Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

He's Not Wrong: 'Bigger Crime than Watergate'

1457910

Comments

  • GoduckiesGoduckies Member Posts: 7,594
    HHusky said:

    The National Archives is in on it too? Okay.
    Then get us going to jail right? Right?
  • GoduckiesGoduckies Member Posts: 7,594
    46XiJCAB said:

    Isn't it interesting that when the spying by Hillary is about to break, all of the sudden we have TRUMP "stolen" documents and "documents" flushed down a toilet according to someone in the WH. And who swallows both deflections? The Dazzler.

    When the Clintons are involved in nefarious business, they always get the media to chomp on their deflections when they're about to be exposed.

    Yup they have to have misdirection
  • hardhathardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    HHusky said:

    Where will you be when the wheels come off Durham crazy train though?
    When will you see your therapist?
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    HHusky said:

    No, I want to know what you mean by it.

    It's not a hoax that Russia tried to help Daddy. It's not a hoax that Daddy welcomed that help.

    The only unproven thing is any actual conspiracy with between his campaign and Russia. Even that's merely unproven, not disproven.
    EVIDENCE! Fu*k off. Loser.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 22,807
    hardhat said:

    When will you see your therapist?
    So, no engagement.

    Disappointing, but not astonishing.
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    HHusky said:

    Where will you be when the wheels come off Durham crazy train though?
    You do realize that most in DC consider Durham "non-partisan" right? Or have you not been out from under you bed for so long, other than to link up with Blue Anon, that you don't know this? You're a moron Dazzler, you prove it with each poast.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 22,807
    46XiJCAB said:

    EVIDENCE! Fu*k off. Loser.
    brilliantly argued, Boris.
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    SFGbob said:

    And when this one blows up in his face he'll fall back on "I never said it."
    The reports are that Durham is busy interviewing folks that have come forward recently. Always better to be proactive, rather than become the fall guy/gal for the Clintons. Of course Dazzler doesn't know any of this is happening, how could he, he gets his news from a Corrupt Media, NYTimes seems to be a prime source. Hell WaPo claims than the Hillary spying on Trump has already been debunked. Case Closed.
  • Bob_CBob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,981 Swaye's Wigwam
    HHusky said:
    Ok sure.
    hardhat said:

    When will you see your therapist?
    @PurpleThrobber any advice here?
  • hardhathardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    HHusky said:

    So, no engagement.

    Disappointing, but not astonishing.
    I've answered all of your questions. Already told you I don't care about it. And thanks for reading.
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    HHusky said:

    brilliantly argued, Boris.
    You yammer about evidence then go on a Blue Anon screed with zero evidence. That deserves a Fu*k off and nothing more.
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    hardhat said:

    I've answered all of your questions. Already told you I don't care about it. And thanks for reading.
    Pathological liars can sometimes get confused.
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 46,848 Standard Supporter
    Bob_C said:

    Ok sure. @PurpleThrobber any advice here?
    You can't fix stupid.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 22,807
    46XiJCAB said:

    You do realize that most in DC consider Durham "non-partisan" right? Or have you not been out from under you bed for so long, other than to link up with Blue Anon, that you don't know this? You're a moron Dazzler, you prove it with each poast.
    So Durham’s merely incompetent?

    Helluva defense.
  • Bob_CBob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,981 Swaye's Wigwam

    You can't fix stupid.
    I meant on therapists.
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    HHusky said:

    So Durham’s merely incompetent?

    Helluva defense.
    In the eyes of a Kook like you that opinion means very little. Are you on the Clinton payroll?
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 36,011 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    No, I want to know what you mean by it.

    It's not a hoax that Russia tried to help Daddy. It's not a hoax that Daddy welcomed that help.

    The only unproven thing is any actual conspiracy with between his campaign and Russia. Even that's merely unproven, not disproven.
    Obunghole and Hillary illegally tapped his campaign, phones and Whitehouse. Years of investigation by the left has found zero. Yet you think it's real.

    Drown yourself. You're wasting everyone else's oxygen.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 22,807
    Sledog said:

    Obunghole and Hillary illegally tapped his campaign, phones and Whitehouse. Years of investigation by the left has found zero. Yet you think it's real.

    Drown yourself. You're wasting everyone else's oxygen.
    Uncle Sled weighs in. Doesn't understand the story. Doesn't care.

    https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/new-spying-story-clearly-not-trump-thinks-rcna16370


    What we actually have is a superfluous story about cybersecurity researchers at Joffe's company examining malware in the White House — from Obama’s term, not Trump’s — and there doesn't appear to be any connection between Joffe's firm and Clinton.

    Maybe Durham and his team didn’t realize their court filing would be exploited as part of a public-deception campaign launched by Trump and his media cohorts. Perhaps Durham and his team knew what would happen and didn’t care.

    Either way, when your weird uncle who consumes conservative media all day sent you all-caps emails about Trump being “spied” on, he was pushing a story with no real basis in fact. The original “Spygate” story was a sad joke, and its third iteration is no better.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 22,807
    Bob_C said:

    Good effort, sounds like Rachel is a strong source.
    Rachel didn't write it.

    Sounds like none of you gals really bothered to read Durham's pleading.

    Trump wasn't President during all this "spying on the White House".
Sign In or Register to comment.