Shocking, Biden's SC nominee is soft on pedophiles.
Comments
-
Shocking, the Kunt dodges the question. She gave a lighter sentence, numerous times to pedophiles. If it was conservative nominee and they'd consistently done this with people who engaged in anti-black hate crimes you and every other leftists would be in fully OUTRAGE right now. She has a soft-spot for pedophiles. Shocking that you approve.HHusky said:So she differentiates between possessing sick images and engaging in the behaviors depicted.
It's almost as if she draws distinctions or something. You know, like a judge does.
Sounds terrifying, ladies. -
Paid by the poast, Boris?46XiJCAB said:
Plant the flag deep on Pedo Hill Dazzler. Honest to goodness you’re one sick puppy.HHusky said:
So the maximum, was ten years. No additional details provided. I wonder why--nah, I don't really wonder why.WestlinnDuck said:Yes it is. You even called it "sick" images. Now who equates a Halloween picture with a "sick" image of a naked little girl. They deserve at least the sentencing guidelines. Grooming and child porn is quite the hill to die on.
==============
In the case of United States v. Hawkins, the sex offender had multiple images of child porn. He was over 18. The Sentencing Guidelines called for a sentence of up to 10 years. Judge Jackson sentenced the perpetrator to only 3 months in prison. Three months.
Judge Jackson has said that some people who possess child porn "are in this for either the collection, or the people who are loners and find status in their participation in the community." What community would that be? The community of child exploiters? -
No, it's called giving pedos a lighter sentence then was available, something you claimed was a lie.HHusky said:
You don't read the stuff you poast, Gasbag.WestlinnDuck said:The dazzler just votes for the pedophile grooming party. Circulating naked pictures of little boys and girls, often in sexual poses, doesn't hurt anyone, allegedly. It's no different than dressing your little girl up as a princess for Halloween and then taking some pictures for the scrapbook.
HHusky said:So she differentiates between possessing sick images and engaging in the behaviors depicted.
It's almost as if she draws distinctions or something. You know, like a judge does.
Sounds terrifying, ladies.
So she sentenced some sicko to 5 years instead of 8. That's called "letting him off the hook" in your world. I guess five years is what you get for "dressing your little girl up as a princess for Halloween and then taking some pictures for the scrapbook." -
Hawley has you defending pedophiles, who's the dumb one Dazzler?HHusky said:
You're not bright, PDX. Not even one of those examples your demagogic pal wrote about involved any sexual contact with a child.46XiJCAB said:Guys why should a Pedo be denied 3 additional years to prey on children. Dazzler logic and empathy.
Hawley knows you girls are fucking stupid. You're his market. -
JFC. Are you serious?HHusky said:So she differentiates between possessing sick images and engaging in the behaviors depicted.
It's almost as if she draws distinctions or something. You know, like a judge does.
Sounds terrifying, ladies. -
Looking at sick pictures is "preying" and "grooming" says Mr. Salads. We need a metaphysics bored.46XiJCAB said:
Dazzler thinks preying on children is just the physical act. What a disgusting take. But quite on par for the Groomer party.HHusky said:
You're not bright, PDX. Not even one of those examples your demagogic pal wrote about involved any sexual contact with a child.46XiJCAB said:Guys why should a Pedo be denied 3 additional years to prey on children. Dazzler logic and empathy.
Hawley knows you girls are fucking stupid. You're his market. -
Consuming the act of abuse is it what you're trying to minimize. Someone was horribly and maybe irreparably harmed making the images you consume. You're a sick fuck.HHusky said:
Looking at sick pictures is "preying" and "grooming" says Mr. Salads. We need a metaphysics bored.46XiJCAB said:
Dazzler thinks preying on children is just the physical act. What a disgusting take. But quite on par for the Groomer party.HHusky said:
You're not bright, PDX. Not even one of those examples your demagogic pal wrote about involved any sexual contact with a child.46XiJCAB said:Guys why should a Pedo be denied 3 additional years to prey on children. Dazzler logic and empathy.
Hawley knows you girls are fucking stupid. You're his market.
Imagine defending this. -
No one is saying otherwise, lady.MikeDamone said:
Someone was horribly and maybe irreparably harmed making the imagesHHusky said:
Looking at sick pictures is "preying" and "grooming" says Mr. Salads. We need a metaphysics bored.46XiJCAB said:
Dazzler thinks preying on children is just the physical act. What a disgusting take. But quite on par for the Groomer party.HHusky said:
You're not bright, PDX. Not even one of those examples your demagogic pal wrote about involved any sexual contact with a child.46XiJCAB said:Guys why should a Pedo be denied 3 additional years to prey on children. Dazzler logic and empathy.
Hawley knows you girls are fucking stupid. You're his market. -
Can you imagine making excuses for pedophiles just because your team nominated someone who as a judge went easy on pedophiles? Dazzler, isn't there a black female judge Biden could have nominated that wasn't an apologist for pedophiles?MikeDamone said:
Consuming the act of abuse is it what you're trying to minimize. Someone was horribly and maybe irreparably harmed making the images you consume. You're a sick fuck.HHusky said:
Looking at sick pictures is "preying" and "grooming" says Mr. Salads. We need a metaphysics bored.46XiJCAB said:
Dazzler thinks preying on children is just the physical act. What a disgusting take. But quite on par for the Groomer party.HHusky said:
You're not bright, PDX. Not even one of those examples your demagogic pal wrote about involved any sexual contact with a child.46XiJCAB said:Guys why should a Pedo be denied 3 additional years to prey on children. Dazzler logic and empathy.
Hawley knows you girls are fucking stupid. You're his market.
Imagine defending this. -
Add pedo to your long list of monikers, creepHHusky said:
No one is saying otherwise, lady.MikeDamone said:
Someone was horribly and maybe irreparably harmed making the imagesHHusky said:
Looking at sick pictures is "preying" and "grooming" says Mr. Salads. We need a metaphysics bored.46XiJCAB said:
Dazzler thinks preying on children is just the physical act. What a disgusting take. But quite on par for the Groomer party.HHusky said:
You're not bright, PDX. Not even one of those examples your demagogic pal wrote about involved any sexual contact with a child.46XiJCAB said:Guys why should a Pedo be denied 3 additional years to prey on children. Dazzler logic and empathy.
Hawley knows you girls are fucking stupid. You're his market.
