Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Straight from the horse's mouth: Son of Hamas founder pulls the mask off the Hamas terrorist group
Comments
-
Who is we? You and the other handle you made up to make it look like more people agree with you?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Your priority is jizz. We know. You seem to have trouble answering the question pertaining to the right of Native Americans to return to the land that you are currently occupying. Since there's room for us all, I assume you will be donating your property to them?OZONE said:
Is this really the best you've got? If you can't argue the topic directly... just give up.Cuogar_Gold said:
Wow quook, those fortune 1000's must be proud of that response. Nice job of side stepping the topic of that huge creamy wad of Zinn sliding down your throat.OZONE said:
No idea. Never tasted Jizz.Cuogar_Gold said:
What does Howard Zinn's jizz taste like?OZONE said:
Your knowledge of history is like that of a small child... or somebody that only watches fox news or listens to rush & beck...oregonblitzkrieg said:
Sounds like you need to retake World History 101.OZONE said:
In the last 100 years... who committed the first acts of terrorism in the lands today called Israel?oregonblitzkrieg said:
You're a fucking idiot. Israel would just sit there and let terrorists fire missiles at them if you and TheGloveFS had your way. Hamas uses human shields. But I'm sure if terrorists were lobbing missiles at the community you live in, you would object to attacking them back with 1000 pound bombs lobbed from a naval vessel off shore, right?OZONE said:
When Israel is murdering civilians... why is it better that they don't use suicide bombers to do so?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Maybe you should do a little research. Last time I checked, the Israelis don't send suicide bombers to bomb buses and murder civilians.TheGlove said:Whether or not Hamas is a terrorist and/or humanitarian organization is a matter of perspective, don't you think?
I'm sure the Palestinians consider the missiles and mortars that are coming from Israel as inflicting terror. Therefore, the Palestinians consider the Israelis to be terrorists.
The founders of the USA were considered terrorists by England.
You see, trying to pass judgment by labeling one party of a conflict as terrorist, doesn't get you anywhere. You should look a little deeper. The world is not black/white, good/bad.
Is the murder of civilians less repugnant when it is done by a 1000 pound bomb lobbed from a naval vessel off shore?
Have you found that different men have different tasting jizz? Your question suggests as much.
Though you do seem to have a way with male on male imagery... I wonder why that is.
I already answered the question about right of return. Learn to read. -
No you didn't answer the question. The question was directed at you personally. Answer it or you're a pussy. Since you promote the idea of the right of return, you will also have to agree to vacate your land (if you own land) and give it back to the Native Americans, or you are betraying your own philosophy. You are occupying that land and they are refugees with the right to return to it. Will you hand over your land?OZONE said:
Who is we? You and the other handle you made up to make it look like more people agree with you?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Your priority is jizz. We know. You seem to have trouble answering the question pertaining to the right of Native Americans to return to the land that you are currently occupying. Since there's room for us all, I assume you will be donating your property to them?OZONE said:
Is this really the best you've got? If you can't argue the topic directly... just give up.Cuogar_Gold said:
Wow quook, those fortune 1000's must be proud of that response. Nice job of side stepping the topic of that huge creamy wad of Zinn sliding down your throat.OZONE said:
No idea. Never tasted Jizz.Cuogar_Gold said:
What does Howard Zinn's jizz taste like?OZONE said:
Your knowledge of history is like that of a small child... or somebody that only watches fox news or listens to rush & beck...oregonblitzkrieg said:
Sounds like you need to retake World History 101.OZONE said:
In the last 100 years... who committed the first acts of terrorism in the lands today called Israel?oregonblitzkrieg said:
You're a fucking idiot. Israel would just sit there and let terrorists fire missiles at them if you and TheGloveFS had your way. Hamas uses human shields. But I'm sure if terrorists were lobbing missiles at the community you live in, you would object to attacking them back with 1000 pound bombs lobbed from a naval vessel off shore, right?OZONE said:
When Israel is murdering civilians... why is it better that they don't use suicide bombers to do so?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Maybe you should do a little research. Last time I checked, the Israelis don't send suicide bombers to bomb buses and murder civilians.TheGlove said:Whether or not Hamas is a terrorist and/or humanitarian organization is a matter of perspective, don't you think?
I'm sure the Palestinians consider the missiles and mortars that are coming from Israel as inflicting terror. Therefore, the Palestinians consider the Israelis to be terrorists.
The founders of the USA were considered terrorists by England.
You see, trying to pass judgment by labeling one party of a conflict as terrorist, doesn't get you anywhere. You should look a little deeper. The world is not black/white, good/bad.
Is the murder of civilians less repugnant when it is done by a 1000 pound bomb lobbed from a naval vessel off shore?
Have you found that different men have different tasting jizz? Your question suggests as much.
Though you do seem to have a way with male on male imagery... I wonder why that is.
I already answered the question about right of return. Learn to read. -
You've tried to equate Israeli soldiers retaliating against terrorist attacks as terrorists themselves. What more do I need to add quook? Oh right, you're not seeing things in black and white like the rest of us. So Israeli Solder == Terrorist truly sees the complexity of the situation? Oh yeah, you cherry pick examples (like starting your argument in the 1940's, how many times did that area change hands before that?) in order to fit your agenda like....OZONE said:
Is this really the best you've got? If you can't argue the topic directly... just give up.Cuogar_Gold said:
Wow quook, those fortune 1000's must be proud of that response. Nice job of side stepping the topic of that huge creamy wad of Zinn sliding down your throat.OZONE said:
No idea. Never tasted Jizz.Cuogar_Gold said:
What does Howard Zinn's jizz taste like?OZONE said:
Your knowledge of history is like that of a small child... or somebody that only watches fox news or listens to rush & beck...oregonblitzkrieg said:
Sounds like you need to retake World History 101.OZONE said:
In the last 100 years... who committed the first acts of terrorism in the lands today called Israel?oregonblitzkrieg said:
You're a fucking idiot. Israel would just sit there and let terrorists fire missiles at them if you and TheGloveFS had your way. Hamas uses human shields. But I'm sure if terrorists were lobbing missiles at the community you live in, you would object to attacking them back with 1000 pound bombs lobbed from a naval vessel off shore, right?OZONE said:
When Israel is murdering civilians... why is it better that they don't use suicide bombers to do so?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Maybe you should do a little research. Last time I checked, the Israelis don't send suicide bombers to bomb buses and murder civilians.TheGlove said:Whether or not Hamas is a terrorist and/or humanitarian organization is a matter of perspective, don't you think?
I'm sure the Palestinians consider the missiles and mortars that are coming from Israel as inflicting terror. Therefore, the Palestinians consider the Israelis to be terrorists.
The founders of the USA were considered terrorists by England.
You see, trying to pass judgment by labeling one party of a conflict as terrorist, doesn't get you anywhere. You should look a little deeper. The world is not black/white, good/bad.
Is the murder of civilians less repugnant when it is done by a 1000 pound bomb lobbed from a naval vessel off shore?
Have you found that different men have different tasting jizz? Your question suggests as much.
Though you do seem to have a way with male on male imagery... I wonder why that is.
....HOWARD FUCKING ZINN -
Libtard philosophy only applies to other people. Never to themselves. You're in a vise bitch. You won't be allowed to weasel your way out of it.
-
I know you're just trying to be a dumbshit (and if you aren't trying... then it comes naturally to you)... but if you can't see that in your analogy... the Native Americans would equate to the Israelites... since in both cases... according to you and your supporters they were the original inhabitants of their respective lands... then are you really sure you want to pursue this line of logic?oregonblitzkrieg said:
No you didn't answer the question. The question was directed at you personally. Answer it or you're a pussy. Since you promote the idea of the right of return, you will also have to agree to vacate your land (if you own land) and give it back to the Native Americans, or you are betraying your own philosophy. You are occupying that land and they are refugees with the right to return to it. Will you hand over your land?OZONE said:
Who is we? You and the other handle you made up to make it look like more people agree with you?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Your priority is jizz. We know. You seem to have trouble answering the question pertaining to the right of Native Americans to return to the land that you are currently occupying. Since there's room for us all, I assume you will be donating your property to them?OZONE said:
Is this really the best you've got? If you can't argue the topic directly... just give up.Cuogar_Gold said:
Wow quook, those fortune 1000's must be proud of that response. Nice job of side stepping the topic of that huge creamy wad of Zinn sliding down your throat.OZONE said:
No idea. Never tasted Jizz.Cuogar_Gold said:
What does Howard Zinn's jizz taste like?OZONE said:
Your knowledge of history is like that of a small child... or somebody that only watches fox news or listens to rush & beck...oregonblitzkrieg said:
Sounds like you need to retake World History 101.OZONE said:
In the last 100 years... who committed the first acts of terrorism in the lands today called Israel?oregonblitzkrieg said:
You're a fucking idiot. Israel would just sit there and let terrorists fire missiles at them if you and TheGloveFS had your way. Hamas uses human shields. But I'm sure if terrorists were lobbing missiles at the community you live in, you would object to attacking them back with 1000 pound bombs lobbed from a naval vessel off shore, right?OZONE said:
When Israel is murdering civilians... why is it better that they don't use suicide bombers to do so?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Maybe you should do a little research. Last time I checked, the Israelis don't send suicide bombers to bomb buses and murder civilians.TheGlove said:Whether or not Hamas is a terrorist and/or humanitarian organization is a matter of perspective, don't you think?
I'm sure the Palestinians consider the missiles and mortars that are coming from Israel as inflicting terror. Therefore, the Palestinians consider the Israelis to be terrorists.
The founders of the USA were considered terrorists by England.
You see, trying to pass judgment by labeling one party of a conflict as terrorist, doesn't get you anywhere. You should look a little deeper. The world is not black/white, good/bad.
Is the murder of civilians less repugnant when it is done by a 1000 pound bomb lobbed from a naval vessel off shore?
Have you found that different men have different tasting jizz? Your question suggests as much.
Though you do seem to have a way with male on male imagery... I wonder why that is.
I already answered the question about right of return. Learn to read.
If anything, we would be like the arabs... the occupiers of the land after the original inhabitants... until such time as the UN comes along and gives a chunk of it back to the original inhabitants (as they did for the Jews).
Do you really not know why they are called the 12 Tribes of Israel?
So... smart guy... where do you really want to take this?
-
You're still dodging the question because to answer it you will have to betray your line of logic and philosophy. Your silence is answer enough -- of course you won't give up your own fucking land. Your position has a foundation of sand because you refuse to apply it to yourself. Kind of like how Obama Care doesn't apply to the libtard senators and congressmen that shoved it down our throats.OZONE said:
I know you're just trying to be a dumbshit (and if you aren't trying... then it comes naturally to you)... but if you can't see that in your analogy... the Native Americans would equate to the Israelites... since in both cases... according to you and your supporters they were the original inhabitants of their respective lands... then are you really sure you want to pursue this line of logic?oregonblitzkrieg said:
No you didn't answer the question. The question was directed at you personally. Answer it or you're a pussy. Since you promote the idea of the right of return, you will also have to agree to vacate your land (if you own land) and give it back to the Native Americans, or you are betraying your own philosophy. You are occupying that land and they are refugees with the right to return to it. Will you hand over your land?OZONE said:
Who is we? You and the other handle you made up to make it look like more people agree with you?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Your priority is jizz. We know. You seem to have trouble answering the question pertaining to the right of Native Americans to return to the land that you are currently occupying. Since there's room for us all, I assume you will be donating your property to them?OZONE said:
Is this really the best you've got? If you can't argue the topic directly... just give up.Cuogar_Gold said:
Wow quook, those fortune 1000's must be proud of that response. Nice job of side stepping the topic of that huge creamy wad of Zinn sliding down your throat.OZONE said:
No idea. Never tasted Jizz.Cuogar_Gold said:
What does Howard Zinn's jizz taste like?OZONE said:
Your knowledge of history is like that of a small child... or somebody that only watches fox news or listens to rush & beck...oregonblitzkrieg said:
Sounds like you need to retake World History 101.OZONE said:
In the last 100 years... who committed the first acts of terrorism in the lands today called Israel?oregonblitzkrieg said:
You're a fucking idiot. Israel would just sit there and let terrorists fire missiles at them if you and TheGloveFS had your way. Hamas uses human shields. But I'm sure if terrorists were lobbing missiles at the community you live in, you would object to attacking them back with 1000 pound bombs lobbed from a naval vessel off shore, right?OZONE said:
When Israel is murdering civilians... why is it better that they don't use suicide bombers to do so?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Maybe you should do a little research. Last time I checked, the Israelis don't send suicide bombers to bomb buses and murder civilians.TheGlove said:Whether or not Hamas is a terrorist and/or humanitarian organization is a matter of perspective, don't you think?
I'm sure the Palestinians consider the missiles and mortars that are coming from Israel as inflicting terror. Therefore, the Palestinians consider the Israelis to be terrorists.
The founders of the USA were considered terrorists by England.
You see, trying to pass judgment by labeling one party of a conflict as terrorist, doesn't get you anywhere. You should look a little deeper. The world is not black/white, good/bad.
Is the murder of civilians less repugnant when it is done by a 1000 pound bomb lobbed from a naval vessel off shore?
Have you found that different men have different tasting jizz? Your question suggests as much.
Though you do seem to have a way with male on male imagery... I wonder why that is.
I already answered the question about right of return. Learn to read.
If anything, we would be like the arabs... the occupiers of the land after the original inhabitants... until such time as the UN comes along and gives a chunk of it back to the original inhabitants (as they did for the Jews).
Do you really not know why they are called the 12 Tribes of Israel?
So... smart guy... where do you really want to take this? -
I answered it by pointing out your flaw. Why don't you answer your own question?oregonblitzkrieg said:
You're still dodging the question because to answer it you will have to betray your line of logic and philosophy. Your silence is answer enough -- of course you won't give up your own fucking land. Your position has a foundation of sand because you refuse to apply it to yourself. Kind of like how Obama Care doesn't apply to the libtard senators and congressmen that shoved it down our throats.OZONE said:
I know you're just trying to be a dumbshit (and if you aren't trying... then it comes naturally to you)... but if you can't see that in your analogy... the Native Americans would equate to the Israelites... since in both cases... according to you and your supporters they were the original inhabitants of their respective lands... then are you really sure you want to pursue this line of logic?oregonblitzkrieg said:
No you didn't answer the question. The question was directed at you personally. Answer it or you're a pussy. Since you promote the idea of the right of return, you will also have to agree to vacate your land (if you own land) and give it back to the Native Americans, or you are betraying your own philosophy. You are occupying that land and they are refugees with the right to return to it. Will you hand over your land?OZONE said:
Who is we? You and the other handle you made up to make it look like more people agree with you?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Your priority is jizz. We know. You seem to have trouble answering the question pertaining to the right of Native Americans to return to the land that you are currently occupying. Since there's room for us all, I assume you will be donating your property to them?OZONE said:
Is this really the best you've got? If you can't argue the topic directly... just give up.Cuogar_Gold said:
Wow quook, those fortune 1000's must be proud of that response. Nice job of side stepping the topic of that huge creamy wad of Zinn sliding down your throat.OZONE said:
No idea. Never tasted Jizz.Cuogar_Gold said:
What does Howard Zinn's jizz taste like?OZONE said:
Your knowledge of history is like that of a small child... or somebody that only watches fox news or listens to rush & beck...oregonblitzkrieg said:
Sounds like you need to retake World History 101.OZONE said:
In the last 100 years... who committed the first acts of terrorism in the lands today called Israel?oregonblitzkrieg said:
You're a fucking idiot. Israel would just sit there and let terrorists fire missiles at them if you and TheGloveFS had your way. Hamas uses human shields. But I'm sure if terrorists were lobbing missiles at the community you live in, you would object to attacking them back with 1000 pound bombs lobbed from a naval vessel off shore, right?OZONE said:
When Israel is murdering civilians... why is it better that they don't use suicide bombers to do so?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Maybe you should do a little research. Last time I checked, the Israelis don't send suicide bombers to bomb buses and murder civilians.TheGlove said:Whether or not Hamas is a terrorist and/or humanitarian organization is a matter of perspective, don't you think?
I'm sure the Palestinians consider the missiles and mortars that are coming from Israel as inflicting terror. Therefore, the Palestinians consider the Israelis to be terrorists.
The founders of the USA were considered terrorists by England.
You see, trying to pass judgment by labeling one party of a conflict as terrorist, doesn't get you anywhere. You should look a little deeper. The world is not black/white, good/bad.
Is the murder of civilians less repugnant when it is done by a 1000 pound bomb lobbed from a naval vessel off shore?
Have you found that different men have different tasting jizz? Your question suggests as much.
Though you do seem to have a way with male on male imagery... I wonder why that is.
I already answered the question about right of return. Learn to read.
If anything, we would be like the arabs... the occupiers of the land after the original inhabitants... until such time as the UN comes along and gives a chunk of it back to the original inhabitants (as they did for the Jews).
Do you really not know why they are called the 12 Tribes of Israel?
So... smart guy... where do you really want to take this?
If Jews had a right to return to their land, why don't native Americans?
-
Anyone with half a brain can see that you are dodging the question. If Native Americans have the right to return to their land, do they also have the right to return to your land? I'm done with you if you dodge it once more.OZONE said:
I answered it by pointing out your flaw. Why don't you answer your own question?oregonblitzkrieg said:
You're still dodging the question because to answer it you will have to betray your line of logic and philosophy. Your silence is answer enough -- of course you won't give up your own fucking land. Your position has a foundation of sand because you refuse to apply it to yourself. Kind of like how Obama Care doesn't apply to the libtard senators and congressmen that shoved it down our throats.OZONE said:
I know you're just trying to be a dumbshit (and if you aren't trying... then it comes naturally to you)... but if you can't see that in your analogy... the Native Americans would equate to the Israelites... since in both cases... according to you and your supporters they were the original inhabitants of their respective lands... then are you really sure you want to pursue this line of logic?oregonblitzkrieg said:
No you didn't answer the question. The question was directed at you personally. Answer it or you're a pussy. Since you promote the idea of the right of return, you will also have to agree to vacate your land (if you own land) and give it back to the Native Americans, or you are betraying your own philosophy. You are occupying that land and they are refugees with the right to return to it. Will you hand over your land?OZONE said:
Who is we? You and the other handle you made up to make it look like more people agree with you?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Your priority is jizz. We know. You seem to have trouble answering the question pertaining to the right of Native Americans to return to the land that you are currently occupying. Since there's room for us all, I assume you will be donating your property to them?OZONE said:
Is this really the best you've got? If you can't argue the topic directly... just give up.Cuogar_Gold said:
Wow quook, those fortune 1000's must be proud of that response. Nice job of side stepping the topic of that huge creamy wad of Zinn sliding down your throat.OZONE said:
No idea. Never tasted Jizz.Cuogar_Gold said:
What does Howard Zinn's jizz taste like?OZONE said:
Your knowledge of history is like that of a small child... or somebody that only watches fox news or listens to rush & beck...oregonblitzkrieg said:
Sounds like you need to retake World History 101.OZONE said:
In the last 100 years... who committed the first acts of terrorism in the lands today called Israel?oregonblitzkrieg said:
You're a fucking idiot. Israel would just sit there and let terrorists fire missiles at them if you and TheGloveFS had your way. Hamas uses human shields. But I'm sure if terrorists were lobbing missiles at the community you live in, you would object to attacking them back with 1000 pound bombs lobbed from a naval vessel off shore, right?OZONE said:
When Israel is murdering civilians... why is it better that they don't use suicide bombers to do so?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Maybe you should do a little research. Last time I checked, the Israelis don't send suicide bombers to bomb buses and murder civilians.TheGlove said:Whether or not Hamas is a terrorist and/or humanitarian organization is a matter of perspective, don't you think?
I'm sure the Palestinians consider the missiles and mortars that are coming from Israel as inflicting terror. Therefore, the Palestinians consider the Israelis to be terrorists.
The founders of the USA were considered terrorists by England.
You see, trying to pass judgment by labeling one party of a conflict as terrorist, doesn't get you anywhere. You should look a little deeper. The world is not black/white, good/bad.
Is the murder of civilians less repugnant when it is done by a 1000 pound bomb lobbed from a naval vessel off shore?
Have you found that different men have different tasting jizz? Your question suggests as much.
Though you do seem to have a way with male on male imagery... I wonder why that is.
I already answered the question about right of return. Learn to read.
If anything, we would be like the arabs... the occupiers of the land after the original inhabitants... until such time as the UN comes along and gives a chunk of it back to the original inhabitants (as they did for the Jews).
Do you really not know why they are called the 12 Tribes of Israel?
So... smart guy... where do you really want to take this?
If Jews had a right to return to their land, why don't native Americans? -
Because the native americans don't understand that before they were nearly wiped out by disease (cue OZONE's disease blankets argument), their lands changed hands by other tribes who had no problem killing them over it. You can go ahead and paint some picture of them all standing together smoking pipe but the reality is that often they didn't even want peace when it was offered to them. A warrior culture was prevalent in almost all of these tribes. I have a gun and a disease you have a tomahawk and you don't want to have a peaceful coexistence? GTFOOZONE said:
I answered it by pointing out your flaw. Why don't you answer your own question?oregonblitzkrieg said:
You're still dodging the question because to answer it you will have to betray your line of logic and philosophy. Your silence is answer enough -- of course you won't give up your own fucking land. Your position has a foundation of sand because you refuse to apply it to yourself. Kind of like how Obama Care doesn't apply to the libtard senators and congressmen that shoved it down our throats.OZONE said:
I know you're just trying to be a dumbshit (and if you aren't trying... then it comes naturally to you)... but if you can't see that in your analogy... the Native Americans would equate to the Israelites... since in both cases... according to you and your supporters they were the original inhabitants of their respective lands... then are you really sure you want to pursue this line of logic?oregonblitzkrieg said:
No you didn't answer the question. The question was directed at you personally. Answer it or you're a pussy. Since you promote the idea of the right of return, you will also have to agree to vacate your land (if you own land) and give it back to the Native Americans, or you are betraying your own philosophy. You are occupying that land and they are refugees with the right to return to it. Will you hand over your land?OZONE said:
Who is we? You and the other handle you made up to make it look like more people agree with you?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Your priority is jizz. We know. You seem to have trouble answering the question pertaining to the right of Native Americans to return to the land that you are currently occupying. Since there's room for us all, I assume you will be donating your property to them?OZONE said:
Is this really the best you've got? If you can't argue the topic directly... just give up.Cuogar_Gold said:
Wow quook, those fortune 1000's must be proud of that response. Nice job of side stepping the topic of that huge creamy wad of Zinn sliding down your throat.OZONE said:
No idea. Never tasted Jizz.Cuogar_Gold said:
What does Howard Zinn's jizz taste like?OZONE said:
Your knowledge of history is like that of a small child... or somebody that only watches fox news or listens to rush & beck...oregonblitzkrieg said:
Sounds like you need to retake World History 101.OZONE said:
In the last 100 years... who committed the first acts of terrorism in the lands today called Israel?oregonblitzkrieg said:
You're a fucking idiot. Israel would just sit there and let terrorists fire missiles at them if you and TheGloveFS had your way. Hamas uses human shields. But I'm sure if terrorists were lobbing missiles at the community you live in, you would object to attacking them back with 1000 pound bombs lobbed from a naval vessel off shore, right?OZONE said:
When Israel is murdering civilians... why is it better that they don't use suicide bombers to do so?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Maybe you should do a little research. Last time I checked, the Israelis don't send suicide bombers to bomb buses and murder civilians.TheGlove said:Whether or not Hamas is a terrorist and/or humanitarian organization is a matter of perspective, don't you think?
I'm sure the Palestinians consider the missiles and mortars that are coming from Israel as inflicting terror. Therefore, the Palestinians consider the Israelis to be terrorists.
The founders of the USA were considered terrorists by England.
You see, trying to pass judgment by labeling one party of a conflict as terrorist, doesn't get you anywhere. You should look a little deeper. The world is not black/white, good/bad.
Is the murder of civilians less repugnant when it is done by a 1000 pound bomb lobbed from a naval vessel off shore?
Have you found that different men have different tasting jizz? Your question suggests as much.
Though you do seem to have a way with male on male imagery... I wonder why that is.
I already answered the question about right of return. Learn to read.
If anything, we would be like the arabs... the occupiers of the land after the original inhabitants... until such time as the UN comes along and gives a chunk of it back to the original inhabitants (as they did for the Jews).
Do you really not know why they are called the 12 Tribes of Israel?
So... smart guy... where do you really want to take this?
If Jews had a right to return to their land, why don't native Americans?
With the Jews we saw a CALCULATED, PROCEDURAL way of eradicating a group of people who were victimized largely by their standing in society in Germany. You can argue whatever you want, but that was absolutely brutal finding those camps. The shear planning, the imagery of marching a group of people into a gas chamber, should immediately cause you to stfu about this whole debate. With the indians it was sad, we do have the Trail of Tears, etc. but it was also chaotic. I don't see you giving a fuck about victims of the European plagues.
The nature of the situations as well as their respective times in history (so context, which I'm not going to get into at length here) is what makes them fundamentally different and acceptable for them to have different outcomes IMO. -
Kennewick Man?
-
Is this thread worth reading?
-
It's 75% Ozone and OBK, so nuff said on that. It does have an interesting side of the Coog Sven says is Harv taking the conservative position, so either I'm being whooshed or Sven's Harvdar is a bit off or perhaps abundance.allpurpleallgold said:Is this thread worth reading?
-
No.allpurpleallgold said:Is this thread worth reading?
-
dnc said:
It'sallpurpleallgold said:Is this thread worth reading?
75%81% Ozone and OBK, so nuff said on that. It does have an interesting side of the Coog Sven says is Harv taking the conservative position, so either I'm being whooshed or Sven's Harvdar is a bit off or perhaps abundance. -
Agreed. I'm regretting ever getting involved in an OBK thread.Cuogar_Gold said:
No.allpurpleallgold said:Is this thread worth reading?
Wish I hadn't read it. -
Agreed, different situations, which is why I'm not giving back any land, but the Jews should.Cuogar_Gold said:
Because the native americans don't understand that before they were nearly wiped out by disease (cue OZONE's disease blankets argument), their lands changed hands by other tribes who had no problem killing them over it. You can go ahead and paint some picture of them all standing together smoking pipe but the reality is that often they didn't even want peace when it was offered to them. A warrior culture was prevalent in almost all of these tribes. I have a gun and a disease you have a tomahawk and you don't want to have a peaceful coexistence? GTFOOZONE said:
I answered it by pointing out your flaw. Why don't you answer your own question?oregonblitzkrieg said:
You're still dodging the question because to answer it you will have to betray your line of logic and philosophy. Your silence is answer enough -- of course you won't give up your own fucking land. Your position has a foundation of sand because you refuse to apply it to yourself. Kind of like how Obama Care doesn't apply to the libtard senators and congressmen that shoved it down our throats.OZONE said:
I know you're just trying to be a dumbshit (and if you aren't trying... then it comes naturally to you)... but if you can't see that in your analogy... the Native Americans would equate to the Israelites... since in both cases... according to you and your supporters they were the original inhabitants of their respective lands... then are you really sure you want to pursue this line of logic?oregonblitzkrieg said:
No you didn't answer the question. The question was directed at you personally. Answer it or you're a pussy. Since you promote the idea of the right of return, you will also have to agree to vacate your land (if you own land) and give it back to the Native Americans, or you are betraying your own philosophy. You are occupying that land and they are refugees with the right to return to it. Will you hand over your land?OZONE said:
Who is we? You and the other handle you made up to make it look like more people agree with you?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Your priority is jizz. We know. You seem to have trouble answering the question pertaining to the right of Native Americans to return to the land that you are currently occupying. Since there's room for us all, I assume you will be donating your property to them?OZONE said:
Is this really the best you've got? If you can't argue the topic directly... just give up.Cuogar_Gold said:
Wow quook, those fortune 1000's must be proud of that response. Nice job of side stepping the topic of that huge creamy wad of Zinn sliding down your throat.OZONE said:
No idea. Never tasted Jizz.Cuogar_Gold said:
What does Howard Zinn's jizz taste like?OZONE said:
Your knowledge of history is like that of a small child... or somebody that only watches fox news or listens to rush & beck...oregonblitzkrieg said:
Sounds like you need to retake World History 101.OZONE said:
In the last 100 years... who committed the first acts of terrorism in the lands today called Israel?oregonblitzkrieg said:
You're a fucking idiot. Israel would just sit there and let terrorists fire missiles at them if you and TheGloveFS had your way. Hamas uses human shields. But I'm sure if terrorists were lobbing missiles at the community you live in, you would object to attacking them back with 1000 pound bombs lobbed from a naval vessel off shore, right?OZONE said:
When Israel is murdering civilians... why is it better that they don't use suicide bombers to do so?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Maybe you should do a little research. Last time I checked, the Israelis don't send suicide bombers to bomb buses and murder civilians.TheGlove said:Whether or not Hamas is a terrorist and/or humanitarian organization is a matter of perspective, don't you think?
I'm sure the Palestinians consider the missiles and mortars that are coming from Israel as inflicting terror. Therefore, the Palestinians consider the Israelis to be terrorists.
The founders of the USA were considered terrorists by England.
You see, trying to pass judgment by labeling one party of a conflict as terrorist, doesn't get you anywhere. You should look a little deeper. The world is not black/white, good/bad.
Is the murder of civilians less repugnant when it is done by a 1000 pound bomb lobbed from a naval vessel off shore?
Have you found that different men have different tasting jizz? Your question suggests as much.
Though you do seem to have a way with male on male imagery... I wonder why that is.
I already answered the question about right of return. Learn to read.
If anything, we would be like the arabs... the occupiers of the land after the original inhabitants... until such time as the UN comes along and gives a chunk of it back to the original inhabitants (as they did for the Jews).
Do you really not know why they are called the 12 Tribes of Israel?
So... smart guy... where do you really want to take this?
If Jews had a right to return to their land, why don't native Americans?
With the Jews we saw a CALCULATED, PROCEDURAL way of eradicating a group of people who were victimized largely by their standing in society in Germany. You can argue whatever you want, but that was absolutely brutal finding those camps. The shear planning, the imagery of marching a group of people into a gas chamber, should immediately cause you to stfu about this whole debate. With the indians it was sad, we do have the Trail of Tears, etc. but it was also chaotic. I don't see you giving a fuck about victims of the European plagues.
The nature of the situations as well as their respective times in history (so context, which I'm not going to get into at length here) is what makes them fundamentally different and acceptable for them to have different outcomes IMO. -
Good of you to finally answer the question and admit that your libtard philosophy applies only to others but not to yourself. The exit is that way --------->OZONE said:
Agreed, different situations, which is why I'm not giving back any land, but the Jews should.Cuogar_Gold said:
Because the native americans don't understand that before they were nearly wiped out by disease (cue OZONE's disease blankets argument), their lands changed hands by other tribes who had no problem killing them over it. You can go ahead and paint some picture of them all standing together smoking pipe but the reality is that often they didn't even want peace when it was offered to them. A warrior culture was prevalent in almost all of these tribes. I have a gun and a disease you have a tomahawk and you don't want to have a peaceful coexistence? GTFOOZONE said:
I answered it by pointing out your flaw. Why don't you answer your own question?oregonblitzkrieg said:
You're still dodging the question because to answer it you will have to betray your line of logic and philosophy. Your silence is answer enough -- of course you won't give up your own fucking land. Your position has a foundation of sand because you refuse to apply it to yourself. Kind of like how Obama Care doesn't apply to the libtard senators and congressmen that shoved it down our throats.OZONE said:
I know you're just trying to be a dumbshit (and if you aren't trying... then it comes naturally to you)... but if you can't see that in your analogy... the Native Americans would equate to the Israelites... since in both cases... according to you and your supporters they were the original inhabitants of their respective lands... then are you really sure you want to pursue this line of logic?oregonblitzkrieg said:
No you didn't answer the question. The question was directed at you personally. Answer it or you're a pussy. Since you promote the idea of the right of return, you will also have to agree to vacate your land (if you own land) and give it back to the Native Americans, or you are betraying your own philosophy. You are occupying that land and they are refugees with the right to return to it. Will you hand over your land?OZONE said:
Who is we? You and the other handle you made up to make it look like more people agree with you?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Your priority is jizz. We know. You seem to have trouble answering the question pertaining to the right of Native Americans to return to the land that you are currently occupying. Since there's room for us all, I assume you will be donating your property to them?OZONE said:
Is this really the best you've got? If you can't argue the topic directly... just give up.Cuogar_Gold said:
Wow quook, those fortune 1000's must be proud of that response. Nice job of side stepping the topic of that huge creamy wad of Zinn sliding down your throat.OZONE said:
No idea. Never tasted Jizz.Cuogar_Gold said:
What does Howard Zinn's jizz taste like?OZONE said:
Your knowledge of history is like that of a small child... or somebody that only watches fox news or listens to rush & beck...oregonblitzkrieg said:
Sounds like you need to retake World History 101.OZONE said:
In the last 100 years... who committed the first acts of terrorism in the lands today called Israel?oregonblitzkrieg said:
You're a fucking idiot. Israel would just sit there and let terrorists fire missiles at them if you and TheGloveFS had your way. Hamas uses human shields. But I'm sure if terrorists were lobbing missiles at the community you live in, you would object to attacking them back with 1000 pound bombs lobbed from a naval vessel off shore, right?OZONE said:
When Israel is murdering civilians... why is it better that they don't use suicide bombers to do so?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Maybe you should do a little research. Last time I checked, the Israelis don't send suicide bombers to bomb buses and murder civilians.TheGlove said:Whether or not Hamas is a terrorist and/or humanitarian organization is a matter of perspective, don't you think?
I'm sure the Palestinians consider the missiles and mortars that are coming from Israel as inflicting terror. Therefore, the Palestinians consider the Israelis to be terrorists.
The founders of the USA were considered terrorists by England.
You see, trying to pass judgment by labeling one party of a conflict as terrorist, doesn't get you anywhere. You should look a little deeper. The world is not black/white, good/bad.
Is the murder of civilians less repugnant when it is done by a 1000 pound bomb lobbed from a naval vessel off shore?
Have you found that different men have different tasting jizz? Your question suggests as much.
Though you do seem to have a way with male on male imagery... I wonder why that is.
I already answered the question about right of return. Learn to read.
If anything, we would be like the arabs... the occupiers of the land after the original inhabitants... until such time as the UN comes along and gives a chunk of it back to the original inhabitants (as they did for the Jews).
Do you really not know why they are called the 12 Tribes of Israel?
So... smart guy... where do you really want to take this?
If Jews had a right to return to their land, why don't native Americans?
With the Jews we saw a CALCULATED, PROCEDURAL way of eradicating a group of people who were victimized largely by their standing in society in Germany. You can argue whatever you want, but that was absolutely brutal finding those camps. The shear planning, the imagery of marching a group of people into a gas chamber, should immediately cause you to stfu about this whole debate. With the indians it was sad, we do have the Trail of Tears, etc. but it was also chaotic. I don't see you giving a fuck about victims of the European plagues.
The nature of the situations as well as their respective times in history (so context, which I'm not going to get into at length here) is what makes them fundamentally different and acceptable for them to have different outcomes IMO.
-
Way to miss the point so many times that one has to wonder if you ever get it?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Good of you to finally answer the question and admit that your libtard philosophy applies only to others but not yourself. The exit is that way --------->OZONE said:
Agreed, different situations, which is why I'm not giving back any land, but the Jews should.Cuogar_Gold said:
Because the native americans don't understand that before they were nearly wiped out by disease (cue OZONE's disease blankets argument), their lands changed hands by other tribes who had no problem killing them over it. You can go ahead and paint some picture of them all standing together smoking pipe but the reality is that often they didn't even want peace when it was offered to them. A warrior culture was prevalent in almost all of these tribes. I have a gun and a disease you have a tomahawk and you don't want to have a peaceful coexistence? GTFOOZONE said:
I answered it by pointing out your flaw. Why don't you answer your own question?oregonblitzkrieg said:
You're still dodging the question because to answer it you will have to betray your line of logic and philosophy. Your silence is answer enough -- of course you won't give up your own fucking land. Your position has a foundation of sand because you refuse to apply it to yourself. Kind of like how Obama Care doesn't apply to the libtard senators and congressmen that shoved it down our throats.OZONE said:
I know you're just trying to be a dumbshit (and if you aren't trying... then it comes naturally to you)... but if you can't see that in your analogy... the Native Americans would equate to the Israelites... since in both cases... according to you and your supporters they were the original inhabitants of their respective lands... then are you really sure you want to pursue this line of logic?oregonblitzkrieg said:
No you didn't answer the question. The question was directed at you personally. Answer it or you're a pussy. Since you promote the idea of the right of return, you will also have to agree to vacate your land (if you own land) and give it back to the Native Americans, or you are betraying your own philosophy. You are occupying that land and they are refugees with the right to return to it. Will you hand over your land?OZONE said:
Who is we? You and the other handle you made up to make it look like more people agree with you?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Your priority is jizz. We know. You seem to have trouble answering the question pertaining to the right of Native Americans to return to the land that you are currently occupying. Since there's room for us all, I assume you will be donating your property to them?OZONE said:
Is this really the best you've got? If you can't argue the topic directly... just give up.Cuogar_Gold said:
Wow quook, those fortune 1000's must be proud of that response. Nice job of side stepping the topic of that huge creamy wad of Zinn sliding down your throat.OZONE said:
No idea. Never tasted Jizz.Cuogar_Gold said:
What does Howard Zinn's jizz taste like?OZONE said:
Your knowledge of history is like that of a small child... or somebody that only watches fox news or listens to rush & beck...oregonblitzkrieg said:
Sounds like you need to retake World History 101.OZONE said:
In the last 100 years... who committed the first acts of terrorism in the lands today called Israel?oregonblitzkrieg said:
You're a fucking idiot. Israel would just sit there and let terrorists fire missiles at them if you and TheGloveFS had your way. Hamas uses human shields. But I'm sure if terrorists were lobbing missiles at the community you live in, you would object to attacking them back with 1000 pound bombs lobbed from a naval vessel off shore, right?OZONE said:
When Israel is murdering civilians... why is it better that they don't use suicide bombers to do so?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Maybe you should do a little research. Last time I checked, the Israelis don't send suicide bombers to bomb buses and murder civilians.TheGlove said:Whether or not Hamas is a terrorist and/or humanitarian organization is a matter of perspective, don't you think?
I'm sure the Palestinians consider the missiles and mortars that are coming from Israel as inflicting terror. Therefore, the Palestinians consider the Israelis to be terrorists.
The founders of the USA were considered terrorists by England.
You see, trying to pass judgment by labeling one party of a conflict as terrorist, doesn't get you anywhere. You should look a little deeper. The world is not black/white, good/bad.
Is the murder of civilians less repugnant when it is done by a 1000 pound bomb lobbed from a naval vessel off shore?
Have you found that different men have different tasting jizz? Your question suggests as much.
Though you do seem to have a way with male on male imagery... I wonder why that is.
I already answered the question about right of return. Learn to read.
If anything, we would be like the arabs... the occupiers of the land after the original inhabitants... until such time as the UN comes along and gives a chunk of it back to the original inhabitants (as they did for the Jews).
Do you really not know why they are called the 12 Tribes of Israel?
So... smart guy... where do you really want to take this?
If Jews had a right to return to their land, why don't native Americans?
With the Jews we saw a CALCULATED, PROCEDURAL way of eradicating a group of people who were victimized largely by their standing in society in Germany. You can argue whatever you want, but that was absolutely brutal finding those camps. The shear planning, the imagery of marching a group of people into a gas chamber, should immediately cause you to stfu about this whole debate. With the indians it was sad, we do have the Trail of Tears, etc. but it was also chaotic. I don't see you giving a fuck about victims of the European plagues.
The nature of the situations as well as their respective times in history (so context, which I'm not going to get into at length here) is what makes them fundamentally different and acceptable for them to have different outcomes IMO. -
You lost the argument. LEAVE.OZONE said:
Way to miss the point so many times that one has to wonder if you ever get it?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Good of you to finally answer the question and admit that your libtard philosophy applies only to others but not yourself. The exit is that way --------->OZONE said:
Agreed, different situations, which is why I'm not giving back any land, but the Jews should.Cuogar_Gold said:
Because the native americans don't understand that before they were nearly wiped out by disease (cue OZONE's disease blankets argument), their lands changed hands by other tribes who had no problem killing them over it. You can go ahead and paint some picture of them all standing together smoking pipe but the reality is that often they didn't even want peace when it was offered to them. A warrior culture was prevalent in almost all of these tribes. I have a gun and a disease you have a tomahawk and you don't want to have a peaceful coexistence? GTFOOZONE said:
I answered it by pointing out your flaw. Why don't you answer your own question?oregonblitzkrieg said:
You're still dodging the question because to answer it you will have to betray your line of logic and philosophy. Your silence is answer enough -- of course you won't give up your own fucking land. Your position has a foundation of sand because you refuse to apply it to yourself. Kind of like how Obama Care doesn't apply to the libtard senators and congressmen that shoved it down our throats.OZONE said:
I know you're just trying to be a dumbshit (and if you aren't trying... then it comes naturally to you)... but if you can't see that in your analogy... the Native Americans would equate to the Israelites... since in both cases... according to you and your supporters they were the original inhabitants of their respective lands... then are you really sure you want to pursue this line of logic?oregonblitzkrieg said:
No you didn't answer the question. The question was directed at you personally. Answer it or you're a pussy. Since you promote the idea of the right of return, you will also have to agree to vacate your land (if you own land) and give it back to the Native Americans, or you are betraying your own philosophy. You are occupying that land and they are refugees with the right to return to it. Will you hand over your land?OZONE said:
Who is we? You and the other handle you made up to make it look like more people agree with you?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Your priority is jizz. We know. You seem to have trouble answering the question pertaining to the right of Native Americans to return to the land that you are currently occupying. Since there's room for us all, I assume you will be donating your property to them?OZONE said:
Is this really the best you've got? If you can't argue the topic directly... just give up.Cuogar_Gold said:
Wow quook, those fortune 1000's must be proud of that response. Nice job of side stepping the topic of that huge creamy wad of Zinn sliding down your throat.OZONE said:
No idea. Never tasted Jizz.Cuogar_Gold said:
What does Howard Zinn's jizz taste like?OZONE said:
Your knowledge of history is like that of a small child... or somebody that only watches fox news or listens to rush & beck...oregonblitzkrieg said:
Sounds like you need to retake World History 101.OZONE said:
In the last 100 years... who committed the first acts of terrorism in the lands today called Israel?oregonblitzkrieg said:
You're a fucking idiot. Israel would just sit there and let terrorists fire missiles at them if you and TheGloveFS had your way. Hamas uses human shields. But I'm sure if terrorists were lobbing missiles at the community you live in, you would object to attacking them back with 1000 pound bombs lobbed from a naval vessel off shore, right?OZONE said:
When Israel is murdering civilians... why is it better that they don't use suicide bombers to do so?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Maybe you should do a little research. Last time I checked, the Israelis don't send suicide bombers to bomb buses and murder civilians.TheGlove said:Whether or not Hamas is a terrorist and/or humanitarian organization is a matter of perspective, don't you think?
I'm sure the Palestinians consider the missiles and mortars that are coming from Israel as inflicting terror. Therefore, the Palestinians consider the Israelis to be terrorists.
The founders of the USA were considered terrorists by England.
You see, trying to pass judgment by labeling one party of a conflict as terrorist, doesn't get you anywhere. You should look a little deeper. The world is not black/white, good/bad.
Is the murder of civilians less repugnant when it is done by a 1000 pound bomb lobbed from a naval vessel off shore?
Have you found that different men have different tasting jizz? Your question suggests as much.
Though you do seem to have a way with male on male imagery... I wonder why that is.
I already answered the question about right of return. Learn to read.
If anything, we would be like the arabs... the occupiers of the land after the original inhabitants... until such time as the UN comes along and gives a chunk of it back to the original inhabitants (as they did for the Jews).
Do you really not know why they are called the 12 Tribes of Israel?
So... smart guy... where do you really want to take this?
If Jews had a right to return to their land, why don't native Americans?
With the Jews we saw a CALCULATED, PROCEDURAL way of eradicating a group of people who were victimized largely by their standing in society in Germany. You can argue whatever you want, but that was absolutely brutal finding those camps. The shear planning, the imagery of marching a group of people into a gas chamber, should immediately cause you to stfu about this whole debate. With the indians it was sad, we do have the Trail of Tears, etc. but it was also chaotic. I don't see you giving a fuck about victims of the European plagues.
The nature of the situations as well as their respective times in history (so context, which I'm not going to get into at length here) is what makes them fundamentally different and acceptable for them to have different outcomes IMO.
-
This thread needs a nuking more than every arab nation combined.
-
ITT: lots of Joos
-
-
OZONE said:
When Israel is murdering civilians... why is it better that they don't use suicide bombers to do so?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Maybe you should do a little research. Last time I checked, the Israelis don't send suicide bombers to bomb buses and murder civilians.TheGlove said:Whether or not Hamas is a terrorist and/or humanitarian organization is a matter of perspective, don't you think?
I'm sure the Palestinians consider the missiles and mortars that are coming from Israel as inflicting terror. Therefore, the Palestinians consider the Israelis to be terrorists.
The founders of the USA were considered terrorists by England.
You see, trying to pass judgment by labeling one party of a conflict as terrorist, doesn't get you anywhere. You should look a little deeper. The world is not black/white, good/bad.
Is the murder of civilians less repugnant when it is done by a 1000 pound bomb lobbed from a naval vessel off shore?
YES!!!!! Some dirty cave dweller with a Jansport full of C4 doesn't command respect. A fucking warship off your coast sending thousands of pounds of N.E.W. on target says you mean fucking business.
The biggest group of guys in pajamas with AK-47's doesn't strike half the fear one A-10 does.
-
Disagreeoregonblitzkrieg said:-
