More swooning for Pete
"Haven't figured it out. And it's not something you get used to. Losses hurt more now than ever. It's painful. And it's not just 'big' games. They all hurt."
Can you imagine Sark's answer to that question? "Doesn't really bother me. The score isn't indicative of how good the teams are."
Comments
-
Sark would say some pussy shit like "As long as your team takes strides then losses can benefit your team in the long run."
-
"I just need 10 years". No joke, many posters on dickman said Sark needs 10 years, can you believe that shit? Yale and Fleenor among them. A head coach gets 5 years. Pete included...it might take that long to clean up Sark's mess.
Sark took over a better situation than Petersen. (Sark xidnt take over a true 0-12 team). He had a junior QB in Locker, proven runne r in Polk and good line and defense. Pete took over a mess at QB and a terribly thin dline, oline and dB situation depthwise. The starters are great....but not much after that have got reps.. -
Don't forget Sarks 24 hour rule; as long as he's banging a hostess within 24 hours of a loss, he doesn't let it bother him.
-
He needs his meds FRANNY!
-
Listen fuckers, Petersen wouldn't have went 5-7 with Locker and that crew in '09.There's a lot of similarities between that team and this squad.
Petersen has a great starting 22. The remaining roster is no better than UTAH's second unit. (as they haven't played down 1) Sark left Petersen a buttfucking mess not counting the starters. Pull your heads out and look. -
So you are saying the cupboard is bare ya bearded cunt ya?puppylove_sugarsteel said:Listen fuckers, Petersen wouldn't have went 5-7 with Locker and that crew in '09.There's a lot of similarities between that team and this squad.
Petersen has a great starting 22. The remaining roster is no better than UTAH's second unit. (as they haven't played down 1) Sark left Petersen a buttfucking mess not counting the starters. Pull your heads out and look. -
Yale never said Sark needed ten years.
-
I bleat for Pete!
-
Yes you did Yale. I got a timeout for pounding your flabby cunt over the issue.Gladstone said:Yale never said Sark needed ten years.
-
Fuck me runnin' Puppy! Did your brother get ahold of your account again? Where is Cockus when you need him? You're better than that. The '09 team started either Darrion Jones or Talia Crichton at DE. Te'o Nesheim was good, Kikaha is better. Same with a sophomore Ta'Amu vs. a senior Shelton. Josh Gage was the first LB off the bench. The CB's were a true freshman Trufant, Quinton Richardson, and Adam Long. Nick Wood and Greg Christine started on the OL. Kelemete was the best OL even though he moved there during Spring Ball. Dwayne Washington was more proven than Polk was at the time. Polk got hurt in '08, and was terrible in the two or three games he did play.puppylove_sugarsteel said:"I just need 10 years". No joke, many posters on dickman said Sark needs 10 years, can you believe that shit? Yale and Fleenor among them. A head coach gets 5 years. Pete included...it might take that long to clean up Sark's mess.
Sark took over a better situation than Petersen. (Sark xidnt take over a true 0-12 team). He had a junior QB in Locker, proven runne r in Polk and good line and defense. Pete took over a mess at QB and a terribly thin dline, oline and dB situation depthwise. The starters are great....but not much after that have got reps..
The '09 team had some talent in places, but this year's team is way better, especially on the OL and DL. It's not even close. The depth is way better too. Their was no depth on the OL and DL in '09. There is now. Same with LB. The DB depth is young, but is also better.
