Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Campbell? Meh

Don't want a guy who sets low expectations for his team and who, with 20 starters returning, significantly regresses coming off of a surprise Fiesta Bowl. They had a Heisman finalist running back, the best quarterback in school history, the preseason favorite to win the Mackey Award, and the Big 12 DPOY all back this year and were mediocre.

Campbell clearly didn't have his guys ready to handle expectations this year. No thanks.
«13

Comments

  • BleachedAnusDawg
    BleachedAnusDawg Member Posts: 13,918 Standard Supporter
    HFNY said:

    Meh, 4 out of his 5 losses have been by 7 points or less and 4 of his 5 losses were on the road. He'll probably beat TCU at home and then win his bowl game to finish 8-5.

    He's 30-23 in conference (he was 24-8 in conference at Toledo).

    He also has a top 25 recruiting class coming in.

    Let's not make the perfect the enemy of the good enough.

    So he can't win close games with a seasoned team? Even better.
  • Mad_Son
    Mad_Son Member Posts: 10,194
    Gladstone said:

    I don't think we get him but Campbell would be a big dick hire who (1) has been coveted by nearly vacant every program under the sun, and (2) leveled up two separate historically garbage programs. This isn't exactly Ty going 44-36 at Stanford. I would doog like hell for him.

    That being said, 0-6 vs rival Iowa is terrible. As is most of '21 in general, and yes I never put stock into close losses. Loser doog talk.

    UW could do 800x worse than this dude though. Two separate programs winning well above expectations, with both stops long enough to show he didn't get lucky or just ride a hot QB or senior laden team. He has recruited and developed and generally been pretty decent.

    Generally agree with what you said but I think you have to look at close losses in context. (Which I'm not doing for Campbell here.) Close losses are better than getting blown out. It's best to be able to play with everybody.
  • LawDawg1
    LawDawg1 Member Posts: 3,946

    HFNY said:

    Meh, 4 out of his 5 losses have been by 7 points or less and 4 of his 5 losses were on the road. He'll probably beat TCU at home and then win his bowl game to finish 8-5.

    He's 30-23 in conference (he was 24-8 in conference at Toledo).

    He also has a top 25 recruiting class coming in.

    Let's not make the perfect the enemy of the good enough.

    So he can't win close games with a seasoned team? Even better.
    Close games are mostly luck. Especially in such small samples.

    Unless you think Texas Tech hitting a last second 62 yard fg was somehow Campbell’s responsibility?

    The best way to win close games is to not get into hem in the first place.
    UW’s entire philosophy the past few years is to stay in close games no matter who they’re playing. See Kwiatkoswki defense as exhibit A.
  • no_uh
    no_uh Member Posts: 776
    Does anyone even think we are in it for Campbell? This program is such a mess and acts poor, so not expecting much. Probably going to roll the dice on a supposed up and comer.
  • TheHB
    TheHB Member Posts: 7,036
    no_uh said:

    Does anyone even think we are in it for Campbell? This program is such a mess and acts poor, so not expecting much. Probably going to roll the dice on a supposed up and comer.

    Firing a coach mid season and paying him $10 million is acting poor?
  • no_uh
    no_uh Member Posts: 776
    TheHB said:

    no_uh said:

    Does anyone even think we are in it for Campbell? This program is such a mess and acts poor, so not expecting much. Probably going to roll the dice on a supposed up and comer.

    Firing a coach mid season and paying him $10 million is acting poor?
    Just wait. And Hop is still here.