Shocking, Biden's SC nominee is soft on pedophiles.
Comments
-
She was totally asking for it. Ashley Babbit should have just laid back and enjoyed getting murdered when getting shot was inevitable.Goduckies said:
Did he really say that? Wow... that would mean she is a magician as the gunman was through a locked door.SFGbob said:
I remember the Dazzler making that claim and if he denies it, he is just "walking it back."46XiJCAB said:
Remember when Ashley Babbitt tried to take the gun away from the Capitol officer who shot her?
Keeping in the vein of the Dazzler's ongoing misogynistic theme.
-
DIMS are big mad that Republicans are "disrespecting" Joey's SCOTUS nominee. Kavanaugh says, "hold my beer." These people really do believe their base is just plain dumb.
-
As a form of payback I wish the Republicans really would go after her the way the Rats did Kavanaugh.46XiJCAB said:DIMS are big mad that Republicans are "disrespecting" Joey's SCOTUS nominee. Kavanaugh says, "hold my beer." These people really do believe their base is just plain dumb.
-
She probably has a naked kid or two at home tied up in the basement. It's only natural! They say so now publicly.HoustonHusky said:Love how neo-Nazi sympathizer @HHusky is distracting from the fact the Supreme Court nominee doesn’t seem to have a problem with pedos…if I remember my history correct that a pretty consistent historical view…
-
But that isn't when he executed Michael Brown.trublue said:
Darrin Wilson was justified in using deadly physical force when Michael Brown came through the officer’s window and tried to disarm him.HHusky said:
What the fuck are you talking about, Detective? The DA didn't want an indictment and there was no indictment. It was handled splendidly!trublue said:
Don’t forget the Grand Jury investigation was mishandled according to the Dazzler, the “attorney” who know nothing about criminal law.SFGbob said:
Dazzler doesn't give a fuck about any of that. How many times has he been exposed as stone cold lying piece of crap. Have you ever seen him once admit that he was wrong? Dazzler revealed who he really when instead of just admitting he was wrong about the Mike Brown shooting, he went with claiming that Obama and Holder were in on the cover up. You can't shame or embarrass a pathological liar.46XiJCAB said:This is a classic Dazzler meltdown thread. Imagine being Fatso and knowing how much death, destruction and pain around the World your Joey vote is causing and not really giving a shit because you're a pussy and Trump was your Daddy. He does project a lot, doesn't he?
Dazzler, you're a shit human. You and I both know it.
Follow the story much, Sherlock? -
And yet you voted for the guy who covered up this racist murder.HHusky said:
But that isn't when he executed Michael Brown.trublue said:
Darrin Wilson was justified in using deadly physical force when Michael Brown came through the officer’s window and tried to disarm him.HHusky said:
What the fuck are you talking about, Detective? The DA didn't want an indictment and there was no indictment. It was handled splendidly!trublue said:
Don’t forget the Grand Jury investigation was mishandled according to the Dazzler, the “attorney” who know nothing about criminal law.SFGbob said:
Dazzler doesn't give a fuck about any of that. How many times has he been exposed as stone cold lying piece of crap. Have you ever seen him once admit that he was wrong? Dazzler revealed who he really when instead of just admitting he was wrong about the Mike Brown shooting, he went with claiming that Obama and Holder were in on the cover up. You can't shame or embarrass a pathological liar.46XiJCAB said:This is a classic Dazzler meltdown thread. Imagine being Fatso and knowing how much death, destruction and pain around the World your Joey vote is causing and not really giving a shit because you're a pussy and Trump was your Daddy. He does project a lot, doesn't he?
Dazzler, you're a shit human. You and I both know it.
Follow the story much, Sherlock? -
Herr Dazzler just can’t give up “hand up, don’t shoot”. If anything, he is committed to the lie.HHusky said:
But that isn't when he executed Michael Brown.trublue said:
Darrin Wilson was justified in using deadly physical force when Michael Brown came through the officer’s window and tried to disarm him.HHusky said:
What the fuck are you talking about, Detective? The DA didn't want an indictment and there was no indictment. It was handled splendidly!trublue said:
Don’t forget the Grand Jury investigation was mishandled according to the Dazzler, the “attorney” who know nothing about criminal law.SFGbob said:
Dazzler doesn't give a fuck about any of that. How many times has he been exposed as stone cold lying piece of crap. Have you ever seen him once admit that he was wrong? Dazzler revealed who he really when instead of just admitting he was wrong about the Mike Brown shooting, he went with claiming that Obama and Holder were in on the cover up. You can't shame or embarrass a pathological liar.46XiJCAB said:This is a classic Dazzler meltdown thread. Imagine being Fatso and knowing how much death, destruction and pain around the World your Joey vote is causing and not really giving a shit because you're a pussy and Trump was your Daddy. He does project a lot, doesn't he?
Dazzler, you're a shit human. You and I both know it.
Follow the story much, Sherlock? -
I'm told the red dot on your forehead has nothing to do with your bigotry of Indian women.HHusky said:
I'm told the guy who arrived armed and ready to kill Democrats had heard of it.RaceBannon said:Sled references the alleged Q conspiracy about pizzagate that no one heard of except when the left accused the right of believing it
Could be a way to hide in plain sight all the pedophilia that keeps getting linked to the left
If you think grade schoolers need to be able to change their sex and be taught all sorts of sexualization stuff then you aren't far from pedophilia
-
He deserved to get dead. Simple fact.HHusky said:
But that isn't when he executed Michael Brown.trublue said:
Darrin Wilson was justified in using deadly physical force when Michael Brown came through the officer’s window and tried to disarm him.HHusky said:
What the fuck are you talking about, Detective? The DA didn't want an indictment and there was no indictment. It was handled splendidly!trublue said:
Don’t forget the Grand Jury investigation was mishandled according to the Dazzler, the “attorney” who know nothing about criminal law.SFGbob said:
Dazzler doesn't give a fuck about any of that. How many times has he been exposed as stone cold lying piece of crap. Have you ever seen him once admit that he was wrong? Dazzler revealed who he really when instead of just admitting he was wrong about the Mike Brown shooting, he went with claiming that Obama and Holder were in on the cover up. You can't shame or embarrass a pathological liar.46XiJCAB said:This is a classic Dazzler meltdown thread. Imagine being Fatso and knowing how much death, destruction and pain around the World your Joey vote is causing and not really giving a shit because you're a pussy and Trump was your Daddy. He does project a lot, doesn't he?
Dazzler, you're a shit human. You and I both know it.
Follow the story much, Sherlock?
Ashli Babbitt did not.
Yet being a clueless maroon you can't figure this out.
That's why we feel sorry for anyone related to you that has to change your drool bucket. -
So do you, but I don't think the state should do the deed.Sledog said:
He deserved to get dead. Simple fact.HHusky said:
But that isn't when he executed Michael Brown.trublue said:
Darrin Wilson was justified in using deadly physical force when Michael Brown came through the officer’s window and tried to disarm him.HHusky said:
What the fuck are you talking about, Detective? The DA didn't want an indictment and there was no indictment. It was handled splendidly!trublue said:
Don’t forget the Grand Jury investigation was mishandled according to the Dazzler, the “attorney” who know nothing about criminal law.SFGbob said:
Dazzler doesn't give a fuck about any of that. How many times has he been exposed as stone cold lying piece of crap. Have you ever seen him once admit that he was wrong? Dazzler revealed who he really when instead of just admitting he was wrong about the Mike Brown shooting, he went with claiming that Obama and Holder were in on the cover up. You can't shame or embarrass a pathological liar.46XiJCAB said:This is a classic Dazzler meltdown thread. Imagine being Fatso and knowing how much death, destruction and pain around the World your Joey vote is causing and not really giving a shit because you're a pussy and Trump was your Daddy. He does project a lot, doesn't he?
Dazzler, you're a shit human. You and I both know it.
Follow the story much, Sherlock? -
You're really sick in the head Fatso. Now do Ashley Babbitt.HHusky said:
But that isn't when he executed Michael Brown.trublue said:
Darrin Wilson was justified in using deadly physical force when Michael Brown came through the officer’s window and tried to disarm him.HHusky said:
What the fuck are you talking about, Detective? The DA didn't want an indictment and there was no indictment. It was handled splendidly!trublue said:
Don’t forget the Grand Jury investigation was mishandled according to the Dazzler, the “attorney” who know nothing about criminal law.SFGbob said:
Dazzler doesn't give a fuck about any of that. How many times has he been exposed as stone cold lying piece of crap. Have you ever seen him once admit that he was wrong? Dazzler revealed who he really when instead of just admitting he was wrong about the Mike Brown shooting, he went with claiming that Obama and Holder were in on the cover up. You can't shame or embarrass a pathological liar.46XiJCAB said:This is a classic Dazzler meltdown thread. Imagine being Fatso and knowing how much death, destruction and pain around the World your Joey vote is causing and not really giving a shit because you're a pussy and Trump was your Daddy. He does project a lot, doesn't he?
Dazzler, you're a shit human. You and I both know it.
Follow the story much, Sherlock? -
At least she stayed away from Corn Pop while a child.
https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2022/03/why-are-liberals-so-psychologically-needy-and-inauthentic.php
The latest such example is President Biden’s nominee for the Supreme Court, Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson. Turns out she’s a fan of Critical Race Theory and the 1619 Project, and I certainly hope she is asked in detail about these views in her confirmation hearings.
Never mind the issues of her views on CRT for the moment. Two years ago she gave a lecture embracing CRT at the University of Michigan Law School, which includes a curious detail in this passage:
Dr. Janet Bell’s late husband, Professor Derrick Bell, who was a civil rights lawyer and the first tenured African-American professor at Harvard Law School, wrote a book in the early 1990s about the persistence of racism in American life that he entitled “Faces At the Bottom of the Well.” My parents had this book on their coffee table for many years, and I remember staring at the image on the cover when I was growing up; I found it difficult to reconcile the image of the person, who seemed to be smiling, with the depressing message that the title and subtitle conveyed. I thought about this book cover again for the first time in forty years when I started preparing for this speech, because, before the civil rights gains of the 1960s, black women were the quintessential faces at the bottom of the well of American society, given their existence at the intersection of race and gender — both of which were highly disfavored characteristics.
The boldfaced passages are the odd part. Bell’s Faces at the Bottom of the Well was published in 1992, when Judge Jackson was 22, when she was working at Time magazine. It is impossible that her parents had the book on their coffee table “when I was growing up,” unless she was still “growing up” at age 22. It is also impossible that she “thought about this book cover again for the first time in forty years” when the book is only 30 years old today. Judge Jackson is 51 years old; the math doesn’t add up here. Judge Jackson even notes the book was written “in the early 1990s,” yet somehow this basic chronology doesn’t interfere with her subsequent claims in the same paragraph.
Perhaps she simply mis-remembers, in the same way that Joe Biden mis-remembered that he was not, in fact, descended from coal miners, or mis-remembered that Robert Kennedy had said the same things Biden did 20 years later. Funny how these kind of “mis-rememberings” among liberals all skew the same direction—toward aggrandizing their personal “narratives.”
Or maybe people who embrace the creed that truth is relative, and that the world can be bent endlessly to our own good will and idealism, who think the most important thing is “the narrative,” don’t think it’s a big deal to make stuff up in service of their cause. The point is, Judge Jackson appears to be another phony. -
I'm not out attacking police officers and trying to kill them. Makes life longer and more enjoyable. We know you support those very activities and probably donate to them. You are just an asshole in every facet of your miserable existence. My life's good! Cry yourself to nappy time now you'll feel better.HHusky said:
So do you, but I don't think the state should do the deed.Sledog said:
He deserved to get dead. Simple fact.HHusky said:
But that isn't when he executed Michael Brown.trublue said:
Darrin Wilson was justified in using deadly physical force when Michael Brown came through the officer’s window and tried to disarm him.HHusky said:
What the fuck are you talking about, Detective? The DA didn't want an indictment and there was no indictment. It was handled splendidly!trublue said:
Don’t forget the Grand Jury investigation was mishandled according to the Dazzler, the “attorney” who know nothing about criminal law.SFGbob said:
Dazzler doesn't give a fuck about any of that. How many times has he been exposed as stone cold lying piece of crap. Have you ever seen him once admit that he was wrong? Dazzler revealed who he really when instead of just admitting he was wrong about the Mike Brown shooting, he went with claiming that Obama and Holder were in on the cover up. You can't shame or embarrass a pathological liar.46XiJCAB said:This is a classic Dazzler meltdown thread. Imagine being Fatso and knowing how much death, destruction and pain around the World your Joey vote is causing and not really giving a shit because you're a pussy and Trump was your Daddy. He does project a lot, doesn't he?
Dazzler, you're a shit human. You and I both know it.
Follow the story much, Sherlock? -
Another lying liberal. Shocking development.WestlinnDuck said:At least she stayed away from Corn Pop while a child.
https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2022/03/why-are-liberals-so-psychologically-needy-and-inauthentic.php
The latest such example is President Biden’s nominee for the Supreme Court, Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson. Turns out she’s a fan of Critical Race Theory and the 1619 Project, and I certainly hope she is asked in detail about these views in her confirmation hearings.
Never mind the issues of her views on CRT for the moment. Two years ago she gave a lecture embracing CRT at the University of Michigan Law School, which includes a curious detail in this passage:
Dr. Janet Bell’s late husband, Professor Derrick Bell, who was a civil rights lawyer and the first tenured African-American professor at Harvard Law School, wrote a book in the early 1990s about the persistence of racism in American life that he entitled “Faces At the Bottom of the Well.” My parents had this book on their coffee table for many years, and I remember staring at the image on the cover when I was growing up; I found it difficult to reconcile the image of the person, who seemed to be smiling, with the depressing message that the title and subtitle conveyed. I thought about this book cover again for the first time in forty years when I started preparing for this speech, because, before the civil rights gains of the 1960s, black women were the quintessential faces at the bottom of the well of American society, given their existence at the intersection of race and gender — both of which were highly disfavored characteristics.
The boldfaced passages are the odd part. Bell’s Faces at the Bottom of the Well was published in 1992, when Judge Jackson was 22, when she was working at Time magazine. It is impossible that her parents had the book on their coffee table “when I was growing up,” unless she was still “growing up” at age 22. It is also impossible that she “thought about this book cover again for the first time in forty years” when the book is only 30 years old today. Judge Jackson is 51 years old; the math doesn’t add up here. Judge Jackson even notes the book was written “in the early 1990s,” yet somehow this basic chronology doesn’t interfere with her subsequent claims in the same paragraph.
Perhaps she simply mis-remembers, in the same way that Joe Biden mis-remembered that he was not, in fact, descended from coal miners, or mis-remembered that Robert Kennedy had said the same things Biden did 20 years later. Funny how these kind of “mis-rememberings” among liberals all skew the same direction—toward aggrandizing their personal “narratives.”
Or maybe people who embrace the creed that truth is relative, and that the world can be bent endlessly to our own good will and idealism, who think the most important thing is “the narrative,” don’t think it’s a big deal to make stuff up in service of their cause. The point is, Judge Jackson appears to be another phony. -
HHusky said:
But that isn't when he executed Michael Brown.trublue said:
Darrin Wilson was justified in using deadly physical force when Michael Brown came through the officer’s window and tried to disarm him.HHusky said:
What the fuck are you talking about, Detective? The DA didn't want an indictment and there was no indictment. It was handled splendidly!trublue said:
Don’t forget the Grand Jury investigation was mishandled according to the Dazzler, the “attorney” who know nothing about criminal law.SFGbob said:
Dazzler doesn't give a fuck about any of that. How many times has he been exposed as stone cold lying piece of crap. Have you ever seen him once admit that he was wrong? Dazzler revealed who he really when instead of just admitting he was wrong about the Mike Brown shooting, he went with claiming that Obama and Holder were in on the cover up. You can't shame or embarrass a pathological liar.46XiJCAB said:This is a classic Dazzler meltdown thread. Imagine being Fatso and knowing how much death, destruction and pain around the World your Joey vote is causing and not really giving a shit because you're a pussy and Trump was your Daddy. He does project a lot, doesn't he?
Dazzler, you're a shit human. You and I both know it.
Follow the story much, Sherlock?
He didn’t “execute” Michael Brown.
He stopped the threat against his life.
Yes, I did follow the story.
You? -
Well we know what he did. He swallowed like a bitch every false narrative that came out at the time. From the original "hands up don't shoot" lie, to the lie about Brown being shot in the back, to the lie about Brown being on his knees with his arms in the air and being shot point blank in the head, to the lie that Brown never even touched the officer, the Dazzler bought them all, and when he was shown to be a gullible fool on each and everyone of these claims, he doubled and quadrupled down to the point that he now creates his own lies and bullshit like Obama helped cover up Brown's murder.trublue said:HHusky said:
But that isn't when he executed Michael Brown.trublue said:
Darrin Wilson was justified in using deadly physical force when Michael Brown came through the officer’s window and tried to disarm him.HHusky said:
What the fuck are you talking about, Detective? The DA didn't want an indictment and there was no indictment. It was handled splendidly!trublue said:
Don’t forget the Grand Jury investigation was mishandled according to the Dazzler, the “attorney” who know nothing about criminal law.SFGbob said:
Dazzler doesn't give a fuck about any of that. How many times has he been exposed as stone cold lying piece of crap. Have you ever seen him once admit that he was wrong? Dazzler revealed who he really when instead of just admitting he was wrong about the Mike Brown shooting, he went with claiming that Obama and Holder were in on the cover up. You can't shame or embarrass a pathological liar.46XiJCAB said:This is a classic Dazzler meltdown thread. Imagine being Fatso and knowing how much death, destruction and pain around the World your Joey vote is causing and not really giving a shit because you're a pussy and Trump was your Daddy. He does project a lot, doesn't he?
Dazzler, you're a shit human. You and I both know it.
Follow the story much, Sherlock?
He didn’t “execute” Michael Brown.
He stopped the threat against his life.
Yes, I did follow the story.
You? -
That turd says we're conspiracy theorists!SFGbob said:
Well we know what he did. He swallowed like a bitch every false narrative that came out at the time. From the original "hands up don't shoot" lie, to the lie about Brown being shot in the back, to the lie about Brown being on his knees with his arms in the air and being shot point blank in the head, to the lie that Brown never even touched the officer, the Dazzler bought them all, and when he was shown to be a gullible fool on each and everyone of these claims, he doubled and quadrupled down to the point that he now creates his own lies and bullshit like Obama helped cover up Brown's murder.trublue said:HHusky said:
But that isn't when he executed Michael Brown.trublue said:
Darrin Wilson was justified in using deadly physical force when Michael Brown came through the officer’s window and tried to disarm him.HHusky said:
What the fuck are you talking about, Detective? The DA didn't want an indictment and there was no indictment. It was handled splendidly!trublue said:
Don’t forget the Grand Jury investigation was mishandled according to the Dazzler, the “attorney” who know nothing about criminal law.SFGbob said:
Dazzler doesn't give a fuck about any of that. How many times has he been exposed as stone cold lying piece of crap. Have you ever seen him once admit that he was wrong? Dazzler revealed who he really when instead of just admitting he was wrong about the Mike Brown shooting, he went with claiming that Obama and Holder were in on the cover up. You can't shame or embarrass a pathological liar.46XiJCAB said:This is a classic Dazzler meltdown thread. Imagine being Fatso and knowing how much death, destruction and pain around the World your Joey vote is causing and not really giving a shit because you're a pussy and Trump was your Daddy. He does project a lot, doesn't he?
Dazzler, you're a shit human. You and I both know it.
Follow the story much, Sherlock?
He didn’t “execute” Michael Brown.
He stopped the threat against his life.
Yes, I did follow the story.
You?
Hows Hunter's laptop taste now BidenBros? -
He was also all in the Dossier and the Russian collusion fraud. Still claims they're true.Sledog said:
That turd says we're conspiracy theorists!SFGbob said:
Well we know what he did. He swallowed like a bitch every false narrative that came out at the time. From the original "hands up don't shoot" lie, to the lie about Brown being shot in the back, to the lie about Brown being on his knees with his arms in the air and being shot point blank in the head, to the lie that Brown never even touched the officer, the Dazzler bought them all, and when he was shown to be a gullible fool on each and everyone of these claims, he doubled and quadrupled down to the point that he now creates his own lies and bullshit like Obama helped cover up Brown's murder.trublue said:HHusky said:
But that isn't when he executed Michael Brown.trublue said:
Darrin Wilson was justified in using deadly physical force when Michael Brown came through the officer’s window and tried to disarm him.HHusky said:
What the fuck are you talking about, Detective? The DA didn't want an indictment and there was no indictment. It was handled splendidly!trublue said:
Don’t forget the Grand Jury investigation was mishandled according to the Dazzler, the “attorney” who know nothing about criminal law.SFGbob said:
Dazzler doesn't give a fuck about any of that. How many times has he been exposed as stone cold lying piece of crap. Have you ever seen him once admit that he was wrong? Dazzler revealed who he really when instead of just admitting he was wrong about the Mike Brown shooting, he went with claiming that Obama and Holder were in on the cover up. You can't shame or embarrass a pathological liar.46XiJCAB said:This is a classic Dazzler meltdown thread. Imagine being Fatso and knowing how much death, destruction and pain around the World your Joey vote is causing and not really giving a shit because you're a pussy and Trump was your Daddy. He does project a lot, doesn't he?
Dazzler, you're a shit human. You and I both know it.
Follow the story much, Sherlock?
He didn’t “execute” Michael Brown.
He stopped the threat against his life.
Yes, I did follow the story.
You?
Hows Hunter's laptop taste now BidenBros? -
You didn't follow the story did you? Wilson executed the future astronaut as he had his hands in the air, while on his knees, begging for his life. Not only did Wilson shoot him, but he finished him off with a shot to the top of the head. Then the Ferguson DA got the result he wanted out of the grand jury. And Obama and Holder were in on it too because they wanted Wilson to walk. The City of Ferguson paid bigly because they knew Wilson was guilty. I can't believe you don't know all of these undisputed facts of the case.SFGbob said:
Well we know what he did. He swallowed like a bitch every false narrative that came out at the time. From the original "hands up don't shoot" lie, to the lie about Brown being shot in the back, to the lie about Brown being on his knees with his arms in the air and being shot point blank in the head, to the lie that Brown never even touched the officer, the Dazzler bought them all, and when he was shown to be a gullible fool on each and everyone of these claims, he doubled and quadrupled down to the point that he now creates his own lies and bullshit like Obama helped cover up Brown's murder.trublue said:HHusky said:
But that isn't when he executed Michael Brown.trublue said:
Darrin Wilson was justified in using deadly physical force when Michael Brown came through the officer’s window and tried to disarm him.HHusky said:
What the fuck are you talking about, Detective? The DA didn't want an indictment and there was no indictment. It was handled splendidly!trublue said:
Don’t forget the Grand Jury investigation was mishandled according to the Dazzler, the “attorney” who know nothing about criminal law.SFGbob said:
Dazzler doesn't give a fuck about any of that. How many times has he been exposed as stone cold lying piece of crap. Have you ever seen him once admit that he was wrong? Dazzler revealed who he really when instead of just admitting he was wrong about the Mike Brown shooting, he went with claiming that Obama and Holder were in on the cover up. You can't shame or embarrass a pathological liar.46XiJCAB said:This is a classic Dazzler meltdown thread. Imagine being Fatso and knowing how much death, destruction and pain around the World your Joey vote is causing and not really giving a shit because you're a pussy and Trump was your Daddy. He does project a lot, doesn't he?
Dazzler, you're a shit human. You and I both know it.
Follow the story much, Sherlock?
He didn’t “execute” Michael Brown.
He stopped the threat against his life.
Yes, I did follow the story.
You?
If you slip on a grape at the local supermarket or fake that you did, my number is 555-555-5555 or #Imashittyattorney -
"Meritless to the point of demagoguery." - Andrew McCarthySFGbob said:Now try to imagine that this was Kavanaugh's record.
-
So she didn't hand down lighter sentences for pedophiles Dazzler? Btw, what do you call it when you lie about what Tulsi Gabbert actually said in order to claim she was repeating Russian propaganda? demagoguery?HHusky said:
"Meritless to the point of demagoguery." - Andrew McCarthySFGbob said:Now try to imagine that this was Kavanaugh's record.
Did Judge Jackson ever give a pedophile less time than what the sentencing guidelines called for Dazzler? Yes or No. Now go run and hide Kunt.
-
DIMS are groomers and when their Pedos are caught their judges give them light sentences. Sounds about par for the Pedo Party.
-
https://ace.mu.nu/
Josh Hawley @HawleyMO
Mar 16
I've been researching the record of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, reading her opinions, articles, interviews & speeches. I've noticed an alarming pattern when it comes to Judge Jackson's treatment of sex offenders, especially those preying on children
Judge Jackson has a pattern of letting child porn offenders off the hook for their appalling crimes, both as a judge and as a policymaker. She's been advocating for it since law school. This goes beyond "soft on crime." I'm concerned that this a record that endangers our children
As far back as her time in law school, Judge Jackson has questioned making convicts register as sex offenders - saying it leads to "stigmatization and ostracism." She's suggested public policy is driven by a "climate of fear, hatred & revenge" against sex offenders
Judge Jackson has also questioned sending dangerous sex offenders to civil commitment. We have a civil commitment law in Missouri, and it protects children
Josh Hawley
It gets worse. As a member of the U.S. Sentencing Commission, Judge Jackson advocated for drastic change in how the law treats sex offenders by eliminating the existing mandatory minimum sentences for child porn
Judge Jackson has said that some people who possess child porn "are in this for either the collection, or the people who are loners and find status in their participation in the community." What community would that be? The community of child exploiters?
Judge Jackson has opined there may be a type of "less-serious child pornography offender" whose motivation is not sexual but "is the challenge, or to use the technology." A "less-serious" child porn offender?
In her time on the U.S. Sentencing Commission, Judge Jackson said she "mistakingly assumed that child pornography offenders are pedophiles" and she wanted "to understand this category of nonpedophiles who obtain child pornography."
On the federal bench, Judge Jackson put her troubling views into action. In every single child porn case for which we can find records, Judge Jackson deviated from the federal sentencing guidelines in favor of child porn offenders
In the case of United States v. Hawkins, the sex offender had multiple images of child porn. He was over 18. The Sentencing Guidelines called for a sentence of up to 10 years. Judge Jackson sentenced the perpetrator to only 3 months in prison. Three months.
In United States v. Stewart, the criminal possessed thousands of images of child porn and also hoped to travel across state lines to abuse a 9-year-old girl. The Guidelines called for a sentence of 97-121 months. Judge Jackson sentenced the criminal to just 57 months.
In United States v. Cooper, in which the criminal had more than 600 images and videos and posted many on a public blog, the Guidelines called for a sentence of 151-188 months. Judge Jackson settled on 60 months, the lowest possible sentence allowed by law.
In United States v. Chazin, the offender had 48 files of child porn, which he had accessed over a period of years. The Guidelines recommended 78-97 months. Judge Jackson gave him 28.
In United States v. Downs, the perp posted multiple images to an anonymous instant messaging app, including an image of a child under the age of 5. The Guidelines recommended 70-87 months. Judge Jackson gave him the lowest sentence allowed by law, 60 months
In United States v. Sears, the sex offender distributed more than 102 child porn videos. He also sent lewd pictures of his own 10-year-old daughter. The Guidelines recommended 97-121 months in prison. Judge Jackson gave him 71 months.
In United States v. Savage, the sex offender was convicted of travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, and also admitted to transporting child porn. The Guidelines recommended 46-57 months. Judge Jackson gave him 37.
This is a disturbing record for any judge, but especially one nominated to the highest court in the land. Protecting the most vulnerable shouldn't be up for debate. Sending child predators to jail shouldn't be controversial.
So far, the Sentencing Commission has refused to turn over all Judge Jackson's records from her time there. In light of what we have learned, this stonewalling must end. We must get access to all relevant records -
only the people with the highest of character get the Dazzler and Yellow's vote.WestlinnDuck said: -
Sex offenders generally keep right on offending. Only exceptions are guys that had to register because their girlfriend was a little under 18 and a case was made. Those guys got screwed.WestlinnDuck said:https://ace.mu.nu/
Josh Hawley @HawleyMO
Mar 16
I've been researching the record of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, reading her opinions, articles, interviews & speeches. I've noticed an alarming pattern when it comes to Judge Jackson's treatment of sex offenders, especially those preying on children
Judge Jackson has a pattern of letting child porn offenders off the hook for their appalling crimes, both as a judge and as a policymaker. She's been advocating for it since law school. This goes beyond "soft on crime." I'm concerned that this a record that endangers our children
As far back as her time in law school, Judge Jackson has questioned making convicts register as sex offenders - saying it leads to "stigmatization and ostracism." She's suggested public policy is driven by a "climate of fear, hatred & revenge" against sex offenders
Judge Jackson has also questioned sending dangerous sex offenders to civil commitment. We have a civil commitment law in Missouri, and it protects children
Josh Hawley
It gets worse. As a member of the U.S. Sentencing Commission, Judge Jackson advocated for drastic change in how the law treats sex offenders by eliminating the existing mandatory minimum sentences for child porn
Judge Jackson has said that some people who possess child porn "are in this for either the collection, or the people who are loners and find status in their participation in the community." What community would that be? The community of child exploiters?
Judge Jackson has opined there may be a type of "less-serious child pornography offender" whose motivation is not sexual but "is the challenge, or to use the technology." A "less-serious" child porn offender?
In her time on the U.S. Sentencing Commission, Judge Jackson said she "mistakingly assumed that child pornography offenders are pedophiles" and she wanted "to understand this category of nonpedophiles who obtain child pornography."
On the federal bench, Judge Jackson put her troubling views into action. In every single child porn case for which we can find records, Judge Jackson deviated from the federal sentencing guidelines in favor of child porn offenders
In the case of United States v. Hawkins, the sex offender had multiple images of child porn. He was over 18. The Sentencing Guidelines called for a sentence of up to 10 years. Judge Jackson sentenced the perpetrator to only 3 months in prison. Three months.
In United States v. Stewart, the criminal possessed thousands of images of child porn and also hoped to travel across state lines to abuse a 9-year-old girl. The Guidelines called for a sentence of 97-121 months. Judge Jackson sentenced the criminal to just 57 months.
In United States v. Cooper, in which the criminal had more than 600 images and videos and posted many on a public blog, the Guidelines called for a sentence of 151-188 months. Judge Jackson settled on 60 months, the lowest possible sentence allowed by law.
In United States v. Chazin, the offender had 48 files of child porn, which he had accessed over a period of years. The Guidelines recommended 78-97 months. Judge Jackson gave him 28.
In United States v. Downs, the perp posted multiple images to an anonymous instant messaging app, including an image of a child under the age of 5. The Guidelines recommended 70-87 months. Judge Jackson gave him the lowest sentence allowed by law, 60 months
In United States v. Sears, the sex offender distributed more than 102 child porn videos. He also sent lewd pictures of his own 10-year-old daughter. The Guidelines recommended 97-121 months in prison. Judge Jackson gave him 71 months.
In United States v. Savage, the sex offender was convicted of travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, and also admitted to transporting child porn. The Guidelines recommended 46-57 months. Judge Jackson gave him 37.
This is a disturbing record for any judge, but especially one nominated to the highest court in the land. Protecting the most vulnerable shouldn't be up for debate. Sending child predators to jail shouldn't be controversial.
So far, the Sentencing Commission has refused to turn over all Judge Jackson's records from her time there. In light of what we have learned, this stonewalling must end. We must get access to all relevant records -
So she differentiates between possessing sick images and engaging in the behaviors depicted.
It's almost as if she draws distinctions or something. You know, like a judge does.
Sounds terrifying, ladies. -
The dazzler just votes for the pedophile grooming party. Circulating naked pictures of little boys and girls, often in sexual poses, doesn't hurt anyone, allegedly. It's no different than dressing your little girl up as a princess for Halloween and then taking some pictures for the scrapbook.HHusky said:
So she differentiates between possessing sick images and engaging in the behaviors depicted.
It's almost as if she draws distinctions or something. You know, like a judge does.
Sounds terrifying, ladies. -
The WH is stalling on the release of thousands of pages requested by Sen. Grassley regarding Pedo-Lite Jackson’s time as Vice-Chair of the US Sentencing Commission. A requirement under law.
