He's Not Wrong: 'Bigger Crime than Watergate'
Comments
-
Russian collusion--"Yeah, that sounds right."
Bountygate--"Just has to be true"
respiratory virus outbreak a few hundred yards from the only research center in China--"It's crackpot theory to suggest it came from there! It was from a bat that flew 1000 miles without infecting anybody on the way and released the virus there. You gals" -
not excited?hardhat said:Russian collusion--"Yeah, that sounds right."
Bountygate--"Just has to be true"
respiratory virus outbreak a few hundred yards from the only research center in China--"It's crackpot theory to suggest it came from there! It was from a bat that flew 1000 miles without infecting anybody on the way and released the virus there. You gals" -
White flagHHusky said:
not excited?hardhat said:Russian collusion--"Yeah, that sounds right."
Bountygate--"Just has to be true"
respiratory virus outbreak a few hundred yards from the only research center in China--"It's crackpot theory to suggest it came from there! It was from a bat that flew 1000 miles without infecting anybody on the way and released the virus there. You gals" -
I'm not gonna chase you when you obviously want to run away.hardhat said:
White flagHHusky said:
not excited?hardhat said:Russian collusion--"Yeah, that sounds right."
Bountygate--"Just has to be true"
respiratory virus outbreak a few hundred yards from the only research center in China--"It's crackpot theory to suggest it came from there! It was from a bat that flew 1000 miles without infecting anybody on the way and released the virus there. You gals" -
Sad old man rea
I'm right here old man. And laughing at your double standards for what is and isn't a conspiracy theory.HHusky said:
I'm not gonna chase you when you obviously want to run away.hardhat said:
White flagHHusky said:
not excited?hardhat said:Russian collusion--"Yeah, that sounds right."
Bountygate--"Just has to be true"
respiratory virus outbreak a few hundred yards from the only research center in China--"It's crackpot theory to suggest it came from there! It was from a bat that flew 1000 miles without infecting anybody on the way and released the virus there. You gals" -
awesomehardhat said:Sad old man rea
I'm right here old man. And laughing at your double standards for what is and isn't a conspiracy theory.HHusky said:
I'm not gonna chase you when you obviously want to run away.hardhat said:
White flagHHusky said:
not excited?hardhat said:Russian collusion--"Yeah, that sounds right."
Bountygate--"Just has to be true"
respiratory virus outbreak a few hundred yards from the only research center in China--"It's crackpot theory to suggest it came from there! It was from a bat that flew 1000 miles without infecting anybody on the way and released the virus there. You gals" -
And I can remember that when the Mike Brown case blew up in your face, rather than admit you were wrong you crafted some pathetic defense that civil settlements proved he was shot in the back while running away and that Obama and Erik Holder were in on the cover-up. You're a clown Dazzler.HHusky said:
You missed the destruction and removal of Presidential records? I can remember when people got prosecuted for that.SFGbob said:
I love how the Dazzler thinks there are all these "crimes" that Trump committed but that the Rats were just too modest and unwilling to charge him with. At every turn the Rats have been shown to be shameless liars. The Dossier, Russian collusion, Alfa Bank, if Hillary was doing the Lord's work and everything they were doing was just in order to expose Trump's crimes why hide the fact that the DNC and Hillary paid for the Dossier? Why not scream that from the rooftops? Why all the lies to the FISA court? Why hide the fact that you were spying on the Trump campaign?46XiJCAB said:
Stooge propagandist for the NY Slimes fits you so well. You have a very weak mind Dazzler. The kind guys like Hitler and Stalin loved.HHusky said:
There was and still remains evidence in support of Hillary's statement. The notion that anyone has disproven it is your fantasy. The data scientists involved haven't determined that their theory was incorrect. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/01/us/politics/trump-alfa-bank-indictment.htmlSFGbob said:
Lotta of Dazzler running and hiding like a Kunt from the very simple question he was asked.HHusky said:Lotta responses. What evidence, ladies?
Just take the L.
Dazzler where was the "evidence" in support of the statement released by the Hillary campaign in October 2016 that Race posted earlier? Since you're so BIG on evidence what was the evidence for that claim? Was that claim true Dazzler? Were you a fucking gullible dipshit yet again?
Durham is lying by omission, at least. His job is to negate the impact of very real crimes committed by Daddy and/or those surrounding him. And why did Daddy keep lying about his interests and involvement in Russia? -
Dazzler goes with the gibberish attack.HHusky said:
Why is Durham trying to tell you the data guys now disbelieve their original hypothesis? It's not true.Bendintheriver said:
OH for fuck sake, grow up Jr. You are beyond embarrassing. For crying out loud.HHusky said:
There was and still remains evidence in support of Hillary's statement. The notion that anyone has disproven it is your fantasy. The data scientists involved haven't determined that their theory was incorrect. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/01/us/politics/trump-alfa-bank-indictment.htmlSFGbob said:
Lotta of Dazzler running and hiding like a Kunt from the very simple question he was asked.HHusky said:Lotta responses. What evidence, ladies?
Just take the L.
Dazzler where was the "evidence" in support of the statement released by the Hillary campaign in October 2016 that Race posted earlier? Since you're so BIG on evidence what was the evidence for that claim? Was that claim true Dazzler? Were you a fucking gullible dipshit yet again?
Durham is lying by omission, at least. His job is to negate the impact of very real crimes committed by Daddy and/or those surrounding him. And why did Daddy keep lying about his interests and involvement in Russia?
The Russians are coming, the Russians are coming!!!!!!!!!!!
Run and hide hh. You are so ridiculous. -
Dazzler goes with the gibberish attack.HHusky said:
Why is Durham trying to tell you the data guys now disbelieve their original hypothesis? It's not true.Bendintheriver said:
OH for fuck sake, grow up Jr. You are beyond embarrassing. For crying out loud.HHusky said:
There was and still remains evidence in support of Hillary's statement. The notion that anyone has disproven it is your fantasy. The data scientists involved haven't determined that their theory was incorrect. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/01/us/politics/trump-alfa-bank-indictment.htmlSFGbob said:
Lotta of Dazzler running and hiding like a Kunt from the very simple question he was asked.HHusky said:Lotta responses. What evidence, ladies?
Just take the L.
Dazzler where was the "evidence" in support of the statement released by the Hillary campaign in October 2016 that Race posted earlier? Since you're so BIG on evidence what was the evidence for that claim? Was that claim true Dazzler? Were you a fucking gullible dipshit yet again?
Durham is lying by omission, at least. His job is to negate the impact of very real crimes committed by Daddy and/or those surrounding him. And why did Daddy keep lying about his interests and involvement in Russia?
The Russians are coming, the Russians are coming!!!!!!!!!!!
Run and hide hh. You are so ridiculous.
And this is where Dazzler just lies his ass off. Dazzler spent all of late 2016 and all of 2017 calling Race and I "comrade" because we asked him for evidence that Trump colluded with the Russians. Dazzler never claimed Trump was "installed" he just claimed that Russian helped him win the election and that he was a stooge for Putin, but he never said he was "installed."HHusky said:
I've never claimed Daddy was "installed by Russian interference". He won the electoral college. No one can possibly prove whether Russia's help was outcome determinative, but he did receive Russia's help, whether that help was coordinated with the campaign or not. And Hillary was shitty at running for office too.hardhat said:
Not hurt at all. Like I said, everyone's backing away from your sad conspiracy theory that 'daddy' was installed by russian interference. It's beyond comical at this point. Hillary was a shitty candidate. You've spent how many years of your life believing in this shit? I have friends and coworkers that are just like you, they would send me links to stupid left wing blogs and articles saying that Trump was going to jail. I always told them they were crazy. I was right.HHusky said:
I understand you're disappointed. The hurt will heal.hardhat said:HHusky said:https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/14/us/politics/durham-sussmann-trump-russia.html
Durham = S. Powell = Guiliani
I've also never said Daddy is going to jail. He's undeniably committed crimes, but I have zero confidence in the courage of the Justice Department to even prosecute them, much less to seek jail time. Many of Daddy's crimes can no longer be prosecuted anyway.
Back to the subject: Durham's filing has got you all excited for no good reason. The piece I've linked does a good job of explaining why your false hopes have been raised. (For example, Daddy's White House cannot have been "spied upon" in 2014, 2015, 2016). Frankly, the whole thing has raised the issue of Daddy's Russian connections again and brings renewed attention to the anomalies in the data that have never been explained to anyone's satisfaction. It may well backfire on you and Daddy. -
Yes it is awesome. You attack people here every day and call them conspiracy theorists. You rant about 'daddy' and fascism. All while swallowing whole the russiagate hoax and laughing off the fascism from your own party. I'm a conspiracy therapist.HHusky said:
awesomehardhat said:Sad old man rea
I'm right here old man. And laughing at your double standards for what is and isn't a conspiracy theory.HHusky said:
I'm not gonna chase you when you obviously want to run away.hardhat said:
White flagHHusky said:
not excited?hardhat said:Russian collusion--"Yeah, that sounds right."
Bountygate--"Just has to be true"
respiratory virus outbreak a few hundred yards from the only research center in China--"It's crackpot theory to suggest it came from there! It was from a bat that flew 1000 miles without infecting anybody on the way and released the virus there. You gals" -
So stupid isn't just an act.HHusky said:
I've never claimed Daddy was "installed by Russian interference". He won the electoral college. No one can possibly prove whether Russia's help was outcome determinative, but he did receive Russia's help, whether that help was coordinated with the campaign or not. And Hillary was shitty at running for office too.hardhat said:
Not hurt at all. Like I said, everyone's backing away from your sad conspiracy theory that 'daddy' was installed by russian interference. It's beyond comical at this point. Hillary was a shitty candidate. You've spent how many years of your life believing in this shit? I have friends and coworkers that are just like you, they would send me links to stupid left wing blogs and articles saying that Trump was going to jail. I always told them they were crazy. I was right.HHusky said:
I understand you're disappointed. The hurt will heal.hardhat said:HHusky said:https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/14/us/politics/durham-sussmann-trump-russia.html
Durham = S. Powell = Guiliani
I've also never said Daddy is going to jail. He's undeniably committed crimes, but I have zero confidence in the courage of the Justice Department to even prosecute them, much less to seek jail time. Many of Daddy's crimes can no longer be prosecuted anyway.
Back to the subject: Durham's filing has got you all excited for no good reason. The piece I've linked does a good job of explaining why your false hopes have been raised. (For example, Daddy's White House cannot have been "spied upon" in 2014, 2015, 2016). Frankly, the whole thing has raised the issue of Daddy's Russian connections again and brings renewed attention to the anomalies in the data that have never been explained to anyone's satisfaction. It may well backfire on you and Daddy. -
But he never "said" he was "installed."hardhat said:
Yes it is awesome. You attack people here every day and call them conspiracy theorists. You rant about 'daddy' and fascism. All while swallowing whole the russiagate hoax and laughing off the fascism from your own party. I'm a conspiracy therapist.HHusky said:
awesomehardhat said:Sad old man rea
I'm right here old man. And laughing at your double standards for what is and isn't a conspiracy theory.HHusky said:
I'm not gonna chase you when you obviously want to run away.hardhat said:
White flagHHusky said:
not excited?hardhat said:Russian collusion--"Yeah, that sounds right."
Bountygate--"Just has to be true"
respiratory virus outbreak a few hundred yards from the only research center in China--"It's crackpot theory to suggest it came from there! It was from a bat that flew 1000 miles without infecting anybody on the way and released the virus there. You gals"
-
BlueAnon. That's your Dazzler. Daddy committed crimes but the people that spent 5 years trying to put him in jail decided not to prosecute him and now it's just too late. You're a F'n kook, you always have been.HHusky said:
I've never claimed Daddy was "installed by Russian interference". He won the electoral college. No one can possibly prove whether Russia's help was outcome determinative, but he did receive Russia's help, whether that help was coordinated with the campaign or not. And Hillary was shitty at running for office too.hardhat said:
Not hurt at all. Like I said, everyone's backing away from your sad conspiracy theory that 'daddy' was installed by russian interference. It's beyond comical at this point. Hillary was a shitty candidate. You've spent how many years of your life believing in this shit? I have friends and coworkers that are just like you, they would send me links to stupid left wing blogs and articles saying that Trump was going to jail. I always told them they were crazy. I was right.HHusky said:
I understand you're disappointed. The hurt will heal.hardhat said:HHusky said:https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/14/us/politics/durham-sussmann-trump-russia.html
Durham = S. Powell = Guiliani
I've also never said Daddy is going to jail. He's undeniably committed crimes, but I have zero confidence in the courage of the Justice Department to even prosecute them, much less to seek jail time. Many of Daddy's crimes can no longer be prosecuted anyway.
Back to the subject: Durham's filing has got you all excited for no good reason. The piece I've linked does a good job of explaining why your false hopes have been raised. (For example, Daddy's White House cannot have been "spied upon" in 2014, 2015, 2016). Frankly, the whole thing has raised the issue of Daddy's Russian connections again and brings renewed attention to the anomalies in the data that have never been explained to anyone's satisfaction. It may well backfire on you and Daddy. -
awesomehardhat said:Sad old man rea
I'm right here old man. And laughing at your double standards for what is and isn't a conspiracy theory.HHusky said:
I'm not gonna chase you when you obviously want to run away.hardhat said:
White flagHHusky said:
not excited?hardhat said:Russian collusion--"Yeah, that sounds right."
Bountygate--"Just has to be true"
respiratory virus outbreak a few hundred yards from the only research center in China--"It's crackpot theory to suggest it came from there! It was from a bat that flew 1000 miles without infecting anybody on the way and released the virus there. You gals"
"russiagate hoax"hardhat said:
Yes it is awesome. You attack people here every day and call them conspiracy theorists. You rant about 'daddy' and fascism. All while swallowing whole the russiagate hoax and laughing off the fascism from your own party. I'm a conspiracy therapist.HHusky said:
awesomehardhat said:Sad old man rea
I'm right here old man. And laughing at your double standards for what is and isn't a conspiracy theory.HHusky said:
I'm not gonna chase you when you obviously want to run away.hardhat said:
White flagHHusky said:
not excited?hardhat said:Russian collusion--"Yeah, that sounds right."
Bountygate--"Just has to be true"
respiratory virus outbreak a few hundred yards from the only research center in China--"It's crackpot theory to suggest it came from there! It was from a bat that flew 1000 miles without infecting anybody on the way and released the virus there. You gals"
What is it? -
Trump was such a Putin stooge that when he got into office, he handed him the nord stream 2 on a platter.
Oh wait, that was the compromised stooge in the WH today, Joey Crackpipe. The guy Dazzler and the rest of the idiots installed. -
Now you're arguing with yourself.HHusky said:
awesomehardhat said:Sad old man rea
I'm right here old man. And laughing at your double standards for what is and isn't a conspiracy theory.HHusky said:
I'm not gonna chase you when you obviously want to run away.hardhat said:
White flagHHusky said:
not excited?hardhat said:Russian collusion--"Yeah, that sounds right."
Bountygate--"Just has to be true"
respiratory virus outbreak a few hundred yards from the only research center in China--"It's crackpot theory to suggest it came from there! It was from a bat that flew 1000 miles without infecting anybody on the way and released the virus there. You gals"
"russiagate hoax"hardhat said:
Yes it is awesome. You attack people here every day and call them conspiracy theorists. You rant about 'daddy' and fascism. All while swallowing whole the russiagate hoax and laughing off the fascism from your own party. I'm a conspiracy therapist.HHusky said:
awesomehardhat said:Sad old man rea
I'm right here old man. And laughing at your double standards for what is and isn't a conspiracy theory.HHusky said:
I'm not gonna chase you when you obviously want to run away.hardhat said:
White flagHHusky said:
not excited?hardhat said:Russian collusion--"Yeah, that sounds right."
Bountygate--"Just has to be true"
respiratory virus outbreak a few hundred yards from the only research center in China--"It's crackpot theory to suggest it came from there! It was from a bat that flew 1000 miles without infecting anybody on the way and released the virus there. You gals"
What is it? -
Daddy committed lots of crimes. Hell, the National Archives just retrieved stolen/classified documents from him the other day.46XiJCAB said:
BlueAnon. That's your Dazzler. Daddy committed crimes but the people that spent 5 years trying to put him in jail decided not to prosecute him and now it's just too late. You're a F'n kook, you always have been.HHusky said:
I've never claimed Daddy was "installed by Russian interference". He won the electoral college. No one can possibly prove whether Russia's help was outcome determinative, but he did receive Russia's help, whether that help was coordinated with the campaign or not. And Hillary was shitty at running for office too.hardhat said:
Not hurt at all. Like I said, everyone's backing away from your sad conspiracy theory that 'daddy' was installed by russian interference. It's beyond comical at this point. Hillary was a shitty candidate. You've spent how many years of your life believing in this shit? I have friends and coworkers that are just like you, they would send me links to stupid left wing blogs and articles saying that Trump was going to jail. I always told them they were crazy. I was right.HHusky said:
I understand you're disappointed. The hurt will heal.hardhat said:HHusky said:https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/14/us/politics/durham-sussmann-trump-russia.html
Durham = S. Powell = Guiliani
I've also never said Daddy is going to jail. He's undeniably committed crimes, but I have zero confidence in the courage of the Justice Department to even prosecute them, much less to seek jail time. Many of Daddy's crimes can no longer be prosecuted anyway.
Back to the subject: Durham's filing has got you all excited for no good reason. The piece I've linked does a good job of explaining why your false hopes have been raised. (For example, Daddy's White House cannot have been "spied upon" in 2014, 2015, 2016). Frankly, the whole thing has raised the issue of Daddy's Russian connections again and brings renewed attention to the anomalies in the data that have never been explained to anyone's satisfaction. It may well backfire on you and Daddy.
Tax fraud? Yes. But much too old to prosecute in the case of his inheritance.
And those are just the crimes that are beyond serious debate.
-
"Stolen" documents. Sounds serious. When does the trial begin? BlueAnon, Dazzler is all in.HHusky said:
Daddy committed lots of crimes. Hell, the National Archives just retrieved stolen/classified documents from him the other day.46XiJCAB said:
BlueAnon. That's your Dazzler. Daddy committed crimes but the people that spent 5 years trying to put him in jail decided not to prosecute him and now it's just too late. You're a F'n kook, you always have been.HHusky said:
I've never claimed Daddy was "installed by Russian interference". He won the electoral college. No one can possibly prove whether Russia's help was outcome determinative, but he did receive Russia's help, whether that help was coordinated with the campaign or not. And Hillary was shitty at running for office too.hardhat said:
Not hurt at all. Like I said, everyone's backing away from your sad conspiracy theory that 'daddy' was installed by russian interference. It's beyond comical at this point. Hillary was a shitty candidate. You've spent how many years of your life believing in this shit? I have friends and coworkers that are just like you, they would send me links to stupid left wing blogs and articles saying that Trump was going to jail. I always told them they were crazy. I was right.HHusky said:
I understand you're disappointed. The hurt will heal.hardhat said:HHusky said:https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/14/us/politics/durham-sussmann-trump-russia.html
Durham = S. Powell = Guiliani
I've also never said Daddy is going to jail. He's undeniably committed crimes, but I have zero confidence in the courage of the Justice Department to even prosecute them, much less to seek jail time. Many of Daddy's crimes can no longer be prosecuted anyway.
Back to the subject: Durham's filing has got you all excited for no good reason. The piece I've linked does a good job of explaining why your false hopes have been raised. (For example, Daddy's White House cannot have been "spied upon" in 2014, 2015, 2016). Frankly, the whole thing has raised the issue of Daddy's Russian connections again and brings renewed attention to the anomalies in the data that have never been explained to anyone's satisfaction. It may well backfire on you and Daddy.
Tax fraud? Yes. But much too old to prosecute in the case of his inheritance.
And those are just the crimes that are beyond serious debate. -
Don't forget, Dazzler also claimed that stories about Hunter Biden's laptop were "Russian disinformation." The list of topics where the Dazzler stuck his head up his ass are countless.
-
I just knew that someone would wind you up and you'd let it rip. I'm going to go get some popcorn.HHusky said:
Daddy committed lots of crimes. Hell, the National Archives just retrieved stolen/classified documents from him the other day.46XiJCAB said:
BlueAnon. That's your Dazzler. Daddy committed crimes but the people that spent 5 years trying to put him in jail decided not to prosecute him and now it's just too late. You're a F'n kook, you always have been.HHusky said:
I've never claimed Daddy was "installed by Russian interference". He won the electoral college. No one can possibly prove whether Russia's help was outcome determinative, but he did receive Russia's help, whether that help was coordinated with the campaign or not. And Hillary was shitty at running for office too.hardhat said:
Not hurt at all. Like I said, everyone's backing away from your sad conspiracy theory that 'daddy' was installed by russian interference. It's beyond comical at this point. Hillary was a shitty candidate. You've spent how many years of your life believing in this shit? I have friends and coworkers that are just like you, they would send me links to stupid left wing blogs and articles saying that Trump was going to jail. I always told them they were crazy. I was right.HHusky said:
I understand you're disappointed. The hurt will heal.hardhat said:HHusky said:https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/14/us/politics/durham-sussmann-trump-russia.html
Durham = S. Powell = Guiliani
I've also never said Daddy is going to jail. He's undeniably committed crimes, but I have zero confidence in the courage of the Justice Department to even prosecute them, much less to seek jail time. Many of Daddy's crimes can no longer be prosecuted anyway.
Back to the subject: Durham's filing has got you all excited for no good reason. The piece I've linked does a good job of explaining why your false hopes have been raised. (For example, Daddy's White House cannot have been "spied upon" in 2014, 2015, 2016). Frankly, the whole thing has raised the issue of Daddy's Russian connections again and brings renewed attention to the anomalies in the data that have never been explained to anyone's satisfaction. It may well backfire on you and Daddy.
Tax fraud? Yes. But much too old to prosecute in the case of his inheritance.
And those are just the crimes that are beyond serious debate.
-
No, I want to know what you mean by it.hardhat said:
Now you're arguing with yourself.HHusky said:
awesomehardhat said:Sad old man rea
I'm right here old man. And laughing at your double standards for what is and isn't a conspiracy theory.HHusky said:
I'm not gonna chase you when you obviously want to run away.hardhat said:
White flagHHusky said:
not excited?hardhat said:Russian collusion--"Yeah, that sounds right."
Bountygate--"Just has to be true"
respiratory virus outbreak a few hundred yards from the only research center in China--"It's crackpot theory to suggest it came from there! It was from a bat that flew 1000 miles without infecting anybody on the way and released the virus there. You gals"
"russiagate hoax"hardhat said:
Yes it is awesome. You attack people here every day and call them conspiracy theorists. You rant about 'daddy' and fascism. All while swallowing whole the russiagate hoax and laughing off the fascism from your own party. I'm a conspiracy therapist.HHusky said:
awesomehardhat said:Sad old man rea
I'm right here old man. And laughing at your double standards for what is and isn't a conspiracy theory.HHusky said:
I'm not gonna chase you when you obviously want to run away.hardhat said:
White flagHHusky said:
not excited?hardhat said:Russian collusion--"Yeah, that sounds right."
Bountygate--"Just has to be true"
respiratory virus outbreak a few hundred yards from the only research center in China--"It's crackpot theory to suggest it came from there! It was from a bat that flew 1000 miles without infecting anybody on the way and released the virus there. You gals"
What is it?
It's not a hoax that Russia tried to help Daddy. It's not a hoax that Daddy welcomed that help.
The only unproven thing is any actual conspiracy with between his campaign and Russia. Even that's merely unproven, not disproven. -
You have evidence of this? Those same "sources" have lied 24 7HHusky said:
You missed the destruction and removal of Presidential records? I can remember when people got prosecuted for that.SFGbob said:
I love how the Dazzler thinks there are all these "crimes" that Trump committed but that the Rats were just too modest and unwilling to charge him with. At every turn the Rats have been shown to be shameless liars. The Dossier, Russian collusion, Alfa Bank, if Hillary was doing the Lord's work and everything they were doing was just in order to expose Trump's crimes why hide the fact that the DNC and Hillary paid for the Dossier? Why not scream that from the rooftops? Why all the lies to the FISA court? Why hide the fact that you were spying on the Trump campaign?46XiJCAB said:
Stooge propagandist for the NY Slimes fits you so well. You have a very weak mind Dazzler. The kind guys like Hitler and Stalin loved.HHusky said:
There was and still remains evidence in support of Hillary's statement. The notion that anyone has disproven it is your fantasy. The data scientists involved haven't determined that their theory was incorrect. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/01/us/politics/trump-alfa-bank-indictment.htmlSFGbob said:
Lotta of Dazzler running and hiding like a Kunt from the very simple question he was asked.HHusky said:Lotta responses. What evidence, ladies?
Just take the L.
Dazzler where was the "evidence" in support of the statement released by the Hillary campaign in October 2016 that Race posted earlier? Since you're so BIG on evidence what was the evidence for that claim? Was that claim true Dazzler? Were you a fucking gullible dipshit yet again?
Durham is lying by omission, at least. His job is to negate the impact of very real crimes committed by Daddy and/or those surrounding him. And why did Daddy keep lying about his interests and involvement in Russia? -
Another Dazzler classic, Hillary never lied to the public about her emails.
-
Take it easy, Vlad. I'm trying to see whether hardhat will engage. I already know you won't.46XiJCAB said:Trump was such a Putin stooge that when he got into office, he handed him the nord stream 2 on a platter.
Oh wait, that was the compromised stooge in the WH today, Joey Crackpipe. The guy Dazzler and the rest of the idiots installed. -
Isn't it interesting that when the spying by Hillary is about to break, all of the sudden we have TRUMP "stolen" documents and "documents" flushed down a toilet according to someone in the WH. And who swallows both deflections? The Dazzler.
When the Clintons are involved in nefarious business, they always get the media to chomp on their deflections when they're about to be exposed. -
The National Archives is in on it too? Okay.Goduckies said:
You have evidence of this? Those same "sources" have lied 24 7HHusky said:
You missed the destruction and removal of Presidential records? I can remember when people got prosecuted for that.SFGbob said:
I love how the Dazzler thinks there are all these "crimes" that Trump committed but that the Rats were just too modest and unwilling to charge him with. At every turn the Rats have been shown to be shameless liars. The Dossier, Russian collusion, Alfa Bank, if Hillary was doing the Lord's work and everything they were doing was just in order to expose Trump's crimes why hide the fact that the DNC and Hillary paid for the Dossier? Why not scream that from the rooftops? Why all the lies to the FISA court? Why hide the fact that you were spying on the Trump campaign?46XiJCAB said:
Stooge propagandist for the NY Slimes fits you so well. You have a very weak mind Dazzler. The kind guys like Hitler and Stalin loved.HHusky said:
There was and still remains evidence in support of Hillary's statement. The notion that anyone has disproven it is your fantasy. The data scientists involved haven't determined that their theory was incorrect. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/01/us/politics/trump-alfa-bank-indictment.htmlSFGbob said:
Lotta of Dazzler running and hiding like a Kunt from the very simple question he was asked.HHusky said:Lotta responses. What evidence, ladies?
Just take the L.
Dazzler where was the "evidence" in support of the statement released by the Hillary campaign in October 2016 that Race posted earlier? Since you're so BIG on evidence what was the evidence for that claim? Was that claim true Dazzler? Were you a fucking gullible dipshit yet again?
Durham is lying by omission, at least. His job is to negate the impact of very real crimes committed by Daddy and/or those surrounding him. And why did Daddy keep lying about his interests and involvement in Russia? -
"The Clintons!"46XiJCAB said:Isn't it interesting that when the spying by Hillary is about to break, all of the sudden we have TRUMP "stolen" documents and "documents" flushed down a toilet according to someone in the WH. And who swallows both deflections? The Dazzler.
When the Clintons are involved in nefarious business, they always get the media to chomp on their deflections when they're about to be exposed.
Puppet masters!
-
And when this one blows up in his face he'll fall back on "I never said it."46XiJCAB said:Isn't it interesting that when the spying by Hillary is about to break, all of the sudden we have TRUMP "stolen" documents and "documents" flushed down a toilet according to someone in the WH. And who swallows both deflections? The Dazzler.
When the Clintons are involved in nefarious business, they always get the media to chomp on their deflections when they're about to be exposed. -
'Russia tried to help daddy' is the hoax that you silly people fell for. It's one of the saddest liberal media failures we have ever seen. This is coming from someone that never watched Fox News and still does not. I was a loyal NPR listener and NY Times reader. I have no idea what kind of garbage media you consume. JFC, even Rachel Maddow knows it. CNN pumped that volume up to 11 and you're still on it like my puppy and his new toy. You're going to end up like one of the Japanese soldiers holed up in the jungle that still believed it was WW2.HHusky said:
No, I want to know what you mean by it.hardhat said:
Now you're arguing with yourself.HHusky said:
awesomehardhat said:Sad old man rea
I'm right here old man. And laughing at your double standards for what is and isn't a conspiracy theory.HHusky said:
I'm not gonna chase you when you obviously want to run away.hardhat said:
White flagHHusky said:
not excited?hardhat said:Russian collusion--"Yeah, that sounds right."
Bountygate--"Just has to be true"
respiratory virus outbreak a few hundred yards from the only research center in China--"It's crackpot theory to suggest it came from there! It was from a bat that flew 1000 miles without infecting anybody on the way and released the virus there. You gals"
"russiagate hoax"hardhat said:
Yes it is awesome. You attack people here every day and call them conspiracy theorists. You rant about 'daddy' and fascism. All while swallowing whole the russiagate hoax and laughing off the fascism from your own party. I'm a conspiracy therapist.HHusky said:
awesomehardhat said:Sad old man rea
I'm right here old man. And laughing at your double standards for what is and isn't a conspiracy theory.HHusky said:
I'm not gonna chase you when you obviously want to run away.hardhat said:
White flagHHusky said:
not excited?hardhat said:Russian collusion--"Yeah, that sounds right."
Bountygate--"Just has to be true"
respiratory virus outbreak a few hundred yards from the only research center in China--"It's crackpot theory to suggest it came from there! It was from a bat that flew 1000 miles without infecting anybody on the way and released the virus there. You gals"
What is it?
It's not a hoax that Russia tried to help Daddy. It's not a hoax that Daddy welcomed that help.
The only unproven thing is any actual conspiracy with between his campaign and Russia. Even that's merely unproven, not disproven. -
Where will you be when the wheels come off Durham crazy train though?hardhat said:
I just knew that someone would wind you up and you'd let it rip. I'm going to go get some popcorn.HHusky said:
Daddy committed lots of crimes. Hell, the National Archives just retrieved stolen/classified documents from him the other day.46XiJCAB said:
BlueAnon. That's your Dazzler. Daddy committed crimes but the people that spent 5 years trying to put him in jail decided not to prosecute him and now it's just too late. You're a F'n kook, you always have been.HHusky said:
I've never claimed Daddy was "installed by Russian interference". He won the electoral college. No one can possibly prove whether Russia's help was outcome determinative, but he did receive Russia's help, whether that help was coordinated with the campaign or not. And Hillary was shitty at running for office too.hardhat said:
Not hurt at all. Like I said, everyone's backing away from your sad conspiracy theory that 'daddy' was installed by russian interference. It's beyond comical at this point. Hillary was a shitty candidate. You've spent how many years of your life believing in this shit? I have friends and coworkers that are just like you, they would send me links to stupid left wing blogs and articles saying that Trump was going to jail. I always told them they were crazy. I was right.HHusky said:
I understand you're disappointed. The hurt will heal.hardhat said:HHusky said:https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/14/us/politics/durham-sussmann-trump-russia.html
Durham = S. Powell = Guiliani
I've also never said Daddy is going to jail. He's undeniably committed crimes, but I have zero confidence in the courage of the Justice Department to even prosecute them, much less to seek jail time. Many of Daddy's crimes can no longer be prosecuted anyway.
Back to the subject: Durham's filing has got you all excited for no good reason. The piece I've linked does a good job of explaining why your false hopes have been raised. (For example, Daddy's White House cannot have been "spied upon" in 2014, 2015, 2016). Frankly, the whole thing has raised the issue of Daddy's Russian connections again and brings renewed attention to the anomalies in the data that have never been explained to anyone's satisfaction. It may well backfire on you and Daddy.
Tax fraud? Yes. But much too old to prosecute in the case of his inheritance.
And those are just the crimes that are beyond serious debate.