Free money

Comments
-
That looks even a better bet than Michigan and that was like taking candy from a baby.
Stanford has they covered 1st time they have ball and don't turn it over. -
Don't forget Shaw will also try to keep it within one score.
-
We probably put up 10-17 points. Odds are we lose by more than 10.
-
Stanfurd 34-17 rather easily
-
This game is on the farm? (ILTCIT) Then this will probably be the most painful game of the season. Dwags score on a thrilling drive to end the game losing 28-17
-
I haven’t sports bet in a few years but man am I tempted to fire up the old account and drop a few grand on Stanford.insinceredawg said:Opening line is Stanford -2. Throw everything you got at this. There's no chance Jimmy no ballz keeps it within one score.
Knowing my luck UW would probably eek out some shit win the one time I decide to bet against them. -
Thats why I don't bet. I make big statements...free money, lead pipe cinch, etc...but rarely put money in anything I can't have some control over.Edwin_Bambino said:
I haven’t sports bet in a few years but man am I tempted to fire up the old account and drop a few grand on Stanford.insinceredawg said:Opening line is Stanford -2. Throw everything you got at this. There's no chance Jimmy no ballz keeps it within one score.
Knowing my luck UW would probably eek out some shit win the one time I decide to bet against them. -
81% sure Stanford covers that rather easily.
-
I like UW here. Stanford cannot run the ball. Actually plays to our strengths this year
-
You know what cures a team that can’t run the ball? Playing WashingtonSonnyShackelford said:I like UW here. Stanford cannot run the ball. Actually plays to our strengths this year
-
For anyone having doubts, Arizona ran on usTequilla said:
You know what cures a team that can’t run the ball? Playing WashingtonSonnyShackelford said:I like UW here. Stanford cannot run the ball. Actually plays to our strengths this year
-
While I agree with you, it can't be ignored that Stanford ranks last in the conference with 94.9 rushing yards per game.Sources said:
For anyone having doubts, Arizona ran on usTequilla said:
You know what cures a team that can’t run the ball? Playing WashingtonSonnyShackelford said:I like UW here. Stanford cannot run the ball. Actually plays to our strengths this year
-
Just threw some cash on that EZ money...
-
I still remember when their 3rd string OLine pushed our shit in during the 2019 game. It’s possible. Especially if cook is still out we won’t have a safety that can tackle.DerekJohnson said:
While I agree with you, it can't be ignored that Stanford ranks last in the conference with 94.9 rushing yards per game.Sources said:
For anyone having doubts, Arizona ran on usTequilla said:
You know what cures a team that can’t run the ball? Playing WashingtonSonnyShackelford said:I like UW here. Stanford cannot run the ball. Actually plays to our strengths this year
A win here would be detrimental to the program. -
SonnyShackelford said:
I like UW here. Stanford cannot run the ball. Actually plays to our strengths this year
I feel like their running game was shit last year as well before they averaged 7+ YPCDerekJohnson said:
While I agree with you, it can't be ignored that Stanford ranks last in the conference with 94.9 rushing yards per game.Sources said:
For anyone having doubts, Arizona ran on usTequilla said:
You know what cures a team that can’t run the ball? Playing WashingtonSonnyShackelford said:I like UW here. Stanford cannot run the ball. Actually plays to our strengths this year
-
-
Stanford could roll out only 3 OL…. all walkons and still run for 250 on Saturday night
-
And its not like they aren't TRYING to run the ball.DerekJohnson said:
While I agree with you, it can't be ignored that Stanford ranks last in the conference with 94.9 rushing yards per game.Sources said:
For anyone having doubts, Arizona ran on usTequilla said:
You know what cures a team that can’t run the ball? Playing WashingtonSonnyShackelford said:I like UW here. Stanford cannot run the ball. Actually plays to our strengths this year
They're averaging 3.5 yards per attempt. That is 104th in the nation. (shoutout to LOL Purdue at 2.4 yards per rush attempt.) -
JFC the entire pac12 is dreck.
Never has a UW HC had an easier path to 10-2 or better.
-
Look, UW is currently in a tight race for the most continually disappointing team relative to betting market expectations.
Worst teams ATS 2021
Clemson 0-7
Missouri 0-7
Indiana 1-6
S. Miss 1-6
Kansas 1-6
Washington 1-6
It is really difficult to continually lose against the spread because every week the betting market readjusts to how shitty you are so you have to be highly overrated pre-season and get worse throughout the season to keep failing to cover.
In the last ten years no team has gone 0 for the season against the spread. Only two teams have gone 1-11.
Eventually UW has to surprise bettors to the positive, they just have to. Will it be this week? Probably not. -
No way they cover this week. They'll cover against Oregon by only losing by 15 with an Oregon -17 line.
-
When a team with an 18 game losing streak takes you to the clinic, you take the Stanford bet. The only thing that saved the Dawgs was they were playing a team that has lost 18 in a row, and that team did what teams do in that position in the 4th quarter.
-
-
Dayum so how much money did everybody lose betting against Washington here?
Glad I don't live near any casinos as I might have done the same thing. -
$80HairyBallsDawg said:Dayum so how much money did everybody lose betting against Washington here?
Glad I don't live near any casinos as I might have done the same thing. -
There's a dog watching and he's thinking - put that bitch on a leashpicalogestabo said: -
Need some more investment advise
You guys are GOOD! -
Lmao
-
Can’t get a good look at her face but she’s skinny and dumb so I’m in!!!picalogestabo said:
@insinceredawg do we need to start a gofundme because you went all in?? -
😆👍AtomicDawg said:Odds are we lose by more than 10.