Ed Cunningham sucking off on sark on 710

dhdawg · August 2014

mynorthwest.com/category/pod_player_sports/?a=9975989&p=1013&n=Danny,%20Dave%20and%20Moore
Beginning of the podcast. "I don't know if Peterson is an upgrade"
"Sark didn't get enough credit"

puppylove_sugarsteel · August 2014

Cuntingham hates Washington. And for what Hedges did to his head coach i don't blame him.

MikeDamone · August 2014

Speaking of Ed Cunningham...What's he go these days? 125lbs? No steroids in UW football, nope...none.

gmo · August 2014

voted up for Cuntingham

RaceBannon · August 2014

He loved Ty. Back when I listened on KJR he was a weekly guest. Praised Ty to all end.

RoadDawg55 · August 2014

Cunningham is terrible. He was embarrassingly bad one time when announcing an Oregon game against Virginia. No professionalism at all. His Duck hate was pouring out of him. I will say the documentaries he has produced have been good.

CokeGreaterThanPepsi · August 2014

Sweet Jake Locker, what is he talking about?

HuskyJW · August 2014

Sark did an ok job....to say he sucked would be inaccurate. To say he brought us back would be inaccurate also.

We paid him a shitload of money though to do an ok job. A lot of coaches could have done what he did though.....Peterman is an upgrade and anybody that says different needs to DIAFF.

haie · August 2014

HuskyJW said:
Sark did an ok job....to say he sucked would be inaccurate. To say he brought us back would be inaccurate also.

We paid him a shitload of money though to do an ok job. A lot of coaches could have done what he did though.....Peterman is an upgrade and anybody that says different needs to DIAFF.

Harbaug and Chimp had a belly laugh over this.

HeretoBeatmyChest · August 2014

Ed will say something smart and insightful and then something totally ridiculous.

He spoke highly of UW's DL & defense and said Oregon is just a touch better. He basically intimated that UW should be 5-0 into Eugene and that if a few things go wrong for Oregon (over the course of the year) UW could be in the Pac12 title game.

Then he goes on to blow Sark and say Petersen is a great hire but not an upgrade. Then he says Oregon's strong program is a result of marketing/branding and Rich Brooks set the foundation.

SilkyJohnston · August 2014

I also don't know if Petersen is an upgrade, I mean 92-12 vs 34-29 is basically the same record. Sark definitely doesn't get enough credit for taking a 4-5 conference record team in 2009 to a 5-4 conference record team in 2013, just 5 years later! If you can't see the progress there, then I just can't help you.

TierbsHsotBoobs · August 2014

HuskyJW said:
Sark did an ok job....to say he sucked would be inaccurate. To say he brought us back would be inaccurate also.

We paid him a shitload of money though to do an ok job. A lot of coaches could have done what he did though.....Peterman is an upgrade and anybody that says different needs to DIAFF.

24-21 in the conference is OK at Oregon State.

At WASHINGTON (RIP), it fucking sucks.

TierbsHsotBoobs · August 2014

HeretoBeatmyChest said:
Ed will say something smart and insightful and then something totally ridiculous.

He spoke highly of UW's DL & defense and said Oregon is just a touch better. He basically intimated that UW should be 1-0 into Eugene and that if a few things go wrong for Oregon (over the course of the year) UW could be in the Pac12 title game.

Then he goes on to blow Sark and say Petersen is a great hire but not an upgrade. Then he says Oregon's strong program is a result of marketing/branding and Rich Brooks set the foundation.

Fixed. Look at the fucking schedule.

HuskyJW · August 2014

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

show previous quotes
HuskyJW said:
Sark did an ok job....to say he sucked would be inaccurate. To say he brought us back would be inaccurate also.

We paid him a shitload of money though to do an ok job. A lot of coaches could have done what he did though.....Peterman is an upgrade and anybody that says different needs to DIAFF.

24-21 in the conference is OK at Oregon State.

At WASHINGTON (RIP), it fucking sucks.

If you are going to skew the stats by looking at his entire body of work than I can't help you.

sarktastic · August 2014

Cuntingham will be proven right when Sark gets to 35-29 at USC that includes impressive blowout wins over a handful of FCS schools

HeretoBeatmyChest · August 2014

24-21 in the pac-12.

19-21 in the pac-10.

TierbsHsotBoobs · August 2014

HeretoBeatmyChest said:
24-21 in the pac-12.

19-21 in the pac-10.

You still have Cal too high.

14-21 in the Pac-9.

EsophagealFeces · August 2014

You guys still have no idea the damage Ty did. Owen Twelve was crippling, and he left no talent on the roster. Sark practically saved Warshington.

whatshouldicareabout · August 2014

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

show previous quotes
HeretoBeatmyChest said:
24-21 in the pac-12.

19-21 in the pac-10.
You still have Cal too high.

14-21 in the Pac-9.

So you're telling me OSU and Wazzu are equal to USC and Oregon??

7-18 versus the important Pac-12 teams

sarktastic · August 2014

HeretoBeatmyChest said:
24-21 in the pac-12.

19-21 in the pac-10.</blockquote

While it makes sense to give credit to Sark for those 19 wins, 20 of those 21 losses can be directly tied to Ty

TierbsHsotBoobs · August 2014

whatshouldicareabout said:

show previous quotes
TierbsHsotBoobs said:

HeretoBeatmyChest said:
24-21 in the pac-12.

19-21 in the pac-10.
You still have Cal too high.

14-21 in the Pac-9.

So you're telling me OSU and Wazzu are equal to USC and Oregon??

7-18 versus the important Pac-12 teams

My post had nothing to do with OS, WSU, USC, or Oregon.

Hope this helps.

Howdy, Stranger!

Quick Links

Ed Cunningham sucking off on sark on 710

Comments