Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Ed Cunningham sucking off on sark on 710
dhdawg
Member Posts: 13,326
mynorthwest.com/category/pod_player_sports/?a=9975989&p=1013&n=Danny,%20Dave%20and%20Moore
Beginning of the podcast. "I don't know if Peterson is an upgrade"
"Sark didn't get enough credit"
Beginning of the podcast. "I don't know if Peterson is an upgrade"
"Sark didn't get enough credit"
Comments
-
Cuntingham hates Washington. And for what Hedges did to his head coach i don't blame him.
-
Speaking of Ed Cunningham...What's he go these days? 125lbs? No steroids in UW football, nope...none.
-
voted up for Cuntingham
-
He loved Ty. Back when I listened on KJR he was a weekly guest. Praised Ty to all end.
-
Cunningham is terrible. He was embarrassingly bad one time when announcing an Oregon game against Virginia. No professionalism at all. His Duck hate was pouring out of him. I will say the documentaries he has produced have been good.
-
Sweet Jake Locker, what is he talking about?
-
Sark did an ok job....to say he sucked would be inaccurate. To say he brought us back would be inaccurate also.
We paid him a shitload of money though to do an ok job. A lot of coaches could have done what he did though.....Peterman is an upgrade and anybody that says different needs to DIAFF.
-
Harbaug and Chimp had a belly laugh over this.HuskyJW said:Sark did an ok job....to say he sucked would be inaccurate. To say he brought us back would be inaccurate also.
We paid him a shitload of money though to do an ok job. A lot of coaches could have done what he did though.....Peterman is an upgrade and anybody that says different needs to DIAFF. -
Ed will say something smart and insightful and then something totally ridiculous.
He spoke highly of UW's DL & defense and said Oregon is just a touch better. He basically intimated that UW should be 5-0 into Eugene and that if a few things go wrong for Oregon (over the course of the year) UW could be in the Pac12 title game.
Then he goes on to blow Sark and say Petersen is a great hire but not an upgrade. Then he says Oregon's strong program is a result of marketing/branding and Rich Brooks set the foundation.
-
I also don't know if Petersen is an upgrade, I mean 92-12 vs 34-29 is basically the same record. Sark definitely doesn't get enough credit for taking a 4-5 conference record team in 2009 to a 5-4 conference record team in 2013, just 5 years later! If you can't see the progress there, then I just can't help you.
