Shocking, Biden's SC nominee is soft on pedophiles.
Comments
-
Pedo Grooming party. Not a hill to die on loser.HHusky said:So she differentiates between possessing sick images and engaging in the behaviors depicted.
It's almost as if she draws distinctions or something. You know, like a judge does.
Sounds terrifying, ladies.
-
You don't read the stuff you poast, Gasbag.WestlinnDuck said:The dazzler just votes for the pedophile grooming party. Circulating naked pictures of little boys and girls, often in sexual poses, doesn't hurt anyone, allegedly. It's no different than dressing your little girl up as a princess for Halloween and then taking some pictures for the scrapbook.
HHusky said:So she differentiates between possessing sick images and engaging in the behaviors depicted.
It's almost as if she draws distinctions or something. You know, like a judge does.
Sounds terrifying, ladies.
So she sentenced some sicko to 5 years instead of 8. That's called "letting him off the hook" in your world. I guess five years is what you get for "dressing your little girl up as a princess for Halloween and then taking some pictures for the scrapbook." -
A vote for the Pedo is a vote for the DIMS. Nice hill to die on liarHHusky said:
You don't read the stuff you poast, Gasbag.WestlinnDuck said:The dazzler just votes for the pedophile grooming party. Circulating naked pictures of little boys and girls, often in sexual poses, doesn't hurt anyone, allegedly. It's no different than dressing your little girl up as a princess for Halloween and then taking some pictures for the scrapbook.
HHusky said:So she differentiates between possessing sick images and engaging in the behaviors depicted.
It's almost as if she draws distinctions or something. You know, like a judge does.
Sounds terrifying, ladies.
So she sentenced some sicko to 5 years instead of 8. That's called "letting him off the hook" in your world. I guess five years is what you get for "dressing your little girl up as a princess for Halloween and then taking some pictures for the scrapbook." -
Guys why should a Pedo be denied 3 additional years to prey on children. Dazzler logic and empathy.
-
You're not bright, PDX. Not even one of those examples your demagogic pal wrote about involved any sexual contact with a child.46XiJCAB said:Guys why should a Pedo be denied 3 additional years to prey on children. Dazzler logic and empathy.
Hawley knows you girls are fucking stupid. You're his market. -
Yes it is. You even called it "sick" images. Now who equates a Halloween picture with a "sick" image of a naked little girl. They deserve at least the sentencing guidelines. Grooming and child porn is quite the hill to die on.
==============
In the case of United States v. Hawkins, the sex offender had multiple images of child porn. He was over 18. The Sentencing Guidelines called for a sentence of up to 10 years. Judge Jackson sentenced the perpetrator to only 3 months in prison. Three months.
Judge Jackson has said that some people who possess child porn "are in this for either the collection, or the people who are loners and find status in their participation in the community." What community would that be? The community of child exploiters?
-
Biden picked her
H will die for her
It's not like she was falsely accused of rape -
Dazzler thinks preying on children is just the physical act. What a disgusting take. But quite on par for the Groomer party.HHusky said:
You're not bright, PDX. Not even one of those examples your demagogic pal wrote about involved any sexual contact with a child.46XiJCAB said:Guys why should a Pedo be denied 3 additional years to prey on children. Dazzler logic and empathy.
Hawley knows you girls are fucking stupid. You're his market. -
So the maximum, was ten years. No additional details provided. I wonder why--nah, I don't really wonder why.WestlinnDuck said:Yes it is. You even called it "sick" images. Now who equates a Halloween picture with a "sick" image of a naked little girl. They deserve at least the sentencing guidelines. Grooming and child porn is quite the hill to die on.
==============
In the case of United States v. Hawkins, the sex offender had multiple images of child porn. He was over 18. The Sentencing Guidelines called for a sentence of up to 10 years. Judge Jackson sentenced the perpetrator to only 3 months in prison. Three months.
Judge Jackson has said that some people who possess child porn "are in this for either the collection, or the people who are loners and find status in their participation in the community." What community would that be? The community of child exploiters? -
Plant the flag deep on Pedo Hill Dazzler. Honest to goodness you’re one sick puppy.HHusky said:
So the maximum, was ten years. No additional details provided. I wonder why--nah, I don't really wonder why.WestlinnDuck said:Yes it is. You even called it "sick" images. Now who equates a Halloween picture with a "sick" image of a naked little girl. They deserve at least the sentencing guidelines. Grooming and child porn is quite the hill to die on.
==============
In the case of United States v. Hawkins, the sex offender had multiple images of child porn. He was over 18. The Sentencing Guidelines called for a sentence of up to 10 years. Judge Jackson sentenced the perpetrator to only 3 months in prison. Three months.
Judge Jackson has said that some people who possess child porn "are in this for either the collection, or the people who are loners and find status in their participation in the community." What community would that be? The community of child exploiters?
