The Hunter Biden dam is about to burst

Sources said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

Dazzler's position is that everyone in Biden's family was cashing in on access to Joe but Joe was too stupid to realize it. His meetings with Hunter's business partners was totally innocent and had nothing to do with Hunter's business. The fact that people were willing to toss millions of dollars at someone he knew to be a crack head who was fucking his dead son's widow raised no red flags with Joe. Hunter was just traveling the world, often with Joe, and cutting all these deals because he was such a savvy businessman.

And then imagine you actually voted for that person to be President. Cock sucking is far too tame to describe what Dazzler is engaging in.

So "Joe must have cashed in" is still all you've got.

I'm glad to see the admission that this is your "evidence" so far.

You keep moving the goalposts and then pretending your latest line in the sand has been your position all along. But keep shouting "Ivan" "Comrade" "Boris" all you want. I'm sure you at least think it's clever

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

WestlinnDuck said:

HHusky said:

PurpleThrobber said:

HHusky said:

Hunter Biden's laptop revealed evidence of an international criminal money laundering operation that directly implicates his father in his criminal activity.

okay

where is this evidence?

You don't think that crackhold won't squeal like a pig?

Yes or No answer only.

Disparaging the witness you plan to rely on?

Shrewd!

Pretty easy to look at the bank accounts and figure out where the money was going. Surprised that someone with a hypothetical MBA couldn't figure that out.

You're making my point, ma'am.

So where's this evidence?

Who are you kidding Dazzler? If don't give a fuck if Biden is guilty or not. If letting Joe shit in your mouth meant that it would keep Trump out of the White House you'd have done it.

The Captain Parmenter of the TugCon gals says it doesn't matter that you don't have the evidence because I wouldn't care anyway.

White flag

It doesn't matter what evidence you're presented.

That theory is untested.

Please define your standard of evidence for us. It seems somewhat contextual.

Gasbag says we need to see financial records. He's right . . . for once.

So we need Biden to be investigated. I'm glad we agree.

If the law enforcement investigation of Hunter actually implicates Joe, then yes.

Unlike you gals, I don't cheer when people on "my team" stonewall law enforcement.

HHusky said:

Sources said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

Dazzler's position is that everyone in Biden's family was cashing in on access to Joe but Joe was too stupid to realize it. His meetings with Hunter's business partners was totally innocent and had nothing to do with Hunter's business. The fact that people were willing to toss millions of dollars at someone he knew to be a crack head who was fucking his dead son's widow raised no red flags with Joe. Hunter was just traveling the world, often with Joe, and cutting all these deals because he was such a savvy businessman.

And then imagine you actually voted for that person to be President. Cock sucking is far too tame to describe what Dazzler is engaging in.

So "Joe must have cashed in" is still all you've got.

I'm glad to see the admission that this is your "evidence" so far.

You keep moving the goalposts and then pretending your latest line in the sand has been your position all along. But keep shouting "Ivan" "Comrade" "Boris" all you want. I'm sure you at least think it's clever

Did you know financial benefits should leave some sort of trace? An inflow and an outflow--like your checking account, for example.

waiting for that dam to burst. . .

If Biden has nothing to hide then he shouldn't mind being investigated. It should clear his name of any wrong doing correct?

This was the standard you argued for with Trump after all. Is there any difference?

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

WestlinnDuck said:

HHusky said:

PurpleThrobber said:

HHusky said:

Hunter Biden's laptop revealed evidence of an international criminal money laundering operation that directly implicates his father in his criminal activity.

okay

where is this evidence?

You don't think that crackhold won't squeal like a pig?

Yes or No answer only.

Disparaging the witness you plan to rely on?

Shrewd!

Pretty easy to look at the bank accounts and figure out where the money was going. Surprised that someone with a hypothetical MBA couldn't figure that out.

You're making my point, ma'am.

So where's this evidence?

Who are you kidding Dazzler? If don't give a fuck if Biden is guilty or not. If letting Joe shit in your mouth meant that it would keep Trump out of the White House you'd have done it.

The Captain Parmenter of the TugCon gals says it doesn't matter that you don't have the evidence because I wouldn't care anyway.

White flag

It doesn't matter what evidence you're presented.

That theory is untested.

Please define your standard of evidence for us. It seems somewhat contextual.

Gasbag says we need to see financial records. He's right . . . for once.

So we need Biden to be investigated. I'm glad we agree.

If the law enforcement investigation of Hunter actually implicates Joe, then yes.

Unlike you gals, I don't cheer when people on "my team" stonewall law enforcement.

HHusky said:

Sources said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

Dazzler's position is that everyone in Biden's family was cashing in on access to Joe but Joe was too stupid to realize it. His meetings with Hunter's business partners was totally innocent and had nothing to do with Hunter's business. The fact that people were willing to toss millions of dollars at someone he knew to be a crack head who was fucking his dead son's widow raised no red flags with Joe. Hunter was just traveling the world, often with Joe, and cutting all these deals because he was such a savvy businessman.

And then imagine you actually voted for that person to be President. Cock sucking is far too tame to describe what Dazzler is engaging in.

So "Joe must have cashed in" is still all you've got.

I'm glad to see the admission that this is your "evidence" so far.

You keep moving the goalposts and then pretending your latest line in the sand has been your position all along. But keep shouting "Ivan" "Comrade" "Boris" all you want. I'm sure you at least think it's clever

Did you know financial benefits should leave some sort of trace? An inflow and an outflow--like your checking account, for example.

waiting for that dam to burst. . .

If Biden has nothing to hide then he shouldn't mind being investigated. It should clear his name of any wrong doing correct?

This was the standard you argued for with Trump after all. Is there any difference?

If you see something that went to Joe, that should definitely be investigated.

still waiting . . .

So if I can clarify your position, "There's no investigation so therefore there's no evidence so therefore there's no need for an investigation."

Do I have that right "counselor"?

HHusky said:

Sources said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

Dazzler's position is that everyone in Biden's family was cashing in on access to Joe but Joe was too stupid to realize it. His meetings with Hunter's business partners was totally innocent and had nothing to do with Hunter's business. The fact that people were willing to toss millions of dollars at someone he knew to be a crack head who was fucking his dead son's widow raised no red flags with Joe. Hunter was just traveling the world, often with Joe, and cutting all these deals because he was such a savvy businessman.

And then imagine you actually voted for that person to be President. Cock sucking is far too tame to describe what Dazzler is engaging in.

So "Joe must have cashed in" is still all you've got.

I'm glad to see the admission that this is your "evidence" so far.

You keep moving the goalposts and then pretending your latest line in the sand has been your position all along. But keep shouting "Ivan" "Comrade" "Boris" all you want. I'm sure you at least think it's clever

Did you know financial benefits should leave some sort of trace? An inflow and an outflow--like your checking account, for example.

waiting for that dam to burst. . .

HHusky said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

WestlinnDuck said:

HHusky said:

PurpleThrobber said:

HHusky said:

Hunter Biden's laptop revealed evidence of an international criminal money laundering operation that directly implicates his father in his criminal activity.

okay

where is this evidence?

You don't think that crackhold won't squeal like a pig?

Yes or No answer only.

Disparaging the witness you plan to rely on?

Shrewd!

Pretty easy to look at the bank accounts and figure out where the money was going. Surprised that someone with a hypothetical MBA couldn't figure that out.

You're making my point, ma'am.

So where's this evidence?

Who are you kidding Dazzler? If don't give a fuck if Biden is guilty or not. If letting Joe shit in your mouth meant that it would keep Trump out of the White House you'd have done it.

The Captain Parmenter of the TugCon gals says it doesn't matter that you don't have the evidence because I wouldn't care anyway.

White flag

It doesn't matter what evidence you're presented.

That theory is untested.

Please define your standard of evidence for us. It seems somewhat contextual.

Gasbag says we need to see financial records. He's right . . . for once.

So we need Biden to be investigated. I'm glad we agree.

If the law enforcement investigation of Hunter actually implicates Joe, then yes.

Unlike you gals, I don't cheer when people on "my team" stonewall law enforcement.

HHusky said:

Sources said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

Dazzler's position is that everyone in Biden's family was cashing in on access to Joe but Joe was too stupid to realize it. His meetings with Hunter's business partners was totally innocent and had nothing to do with Hunter's business. The fact that people were willing to toss millions of dollars at someone he knew to be a crack head who was fucking his dead son's widow raised no red flags with Joe. Hunter was just traveling the world, often with Joe, and cutting all these deals because he was such a savvy businessman.

And then imagine you actually voted for that person to be President. Cock sucking is far too tame to describe what Dazzler is engaging in.

So "Joe must have cashed in" is still all you've got.

I'm glad to see the admission that this is your "evidence" so far.

You keep moving the goalposts and then pretending your latest line in the sand has been your position all along. But keep shouting "Ivan" "Comrade" "Boris" all you want. I'm sure you at least think it's clever

Did you know financial benefits should leave some sort of trace? An inflow and an outflow--like your checking account, for example.

waiting for that dam to burst. . .

If Biden has nothing to hide then he shouldn't mind being investigated. It should clear his name of any wrong doing correct?

This was the standard you argued for with Trump after all. Is there any difference?

If you see something that went to Joe, that should definitely be investigated.

still waiting . . .

So if I can clarify your position, "There's no investigation so therefore there's no evidence so therefore there's no need for an investigation."

Do I have that right "counselor"?

Hunter Biden is being investigated for a host of things. You keep saying that this will produce evidence, or already has produced evidence tending to show personal benefit to Joe.

If so, investigate where that evidence leads.

still waiting . . .

"Tony Bobulinski, a former business associate of Hunter Biden, said Wednesday night that he can confirm details regarding his overseas business dealings, including that a reference to a “Big Guy” in a May 13, 2017 email did, in fact, refer to Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden."

"In an article discussing Hunter Biden’s tax liability and potential criminal charges, The New York Times reporters noted that they and prosecutors gathered evidence from “a cache of files that appears to have come from a laptop abandoned by Mr. Biden in a Delaware repair shop.” It is the only mention of Biden’s laptop in the article, but the piece goes on to describe how emails pertaining to the tax liability case, “were authenticated by people familiar with them and the investigation.”

So we just need Joe to show his financial records and that should clear this right up and exonerate him. Easy peasy.

So far you haven't even identified any flows in his direction. Where are those records?

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

WestlinnDuck said:

HHusky said:

PurpleThrobber said:

HHusky said:

Hunter Biden's laptop revealed evidence of an international criminal money laundering operation that directly implicates his father in his criminal activity.

okay

where is this evidence?

You don't think that crackhold won't squeal like a pig?

Yes or No answer only.

Disparaging the witness you plan to rely on?

Shrewd!

Pretty easy to look at the bank accounts and figure out where the money was going. Surprised that someone with a hypothetical MBA couldn't figure that out.

You're making my point, ma'am.

So where's this evidence?

Who are you kidding Dazzler? If don't give a fuck if Biden is guilty or not. If letting Joe shit in your mouth meant that it would keep Trump out of the White House you'd have done it.

The Captain Parmenter of the TugCon gals says it doesn't matter that you don't have the evidence because I wouldn't care anyway.

White flag

It doesn't matter what evidence you're presented.

That theory is untested.

Please define your standard of evidence for us. It seems somewhat contextual.

Gasbag says we need to see financial records. He's right . . . for once.

So we need Biden to be investigated. I'm glad we agree.

If the law enforcement investigation of Hunter actually implicates Joe, then yes.

Unlike you gals, I don't cheer when people on "my team" stonewall law enforcement.

HHusky said:

Sources said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

Dazzler's position is that everyone in Biden's family was cashing in on access to Joe but Joe was too stupid to realize it. His meetings with Hunter's business partners was totally innocent and had nothing to do with Hunter's business. The fact that people were willing to toss millions of dollars at someone he knew to be a crack head who was fucking his dead son's widow raised no red flags with Joe. Hunter was just traveling the world, often with Joe, and cutting all these deals because he was such a savvy businessman.

And then imagine you actually voted for that person to be President. Cock sucking is far too tame to describe what Dazzler is engaging in.

So "Joe must have cashed in" is still all you've got.

I'm glad to see the admission that this is your "evidence" so far.

You keep moving the goalposts and then pretending your latest line in the sand has been your position all along. But keep shouting "Ivan" "Comrade" "Boris" all you want. I'm sure you at least think it's clever

Did you know financial benefits should leave some sort of trace? An inflow and an outflow--like your checking account, for example.

waiting for that dam to burst. . .

If Biden has nothing to hide then he shouldn't mind being investigated. It should clear his name of any wrong doing correct?

This was the standard you argued for with Trump after all. Is there any difference?

If you see something that went to Joe, that should definitely be investigated.

still waiting . . .

So if I can clarify your position, "There's no investigation so therefore there's no evidence so therefore there's no need for an investigation."

Do I have that right "counselor"?

Hunter Biden is being investigated for a host of things. You keep saying that this will produce evidence, or already has produced evidence tending to show personal benefit to Joe.

If so, investigate where that evidence leads.

still waiting . . .

"Tony Bobulinski, a former business associate of Hunter Biden, said Wednesday night that he can confirm details regarding his overseas business dealings, including that a reference to a “Big Guy” in a May 13, 2017 email did, in fact, refer to Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden."

"In an article discussing Hunter Biden’s tax liability and potential criminal charges, The New York Times reporters noted that they and prosecutors gathered evidence from “a cache of files that appears to have come from a laptop abandoned by Mr. Biden in a Delaware repair shop.” It is the only mention of Biden’s laptop in the article, but the piece goes on to describe how emails pertaining to the tax liability case, “were authenticated by people familiar with them and the investigation.”

So we just need Joe to show his financial records and that should clear this right up and exonerate him. Easy peasy.

So far you haven't even identified any flows in his direction. Where are those records?

"The email, dated May 13, 2017, included a discussion of “remuneration packages” for six people in a business deal with the now-bankrupt Chinese firm CEFC China Energy Co. The email includes a note that “Hunter has some office expectations he will elaborate.” A proposed equity split references “20” for “H” and “10 held by H for the big guy?”

“I realized the Chinese were not really focused on a healthy financial [return on investment],” Bobulinski said. “They were looking at this as a political or influence investment. Once I realized that Hunter wanted to use the company as his personal piggy bank by just taking money out of it as soon as it came from the Chinese, I took steps to prevent that from happening.”"

Whistling past the graveyard counselor?

It seems we have an authenticated accusation from a former business partner. Why won't Biden just clear this up by releasing the financials that exonerate him?

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

Sources said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

Dazzler's position is that everyone in Biden's family was cashing in on access to Joe but Joe was too stupid to realize it. His meetings with Hunter's business partners was totally innocent and had nothing to do with Hunter's business. The fact that people were willing to toss millions of dollars at someone he knew to be a crack head who was fucking his dead son's widow raised no red flags with Joe. Hunter was just traveling the world, often with Joe, and cutting all these deals because he was such a savvy businessman.

And then imagine you actually voted for that person to be President. Cock sucking is far too tame to describe what Dazzler is engaging in.

So "Joe must have cashed in" is still all you've got.

I'm glad to see the admission that this is your "evidence" so far.

You keep moving the goalposts and then pretending your latest line in the sand has been your position all along. But keep shouting "Ivan" "Comrade" "Boris" all you want. I'm sure you at least think it's clever

Did you know financial benefits should leave some sort of trace? An inflow and an outflow--like your checking account, for example.

waiting for that dam to burst. . .

I sure he was just lying about never meeting Hunter's business partners and the laptop being "Russian disinformation" because he is completely innocent. All of Joe's relations are cashing in but not Joe, that's why he lied.

Like I said, cocksucking is too tame to describe what you're doing to old Joe Dazzler.

So, no records. Just lots of hearsay regarding what a crackhead said.

Gasbag and I want to see financial records before we hunt snipe.

RaceBannon said:

http://twitter.com/MarshaBlackburn/status/1509517399153909768?s=20&t=OIxK9e1nD3fAfeIrtiCXgw

Proof of another pile of bullshit that H swallowed whole and continues to double down on

WHERE IS THE PROOF