Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
5-star QB's usually suck
Comments
-
Holy shit, I retract my a statement. Who the fuck would name their kid a lettucednc said: -
It’s classic selection bias. If he tried to write a scientific paper based with that data, his editor would laugh him out of the building.dnc said:
They're facts but it's still slanted.BleachedAnusDawg said:
Probably, but them are the facts.dnc said:He is so jealous we took Damon's kid over his.
Did he takes the ones higher than Huard because they are the ones more likely to have a better career, or because they are the ones that fit his narrative better?
It would make far more sense to look at all 45 5 stars than a subset of 5 stars. It's already a very small sample, no need to reduce further. -
It's pretty tough to make a prediction on Huard. He was a true frosh who started the last game of the season with an interim OC, a subpar OL, and middling RBs.
DeBoer's offense sure sounds like a better fit for him, the OL should be better, and the RB room is more promising with Aaron Dumas and Emeka Megwa in the fold. -
Anyone who knows for sure that Huard is a flameout saw a lot more than I did to make that determination.
Judging any player based on the environment they had to work in last season is a sketchy proposition.
But hey, judge away. -
It's best for the program if Penix starts while Sam learns the new system.
Fuck a 2015 type season. Fucking win as many games as you can in year 1. -
Both of Hugh’s kids weren’t P5 worthy.
Baby Huey so far has proven less than Hero status.
Alabama can win with 5 star or 2 star QB
Trevor Lawrence was good in college
Old recruiting rankings somehow sucked ( no way)
Water is wet
Defensive and offensive lines win championships. Convince me otherwise -
It’s interesting because we want it to be interestingOreDawg said:
It’s classic selection bias. If he tried to write a scientific paper based with that data, his editor would laugh him out of the building.dnc said:
They're facts but it's still slanted.BleachedAnusDawg said:
Probably, but them are the facts.dnc said:He is so jealous we took Damon's kid over his.
Did he takes the ones higher than Huard because they are the ones more likely to have a better career, or because they are the ones that fit his narrative better?
It would make far more sense to look at all 45 5 stars than a subset of 5 stars. It's already a very small sample, no need to reduce further. -
Same discussion as always when it comes to 5*s.
Instead of talking about the top 30 players I'd be be more interested in comparing players ranked 10-100. Seems like there will always be a handful of real freaks in the top 10 then a next level of your regular elite players that can still suck sometimes. -
QB recruiting is a shit show. Shocking.
-
Kellen Moore couldn't beat out Taylor Tharp as a true freshman. The same Taylor Tharp that lost to Ty.
As Huard has always been a better Moore comp than Lawrence I'll give it a year.
