Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
We need a general tweet of the day thread
Comments
-
-
-
This post is misleading and considered to have potentially dangerous disinformation.Bob_C said:
-
I we lose we just try harder next time and don't claim fraud - Kobe
-
What is clear is that in the last decades, people who proudly call themselves professionals have largely allowed their "professions" to be totally demeaned by the left. When I hear Harvard Law Degree, I don't think about Ted Cruz, I think about barry and Adam Schiff. The AMA supported obamacare and have largely supported the Fow Chee approach to killing Americans instead of saving them from the chicom crud. Personally, the law profession has no more professionalism than the used car salesman profession. Then you can toss in the journalism profession. Anyway, the Kyle Rittenhouse show trial is underway. The Assistant DA who is putting on the states case is both beyond incompetent but also lying to judge and jury. Here is a summary of yesterday's STATE CASE and it was nothing but lies. Case should have never been brought, the Judge should issue a directed verdict after the State rests and the ADA should be disbarred. But, Rittenhouse will always be a "murderer" in the eyes of the leftards.
https://legalinsurrection.com/2021/11/rittenhouse-trial-day-3-states-own-witnesses-damage-prosecution-reinforce-self-defense-narrative/?eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=cf7769ec-27f9-4430-9e7c-69d63d8b0789
This third day of the trial was perhaps the worst yet for ADA Thomas Binger’s efforts to have Kyle Rittenhouse convicted and sentenced to life in prison for having shot three men (two fatally) the night of August 25, 2020 in Kenosha WI, when the city was suffering a tsunami of rioting, looting, and arson following the lawful shooting of a knife-wielding Jacob Blake by Kenosha police officers.
And that’s really saying something because its’ not like the prosecution out-performed in the first two days of the trial. Indeed, coming into today, the state had yet to present any evidence that was substantively inconsistent with Kyle’s legal defense of self-defense—none.
Today, however, was even worse. Two of the state’s own witnesses, and arguably their star witnesses with the greatest immediate personal knowledge of the events surrounding the shootings—journalist Richard McGinnis who was filming and interviewing Kyle that night, and former Army Infantryman Ryan Balch, who was also armed along with Kyle that night—provided lengthy testimony that not only failed to assist the state’s efforts to attack Kyle’s claim of self-defense, their testimony substantively strengthened that claim of self-defense...
HOW STATE WITNESSES TESTIFY IN A TRIAL OF LEGAL MERIT
Before I dive into the individual testimony of state witnesses Richard McGinnis, a videographer for the Daily Caller news organization, and Ryan Balch, a manufacturing worker and former Army Infantryman, it’s worth reminding ourselves what their testimony ought to have looked like, had this been a normal criminal prosecution based on actual legal merit.
As two state witnesses, not defense witnesses, both McGinnis and Balch would be expected to provide testimony that contributed to the prosecution’s narrative of guilt and undermined the defendant’s legal defenses. In this case that largely boils down to attacking and destroying Kyle’s legal defense of self-defense, at least with respect to all the felony use-of-force and reckless endangerment charges in this case.
Kyle Rittenhouse is presumed innocent, and that means that his shooting of the three men, and the reasonableness of his conduct otherwise the night of August 25, 2020, is presumed to be justified as lawful self-defense, unless the state can disprove self-defense beyond a reasonable doubt.
Now, the prosecution doesn’t have to disprove Kyle’s claim of self-defense in its entirety. The prosecution merely needs to disprove any one of the four elements that make up that claim of self-defense. These four elements are cumulative—meaning, every one of the four is required—so if even a single one is disproven beyond a reasonable doubt, Kyle’s legal justification of self-defense collapses entirely.
Read the whole thing --- -
Any Twitter users have link to the video of Pelosi today where she looks like she was having a stroke or seizure during an interview?
-
BleachedAnusDawg said:
Any Twitter users have link to the video of Pelosi today where she looks like she was having a stroke or seizure during an interview?
-
Stealing a diary is worse offense than child molesting tweet of the day.
-
But providing false witness to the FISA court on multiple occasions is what the left calls civic duty.huskyhooligan said:Stealing a diary is worse offense than child molesting tweet of the day.
-

Mrs Lonestar sends me texts






