-door-for-pro-trump-protesters-video-shows/
Oh and let me know who unlocked the magnetically sealed doors. Special high tech shit didn't unlock itself!
That's not entrapment, dumbshit.
-
So you have no problem with the FBI planning false flags, got it.HHusky said:
pathetic losers = Daddy's baseSFGbob said:
The FBI came up with the plan, provided the money, equipment, and the personnel to carry out the plan that they had hatched. The people they had entrapped were pathetic losers who liked smoking dope and running their mouths. One of the "terrorists" lived in the basement of a vacuum cleaner store and had to use the bathroom at the Mexican restaurant next door every time he needed to take a dump. The only reason the left isn't OUTRAGED over what the government did to these guys is because they're white. If they had done this to BLM members Dazzler would be screaming.HoustonHusky said:
The Governor was never kidnapped you lying speed limit IQ pedophile apologist. The FBI came up with the idea, these morons said they didn’t want to proceed, the FBI pushed the idea anyway and then arrested these schmoes for the FBI’s idea.HHusky said:
"Entrapment" means you did it. Whether allowing people to excuse their crimes on the basis that someone talked them into committing said crimes is a good or a bad thing is a philosophical debate.TurdBomber said:
In other words, H still believes they're guilty and it wasn't a load of shit from the get-go. Got it.HHusky said:OJ was acquitted.
It's okay for the jury to say it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they were guilty.
That's our system.
Keep lying.
in criminal law, the act of law enforcement officers or government agents to induce or encourage a person to commit a crime when the potential criminal expresses a desire not to go ahead. The key to entrapment is whether the idea for the commission or encouragement of the criminal act originated with the police or government agents instead of with the "criminal."
I still have no problem with the verdict, but I think you girls seizing on every reasonable doubt as an affirmative finding in favor of these pathetic losers, as we agree they are, takes it way too far.
And suggesting that I have some allegiance to BLM is your patented dishonesty at work.
Pathetic out in the woods losers are a threat to democracy!
Institutional state power conducting false flags is DEFENDING DEMOCRACY!
This is why the dazzler didn't want to respond to me. -
The reasonable doubt about whether the FBI was too involved is not a finding that the FBI is "planning false flags". You're getting hysterical, Madam. If the jury had so found, all defendants would have been acquitted.UW_Doog_Bot said:
So you have no problem with the FBI planning false flags, got it.HHusky said:
pathetic losers = Daddy's baseSFGbob said:
The FBI came up with the plan, provided the money, equipment, and the personnel to carry out the plan that they had hatched. The people they had entrapped were pathetic losers who liked smoking dope and running their mouths. One of the "terrorists" lived in the basement of a vacuum cleaner store and had to use the bathroom at the Mexican restaurant next door every time he needed to take a dump. The only reason the left isn't OUTRAGED over what the government did to these guys is because they're white. If they had done this to BLM members Dazzler would be screaming.HoustonHusky said:
The Governor was never kidnapped you lying speed limit IQ pedophile apologist. The FBI came up with the idea, these morons said they didn’t want to proceed, the FBI pushed the idea anyway and then arrested these schmoes for the FBI’s idea.HHusky said:
"Entrapment" means you did it. Whether allowing people to excuse their crimes on the basis that someone talked them into committing said crimes is a good or a bad thing is a philosophical debate.TurdBomber said:
In other words, H still believes they're guilty and it wasn't a load of shit from the get-go. Got it.HHusky said:OJ was acquitted.
It's okay for the jury to say it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they were guilty.
That's our system.
Keep lying.
in criminal law, the act of law enforcement officers or government agents to induce or encourage a person to commit a crime when the potential criminal expresses a desire not to go ahead. The key to entrapment is whether the idea for the commission or encouragement of the criminal act originated with the police or government agents instead of with the "criminal."
I still have no problem with the verdict, but I think you girls seizing on every reasonable doubt as an affirmative finding in favor of these pathetic losers, as we agree they are, takes it way too far.
And suggesting that I have some allegiance to BLM is your patented dishonesty at work.
Pathetic out in the woods losers are a threat to democracy!
Institutional state power conducting false flags is DEFENDING DEMOCRACY!
This is why the dazzler didn't want to respond to me. -
Now we care about reasonable doubt? Interesting.HHusky said:
The reasonable doubt about whether the FBI was too involved is not a finding that the FBI is "planning false flags". You're getting hysterical, Madam. If the jury had so found, all defendants would have been acquitted.UW_Doog_Bot said:
So you have no problem with the FBI planning false flags, got it.HHusky said:
pathetic losers = Daddy's baseSFGbob said:
The FBI came up with the plan, provided the money, equipment, and the personnel to carry out the plan that they had hatched. The people they had entrapped were pathetic losers who liked smoking dope and running their mouths. One of the "terrorists" lived in the basement of a vacuum cleaner store and had to use the bathroom at the Mexican restaurant next door every time he needed to take a dump. The only reason the left isn't OUTRAGED over what the government did to these guys is because they're white. If they had done this to BLM members Dazzler would be screaming.HoustonHusky said:
The Governor was never kidnapped you lying speed limit IQ pedophile apologist. The FBI came up with the idea, these morons said they didn’t want to proceed, the FBI pushed the idea anyway and then arrested these schmoes for the FBI’s idea.HHusky said:
"Entrapment" means you did it. Whether allowing people to excuse their crimes on the basis that someone talked them into committing said crimes is a good or a bad thing is a philosophical debate.TurdBomber said:
In other words, H still believes they're guilty and it wasn't a load of shit from the get-go. Got it.HHusky said:OJ was acquitted.
It's okay for the jury to say it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they were guilty.
That's our system.
Keep lying.
in criminal law, the act of law enforcement officers or government agents to induce or encourage a person to commit a crime when the potential criminal expresses a desire not to go ahead. The key to entrapment is whether the idea for the commission or encouragement of the criminal act originated with the police or government agents instead of with the "criminal."
I still have no problem with the verdict, but I think you girls seizing on every reasonable doubt as an affirmative finding in favor of these pathetic losers, as we agree they are, takes it way too far.
And suggesting that I have some allegiance to BLM is your patented dishonesty at work.
Pathetic out in the woods losers are a threat to democracy!
Institutional state power conducting false flags is DEFENDING DEMOCRACY!
This is why the dazzler didn't want to respond to me.
Tell me again how the entrapment defense works councilor. -
Wasn't someone just complaining about non-responsiveness?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Now we care about reasonable doubt? Interesting.HHusky said:
The reasonable doubt about whether the FBI was too involved is not a finding that the FBI is "planning false flags". You're getting hysterical, Madam. If the jury had so found, all defendants would have been acquitted.UW_Doog_Bot said:
So you have no problem with the FBI planning false flags, got it.HHusky said:
pathetic losers = Daddy's baseSFGbob said:
The FBI came up with the plan, provided the money, equipment, and the personnel to carry out the plan that they had hatched. The people they had entrapped were pathetic losers who liked smoking dope and running their mouths. One of the "terrorists" lived in the basement of a vacuum cleaner store and had to use the bathroom at the Mexican restaurant next door every time he needed to take a dump. The only reason the left isn't OUTRAGED over what the government did to these guys is because they're white. If they had done this to BLM members Dazzler would be screaming.HoustonHusky said:
The Governor was never kidnapped you lying speed limit IQ pedophile apologist. The FBI came up with the idea, these morons said they didn’t want to proceed, the FBI pushed the idea anyway and then arrested these schmoes for the FBI’s idea.HHusky said:
"Entrapment" means you did it. Whether allowing people to excuse their crimes on the basis that someone talked them into committing said crimes is a good or a bad thing is a philosophical debate.TurdBomber said:
In other words, H still believes they're guilty and it wasn't a load of shit from the get-go. Got it.HHusky said:OJ was acquitted.
It's okay for the jury to say it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they were guilty.
That's our system.
Keep lying.
in criminal law, the act of law enforcement officers or government agents to induce or encourage a person to commit a crime when the potential criminal expresses a desire not to go ahead. The key to entrapment is whether the idea for the commission or encouragement of the criminal act originated with the police or government agents instead of with the "criminal."
I still have no problem with the verdict, but I think you girls seizing on every reasonable doubt as an affirmative finding in favor of these pathetic losers, as we agree they are, takes it way too far.
And suggesting that I have some allegiance to BLM is your patented dishonesty at work.
Pathetic out in the woods losers are a threat to democracy!
Institutional state power conducting false flags is DEFENDING DEMOCRACY!
This is why the dazzler didn't want to respond to me.
Tell me again how the entrapment defense works councilor. -
Did you read the linked article from Buzzfeed? Just a rhetorical question. Of course you didn’t. STFU.HHusky said:
"Entrapment" means you did it. Whether allowing people to excuse their crimes on the basis that someone talked them into committing said crimes is a good or a bad thing is a philosophical debate.TurdBomber said:
In other words, H still believes they're guilty and it wasn't a load of shit from the get-go. Got it.HHusky said:OJ was acquitted.
It's okay for the jury to say it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they were guilty.
That's our system. -
Wrong link. Also answer me on who unlocked the megneticilly sealed doors and why are they withholding 14,000 hours of video from that day?HHusky said:
A Capitol Police officer was seen politely holding the door for the pro-President Trump protesters to walk out of the building after they caused mayhem that forced lawmakers to barricade themselves inside.Sledog said:Yeah right!
https://nypost.com/2021/01/07/capitol-police-hold-door-for-pro-trump-protesters-video-shows/
Oh and let me know who unlocked the magnetically sealed doors. Special high tech shit didn't unlock itself!
That's not entrapment, dumbshit.
https://rumble.com/vhcuax-capitol-hill-protesters-yelling-for-peaceful-protests-after-being-let-in.html -
FBI comes up with plot to kidnap governor.HHusky said:
Wasn't someone just complaining about non-responsiveness?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Now we care about reasonable doubt? Interesting.HHusky said:
The reasonable doubt about whether the FBI was too involved is not a finding that the FBI is "planning false flags". You're getting hysterical, Madam. If the jury had so found, all defendants would have been acquitted.UW_Doog_Bot said:
So you have no problem with the FBI planning false flags, got it.HHusky said:
pathetic losers = Daddy's baseSFGbob said:
The FBI came up with the plan, provided the money, equipment, and the personnel to carry out the plan that they had hatched. The people they had entrapped were pathetic losers who liked smoking dope and running their mouths. One of the "terrorists" lived in the basement of a vacuum cleaner store and had to use the bathroom at the Mexican restaurant next door every time he needed to take a dump. The only reason the left isn't OUTRAGED over what the government did to these guys is because they're white. If they had done this to BLM members Dazzler would be screaming.HoustonHusky said:
The Governor was never kidnapped you lying speed limit IQ pedophile apologist. The FBI came up with the idea, these morons said they didn’t want to proceed, the FBI pushed the idea anyway and then arrested these schmoes for the FBI’s idea.HHusky said:
"Entrapment" means you did it. Whether allowing people to excuse their crimes on the basis that someone talked them into committing said crimes is a good or a bad thing is a philosophical debate.TurdBomber said:
In other words, H still believes they're guilty and it wasn't a load of shit from the get-go. Got it.HHusky said:OJ was acquitted.
It's okay for the jury to say it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they were guilty.
That's our system.
Keep lying.
in criminal law, the act of law enforcement officers or government agents to induce or encourage a person to commit a crime when the potential criminal expresses a desire not to go ahead. The key to entrapment is whether the idea for the commission or encouragement of the criminal act originated with the police or government agents instead of with the "criminal."
I still have no problem with the verdict, but I think you girls seizing on every reasonable doubt as an affirmative finding in favor of these pathetic losers, as we agree they are, takes it way too far.
And suggesting that I have some allegiance to BLM is your patented dishonesty at work.
Pathetic out in the woods losers are a threat to democracy!
Institutional state power conducting false flags is DEFENDING DEMOCRACY!
This is why the dazzler didn't want to respond to me.
Tell me again how the entrapment defense works councilor.
FBI tries to convince yokels to go along with plot.
Mostly fails at it.
FBI then makes arrests and a big show in the media lies there asses off to run cover.
Yeah, we should all be concerned about the yokels in this equation. Sure.gif
J Edgar Hoover fan heard from. -
That doesn't show what you claimed. Obviously.Sledog said:
Wrong link. Also answer me on who unlocked the megneticilly sealed doors and why are they withholding 14,000 hours of video from that day?HHusky said:
A Capitol Police officer was seen politely holding the door for the pro-President Trump protesters to walk out of the building after they caused mayhem that forced lawmakers to barricade themselves inside.Sledog said:Yeah right!
https://nypost.com/2021/01/07/capitol-police-hold-door-for-pro-trump-protesters-video-shows/
Oh and let me know who unlocked the magnetically sealed doors. Special high tech shit didn't unlock itself!
That's not entrapment, dumbshit.
https://rumble.com/vhcuax-capitol-hill-protesters-yelling-for-peaceful-protests-after-being-let-in.html -
There's good reason to believe that the FBI was doing this in order to generate the negative headlines regarding Trump right before the election. Remember the reporting on this story when it first broke.UW_Doog_Bot said:
FBI comes up with plot to kidnap governor.HHusky said:
Wasn't someone just complaining about non-responsiveness?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Now we care about reasonable doubt? Interesting.HHusky said:
The reasonable doubt about whether the FBI was too involved is not a finding that the FBI is "planning false flags". You're getting hysterical, Madam. If the jury had so found, all defendants would have been acquitted.UW_Doog_Bot said:
So you have no problem with the FBI planning false flags, got it.HHusky said:
pathetic losers = Daddy's baseSFGbob said:
The FBI came up with the plan, provided the money, equipment, and the personnel to carry out the plan that they had hatched. The people they had entrapped were pathetic losers who liked smoking dope and running their mouths. One of the "terrorists" lived in the basement of a vacuum cleaner store and had to use the bathroom at the Mexican restaurant next door every time he needed to take a dump. The only reason the left isn't OUTRAGED over what the government did to these guys is because they're white. If they had done this to BLM members Dazzler would be screaming.HoustonHusky said:
The Governor was never kidnapped you lying speed limit IQ pedophile apologist. The FBI came up with the idea, these morons said they didn’t want to proceed, the FBI pushed the idea anyway and then arrested these schmoes for the FBI’s idea.HHusky said:
"Entrapment" means you did it. Whether allowing people to excuse their crimes on the basis that someone talked them into committing said crimes is a good or a bad thing is a philosophical debate.TurdBomber said:
In other words, H still believes they're guilty and it wasn't a load of shit from the get-go. Got it.HHusky said:OJ was acquitted.
It's okay for the jury to say it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they were guilty.
That's our system.
Keep lying.
in criminal law, the act of law enforcement officers or government agents to induce or encourage a person to commit a crime when the potential criminal expresses a desire not to go ahead. The key to entrapment is whether the idea for the commission or encouragement of the criminal act originated with the police or government agents instead of with the "criminal."
I still have no problem with the verdict, but I think you girls seizing on every reasonable doubt as an affirmative finding in favor of these pathetic losers, as we agree they are, takes it way too far.
And suggesting that I have some allegiance to BLM is your patented dishonesty at work.
Pathetic out in the woods losers are a threat to democracy!
Institutional state power conducting false flags is DEFENDING DEMOCRACY!
This is why the dazzler didn't want to respond to me.
Tell me again how the entrapment defense works councilor.
FBI tries to convince yokels to go along with plot.
Mostly fails at it.
FBI then makes arrests and a big show in the media lies there asses off to run cover.
Yeah, we should all be concerned about the yokels in this equation. Sure.gif
J Edgar Hoover fan heard from. -
At the time the FBI announced the charges in October 2020, with the presidential campaign at a crucial point, Biden suggested that the defendants were white supremacists, and that Trump was at fault for the plot:
There is no place for hate in America. And both of us [including Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) have been talking about this for some time, about how white supremacists and these militias area a genuine threat. I want to compliment the FBI and the police agencies for what they did, and how they stepped up. But look –the words of a president matter. Whether they can — you’ve heard me say this before. They can cause a nation to have th market rise or fall, go to war or bring peace, but they can also breathe oxygen into those who are filled with hate and danger, and I just think It’s got to stop. The president has to realize the words he utters matter.
There was no evidence at the time tying Trump to the plot whatsoever, nor did any such evidence emerge during the trial. -
The narrative remains undefeated.SFGbob said:At the time the FBI announced the charges in October 2020, with the presidential campaign at a crucial point, Biden suggested that the defendants were white supremacists, and that Trump was at fault for the plot:
There is no place for hate in America. And both of us [including Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) have been talking about this for some time, about how white supremacists and these militias area a genuine threat. I want to compliment the FBI and the police agencies for what they did, and how they stepped up. But look –the words of a president matter. Whether they can — you’ve heard me say this before. They can cause a nation to have th market rise or fall, go to war or bring peace, but they can also breathe oxygen into those who are filled with hate and danger, and I just think It’s got to stop. The president has to realize the words he utters matter.
There was no evidence at the time tying Trump to the plot whatsoever, nor did any such evidence emerge during the trial.
I'm doubtful that changes. It's gonna get weird at some point without any accountability.
The most damaging thing happening in the world right now is the 24/hr news cycle and the establishments ability to get to memory hole the past.
Wake the fuck up people. -
Mayhem. Sounds serious and untrue. Fuck off.HHusky said:
A Capitol Police officer was seen politely holding the door for the pro-President Trump protesters to walk out of the building after they caused mayhem that forced lawmakers to barricade themselves inside.Sledog said:Yeah right!
https://nypost.com/2021/01/07/capitol-police-hold-door-for-pro-trump-protesters-video-shows/
Oh and let me know who unlocked the magnetically sealed doors. Special high tech shit didn't unlock itself!
That's not entrapment, dumbshit. -
The amazing part about this is that much of the evidence showing the FBI’s malfeasance wasn’t even allowed in court…the judge ruled most of the texts and transcripts of all the crazy FBI employees pushing this conspiracy couldn’t be introduced because it was “hearsay”, and that several of the FBI employees’ criminal history (one agent had been credibly accused of perjury in a previous case, the other one fired after arresting these schmoes because he beat his wife at a swinger’s party) couldn’t be heard by the jury either.
And the jury still found the FBI entrapped them. That is how egregious it was. -
-
Gee it’s almost like the whole thing was coordinated from jumpstreet. Naw.RaceBannon said: -
So Dazzler believes there are no chargeable "Attempted..." crimes. Got it.HHusky said:
"Entrapment" means you did it. Whether allowing people to excuse their crimes on the basis that someone talked them into committing said crimes is a good or a bad thing is a philosophical debate.TurdBomber said:
In other words, H still believes they're guilty and it wasn't a load of shit from the get-go. Got it.HHusky said:OJ was acquitted.
It's okay for the jury to say it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they were guilty.
That's our system.
Dazzler continues to Dazzle. -
Careful. Mens Rea is miles beyond the Dazzler's grasp.WestlinnDuck said:
It isn't a "philosophical debate". It's called the law, and the debate occurred a long-time ago and if you want to allow the government to entrap people, let us know. You approve of entrapment, the law does not. Feel to get entrapment approved as an appropriate use of government resources. Scratch a leftist, find a fascist.HHusky said:
"Entrapment" means you did it. Whether allowing people to excuse their crimes on the basis that someone talked them into committing said crimes is a good or a bad thing is a philosophical debate.TurdBomber said:
In other words, H still believes they're guilty and it wasn't a load of shit from the get-go. Got it.HHusky said:OJ was acquitted.
It's okay for the jury to say it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they were guilty.
That's our system. -
Eve should have had a better lawyer.TurdBomber said:
So Dazzler believes there are no chargeable "Attempted..." crimes. Got it.HHusky said:
"Entrapment" means you did it. Whether allowing people to excuse their crimes on the basis that someone talked them into committing said crimes is a good or a bad thing is a philosophical debate.TurdBomber said:
In other words, H still believes they're guilty and it wasn't a load of shit from the get-go. Got it.HHusky said:OJ was acquitted.
It's okay for the jury to say it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they were guilty.
That's our system.
Dazzler continues to Dazzle. -
And there's the vintage Dazzler weasel, right there.HHusky said:
It is the law, for the most part, today. It has not been the law for most of this country's history. It is very much a philosophical debate whether and when the defense should apply. Your suggestion to the contrary hints at your mental decline.WestlinnDuck said:
It isn't a "philosophical debate". It's called the law, and the debate occurred a long-time ago and if you want to allow the government to entrap people, let us know. You approve of entrapment, the law does not. Feel to get entrapment approved as an appropriate use of government resources. Scratch a leftist, find a fascist.HHusky said:
"Entrapment" means you did it. Whether allowing people to excuse their crimes on the basis that someone talked them into committing said crimes is a good or a bad thing is a philosophical debate.TurdBomber said:
In other words, H still believes they're guilty and it wasn't a load of shit from the get-go. Got it.HHusky said:OJ was acquitted.
It's okay for the jury to say it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they were guilty.
That's our system.
But your sympathies for mouth breathing militia types who play soldier and plot felonies in the woods is noted.
I have no problem with the verdict. The suggestible creatures acquitted are your base.
