He's Not Wrong: 'Bigger Crime than Watergate'
Comments
-
Then get us going to jail right? Right?HHusky said:
The National Archives is in on it too? Okay.Goduckies said:
You have evidence of this? Those same "sources" have lied 24 7HHusky said:
You missed the destruction and removal of Presidential records? I can remember when people got prosecuted for that.SFGbob said:
I love how the Dazzler thinks there are all these "crimes" that Trump committed but that the Rats were just too modest and unwilling to charge him with. At every turn the Rats have been shown to be shameless liars. The Dossier, Russian collusion, Alfa Bank, if Hillary was doing the Lord's work and everything they were doing was just in order to expose Trump's crimes why hide the fact that the DNC and Hillary paid for the Dossier? Why not scream that from the rooftops? Why all the lies to the FISA court? Why hide the fact that you were spying on the Trump campaign?46XiJCAB said:
Stooge propagandist for the NY Slimes fits you so well. You have a very weak mind Dazzler. The kind guys like Hitler and Stalin loved.HHusky said:
There was and still remains evidence in support of Hillary's statement. The notion that anyone has disproven it is your fantasy. The data scientists involved haven't determined that their theory was incorrect. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/01/us/politics/trump-alfa-bank-indictment.htmlSFGbob said:
Lotta of Dazzler running and hiding like a Kunt from the very simple question he was asked.HHusky said:Lotta responses. What evidence, ladies?
Just take the L.
Dazzler where was the "evidence" in support of the statement released by the Hillary campaign in October 2016 that Race posted earlier? Since you're so BIG on evidence what was the evidence for that claim? Was that claim true Dazzler? Were you a fucking gullible dipshit yet again?
Durham is lying by omission, at least. His job is to negate the impact of very real crimes committed by Daddy and/or those surrounding him. And why did Daddy keep lying about his interests and involvement in Russia? -
Yup they have to have misdirection46XiJCAB said:Isn't it interesting that when the spying by Hillary is about to break, all of the sudden we have TRUMP "stolen" documents and "documents" flushed down a toilet according to someone in the WH. And who swallows both deflections? The Dazzler.
When the Clintons are involved in nefarious business, they always get the media to chomp on their deflections when they're about to be exposed. -
When will you see your therapist?HHusky said:
Where will you be when the wheels come off Durham crazy train though?hardhat said:
I just knew that someone would wind you up and you'd let it rip. I'm going to go get some popcorn.HHusky said:
Daddy committed lots of crimes. Hell, the National Archives just retrieved stolen/classified documents from him the other day.46XiJCAB said:
BlueAnon. That's your Dazzler. Daddy committed crimes but the people that spent 5 years trying to put him in jail decided not to prosecute him and now it's just too late. You're a F'n kook, you always have been.HHusky said:
I've never claimed Daddy was "installed by Russian interference". He won the electoral college. No one can possibly prove whether Russia's help was outcome determinative, but he did receive Russia's help, whether that help was coordinated with the campaign or not. And Hillary was shitty at running for office too.hardhat said:
Not hurt at all. Like I said, everyone's backing away from your sad conspiracy theory that 'daddy' was installed by russian interference. It's beyond comical at this point. Hillary was a shitty candidate. You've spent how many years of your life believing in this shit? I have friends and coworkers that are just like you, they would send me links to stupid left wing blogs and articles saying that Trump was going to jail. I always told them they were crazy. I was right.HHusky said:
I understand you're disappointed. The hurt will heal.hardhat said:HHusky said:https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/14/us/politics/durham-sussmann-trump-russia.html
Durham = S. Powell = Guiliani
I've also never said Daddy is going to jail. He's undeniably committed crimes, but I have zero confidence in the courage of the Justice Department to even prosecute them, much less to seek jail time. Many of Daddy's crimes can no longer be prosecuted anyway.
Back to the subject: Durham's filing has got you all excited for no good reason. The piece I've linked does a good job of explaining why your false hopes have been raised. (For example, Daddy's White House cannot have been "spied upon" in 2014, 2015, 2016). Frankly, the whole thing has raised the issue of Daddy's Russian connections again and brings renewed attention to the anomalies in the data that have never been explained to anyone's satisfaction. It may well backfire on you and Daddy.
Tax fraud? Yes. But much too old to prosecute in the case of his inheritance.
And those are just the crimes that are beyond serious debate. -
EVIDENCE! Fu*k off. Loser.HHusky said:
No, I want to know what you mean by it.hardhat said:
Now you're arguing with yourself.HHusky said:
awesomehardhat said:Sad old man rea
I'm right here old man. And laughing at your double standards for what is and isn't a conspiracy theory.HHusky said:
I'm not gonna chase you when you obviously want to run away.hardhat said:
White flagHHusky said:
not excited?hardhat said:Russian collusion--"Yeah, that sounds right."
Bountygate--"Just has to be true"
respiratory virus outbreak a few hundred yards from the only research center in China--"It's crackpot theory to suggest it came from there! It was from a bat that flew 1000 miles without infecting anybody on the way and released the virus there. You gals"
"russiagate hoax"hardhat said:
Yes it is awesome. You attack people here every day and call them conspiracy theorists. You rant about 'daddy' and fascism. All while swallowing whole the russiagate hoax and laughing off the fascism from your own party. I'm a conspiracy therapist.HHusky said:
awesomehardhat said:Sad old man rea
I'm right here old man. And laughing at your double standards for what is and isn't a conspiracy theory.HHusky said:
I'm not gonna chase you when you obviously want to run away.hardhat said:
White flagHHusky said:
not excited?hardhat said:Russian collusion--"Yeah, that sounds right."
Bountygate--"Just has to be true"
respiratory virus outbreak a few hundred yards from the only research center in China--"It's crackpot theory to suggest it came from there! It was from a bat that flew 1000 miles without infecting anybody on the way and released the virus there. You gals"
What is it?
It's not a hoax that Russia tried to help Daddy. It's not a hoax that Daddy welcomed that help.
The only unproven thing is any actual conspiracy with between his campaign and Russia. Even that's merely unproven, not disproven. -
So, no engagement.hardhat said:
When will you see your therapist?HHusky said:
Where will you be when the wheels come off Durham crazy train though?hardhat said:
I just knew that someone would wind you up and you'd let it rip. I'm going to go get some popcorn.HHusky said:
Daddy committed lots of crimes. Hell, the National Archives just retrieved stolen/classified documents from him the other day.46XiJCAB said:
BlueAnon. That's your Dazzler. Daddy committed crimes but the people that spent 5 years trying to put him in jail decided not to prosecute him and now it's just too late. You're a F'n kook, you always have been.HHusky said:
I've never claimed Daddy was "installed by Russian interference". He won the electoral college. No one can possibly prove whether Russia's help was outcome determinative, but he did receive Russia's help, whether that help was coordinated with the campaign or not. And Hillary was shitty at running for office too.hardhat said:
Not hurt at all. Like I said, everyone's backing away from your sad conspiracy theory that 'daddy' was installed by russian interference. It's beyond comical at this point. Hillary was a shitty candidate. You've spent how many years of your life believing in this shit? I have friends and coworkers that are just like you, they would send me links to stupid left wing blogs and articles saying that Trump was going to jail. I always told them they were crazy. I was right.HHusky said:
I understand you're disappointed. The hurt will heal.hardhat said:HHusky said:https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/14/us/politics/durham-sussmann-trump-russia.html
Durham = S. Powell = Guiliani
I've also never said Daddy is going to jail. He's undeniably committed crimes, but I have zero confidence in the courage of the Justice Department to even prosecute them, much less to seek jail time. Many of Daddy's crimes can no longer be prosecuted anyway.
Back to the subject: Durham's filing has got you all excited for no good reason. The piece I've linked does a good job of explaining why your false hopes have been raised. (For example, Daddy's White House cannot have been "spied upon" in 2014, 2015, 2016). Frankly, the whole thing has raised the issue of Daddy's Russian connections again and brings renewed attention to the anomalies in the data that have never been explained to anyone's satisfaction. It may well backfire on you and Daddy.
Tax fraud? Yes. But much too old to prosecute in the case of his inheritance.
And those are just the crimes that are beyond serious debate.
Disappointing, but not astonishing. -
You do realize that most in DC consider Durham "non-partisan" right? Or have you not been out from under you bed for so long, other than to link up with Blue Anon, that you don't know this? You're a moron Dazzler, you prove it with each poast.HHusky said:
Where will you be when the wheels come off Durham crazy train though?hardhat said:
I just knew that someone would wind you up and you'd let it rip. I'm going to go get some popcorn.HHusky said:
Daddy committed lots of crimes. Hell, the National Archives just retrieved stolen/classified documents from him the other day.46XiJCAB said:
BlueAnon. That's your Dazzler. Daddy committed crimes but the people that spent 5 years trying to put him in jail decided not to prosecute him and now it's just too late. You're a F'n kook, you always have been.HHusky said:
I've never claimed Daddy was "installed by Russian interference". He won the electoral college. No one can possibly prove whether Russia's help was outcome determinative, but he did receive Russia's help, whether that help was coordinated with the campaign or not. And Hillary was shitty at running for office too.hardhat said:
Not hurt at all. Like I said, everyone's backing away from your sad conspiracy theory that 'daddy' was installed by russian interference. It's beyond comical at this point. Hillary was a shitty candidate. You've spent how many years of your life believing in this shit? I have friends and coworkers that are just like you, they would send me links to stupid left wing blogs and articles saying that Trump was going to jail. I always told them they were crazy. I was right.HHusky said:
I understand you're disappointed. The hurt will heal.hardhat said:HHusky said:https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/14/us/politics/durham-sussmann-trump-russia.html
Durham = S. Powell = Guiliani
I've also never said Daddy is going to jail. He's undeniably committed crimes, but I have zero confidence in the courage of the Justice Department to even prosecute them, much less to seek jail time. Many of Daddy's crimes can no longer be prosecuted anyway.
Back to the subject: Durham's filing has got you all excited for no good reason. The piece I've linked does a good job of explaining why your false hopes have been raised. (For example, Daddy's White House cannot have been "spied upon" in 2014, 2015, 2016). Frankly, the whole thing has raised the issue of Daddy's Russian connections again and brings renewed attention to the anomalies in the data that have never been explained to anyone's satisfaction. It may well backfire on you and Daddy.
Tax fraud? Yes. But much too old to prosecute in the case of his inheritance.
And those are just the crimes that are beyond serious debate. -
brilliantly argued, Boris.46XiJCAB said:
EVIDENCE! Fu*k off. Loser.HHusky said:
No, I want to know what you mean by it.hardhat said:
Now you're arguing with yourself.HHusky said:
awesomehardhat said:Sad old man rea
I'm right here old man. And laughing at your double standards for what is and isn't a conspiracy theory.HHusky said:
I'm not gonna chase you when you obviously want to run away.hardhat said:
White flagHHusky said:
not excited?hardhat said:Russian collusion--"Yeah, that sounds right."
Bountygate--"Just has to be true"
respiratory virus outbreak a few hundred yards from the only research center in China--"It's crackpot theory to suggest it came from there! It was from a bat that flew 1000 miles without infecting anybody on the way and released the virus there. You gals"
"russiagate hoax"hardhat said:
Yes it is awesome. You attack people here every day and call them conspiracy theorists. You rant about 'daddy' and fascism. All while swallowing whole the russiagate hoax and laughing off the fascism from your own party. I'm a conspiracy therapist.HHusky said:
awesomehardhat said:Sad old man rea
I'm right here old man. And laughing at your double standards for what is and isn't a conspiracy theory.HHusky said:
I'm not gonna chase you when you obviously want to run away.hardhat said:
White flagHHusky said:
not excited?hardhat said:Russian collusion--"Yeah, that sounds right."
Bountygate--"Just has to be true"
respiratory virus outbreak a few hundred yards from the only research center in China--"It's crackpot theory to suggest it came from there! It was from a bat that flew 1000 miles without infecting anybody on the way and released the virus there. You gals"
What is it?
It's not a hoax that Russia tried to help Daddy. It's not a hoax that Daddy welcomed that help.
The only unproven thing is any actual conspiracy with between his campaign and Russia. Even that's merely unproven, not disproven. -
The reports are that Durham is busy interviewing folks that have come forward recently. Always better to be proactive, rather than become the fall guy/gal for the Clintons. Of course Dazzler doesn't know any of this is happening, how could he, he gets his news from a Corrupt Media, NYTimes seems to be a prime source. Hell WaPo claims than the Hillary spying on Trump has already been debunked. Case Closed.SFGbob said:
And when this one blows up in his face he'll fall back on "I never said it."46XiJCAB said:Isn't it interesting that when the spying by Hillary is about to break, all of the sudden we have TRUMP "stolen" documents and "documents" flushed down a toilet according to someone in the WH. And who swallows both deflections? The Dazzler.
When the Clintons are involved in nefarious business, they always get the media to chomp on their deflections when they're about to be exposed. -
Ok sure.HHusky said:https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/14/us/politics/durham-sussmann-trump-russia.html
Durham = S. Powell = Guiliani
@PurpleThrobber any advice here?hardhat said:
When will you see your therapist?HHusky said:
Where will you be when the wheels come off Durham crazy train though?hardhat said:
I just knew that someone would wind you up and you'd let it rip. I'm going to go get some popcorn.HHusky said:
Daddy committed lots of crimes. Hell, the National Archives just retrieved stolen/classified documents from him the other day.46XiJCAB said:
BlueAnon. That's your Dazzler. Daddy committed crimes but the people that spent 5 years trying to put him in jail decided not to prosecute him and now it's just too late. You're a F'n kook, you always have been.HHusky said:
I've never claimed Daddy was "installed by Russian interference". He won the electoral college. No one can possibly prove whether Russia's help was outcome determinative, but he did receive Russia's help, whether that help was coordinated with the campaign or not. And Hillary was shitty at running for office too.hardhat said:
Not hurt at all. Like I said, everyone's backing away from your sad conspiracy theory that 'daddy' was installed by russian interference. It's beyond comical at this point. Hillary was a shitty candidate. You've spent how many years of your life believing in this shit? I have friends and coworkers that are just like you, they would send me links to stupid left wing blogs and articles saying that Trump was going to jail. I always told them they were crazy. I was right.HHusky said:
I understand you're disappointed. The hurt will heal.hardhat said:HHusky said:https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/14/us/politics/durham-sussmann-trump-russia.html
Durham = S. Powell = Guiliani
I've also never said Daddy is going to jail. He's undeniably committed crimes, but I have zero confidence in the courage of the Justice Department to even prosecute them, much less to seek jail time. Many of Daddy's crimes can no longer be prosecuted anyway.
Back to the subject: Durham's filing has got you all excited for no good reason. The piece I've linked does a good job of explaining why your false hopes have been raised. (For example, Daddy's White House cannot have been "spied upon" in 2014, 2015, 2016). Frankly, the whole thing has raised the issue of Daddy's Russian connections again and brings renewed attention to the anomalies in the data that have never been explained to anyone's satisfaction. It may well backfire on you and Daddy.
Tax fraud? Yes. But much too old to prosecute in the case of his inheritance.
And those are just the crimes that are beyond serious debate. -
I've answered all of your questions. Already told you I don't care about it. And thanks for reading.HHusky said:
So, no engagement.hardhat said:
When will you see your therapist?HHusky said:
Where will you be when the wheels come off Durham crazy train though?hardhat said:
I just knew that someone would wind you up and you'd let it rip. I'm going to go get some popcorn.HHusky said:
Daddy committed lots of crimes. Hell, the National Archives just retrieved stolen/classified documents from him the other day.46XiJCAB said:
BlueAnon. That's your Dazzler. Daddy committed crimes but the people that spent 5 years trying to put him in jail decided not to prosecute him and now it's just too late. You're a F'n kook, you always have been.HHusky said:
I've never claimed Daddy was "installed by Russian interference". He won the electoral college. No one can possibly prove whether Russia's help was outcome determinative, but he did receive Russia's help, whether that help was coordinated with the campaign or not. And Hillary was shitty at running for office too.hardhat said:
Not hurt at all. Like I said, everyone's backing away from your sad conspiracy theory that 'daddy' was installed by russian interference. It's beyond comical at this point. Hillary was a shitty candidate. You've spent how many years of your life believing in this shit? I have friends and coworkers that are just like you, they would send me links to stupid left wing blogs and articles saying that Trump was going to jail. I always told them they were crazy. I was right.HHusky said:
I understand you're disappointed. The hurt will heal.hardhat said:HHusky said:https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/14/us/politics/durham-sussmann-trump-russia.html
Durham = S. Powell = Guiliani
I've also never said Daddy is going to jail. He's undeniably committed crimes, but I have zero confidence in the courage of the Justice Department to even prosecute them, much less to seek jail time. Many of Daddy's crimes can no longer be prosecuted anyway.
Back to the subject: Durham's filing has got you all excited for no good reason. The piece I've linked does a good job of explaining why your false hopes have been raised. (For example, Daddy's White House cannot have been "spied upon" in 2014, 2015, 2016). Frankly, the whole thing has raised the issue of Daddy's Russian connections again and brings renewed attention to the anomalies in the data that have never been explained to anyone's satisfaction. It may well backfire on you and Daddy.
Tax fraud? Yes. But much too old to prosecute in the case of his inheritance.
And those are just the crimes that are beyond serious debate.
Disappointing, but not astonishing. -
You yammer about evidence then go on a Blue Anon screed with zero evidence. That deserves a Fu*k off and nothing more.HHusky said:
brilliantly argued, Boris.46XiJCAB said:
EVIDENCE! Fu*k off. Loser.HHusky said:
No, I want to know what you mean by it.hardhat said:
Now you're arguing with yourself.HHusky said:
awesomehardhat said:Sad old man rea
I'm right here old man. And laughing at your double standards for what is and isn't a conspiracy theory.HHusky said:
I'm not gonna chase you when you obviously want to run away.hardhat said:
White flagHHusky said:
not excited?hardhat said:Russian collusion--"Yeah, that sounds right."
Bountygate--"Just has to be true"
respiratory virus outbreak a few hundred yards from the only research center in China--"It's crackpot theory to suggest it came from there! It was from a bat that flew 1000 miles without infecting anybody on the way and released the virus there. You gals"
"russiagate hoax"hardhat said:
Yes it is awesome. You attack people here every day and call them conspiracy theorists. You rant about 'daddy' and fascism. All while swallowing whole the russiagate hoax and laughing off the fascism from your own party. I'm a conspiracy therapist.HHusky said:
awesomehardhat said:Sad old man rea
I'm right here old man. And laughing at your double standards for what is and isn't a conspiracy theory.HHusky said:
I'm not gonna chase you when you obviously want to run away.hardhat said:
White flagHHusky said:
not excited?hardhat said:Russian collusion--"Yeah, that sounds right."
Bountygate--"Just has to be true"
respiratory virus outbreak a few hundred yards from the only research center in China--"It's crackpot theory to suggest it came from there! It was from a bat that flew 1000 miles without infecting anybody on the way and released the virus there. You gals"
What is it?
It's not a hoax that Russia tried to help Daddy. It's not a hoax that Daddy welcomed that help.
The only unproven thing is any actual conspiracy with between his campaign and Russia. Even that's merely unproven, not disproven. -
Pathological liars can sometimes get confused.hardhat said:
I've answered all of your questions. Already told you I don't care about it. And thanks for reading.HHusky said:
So, no engagement.hardhat said:
When will you see your therapist?HHusky said:
Where will you be when the wheels come off Durham crazy train though?hardhat said:
I just knew that someone would wind you up and you'd let it rip. I'm going to go get some popcorn.HHusky said:
Daddy committed lots of crimes. Hell, the National Archives just retrieved stolen/classified documents from him the other day.46XiJCAB said:
BlueAnon. That's your Dazzler. Daddy committed crimes but the people that spent 5 years trying to put him in jail decided not to prosecute him and now it's just too late. You're a F'n kook, you always have been.HHusky said:
I've never claimed Daddy was "installed by Russian interference". He won the electoral college. No one can possibly prove whether Russia's help was outcome determinative, but he did receive Russia's help, whether that help was coordinated with the campaign or not. And Hillary was shitty at running for office too.hardhat said:
Not hurt at all. Like I said, everyone's backing away from your sad conspiracy theory that 'daddy' was installed by russian interference. It's beyond comical at this point. Hillary was a shitty candidate. You've spent how many years of your life believing in this shit? I have friends and coworkers that are just like you, they would send me links to stupid left wing blogs and articles saying that Trump was going to jail. I always told them they were crazy. I was right.HHusky said:
I understand you're disappointed. The hurt will heal.hardhat said:HHusky said:https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/14/us/politics/durham-sussmann-trump-russia.html
Durham = S. Powell = Guiliani
I've also never said Daddy is going to jail. He's undeniably committed crimes, but I have zero confidence in the courage of the Justice Department to even prosecute them, much less to seek jail time. Many of Daddy's crimes can no longer be prosecuted anyway.
Back to the subject: Durham's filing has got you all excited for no good reason. The piece I've linked does a good job of explaining why your false hopes have been raised. (For example, Daddy's White House cannot have been "spied upon" in 2014, 2015, 2016). Frankly, the whole thing has raised the issue of Daddy's Russian connections again and brings renewed attention to the anomalies in the data that have never been explained to anyone's satisfaction. It may well backfire on you and Daddy.
Tax fraud? Yes. But much too old to prosecute in the case of his inheritance.
And those are just the crimes that are beyond serious debate.
Disappointing, but not astonishing. -
You can't fix stupid.Bob_C said:
Ok sure.HHusky said:https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/14/us/politics/durham-sussmann-trump-russia.html
Durham = S. Powell = Guiliani
@PurpleThrobber any advice here?hardhat said:
When will you see your therapist?HHusky said:
Where will you be when the wheels come off Durham crazy train though?hardhat said:
I just knew that someone would wind you up and you'd let it rip. I'm going to go get some popcorn.HHusky said:
Daddy committed lots of crimes. Hell, the National Archives just retrieved stolen/classified documents from him the other day.46XiJCAB said:
BlueAnon. That's your Dazzler. Daddy committed crimes but the people that spent 5 years trying to put him in jail decided not to prosecute him and now it's just too late. You're a F'n kook, you always have been.HHusky said:
I've never claimed Daddy was "installed by Russian interference". He won the electoral college. No one can possibly prove whether Russia's help was outcome determinative, but he did receive Russia's help, whether that help was coordinated with the campaign or not. And Hillary was shitty at running for office too.hardhat said:
Not hurt at all. Like I said, everyone's backing away from your sad conspiracy theory that 'daddy' was installed by russian interference. It's beyond comical at this point. Hillary was a shitty candidate. You've spent how many years of your life believing in this shit? I have friends and coworkers that are just like you, they would send me links to stupid left wing blogs and articles saying that Trump was going to jail. I always told them they were crazy. I was right.HHusky said:
I understand you're disappointed. The hurt will heal.hardhat said:HHusky said:https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/14/us/politics/durham-sussmann-trump-russia.html
Durham = S. Powell = Guiliani
I've also never said Daddy is going to jail. He's undeniably committed crimes, but I have zero confidence in the courage of the Justice Department to even prosecute them, much less to seek jail time. Many of Daddy's crimes can no longer be prosecuted anyway.
Back to the subject: Durham's filing has got you all excited for no good reason. The piece I've linked does a good job of explaining why your false hopes have been raised. (For example, Daddy's White House cannot have been "spied upon" in 2014, 2015, 2016). Frankly, the whole thing has raised the issue of Daddy's Russian connections again and brings renewed attention to the anomalies in the data that have never been explained to anyone's satisfaction. It may well backfire on you and Daddy.
Tax fraud? Yes. But much too old to prosecute in the case of his inheritance.
And those are just the crimes that are beyond serious debate.
-
So Durham’s merely incompetent?46XiJCAB said:
You do realize that most in DC consider Durham "non-partisan" right? Or have you not been out from under you bed for so long, other than to link up with Blue Anon, that you don't know this? You're a moron Dazzler, you prove it with each poast.HHusky said:
Where will you be when the wheels come off Durham crazy train though?hardhat said:
I just knew that someone would wind you up and you'd let it rip. I'm going to go get some popcorn.HHusky said:
Daddy committed lots of crimes. Hell, the National Archives just retrieved stolen/classified documents from him the other day.46XiJCAB said:
BlueAnon. That's your Dazzler. Daddy committed crimes but the people that spent 5 years trying to put him in jail decided not to prosecute him and now it's just too late. You're a F'n kook, you always have been.HHusky said:
I've never claimed Daddy was "installed by Russian interference". He won the electoral college. No one can possibly prove whether Russia's help was outcome determinative, but he did receive Russia's help, whether that help was coordinated with the campaign or not. And Hillary was shitty at running for office too.hardhat said:
Not hurt at all. Like I said, everyone's backing away from your sad conspiracy theory that 'daddy' was installed by russian interference. It's beyond comical at this point. Hillary was a shitty candidate. You've spent how many years of your life believing in this shit? I have friends and coworkers that are just like you, they would send me links to stupid left wing blogs and articles saying that Trump was going to jail. I always told them they were crazy. I was right.HHusky said:
I understand you're disappointed. The hurt will heal.hardhat said:HHusky said:https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/14/us/politics/durham-sussmann-trump-russia.html
Durham = S. Powell = Guiliani
I've also never said Daddy is going to jail. He's undeniably committed crimes, but I have zero confidence in the courage of the Justice Department to even prosecute them, much less to seek jail time. Many of Daddy's crimes can no longer be prosecuted anyway.
Back to the subject: Durham's filing has got you all excited for no good reason. The piece I've linked does a good job of explaining why your false hopes have been raised. (For example, Daddy's White House cannot have been "spied upon" in 2014, 2015, 2016). Frankly, the whole thing has raised the issue of Daddy's Russian connections again and brings renewed attention to the anomalies in the data that have never been explained to anyone's satisfaction. It may well backfire on you and Daddy.
Tax fraud? Yes. But much too old to prosecute in the case of his inheritance.
And those are just the crimes that are beyond serious debate.
Helluva defense. -
I meant on therapists.PurpleThrobber said:
You can't fix stupid.Bob_C said:
Ok sure.HHusky said:https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/14/us/politics/durham-sussmann-trump-russia.html
Durham = S. Powell = Guiliani
@PurpleThrobber any advice here?hardhat said:
When will you see your therapist?HHusky said:
Where will you be when the wheels come off Durham crazy train though?hardhat said:
I just knew that someone would wind you up and you'd let it rip. I'm going to go get some popcorn.HHusky said:
Daddy committed lots of crimes. Hell, the National Archives just retrieved stolen/classified documents from him the other day.46XiJCAB said:
BlueAnon. That's your Dazzler. Daddy committed crimes but the people that spent 5 years trying to put him in jail decided not to prosecute him and now it's just too late. You're a F'n kook, you always have been.HHusky said:
I've never claimed Daddy was "installed by Russian interference". He won the electoral college. No one can possibly prove whether Russia's help was outcome determinative, but he did receive Russia's help, whether that help was coordinated with the campaign or not. And Hillary was shitty at running for office too.hardhat said:
Not hurt at all. Like I said, everyone's backing away from your sad conspiracy theory that 'daddy' was installed by russian interference. It's beyond comical at this point. Hillary was a shitty candidate. You've spent how many years of your life believing in this shit? I have friends and coworkers that are just like you, they would send me links to stupid left wing blogs and articles saying that Trump was going to jail. I always told them they were crazy. I was right.HHusky said:
I understand you're disappointed. The hurt will heal.hardhat said:HHusky said:https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/14/us/politics/durham-sussmann-trump-russia.html
Durham = S. Powell = Guiliani
I've also never said Daddy is going to jail. He's undeniably committed crimes, but I have zero confidence in the courage of the Justice Department to even prosecute them, much less to seek jail time. Many of Daddy's crimes can no longer be prosecuted anyway.
Back to the subject: Durham's filing has got you all excited for no good reason. The piece I've linked does a good job of explaining why your false hopes have been raised. (For example, Daddy's White House cannot have been "spied upon" in 2014, 2015, 2016). Frankly, the whole thing has raised the issue of Daddy's Russian connections again and brings renewed attention to the anomalies in the data that have never been explained to anyone's satisfaction. It may well backfire on you and Daddy.
Tax fraud? Yes. But much too old to prosecute in the case of his inheritance.
And those are just the crimes that are beyond serious debate. -
In the eyes of a Kook like you that opinion means very little. Are you on the Clinton payroll?HHusky said:
So Durham’s merely incompetent?46XiJCAB said:
You do realize that most in DC consider Durham "non-partisan" right? Or have you not been out from under you bed for so long, other than to link up with Blue Anon, that you don't know this? You're a moron Dazzler, you prove it with each poast.HHusky said:
Where will you be when the wheels come off Durham crazy train though?hardhat said:
I just knew that someone would wind you up and you'd let it rip. I'm going to go get some popcorn.HHusky said:
Daddy committed lots of crimes. Hell, the National Archives just retrieved stolen/classified documents from him the other day.46XiJCAB said:
BlueAnon. That's your Dazzler. Daddy committed crimes but the people that spent 5 years trying to put him in jail decided not to prosecute him and now it's just too late. You're a F'n kook, you always have been.HHusky said:
I've never claimed Daddy was "installed by Russian interference". He won the electoral college. No one can possibly prove whether Russia's help was outcome determinative, but he did receive Russia's help, whether that help was coordinated with the campaign or not. And Hillary was shitty at running for office too.hardhat said:
Not hurt at all. Like I said, everyone's backing away from your sad conspiracy theory that 'daddy' was installed by russian interference. It's beyond comical at this point. Hillary was a shitty candidate. You've spent how many years of your life believing in this shit? I have friends and coworkers that are just like you, they would send me links to stupid left wing blogs and articles saying that Trump was going to jail. I always told them they were crazy. I was right.HHusky said:
I understand you're disappointed. The hurt will heal.hardhat said:HHusky said:https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/14/us/politics/durham-sussmann-trump-russia.html
Durham = S. Powell = Guiliani
I've also never said Daddy is going to jail. He's undeniably committed crimes, but I have zero confidence in the courage of the Justice Department to even prosecute them, much less to seek jail time. Many of Daddy's crimes can no longer be prosecuted anyway.
Back to the subject: Durham's filing has got you all excited for no good reason. The piece I've linked does a good job of explaining why your false hopes have been raised. (For example, Daddy's White House cannot have been "spied upon" in 2014, 2015, 2016). Frankly, the whole thing has raised the issue of Daddy's Russian connections again and brings renewed attention to the anomalies in the data that have never been explained to anyone's satisfaction. It may well backfire on you and Daddy.
Tax fraud? Yes. But much too old to prosecute in the case of his inheritance.
And those are just the crimes that are beyond serious debate.
Helluva defense. -
Obunghole and Hillary illegally tapped his campaign, phones and Whitehouse. Years of investigation by the left has found zero. Yet you think it's real.HHusky said:
No, I want to know what you mean by it.hardhat said:
Now you're arguing with yourself.HHusky said:
awesomehardhat said:Sad old man rea
I'm right here old man. And laughing at your double standards for what is and isn't a conspiracy theory.HHusky said:
I'm not gonna chase you when you obviously want to run away.hardhat said:
White flagHHusky said:
not excited?hardhat said:Russian collusion--"Yeah, that sounds right."
Bountygate--"Just has to be true"
respiratory virus outbreak a few hundred yards from the only research center in China--"It's crackpot theory to suggest it came from there! It was from a bat that flew 1000 miles without infecting anybody on the way and released the virus there. You gals"
"russiagate hoax"hardhat said:
Yes it is awesome. You attack people here every day and call them conspiracy theorists. You rant about 'daddy' and fascism. All while swallowing whole the russiagate hoax and laughing off the fascism from your own party. I'm a conspiracy therapist.HHusky said:
awesomehardhat said:Sad old man rea
I'm right here old man. And laughing at your double standards for what is and isn't a conspiracy theory.HHusky said:
I'm not gonna chase you when you obviously want to run away.hardhat said:
White flagHHusky said:
not excited?hardhat said:Russian collusion--"Yeah, that sounds right."
Bountygate--"Just has to be true"
respiratory virus outbreak a few hundred yards from the only research center in China--"It's crackpot theory to suggest it came from there! It was from a bat that flew 1000 miles without infecting anybody on the way and released the virus there. You gals"
What is it?
It's not a hoax that Russia tried to help Daddy. It's not a hoax that Daddy welcomed that help.
The only unproven thing is any actual conspiracy with between his campaign and Russia. Even that's merely unproven, not disproven.
Drown yourself. You're wasting everyone else's oxygen. -
Uncle Sled weighs in. Doesn't understand the story. Doesn't care.Sledog said:
Obunghole and Hillary illegally tapped his campaign, phones and Whitehouse. Years of investigation by the left has found zero. Yet you think it's real.HHusky said:
No, I want to know what you mean by it.hardhat said:
Now you're arguing with yourself.HHusky said:
awesomehardhat said:Sad old man rea
I'm right here old man. And laughing at your double standards for what is and isn't a conspiracy theory.HHusky said:
I'm not gonna chase you when you obviously want to run away.hardhat said:
White flagHHusky said:
not excited?hardhat said:Russian collusion--"Yeah, that sounds right."
Bountygate--"Just has to be true"
respiratory virus outbreak a few hundred yards from the only research center in China--"It's crackpot theory to suggest it came from there! It was from a bat that flew 1000 miles without infecting anybody on the way and released the virus there. You gals"
"russiagate hoax"hardhat said:
Yes it is awesome. You attack people here every day and call them conspiracy theorists. You rant about 'daddy' and fascism. All while swallowing whole the russiagate hoax and laughing off the fascism from your own party. I'm a conspiracy therapist.HHusky said:
awesomehardhat said:Sad old man rea
I'm right here old man. And laughing at your double standards for what is and isn't a conspiracy theory.HHusky said:
I'm not gonna chase you when you obviously want to run away.hardhat said:
White flagHHusky said:
not excited?hardhat said:Russian collusion--"Yeah, that sounds right."
Bountygate--"Just has to be true"
respiratory virus outbreak a few hundred yards from the only research center in China--"It's crackpot theory to suggest it came from there! It was from a bat that flew 1000 miles without infecting anybody on the way and released the virus there. You gals"
What is it?
It's not a hoax that Russia tried to help Daddy. It's not a hoax that Daddy welcomed that help.
The only unproven thing is any actual conspiracy with between his campaign and Russia. Even that's merely unproven, not disproven.
Drown yourself. You're wasting everyone else's oxygen.
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/new-spying-story-clearly-not-trump-thinks-rcna16370
What we actually have is a superfluous story about cybersecurity researchers at Joffe's company examining malware in the White House — from Obama’s term, not Trump’s — and there doesn't appear to be any connection between Joffe's firm and Clinton.
Maybe Durham and his team didn’t realize their court filing would be exploited as part of a public-deception campaign launched by Trump and his media cohorts. Perhaps Durham and his team knew what would happen and didn’t care.
Either way, when your weird uncle who consumes conservative media all day sent you all-caps emails about Trump being “spied” on, he was pushing a story with no real basis in fact. The original “Spygate” story was a sad joke, and its third iteration is no better. -
Good effort, sounds like Rachel is a strong source.HHusky said:
Uncle Sled weighs in. Doesn't understand the story. Doesn't care.Sledog said:
Obunghole and Hillary illegally tapped his campaign, phones and Whitehouse. Years of investigation by the left has found zero. Yet you think it's real.HHusky said:
No, I want to know what you mean by it.hardhat said:
Now you're arguing with yourself.HHusky said:
awesomehardhat said:Sad old man rea
I'm right here old man. And laughing at your double standards for what is and isn't a conspiracy theory.HHusky said:
I'm not gonna chase you when you obviously want to run away.hardhat said:
White flagHHusky said:
not excited?hardhat said:Russian collusion--"Yeah, that sounds right."
Bountygate--"Just has to be true"
respiratory virus outbreak a few hundred yards from the only research center in China--"It's crackpot theory to suggest it came from there! It was from a bat that flew 1000 miles without infecting anybody on the way and released the virus there. You gals"
"russiagate hoax"hardhat said:
Yes it is awesome. You attack people here every day and call them conspiracy theorists. You rant about 'daddy' and fascism. All while swallowing whole the russiagate hoax and laughing off the fascism from your own party. I'm a conspiracy therapist.HHusky said:
awesomehardhat said:Sad old man rea
I'm right here old man. And laughing at your double standards for what is and isn't a conspiracy theory.HHusky said:
I'm not gonna chase you when you obviously want to run away.hardhat said:
White flagHHusky said:
not excited?hardhat said:Russian collusion--"Yeah, that sounds right."
Bountygate--"Just has to be true"
respiratory virus outbreak a few hundred yards from the only research center in China--"It's crackpot theory to suggest it came from there! It was from a bat that flew 1000 miles without infecting anybody on the way and released the virus there. You gals"
What is it?
It's not a hoax that Russia tried to help Daddy. It's not a hoax that Daddy welcomed that help.
The only unproven thing is any actual conspiracy with between his campaign and Russia. Even that's merely unproven, not disproven.
Drown yourself. You're wasting everyone else's oxygen.
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/new-spying-story-clearly-not-trump-thinks-rcna16370
What we actually have is a superfluous story about cybersecurity researchers at Joffe's company examining malware in the White House — from Obama’s term, not Trump’s — and there doesn't appear to be any connection between Joffe's firm and Clinton.
Maybe Durham and his team didn’t realize their court filing would be exploited as part of a public-deception campaign launched by Trump and his media cohorts. Perhaps Durham and his team knew what would happen and didn’t care.
Either way, when your weird uncle who consumes conservative media all day sent you all-caps emails about Trump being “spied” on, he was pushing a story with no real basis in fact. The original “Spygate” story was a sad joke, and its third iteration is no better. -
Rachel didn't write it.Bob_C said:
Good effort, sounds like Rachel is a strong source.HHusky said:
Uncle Sled weighs in. Doesn't understand the story. Doesn't care.Sledog said:
Obunghole and Hillary illegally tapped his campaign, phones and Whitehouse. Years of investigation by the left has found zero. Yet you think it's real.HHusky said:
No, I want to know what you mean by it.hardhat said:
Now you're arguing with yourself.HHusky said:
awesomehardhat said:Sad old man rea
I'm right here old man. And laughing at your double standards for what is and isn't a conspiracy theory.HHusky said:
I'm not gonna chase you when you obviously want to run away.hardhat said:
White flagHHusky said:
not excited?hardhat said:Russian collusion--"Yeah, that sounds right."
Bountygate--"Just has to be true"
respiratory virus outbreak a few hundred yards from the only research center in China--"It's crackpot theory to suggest it came from there! It was from a bat that flew 1000 miles without infecting anybody on the way and released the virus there. You gals"
"russiagate hoax"hardhat said:
Yes it is awesome. You attack people here every day and call them conspiracy theorists. You rant about 'daddy' and fascism. All while swallowing whole the russiagate hoax and laughing off the fascism from your own party. I'm a conspiracy therapist.HHusky said:
awesomehardhat said:Sad old man rea
I'm right here old man. And laughing at your double standards for what is and isn't a conspiracy theory.HHusky said:
I'm not gonna chase you when you obviously want to run away.hardhat said:
White flagHHusky said:
not excited?hardhat said:Russian collusion--"Yeah, that sounds right."
Bountygate--"Just has to be true"
respiratory virus outbreak a few hundred yards from the only research center in China--"It's crackpot theory to suggest it came from there! It was from a bat that flew 1000 miles without infecting anybody on the way and released the virus there. You gals"
What is it?
It's not a hoax that Russia tried to help Daddy. It's not a hoax that Daddy welcomed that help.
The only unproven thing is any actual conspiracy with between his campaign and Russia. Even that's merely unproven, not disproven.
Drown yourself. You're wasting everyone else's oxygen.
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/new-spying-story-clearly-not-trump-thinks-rcna16370
What we actually have is a superfluous story about cybersecurity researchers at Joffe's company examining malware in the White House — from Obama’s term, not Trump’s — and there doesn't appear to be any connection between Joffe's firm and Clinton.
Maybe Durham and his team didn’t realize their court filing would be exploited as part of a public-deception campaign launched by Trump and his media cohorts. Perhaps Durham and his team knew what would happen and didn’t care.
Either way, when your weird uncle who consumes conservative media all day sent you all-caps emails about Trump being “spied” on, he was pushing a story with no real basis in fact. The original “Spygate” story was a sad joke, and its third iteration is no better.
Sounds like none of you gals really bothered to read Durham's pleading.
Trump wasn't President during all this "spying on the White House". -
If I was trying super extra hard to make a poont to this audience, I would definitely source Rachael Maddow. That's certainly what I would do.HHusky said:
Uncle Sled weighs in. Doesn't understand the story. Doesn't care.Sledog said:
Obunghole and Hillary illegally tapped his campaign, phones and Whitehouse. Years of investigation by the left has found zero. Yet you think it's real.HHusky said:
No, I want to know what you mean by it.hardhat said:
Now you're arguing with yourself.HHusky said:
awesomehardhat said:Sad old man rea
I'm right here old man. And laughing at your double standards for what is and isn't a conspiracy theory.HHusky said:
I'm not gonna chase you when you obviously want to run away.hardhat said:
White flagHHusky said:
not excited?hardhat said:Russian collusion--"Yeah, that sounds right."
Bountygate--"Just has to be true"
respiratory virus outbreak a few hundred yards from the only research center in China--"It's crackpot theory to suggest it came from there! It was from a bat that flew 1000 miles without infecting anybody on the way and released the virus there. You gals"
"russiagate hoax"hardhat said:
Yes it is awesome. You attack people here every day and call them conspiracy theorists. You rant about 'daddy' and fascism. All while swallowing whole the russiagate hoax and laughing off the fascism from your own party. I'm a conspiracy therapist.HHusky said:
awesomehardhat said:Sad old man rea
I'm right here old man. And laughing at your double standards for what is and isn't a conspiracy theory.HHusky said:
I'm not gonna chase you when you obviously want to run away.hardhat said:
White flagHHusky said:
not excited?hardhat said:Russian collusion--"Yeah, that sounds right."
Bountygate--"Just has to be true"
respiratory virus outbreak a few hundred yards from the only research center in China--"It's crackpot theory to suggest it came from there! It was from a bat that flew 1000 miles without infecting anybody on the way and released the virus there. You gals"
What is it?
It's not a hoax that Russia tried to help Daddy. It's not a hoax that Daddy welcomed that help.
The only unproven thing is any actual conspiracy with between his campaign and Russia. Even that's merely unproven, not disproven.
Drown yourself. You're wasting everyone else's oxygen.
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/new-spying-story-clearly-not-trump-thinks-rcna16370
What we actually have is a superfluous story about cybersecurity researchers at Joffe's company examining malware in the White House — from Obama’s term, not Trump’s — and there doesn't appear to be any connection between Joffe's firm and Clinton.
Maybe Durham and his team didn’t realize their court filing would be exploited as part of a public-deception campaign launched by Trump and his media cohorts. Perhaps Durham and his team knew what would happen and didn’t care.
Either way, when your weird uncle who consumes conservative media all day sent you all-caps emails about Trump being “spied” on, he was pushing a story with no real basis in fact. The original “Spygate” story was a sad joke, and its third iteration is no better.
You dumb fucking chimp -
Did newsmax tell you Daddy was President in 2014?pawz said:
If I was trying super extra hard to make a poont to this audience, I would definitely source Rachael Maddow. That's certainly what I would do.HHusky said:
Uncle Sled weighs in. Doesn't understand the story. Doesn't care.Sledog said:
Obunghole and Hillary illegally tapped his campaign, phones and Whitehouse. Years of investigation by the left has found zero. Yet you think it's real.HHusky said:
No, I want to know what you mean by it.hardhat said:
Now you're arguing with yourself.HHusky said:
awesomehardhat said:Sad old man rea
I'm right here old man. And laughing at your double standards for what is and isn't a conspiracy theory.HHusky said:
I'm not gonna chase you when you obviously want to run away.hardhat said:
White flagHHusky said:
not excited?hardhat said:Russian collusion--"Yeah, that sounds right."
Bountygate--"Just has to be true"
respiratory virus outbreak a few hundred yards from the only research center in China--"It's crackpot theory to suggest it came from there! It was from a bat that flew 1000 miles without infecting anybody on the way and released the virus there. You gals"
"russiagate hoax"hardhat said:
Yes it is awesome. You attack people here every day and call them conspiracy theorists. You rant about 'daddy' and fascism. All while swallowing whole the russiagate hoax and laughing off the fascism from your own party. I'm a conspiracy therapist.HHusky said:
awesomehardhat said:Sad old man rea
I'm right here old man. And laughing at your double standards for what is and isn't a conspiracy theory.HHusky said:
I'm not gonna chase you when you obviously want to run away.hardhat said:
White flagHHusky said:
not excited?hardhat said:Russian collusion--"Yeah, that sounds right."
Bountygate--"Just has to be true"
respiratory virus outbreak a few hundred yards from the only research center in China--"It's crackpot theory to suggest it came from there! It was from a bat that flew 1000 miles without infecting anybody on the way and released the virus there. You gals"
What is it?
It's not a hoax that Russia tried to help Daddy. It's not a hoax that Daddy welcomed that help.
The only unproven thing is any actual conspiracy with between his campaign and Russia. Even that's merely unproven, not disproven.
Drown yourself. You're wasting everyone else's oxygen.
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/new-spying-story-clearly-not-trump-thinks-rcna16370
What we actually have is a superfluous story about cybersecurity researchers at Joffe's company examining malware in the White House — from Obama’s term, not Trump’s — and there doesn't appear to be any connection between Joffe's firm and Clinton.
Maybe Durham and his team didn’t realize their court filing would be exploited as part of a public-deception campaign launched by Trump and his media cohorts. Perhaps Durham and his team knew what would happen and didn’t care.
Either way, when your weird uncle who consumes conservative media all day sent you all-caps emails about Trump being “spied” on, he was pushing a story with no real basis in fact. The original “Spygate” story was a sad joke, and its third iteration is no better.
You dumb fucking chimp -
If this is proven to be true and Durham finishes his investigation he needs to be totally complete before Congress can convict Trump of sedition for the Jan 6 mostly violent incident at the capital.
The secret service has altered the whereabouts of Kamela to be in the capital during the aforementioned incident. Thus the penalty is more severe. Like he can not be president if convicted of trumped up charges (see what I did there)
So it is a race to the finish Durham v Congress - who wins?
The deep state does and Durham is part of it - he will slow down -
What's newsmax?HHusky said:
Did newsmax tell you Daddy was President in 2014?pawz said:
If I was trying super extra hard to make a poont to this audience, I would definitely source Rachael Maddow. That's certainly what I would do.HHusky said:
Uncle Sled weighs in. Doesn't understand the story. Doesn't care.Sledog said:
Obunghole and Hillary illegally tapped his campaign, phones and Whitehouse. Years of investigation by the left has found zero. Yet you think it's real.HHusky said:
No, I want to know what you mean by it.hardhat said:
Now you're arguing with yourself.HHusky said:
awesomehardhat said:Sad old man rea
I'm right here old man. And laughing at your double standards for what is and isn't a conspiracy theory.HHusky said:
I'm not gonna chase you when you obviously want to run away.hardhat said:
White flagHHusky said:
not excited?hardhat said:Russian collusion--"Yeah, that sounds right."
Bountygate--"Just has to be true"
respiratory virus outbreak a few hundred yards from the only research center in China--"It's crackpot theory to suggest it came from there! It was from a bat that flew 1000 miles without infecting anybody on the way and released the virus there. You gals"
"russiagate hoax"hardhat said:
Yes it is awesome. You attack people here every day and call them conspiracy theorists. You rant about 'daddy' and fascism. All while swallowing whole the russiagate hoax and laughing off the fascism from your own party. I'm a conspiracy therapist.HHusky said:
awesomehardhat said:Sad old man rea
I'm right here old man. And laughing at your double standards for what is and isn't a conspiracy theory.HHusky said:
I'm not gonna chase you when you obviously want to run away.hardhat said:
White flagHHusky said:
not excited?hardhat said:Russian collusion--"Yeah, that sounds right."
Bountygate--"Just has to be true"
respiratory virus outbreak a few hundred yards from the only research center in China--"It's crackpot theory to suggest it came from there! It was from a bat that flew 1000 miles without infecting anybody on the way and released the virus there. You gals"
What is it?
It's not a hoax that Russia tried to help Daddy. It's not a hoax that Daddy welcomed that help.
The only unproven thing is any actual conspiracy with between his campaign and Russia. Even that's merely unproven, not disproven.
Drown yourself. You're wasting everyone else's oxygen.
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/new-spying-story-clearly-not-trump-thinks-rcna16370
What we actually have is a superfluous story about cybersecurity researchers at Joffe's company examining malware in the White House — from Obama’s term, not Trump’s — and there doesn't appear to be any connection between Joffe's firm and Clinton.
Maybe Durham and his team didn’t realize their court filing would be exploited as part of a public-deception campaign launched by Trump and his media cohorts. Perhaps Durham and his team knew what would happen and didn’t care.
Either way, when your weird uncle who consumes conservative media all day sent you all-caps emails about Trump being “spied” on, he was pushing a story with no real basis in fact. The original “Spygate” story was a sad joke, and its third iteration is no better.
You dumb fucking chimp
You dumb fucking chimp -
When you're citing Maddow for anything you've already surrendered.
-
So Daddy's White House was spied on from 2014 - 2016, says blob. 'Cuz a liberal said it wasn't.SFGbob said:When you're citing Maddow for anything you've already surrendered.
-
Unlike you Dazzler there is no dick in my mouth. What I say is very clear. Maddow is a fucking fool and a liar. But I can see why you like her.HHusky said:
So Daddy's White House was spied on from 2014 - 2016, says blob. 'Cuz a liberal said it wasn't.SFGbob said:When you're citing Maddow for anything you've already surrendered.
“He never actually got around to condemning the Nazis.”
– Rachel Maddow, Feb. 3, accusing Florida’s Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis
-
Maddow is a fucking joke, but you can see why the Dazzler like him.