Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
A nation of Kobe's
SFGbob
Member Posts: 33,188
Shapiro makes a statement of fact and of course liberal snowflakes go into hysterics. And instead of telling the snowflakes to grow up, the Admin at Georgetown kowtows to them.
Comments
-
Who is hiring these uneducated snowflakes? Kids I wouldn't trust to pick up the dog poop in the backyard are supposed to function in a competitive adult world? Can you imagine the slobberer handling a customer counter at McDonald's let alone an expresso machine at Starbucks?
-
A lot of folks dreaming of that huge payday.
-
How fucked up in the head must a young black woman, who lets be honest here, almost certainly only got into Georgetown Law because of the color of her skin, be to demand "reparations" because someone said a statement of fact that made her snatch hurt?46XiJCAB said:A lot of folks dreaming of that huge payday.
Bitch, you've been getting your "reparations" your entire life. Your black skin has done nothing but help you your entire academic career. But is she greatful? Fuck no. Now she literally wants a free lunch because her feelings have been hurt. It's Michelle Obama only 45 years younger. -
Some of us can recognize Shapiro’s statement was idiotic AND simultaneously recognize that college administrators are spineless twits.
#NotMutuallyExclusive -
His statement was poorly worded, but only because asswholes like you and the people you vote for do nothing but wait to pounce on that kind of lame shit. Go ahead Kunt tell us why his statement was "idiotic?"HHusky said:Some of us can recognize Shapiro’s statement was idiotic AND simultaneously recognize that college administrators are spineless twits.
#NotMutuallyExclusive
He's absolutely right. And of course you say nothing about the students the "spineless twits" are caving to. I think we call those people your fellow Rat party voters Dazzler.
-
“Poorly worded”
Yeah, that’s all it was.
Of course. -
So you can't tell us why it was "idiotic" Got it. As always, Dazzler runs his mouth and then performs a Kunt act when asked to explain why.HHusky said:“Poorly worded”
Yeah, that’s all it was.
Of course.
You want to take a bet on if Biden's pick will come even close resume wise to the pick Shapiro mentioned Dazzler?
I seem to recall you mentioning quite a few times that Clarence Thomas was an unimpressive legal lightweight who was picked only because of his skin color. I guess your standards have "evolved" -
Clarence Thomas was picked for his skin color. This nominee will be picked for her skin color and gender. Sandra Day O’Connor was picked for her gender.SFGbob said:
So you can't tell us why it was "idiotic" Got it.HHusky said:“Poorly worded”
Yeah, that’s all it was.
Of course.
You want to take a bet on if Biden's pick will come even close resume wise to the pick Shapiro mentioned Dazzler?
I seem to recall you mentioning quite a few times that Clarence Thomas was an unimpressive legal lightweight who was picked only because of his skin color. I guess your standards have "evolved"
Your sudden interest in resumes is charmingly naive. -
That's a good Kunt, keep dancing. You'd hate to actually back up that worthless twat of a mouth. Appears you believe his statement was "idiotic" for the same reason the Georgetown Coed who now want "free" lunch thinks it was "racist." It made your snatches hurt.HHusky said:
Clarence Thomas was picked for his skin color. This nominee will be picked for her skin color and gender. Sandra Day O’Connor was picked for her gender.SFGbob said:
So you can't tell us why it was "idiotic" Got it.HHusky said:“Poorly worded”
Yeah, that’s all it was.
Of course.
You want to take a bet on if Biden's pick will come even close resume wise to the pick Shapiro mentioned Dazzler?
I seem to recall you mentioning quite a few times that Clarence Thomas was an unimpressive legal lightweight who was picked only because of his skin color. I guess your standards have "evolved"
Your sudden interest in resumes is charmingly naive. -
Here in 21st Century America, something that “poorly worded” is idiotic. You are shocked! shocked! there was any reaction.SFGbob said:
That's a good Kunt, keep dancing. You'd hate to actually back up that worthless twat of a mouth. Appears you believe his statement was "idiotic" for the same reason the Georgetown Coed who now want "free" lunch thinks it was "racist." It made your snatches hurt.HHusky said:
Clarence Thomas was picked for his skin color. This nominee will be picked for her skin color and gender. Sandra Day O’Connor was picked for her gender.SFGbob said:
So you can't tell us why it was "idiotic" Got it.HHusky said:“Poorly worded”
Yeah, that’s all it was.
Of course.
You want to take a bet on if Biden's pick will come even close resume wise to the pick Shapiro mentioned Dazzler?
I seem to recall you mentioning quite a few times that Clarence Thomas was an unimpressive legal lightweight who was picked only because of his skin color. I guess your standards have "evolved"
Your sudden interest in resumes is charmingly naive.
I am not.
