Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
He's Not Wrong: 'Bigger Crime than Watergate'
Comments
-
Yeah Durham files charges without reason and Madcow is all knowing. Makes sense.
-
You know when you’re dealing with an absolute moron?
They cite Ray Maddow as a legit news source. Dazzler has jumped the shark. Just gone. -
Any warning?46XiJCAB said:You know when you’re dealing with an absolute moron?
They cite Ray Maddow as a legit news source. Dazzler has jumped the shark. Just gone. -
So they did do research back all the way to 2014... but the only thing they turned over to the CIA was 1000 emails with dirt on Trump.... so noHHusky said:
Uncle Sled weighs in. Doesn't understand the story. Doesn't care.
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/new-spying-story-clearly-not-trump-thinks-rcna16370
What we actually have is a superfluous story about cybersecurity researchers at Joffe's company examining malware in the White House — from Obama’s term, not Trump’s — and there doesn't appear to be any connection between Joffe's firm and Clinton.
Maybe Durham and his team didn’t realize their court filing would be exploited as part of a public-deception campaign launched by Trump and his media cohorts. Perhaps Durham and his team knew what would happen and didn’t care.
Either way, when your weird uncle who consumes conservative media all day sent you all-caps emails about Trump being “spied” on, he was pushing a story with no real basis in fact. The original “Spygate” story was a sad joke, and its third iteration is no better.
Red eye radio has been nailing this... they go into t for a few hours on the 14th episode -
Rachel Maddow didn’t write the piece. You could read Durham’s filing as well. I’m pretty sure none of you gals have done it. I have.46XiJCAB said:You know when you’re dealing with an absolute moron?
They cite Ray Maddow as a legit news source. Dazzler has jumped the shark. Just gone. -
Sorry. I’m not up to date on whatever nonsense you’re spouting about now.Goduckies said:
So they did do research back all the way to 2014... but the only thing they turned over to the CIA was 1000 emails with dirt on Trump.... so no
Red eye radio has been nailing this... they go into t for a few hours on the 14th episode -
Durham has filed any new charges. You girls get the news in Idyhoe?Sledog said:Yeah Durham files charges without reason and Madcow is all knowing. Makes sense.
-
Stop pretending you know how to read. Garbage in, garbage out. That’s Ray Maddow’s MO. If you were capable of being embarrassed you’d just delete your account and rot away under your bed.HHusky said:
Rachel Maddow didn’t write the piece. You could read Durham’s filing as well. I’m pretty sure none of you gals have done it. I have.
Alone. -
From the stellar legal mind that told us he knew Nic Sandman didn’t have a case because he had read the filing.HHusky said:
Rachel Maddow didn’t write the piece. You could read Durham’s filing as well. I’m pretty sure none of you gals have done it. I have. -
So you haven’t read it. No one ever thought you had.SFGbob said:From the stellar legal mind that told us he knew Nic Sandman didn’t have a case because he had read the filing. -
Like I said the same dipshit that claimed he read the filing in the Sandman case and proclaimed he didn’t have a chance in hell winning it is now using his big brain to weigh in on this case.HHusky said:
So you haven’t read it. No one ever thought you had.
Dazzler I wouldn’t believe your take if you were reading a fast food menu. -
And you can’t have a take yourself.SFGbob said:
Like I said the same dipshit that claimed he read the filing in the Sandman case and proclaimed he didn’t have a chance in hell winning it is now using his big brain to weigh in on this case.
Dazzler I wouldn’t believe your take if you were reading a fast food menu. -
You’re always wrong. I pity your clients.HHusky said:
So you haven’t read it. No one ever thought you had. -
I always have a "take" with you Dazzler, but it's always the same take. You're a liar and a hack. Nothing you say should be believed. And when you're exposed for the liar you are, because you have no shame, you'll double down on the bullshit and claim Obama and Eric Holder were part of the Gentle Giant conspiracy. You're nothing more than a dishonest troll Dazzler.HHusky said:
And you can’t have a take yourself. -
Od course you aren't up to date.HHusky said:
Sorry. I’m not up to date on whatever nonsense you’re spouting about now. -
If nothing else, this comment provides me an opportunity to say, Go Fuck Yourself, @GDS, you cock-sucking coward who still can't provide any facts to support his bullshit allegations against Tulsi Gabbard.SFGbob said:Think you'll hear the Dazzler Bros ever admit that they were wrong? Think will get an apology from the assholes who questioned people's patriotism simply for wanting to see the evidence in support of these allegations?
We already know this but I hope that it becomes a much bigger issue, there's no evidence that Russia ever hacked the DNC computers. It's all bullshit, FBI already admitted that they never inspected the servers and that the DNC refused to turn them over but that still didn't stop Comey and company from helping to push that narrative. The "Russian hack" was manufactured bullshit and all part of the plan to go after Trump.
Fucking Dazzler has quiet the track record.
Fuck you, @GDS. You slimy little worm. Crawl back under your rock, you fucking coward POS. -
What clients? He's obviously an AAG.46XiJCAB said:
You’re always wrong. I pity your clients. -
There's that double standard of the burden of evidence again "merely unproven, not disproven" lol such fag, h.HHusky said:
No, I want to know what you mean by it.
It's not a hoax that Russia tried to help Daddy. It's not a hoax that Daddy welcomed that help.
The only unproven thing is any actual conspiracy with between his campaign and Russia. Even that's merely unproven, not disproven. -
Listen to the Feb 14th and 15th editions of Red eye radio, they break it down perfectly... Kobe... if you want to learn something here you go...
I'm listening to Red Eye Radio 2/15/22 Part 1 : Red Eye Radio on the Red Eye Radio app. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.airkast.REDEYERADIO -
HH is the gimp in the trunk! That's what the credits from the movie said anyway.TurdBomber said: -
-
I can see the Racism in his eyes.RaceBannon said:
-
It's actually interesting how @HHusky argues like Kim. Relies on overly specific and irrelevant semantics to avoid being wrong, then throws in condescending and patronizing ad hominem comments to avoid the actual issue.
-
Come watch HHusky struggle in every thread.
-
For what it's worth folks on LinkedIn are openly supporting Trump and slamming the fbi
Still plenty of push back but still -
LinkedIn is easily where the wokest version of myself comes out.RaceBannon said:For what it's worth folks on LinkedIn are openly supporting Trump and slamming the fbi
Still plenty of push back but still -
Gotta read the roomBob_C said:
LinkedIn is easily where the wokest version of myself comes out.
I'm usually in the construction wing where there are more real Americans -
"Russia tried to help Daddy"HHusky said:
No, I want to know what you mean by it.
It's not a hoax that Russia tried to help Daddy. It's not a hoax that Daddy welcomed that help.
The only unproven thing is any actual conspiracy with between his campaign and Russia. Even that's merely unproven, not disproven.
Did they try to help him, or did they also place bounties on US troops? What kind of help did they 'try'? Did it help?
-
I listened to an interview with a retired Gen. He served under Trump. When the Russians sent mercenaries into Syria and attacked US Troops, Trump responded by turning the hounds loose, killing 200 of them.
Trump then called Putin and told him, we let the rest of them retreat, maybe I should have had them all killed? The US knew they were Russian because they had intercepted their communications. So Putin couldn’t deny it.
Trump was a Putin asset!
CoLlUsIoN!
