Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Biden's Nearly 2M Mail-In Pennsylvania Votes in 2020 Would Now Be 'Unconstitutional'

Comments

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,156 Founders Club
    We said it at the time

    And not just Pennsylvania

    No one cares Trump lost and things are great

    Now just make sure he can't run again because everyone hates him

    Science

    His voters all died to hurt Biden

  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,739 Founders Club
    I was told this had been all settled in the courts, gone through audits and that 90% of the country had moved on.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,875 Standard Supporter
    Hey Penn. had 200K more mail in ballots turned in than they sent out. Nothing to see!
  • MelloDawg
    MelloDawg Member Posts: 6,853
    edited January 2022
    Sledog said:

    Hey Penn. had 200K more mail in ballots turned in than they sent out. Nothing to see!

    Sounds like a slam dunk lawsuit to me. Or is it a homerun?
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    So the trucker that reported driving a trailer load of 288K completed ballots from NJ to PA and then reported that it disappeared, wasn’t some nut.
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,642 Standard Supporter
    Bob_C said:

    I was told this had been all settled in the courts, gone through audits and that 90% of the country had moved on.

    The fix was in. That POS Roberts first ruled that the plaintiff's alleging the state unconstitutional change to mail in voting before the election had no standing. After the election, Roberts and the SC ruled that the issue was moot. The SC never settled anything, they just punted on first down.
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967

    Bob_C said:

    I was told this had been all settled in the courts, gone through audits and that 90% of the country had moved on.

    The fix was in. That POS Roberts first ruled that the plaintiff's alleging the state unconstitutional change to mail in voting before the election had no standing. After the election, Roberts and the SC ruled that the issue was moot. The SC never settled anything, they just punted on first down.
    Pics in play.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,875 Standard Supporter

    Bob_C said:

    I was told this had been all settled in the courts, gone through audits and that 90% of the country had moved on.

    The fix was in. That POS Roberts first ruled that the plaintiff's alleging the state unconstitutional change to mail in voting before the election had no standing. After the election, Roberts and the SC ruled that the issue was moot. The SC never settled anything, they just punted on first down.
    There wasn't a voter whose name they could have used for the case? Seems doubtful....