The Hunter Biden dam is about to burst
Comments
-
Did you know financial benefits should leave some sort of trace? An inflow and an outflow--like your checking account, for example.Sources said:
You keep moving the goalposts and then pretending your latest line in the sand has been your position all along. But keep shouting "Ivan" "Comrade" "Boris" all you want. I'm sure you at least think it's cleverHHusky said:
So "Joe must have cashed in" is still all you've got.SFGbob said:Dazzler's position is that everyone in Biden's family was cashing in on access to Joe but Joe was too stupid to realize it. His meetings with Hunter's business partners was totally innocent and had nothing to do with Hunter's business. The fact that people were willing to toss millions of dollars at someone he knew to be a crack head who was fucking his dead son's widow raised no red flags with Joe. Hunter was just traveling the world, often with Joe, and cutting all these deals because he was such a savvy businessman.
And then imagine you actually voted for that person to be President. Cock sucking is far too tame to describe what Dazzler is engaging in.
I'm glad to see the admission that this is your "evidence" so far.
waiting for that dam to burst. . . -
HHusky said:
If the law enforcement investigation of Hunter actually implicates Joe, then yes.UW_Doog_Bot said:
So we need Biden to be investigated. I'm glad we agree.HHusky said:
Gasbag says we need to see financial records. He's right . . . for once.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Please define your standard of evidence for us. It seems somewhat contextual.HHusky said:
That theory is untested.SFGbob said:
It doesn't matter what evidence you're presented.HHusky said:
The Captain Parmenter of the TugCon gals says it doesn't matter that you don't have the evidence because I wouldn't care anyway.SFGbob said:
Who are you kidding Dazzler? If don't give a fuck if Biden is guilty or not. If letting Joe shit in your mouth meant that it would keep Trump out of the White House you'd have done it.HHusky said:
You're making my point, ma'am.WestlinnDuck said:
Pretty easy to look at the bank accounts and figure out where the money was going. Surprised that someone with a hypothetical MBA couldn't figure that out.HHusky said:
Disparaging the witness you plan to rely on?PurpleThrobber said:
You don't think that crackhold won't squeal like a pig?HHusky said:Hunter Biden's laptop revealed evidence of an international criminal money laundering operation that directly implicates his father in his criminal activity.
okay
where is this evidence?
Yes or No answer only.
Shrewd!
So where's this evidence?
White flag
Unlike you gals, I don't cheer when people on "my team" stonewall law enforcement.
If Biden has nothing to hide then he shouldn't mind being investigated. It should clear his name of any wrong doing correct?HHusky said:
Did you know financial benefits should leave some sort of trace? An inflow and an outflow--like your checking account, for example.Sources said:
You keep moving the goalposts and then pretending your latest line in the sand has been your position all along. But keep shouting "Ivan" "Comrade" "Boris" all you want. I'm sure you at least think it's cleverHHusky said:
So "Joe must have cashed in" is still all you've got.SFGbob said:Dazzler's position is that everyone in Biden's family was cashing in on access to Joe but Joe was too stupid to realize it. His meetings with Hunter's business partners was totally innocent and had nothing to do with Hunter's business. The fact that people were willing to toss millions of dollars at someone he knew to be a crack head who was fucking his dead son's widow raised no red flags with Joe. Hunter was just traveling the world, often with Joe, and cutting all these deals because he was such a savvy businessman.
And then imagine you actually voted for that person to be President. Cock sucking is far too tame to describe what Dazzler is engaging in.
I'm glad to see the admission that this is your "evidence" so far.
waiting for that dam to burst. . .
This was the standard you argued for with Trump after all. Is there any difference? -
If you see something that went to Joe, that should definitely be investigated.UW_Doog_Bot said:HHusky said:
If the law enforcement investigation of Hunter actually implicates Joe, then yes.UW_Doog_Bot said:
So we need Biden to be investigated. I'm glad we agree.HHusky said:
Gasbag says we need to see financial records. He's right . . . for once.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Please define your standard of evidence for us. It seems somewhat contextual.HHusky said:
That theory is untested.SFGbob said:
It doesn't matter what evidence you're presented.HHusky said:
The Captain Parmenter of the TugCon gals says it doesn't matter that you don't have the evidence because I wouldn't care anyway.SFGbob said:
Who are you kidding Dazzler? If don't give a fuck if Biden is guilty or not. If letting Joe shit in your mouth meant that it would keep Trump out of the White House you'd have done it.HHusky said:
You're making my point, ma'am.WestlinnDuck said:
Pretty easy to look at the bank accounts and figure out where the money was going. Surprised that someone with a hypothetical MBA couldn't figure that out.HHusky said:
Disparaging the witness you plan to rely on?PurpleThrobber said:
You don't think that crackhold won't squeal like a pig?HHusky said:Hunter Biden's laptop revealed evidence of an international criminal money laundering operation that directly implicates his father in his criminal activity.
okay
where is this evidence?
Yes or No answer only.
Shrewd!
So where's this evidence?
White flag
Unlike you gals, I don't cheer when people on "my team" stonewall law enforcement.
If Biden has nothing to hide then he shouldn't mind being investigated. It should clear his name of any wrong doing correct?HHusky said:
Did you know financial benefits should leave some sort of trace? An inflow and an outflow--like your checking account, for example.Sources said:
You keep moving the goalposts and then pretending your latest line in the sand has been your position all along. But keep shouting "Ivan" "Comrade" "Boris" all you want. I'm sure you at least think it's cleverHHusky said:
So "Joe must have cashed in" is still all you've got.SFGbob said:Dazzler's position is that everyone in Biden's family was cashing in on access to Joe but Joe was too stupid to realize it. His meetings with Hunter's business partners was totally innocent and had nothing to do with Hunter's business. The fact that people were willing to toss millions of dollars at someone he knew to be a crack head who was fucking his dead son's widow raised no red flags with Joe. Hunter was just traveling the world, often with Joe, and cutting all these deals because he was such a savvy businessman.
And then imagine you actually voted for that person to be President. Cock sucking is far too tame to describe what Dazzler is engaging in.
I'm glad to see the admission that this is your "evidence" so far.
waiting for that dam to burst. . .
This was the standard you argued for with Trump after all. Is there any difference?
still waiting . . . -
So if I can clarify your position, "There's no investigation so therefore there's no evidence so therefore there's no need for an investigation."HHusky said:
If you see something that went to Joe, that should definitely be investigated.UW_Doog_Bot said:HHusky said:
If the law enforcement investigation of Hunter actually implicates Joe, then yes.UW_Doog_Bot said:
So we need Biden to be investigated. I'm glad we agree.HHusky said:
Gasbag says we need to see financial records. He's right . . . for once.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Please define your standard of evidence for us. It seems somewhat contextual.HHusky said:
That theory is untested.SFGbob said:
It doesn't matter what evidence you're presented.HHusky said:
The Captain Parmenter of the TugCon gals says it doesn't matter that you don't have the evidence because I wouldn't care anyway.SFGbob said:
Who are you kidding Dazzler? If don't give a fuck if Biden is guilty or not. If letting Joe shit in your mouth meant that it would keep Trump out of the White House you'd have done it.HHusky said:
You're making my point, ma'am.WestlinnDuck said:
Pretty easy to look at the bank accounts and figure out where the money was going. Surprised that someone with a hypothetical MBA couldn't figure that out.HHusky said:
Disparaging the witness you plan to rely on?PurpleThrobber said:
You don't think that crackhold won't squeal like a pig?HHusky said:Hunter Biden's laptop revealed evidence of an international criminal money laundering operation that directly implicates his father in his criminal activity.
okay
where is this evidence?
Yes or No answer only.
Shrewd!
So where's this evidence?
White flag
Unlike you gals, I don't cheer when people on "my team" stonewall law enforcement.
If Biden has nothing to hide then he shouldn't mind being investigated. It should clear his name of any wrong doing correct?HHusky said:
Did you know financial benefits should leave some sort of trace? An inflow and an outflow--like your checking account, for example.Sources said:
You keep moving the goalposts and then pretending your latest line in the sand has been your position all along. But keep shouting "Ivan" "Comrade" "Boris" all you want. I'm sure you at least think it's cleverHHusky said:
So "Joe must have cashed in" is still all you've got.SFGbob said:Dazzler's position is that everyone in Biden's family was cashing in on access to Joe but Joe was too stupid to realize it. His meetings with Hunter's business partners was totally innocent and had nothing to do with Hunter's business. The fact that people were willing to toss millions of dollars at someone he knew to be a crack head who was fucking his dead son's widow raised no red flags with Joe. Hunter was just traveling the world, often with Joe, and cutting all these deals because he was such a savvy businessman.
And then imagine you actually voted for that person to be President. Cock sucking is far too tame to describe what Dazzler is engaging in.
I'm glad to see the admission that this is your "evidence" so far.
waiting for that dam to burst. . .
This was the standard you argued for with Trump after all. Is there any difference?
still waiting . . .
Do I have that right "counselor"? -
Hunter Biden is being investigated for a host of things. You keep saying that this will produce evidence, or already has produced evidence tending to show personal benefit to Joe.UW_Doog_Bot said:
So if I can clarify your position, "There's no investigation so therefore there's no evidence so therefore there's no need for an investigation."HHusky said:
If you see something that went to Joe, that should definitely be investigated.UW_Doog_Bot said:HHusky said:
If the law enforcement investigation of Hunter actually implicates Joe, then yes.UW_Doog_Bot said:
So we need Biden to be investigated. I'm glad we agree.HHusky said:
Gasbag says we need to see financial records. He's right . . . for once.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Please define your standard of evidence for us. It seems somewhat contextual.HHusky said:
That theory is untested.SFGbob said:
It doesn't matter what evidence you're presented.HHusky said:
The Captain Parmenter of the TugCon gals says it doesn't matter that you don't have the evidence because I wouldn't care anyway.SFGbob said:
Who are you kidding Dazzler? If don't give a fuck if Biden is guilty or not. If letting Joe shit in your mouth meant that it would keep Trump out of the White House you'd have done it.HHusky said:
You're making my point, ma'am.WestlinnDuck said:
Pretty easy to look at the bank accounts and figure out where the money was going. Surprised that someone with a hypothetical MBA couldn't figure that out.HHusky said:
Disparaging the witness you plan to rely on?PurpleThrobber said:
You don't think that crackhold won't squeal like a pig?HHusky said:Hunter Biden's laptop revealed evidence of an international criminal money laundering operation that directly implicates his father in his criminal activity.
okay
where is this evidence?
Yes or No answer only.
Shrewd!
So where's this evidence?
White flag
Unlike you gals, I don't cheer when people on "my team" stonewall law enforcement.
If Biden has nothing to hide then he shouldn't mind being investigated. It should clear his name of any wrong doing correct?HHusky said:
Did you know financial benefits should leave some sort of trace? An inflow and an outflow--like your checking account, for example.Sources said:
You keep moving the goalposts and then pretending your latest line in the sand has been your position all along. But keep shouting "Ivan" "Comrade" "Boris" all you want. I'm sure you at least think it's cleverHHusky said:
So "Joe must have cashed in" is still all you've got.SFGbob said:Dazzler's position is that everyone in Biden's family was cashing in on access to Joe but Joe was too stupid to realize it. His meetings with Hunter's business partners was totally innocent and had nothing to do with Hunter's business. The fact that people were willing to toss millions of dollars at someone he knew to be a crack head who was fucking his dead son's widow raised no red flags with Joe. Hunter was just traveling the world, often with Joe, and cutting all these deals because he was such a savvy businessman.
And then imagine you actually voted for that person to be President. Cock sucking is far too tame to describe what Dazzler is engaging in.
I'm glad to see the admission that this is your "evidence" so far.
waiting for that dam to burst. . .
This was the standard you argued for with Trump after all. Is there any difference?
still waiting . . .
Do I have that right "counselor"?
If so, investigate where that evidence leads.
still waiting . . . -
"Tony Bobulinski, a former business associate of Hunter Biden, said Wednesday night that he can confirm details regarding his overseas business dealings, including that a reference to a “Big Guy” in a May 13, 2017 email did, in fact, refer to Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden."HHusky said:
Hunter Biden is being investigated for a host of things. You keep saying that this will produce evidence, or already has produced evidence tending to show personal benefit to Joe.UW_Doog_Bot said:
So if I can clarify your position, "There's no investigation so therefore there's no evidence so therefore there's no need for an investigation."HHusky said:
If you see something that went to Joe, that should definitely be investigated.UW_Doog_Bot said:HHusky said:
If the law enforcement investigation of Hunter actually implicates Joe, then yes.UW_Doog_Bot said:
So we need Biden to be investigated. I'm glad we agree.HHusky said:
Gasbag says we need to see financial records. He's right . . . for once.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Please define your standard of evidence for us. It seems somewhat contextual.HHusky said:
That theory is untested.SFGbob said:
It doesn't matter what evidence you're presented.HHusky said:
The Captain Parmenter of the TugCon gals says it doesn't matter that you don't have the evidence because I wouldn't care anyway.SFGbob said:
Who are you kidding Dazzler? If don't give a fuck if Biden is guilty or not. If letting Joe shit in your mouth meant that it would keep Trump out of the White House you'd have done it.HHusky said:
You're making my point, ma'am.WestlinnDuck said:
Pretty easy to look at the bank accounts and figure out where the money was going. Surprised that someone with a hypothetical MBA couldn't figure that out.HHusky said:
Disparaging the witness you plan to rely on?PurpleThrobber said:
You don't think that crackhold won't squeal like a pig?HHusky said:Hunter Biden's laptop revealed evidence of an international criminal money laundering operation that directly implicates his father in his criminal activity.
okay
where is this evidence?
Yes or No answer only.
Shrewd!
So where's this evidence?
White flag
Unlike you gals, I don't cheer when people on "my team" stonewall law enforcement.
If Biden has nothing to hide then he shouldn't mind being investigated. It should clear his name of any wrong doing correct?HHusky said:
Did you know financial benefits should leave some sort of trace? An inflow and an outflow--like your checking account, for example.Sources said:
You keep moving the goalposts and then pretending your latest line in the sand has been your position all along. But keep shouting "Ivan" "Comrade" "Boris" all you want. I'm sure you at least think it's cleverHHusky said:
So "Joe must have cashed in" is still all you've got.SFGbob said:Dazzler's position is that everyone in Biden's family was cashing in on access to Joe but Joe was too stupid to realize it. His meetings with Hunter's business partners was totally innocent and had nothing to do with Hunter's business. The fact that people were willing to toss millions of dollars at someone he knew to be a crack head who was fucking his dead son's widow raised no red flags with Joe. Hunter was just traveling the world, often with Joe, and cutting all these deals because he was such a savvy businessman.
And then imagine you actually voted for that person to be President. Cock sucking is far too tame to describe what Dazzler is engaging in.
I'm glad to see the admission that this is your "evidence" so far.
waiting for that dam to burst. . .
This was the standard you argued for with Trump after all. Is there any difference?
still waiting . . .
Do I have that right "counselor"?
If so, investigate where that evidence leads.
still waiting . . .
"In an article discussing Hunter Biden’s tax liability and potential criminal charges, The New York Times reporters noted that they and prosecutors gathered evidence from “a cache of files that appears to have come from a laptop abandoned by Mr. Biden in a Delaware repair shop.” It is the only mention of Biden’s laptop in the article, but the piece goes on to describe how emails pertaining to the tax liability case, “were authenticated by people familiar with them and the investigation.”
So we just need Joe to show his financial records and that should clear this right up and exonerate him. Easy peasy. -
H hard at work looking into the Biden crime family
-
So far you haven't even identified any flows in his direction. Where are those records?UW_Doog_Bot said:
"Tony Bobulinski, a former business associate of Hunter Biden, said Wednesday night that he can confirm details regarding his overseas business dealings, including that a reference to a “Big Guy” in a May 13, 2017 email did, in fact, refer to Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden."HHusky said:
Hunter Biden is being investigated for a host of things. You keep saying that this will produce evidence, or already has produced evidence tending to show personal benefit to Joe.UW_Doog_Bot said:
So if I can clarify your position, "There's no investigation so therefore there's no evidence so therefore there's no need for an investigation."HHusky said:
If you see something that went to Joe, that should definitely be investigated.UW_Doog_Bot said:HHusky said:
If the law enforcement investigation of Hunter actually implicates Joe, then yes.UW_Doog_Bot said:
So we need Biden to be investigated. I'm glad we agree.HHusky said:
Gasbag says we need to see financial records. He's right . . . for once.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Please define your standard of evidence for us. It seems somewhat contextual.HHusky said:
That theory is untested.SFGbob said:
It doesn't matter what evidence you're presented.HHusky said:
The Captain Parmenter of the TugCon gals says it doesn't matter that you don't have the evidence because I wouldn't care anyway.SFGbob said:
Who are you kidding Dazzler? If don't give a fuck if Biden is guilty or not. If letting Joe shit in your mouth meant that it would keep Trump out of the White House you'd have done it.HHusky said:
You're making my point, ma'am.WestlinnDuck said:
Pretty easy to look at the bank accounts and figure out where the money was going. Surprised that someone with a hypothetical MBA couldn't figure that out.HHusky said:
Disparaging the witness you plan to rely on?PurpleThrobber said:
You don't think that crackhold won't squeal like a pig?HHusky said:Hunter Biden's laptop revealed evidence of an international criminal money laundering operation that directly implicates his father in his criminal activity.
okay
where is this evidence?
Yes or No answer only.
Shrewd!
So where's this evidence?
White flag
Unlike you gals, I don't cheer when people on "my team" stonewall law enforcement.
If Biden has nothing to hide then he shouldn't mind being investigated. It should clear his name of any wrong doing correct?HHusky said:
Did you know financial benefits should leave some sort of trace? An inflow and an outflow--like your checking account, for example.Sources said:
You keep moving the goalposts and then pretending your latest line in the sand has been your position all along. But keep shouting "Ivan" "Comrade" "Boris" all you want. I'm sure you at least think it's cleverHHusky said:
So "Joe must have cashed in" is still all you've got.SFGbob said:Dazzler's position is that everyone in Biden's family was cashing in on access to Joe but Joe was too stupid to realize it. His meetings with Hunter's business partners was totally innocent and had nothing to do with Hunter's business. The fact that people were willing to toss millions of dollars at someone he knew to be a crack head who was fucking his dead son's widow raised no red flags with Joe. Hunter was just traveling the world, often with Joe, and cutting all these deals because he was such a savvy businessman.
And then imagine you actually voted for that person to be President. Cock sucking is far too tame to describe what Dazzler is engaging in.
I'm glad to see the admission that this is your "evidence" so far.
waiting for that dam to burst. . .
This was the standard you argued for with Trump after all. Is there any difference?
still waiting . . .
Do I have that right "counselor"?
If so, investigate where that evidence leads.
still waiting . . .
"In an article discussing Hunter Biden’s tax liability and potential criminal charges, The New York Times reporters noted that they and prosecutors gathered evidence from “a cache of files that appears to have come from a laptop abandoned by Mr. Biden in a Delaware repair shop.” It is the only mention of Biden’s laptop in the article, but the piece goes on to describe how emails pertaining to the tax liability case, “were authenticated by people familiar with them and the investigation.”
So we just need Joe to show his financial records and that should clear this right up and exonerate him. Easy peasy. -
I'm sure he was just lying about never meeting Hunter's business partners and the laptop being "Russian disinformation" because he is completely innocent. All of Joe's relations are cashing in but not Joe, that's why he lied.HHusky said:
Did you know financial benefits should leave some sort of trace? An inflow and an outflow--like your checking account, for example.Sources said:
You keep moving the goalposts and then pretending your latest line in the sand has been your position all along. But keep shouting "Ivan" "Comrade" "Boris" all you want. I'm sure you at least think it's cleverHHusky said:
So "Joe must have cashed in" is still all you've got.SFGbob said:Dazzler's position is that everyone in Biden's family was cashing in on access to Joe but Joe was too stupid to realize it. His meetings with Hunter's business partners was totally innocent and had nothing to do with Hunter's business. The fact that people were willing to toss millions of dollars at someone he knew to be a crack head who was fucking his dead son's widow raised no red flags with Joe. Hunter was just traveling the world, often with Joe, and cutting all these deals because he was such a savvy businessman.
And then imagine you actually voted for that person to be President. Cock sucking is far too tame to describe what Dazzler is engaging in.
I'm glad to see the admission that this is your "evidence" so far.
waiting for that dam to burst. . .
Like I said, cocksucking is too tame to describe what you're doing to old Joe Dazzler. Joe's been in Washington for nearly 50 years. The way you get rich and shield yourself from scutiny is to enrich your family members, set up a charity or a foundation. Old honest Joe did all of these things. How many crackheads have you heard of who were such great businessmen they were able pull in millions dollars a year? -
So, no records. Just lots of hearsay regarding what a crackhead said.SFGbob said:
I sure he was just lying about never meeting Hunter's business partners and the laptop being "Russian disinformation" because he is completely innocent. All of Joe's relations are cashing in but not Joe, that's why he lied.HHusky said:
Did you know financial benefits should leave some sort of trace? An inflow and an outflow--like your checking account, for example.Sources said:
You keep moving the goalposts and then pretending your latest line in the sand has been your position all along. But keep shouting "Ivan" "Comrade" "Boris" all you want. I'm sure you at least think it's cleverHHusky said:
So "Joe must have cashed in" is still all you've got.SFGbob said:Dazzler's position is that everyone in Biden's family was cashing in on access to Joe but Joe was too stupid to realize it. His meetings with Hunter's business partners was totally innocent and had nothing to do with Hunter's business. The fact that people were willing to toss millions of dollars at someone he knew to be a crack head who was fucking his dead son's widow raised no red flags with Joe. Hunter was just traveling the world, often with Joe, and cutting all these deals because he was such a savvy businessman.
And then imagine you actually voted for that person to be President. Cock sucking is far too tame to describe what Dazzler is engaging in.
I'm glad to see the admission that this is your "evidence" so far.
waiting for that dam to burst. . .
Like I said, cocksucking is too tame to describe what you're doing to old Joe Dazzler.
Gasbag and I want to see financial records before we hunt snipe.
