Query for @HHusky
Comments
-
Had to, cause daddy is long gone. Hence his "Daddy" fixation.UW_Doog_Bot said:
It's amazing how he can cite "anecdotes" one way but realize the rhetorical error when it goes the other right?hardhat said:
Is this why you've posted gleefully about 'non vaccinated' people suffering and dying?HHusky said:
Assumption School isn’t the government. Sad if she really did die from this exceedingly rare side effect. Sad if she didn’t too. People get hit by lightning. But the agenda of the obit’s writer could hardly be missed. Red meat to kooks like yourself.pawz said:What the fuck are you talking about? Use English.
It's either breathtaking stupidity or internalized dishonesty.
Mommy really had to have done a number on him. -
His daddy issue are more likely due to the butt hole being a fancy feast.TurdBomber said:
Had to, cause daddy is long gone. Hence his "Daddy" fixation.UW_Doog_Bot said:
It's amazing how he can cite "anecdotes" one way but realize the rhetorical error when it goes the other right?hardhat said:
Is this why you've posted gleefully about 'non vaccinated' people suffering and dying?HHusky said:
Assumption School isn’t the government. Sad if she really did die from this exceedingly rare side effect. Sad if she didn’t too. People get hit by lightning. But the agenda of the obit’s writer could hardly be missed. Red meat to kooks like yourself.pawz said:What the fuck are you talking about? Use English.
It's either breathtaking stupidity or internalized dishonesty.
Mommy really had to have done a number on him.
-
Cause of death confirmed. Sad whether that part was true or not. We'll never vaccinate anyone if vaccines have to be absolutely safe for absolutely everyone.
The rest of that obit is just argument. Who placed it? -
Big fascist energyHHusky said:Cause of death confirmed. Sad whether that part was true or not. We'll never vaccinate anyone if vaccines have to be absolutely safe for absolutely everyone.
The rest of that obit is just argument. Who placed it? -
You mean like the odds of surviving COVID in the first place?HHusky said:Cause of death confirmed. Sad whether that part was true or not. We'll never vaccinate anyone if vaccines have to be absolutely safe for absolutely everyone.
The rest of that obit is just argument. Who placed it?
We'll never come out of lockdowns if living has to be absolutely safe for absolutely everyone.
You voted for this, Dazzler.
-
Sounds like you believe in censorship. That’s on brand.HHusky said:Cause of death confirmed. Sad whether that part was true or not. We'll never vaccinate anyone if vaccines have to be absolutely safe for absolutely everyone.
The rest of that obit is just argument. Who placed it? -
My interest in further information is a call for censorship?Bob_C said:
Sounds like you believe in censorship. That’s on brand.HHusky said:Cause of death confirmed. Sad whether that part was true or not. We'll never vaccinate anyone if vaccines have to be absolutely safe for absolutely everyone.
The rest of that obit is just argument. Who placed it?
Got logic? -
You really want to pretend that 4 US deaths from the J&J > number of unvaccinated US 30 somethings killed, injured, or who have spread Covid to others?PurpleThrobber said:
You mean like the odds of surviving COVID in the first place?HHusky said:Cause of death confirmed. Sad whether that part was true or not. We'll never vaccinate anyone if vaccines have to be absolutely safe for absolutely everyone.
The rest of that obit is just argument. Who placed it?
We'll never come out of lockdowns if living has to be absolutely safe for absolutely everyone.
You voted for this, Dazzler.
Good luck with that. -
More to the point, was it someone who knew what the fuck he/she/they were talking about?hardhat said:
Big fascist energyHHusky said:Cause of death confirmed. Sad whether that part was true or not. We'll never vaccinate anyone if vaccines have to be absolutely safe for absolutely everyone.
The rest of that obit is just argument. Who placed it? -
So we should allow all information to be seen and let people decide right or wrong for themselves, or allow partial, selected information to be out there which influences people’s choices in the direction that government/corporations want?HHusky said:
My interest in further information is a call for censorship?Bob_C said:
Sounds like you believe in censorship. That’s on brand.HHusky said:Cause of death confirmed. Sad whether that part was true or not. We'll never vaccinate anyone if vaccines have to be absolutely safe for absolutely everyone.
The rest of that obit is just argument. Who placed it?
Got logic? -
HH thinks the jab works. If it worked the CDC wouldn't need to have stopped reporting vaccinated breakthrough cases a few months ago now would they?
Dazzler is one dumb dim! -
I'm not trying to convince you to get the jab, Sled. In fact, I urge you not to.Sledog said:HH thinks the jab works. If it worked the CDC wouldn't need to have stopped reporting vaccinated breakthrough cases a few months ago now would they?
Dazzler is one dumb dim! -
So you whole heartedly endorse a fucking screed posing as an obituary and you're concerned about selectively disseminated information.Bob_C said:
So we should allow all information to be seen and let people decide right or wrong for themselves, or allow partial, selected information to be out there which influences people’s choices in the direction that government/corporations want?HHusky said:
My interest in further information is a call for censorship?Bob_C said:
Sounds like you believe in censorship. That’s on brand.HHusky said:Cause of death confirmed. Sad whether that part was true or not. We'll never vaccinate anyone if vaccines have to be absolutely safe for absolutely everyone.
The rest of that obit is just argument. Who placed it?
Got logic?
Can't make this shit up. -
We? endorse truth.HHusky said:
So you whole heartedly endorse a fucking screed posing as an obituary and you're concerned about selectively disseminated information.Bob_C said:
So we should allow all information to be seen and let people decide right or wrong for themselves, or allow partial, selected information to be out there which influences people’s choices in the direction that government/corporations want?HHusky said:
My interest in further information is a call for censorship?Bob_C said:
Sounds like you believe in censorship. That’s on brand.HHusky said:Cause of death confirmed. Sad whether that part was true or not. We'll never vaccinate anyone if vaccines have to be absolutely safe for absolutely everyone.
The rest of that obit is just argument. Who placed it?
Got logic?
Can't make this shit up.
It's Sad! that the truth must come from an obituary.
What is clear is you don't care about truth. At all. -
anonymous obituary = the truthpawz said:
We? endorse truth.HHusky said:
So you whole heartedly endorse a fucking screed posing as an obituary and you're concerned about selectively disseminated information.Bob_C said:
So we should allow all information to be seen and let people decide right or wrong for themselves, or allow partial, selected information to be out there which influences people’s choices in the direction that government/corporations want?HHusky said:
My interest in further information is a call for censorship?Bob_C said:
Sounds like you believe in censorship. That’s on brand.HHusky said:Cause of death confirmed. Sad whether that part was true or not. We'll never vaccinate anyone if vaccines have to be absolutely safe for absolutely everyone.
The rest of that obit is just argument. Who placed it?
Got logic?
Can't make this shit up.
It's Sad! that the truth must come from an obituary.
What is clear is you don't care about truth. At all.
pawz said so
-
I guess my two-degrees of separation from the deceased is anonymous.HHusky said:
anonymous obituary = the truthpawz said:
We? endorse truth.HHusky said:
So you whole heartedly endorse a fucking screed posing as an obituary and you're concerned about selectively disseminated information.Bob_C said:
So we should allow all information to be seen and let people decide right or wrong for themselves, or allow partial, selected information to be out there which influences people’s choices in the direction that government/corporations want?HHusky said:
My interest in further information is a call for censorship?Bob_C said:
Sounds like you believe in censorship. That’s on brand.HHusky said:Cause of death confirmed. Sad whether that part was true or not. We'll never vaccinate anyone if vaccines have to be absolutely safe for absolutely everyone.
The rest of that obit is just argument. Who placed it?
Got logic?
Can't make this shit up.
It's Sad! that the truth must come from an obituary.
What is clear is you don't care about truth. At all.
pawz said so
@HHusky logic -
On point, is it an anonymous obituary? What the fuck does that even mean?HHusky said:
More to the point, was it someone who knew what the fuck he/she/they were talking about?hardhat said:
Big fascist energyHHusky said:Cause of death confirmed. Sad whether that part was true or not. We'll never vaccinate anyone if vaccines have to be absolutely safe for absolutely everyone.
The rest of that obit is just argument. Who placed it? -
Do you know who wrote it? Do you know who submitted it?hardhat said:
On point, is it an anonymous obituary? What the fuck does that even mean?HHusky said:
More to the point, was it someone who knew what the fuck he/she/they were talking about?hardhat said:
Big fascist energyHHusky said:Cause of death confirmed. Sad whether that part was true or not. We'll never vaccinate anyone if vaccines have to be absolutely safe for absolutely everyone.
The rest of that obit is just argument. Who placed it?
It wasn't submitted to inform anyone about attending her mass. But it supported a certain political narrative. -
You wrote it?pawz said:
I guess my two-degrees of separation from the deceased is anonymous.HHusky said:
anonymous obituary = the truthpawz said:
We? endorse truth.HHusky said:
So you whole heartedly endorse a fucking screed posing as an obituary and you're concerned about selectively disseminated information.Bob_C said:
So we should allow all information to be seen and let people decide right or wrong for themselves, or allow partial, selected information to be out there which influences people’s choices in the direction that government/corporations want?HHusky said:
My interest in further information is a call for censorship?Bob_C said:
Sounds like you believe in censorship. That’s on brand.HHusky said:Cause of death confirmed. Sad whether that part was true or not. We'll never vaccinate anyone if vaccines have to be absolutely safe for absolutely everyone.
The rest of that obit is just argument. Who placed it?
Got logic?
Can't make this shit up.
It's Sad! that the truth must come from an obituary.
What is clear is you don't care about truth. At all.
pawz said so
@HHusky logic -
So the truth is a political narrative?HHusky said:
Do you know who wrote it? Do you know who submitted it?hardhat said:
On point, is it an anonymous obituary? What the fuck does that even mean?HHusky said:
More to the point, was it someone who knew what the fuck he/she/they were talking about?hardhat said:
Big fascist energyHHusky said:Cause of death confirmed. Sad whether that part was true or not. We'll never vaccinate anyone if vaccines have to be absolutely safe for absolutely everyone.
The rest of that obit is just argument. Who placed it?
It wasn't submitted to inform anyone about attending her mass. But it supported a certain political narrative. -
Are you saying it's fake, @HHusky?HHusky said:
anonymous obituary = the truthpawz said:
We? endorse truth.HHusky said:
So you whole heartedly endorse a fucking screed posing as an obituary and you're concerned about selectively disseminated information.Bob_C said:
So we should allow all information to be seen and let people decide right or wrong for themselves, or allow partial, selected information to be out there which influences people’s choices in the direction that government/corporations want?HHusky said:
My interest in further information is a call for censorship?Bob_C said:
Sounds like you believe in censorship. That’s on brand.HHusky said:Cause of death confirmed. Sad whether that part was true or not. We'll never vaccinate anyone if vaccines have to be absolutely safe for absolutely everyone.
The rest of that obit is just argument. Who placed it?
Got logic?
Can't make this shit up.
It's Sad! that the truth must come from an obituary.
What is clear is you don't care about truth. At all.
pawz said so -
Oh please, it's now even being reported in the Seattle Times. And why would anyone who doesn't know the person attend the mass? What an idiotic statement, is that the only reason for an obituary? And you're saying obits that support the lefty narrative and don't even honor the deceased aren't shared around? Get some integrity.HHusky said:
Do you know who wrote it? Do you know who submitted it?hardhat said:
On point, is it an anonymous obituary? What the fuck does that even mean?HHusky said:
More to the point, was it someone who knew what the fuck he/she/they were talking about?hardhat said:
Big fascist energyHHusky said:Cause of death confirmed. Sad whether that part was true or not. We'll never vaccinate anyone if vaccines have to be absolutely safe for absolutely everyone.
The rest of that obit is just argument. Who placed it?
It wasn't submitted to inform anyone about attending her mass. But it supported a certain political narrative. -
HHusky said:
Do you know who wrote it? Do you know who submitted it?hardhat said:
On point, is it an anonymous obituary? What the fuck does that even mean?HHusky said:
More to the point, was it someone who knew what the fuck he/she/they were talking about?hardhat said:
Big fascist energyHHusky said:Cause of death confirmed. Sad whether that part was true or not. We'll never vaccinate anyone if vaccines have to be absolutely safe for absolutely everyone.
The rest of that obit is just argument. Who placed it?
It wasn't submitted to inform anyone about attending her mass. But it supported a certain political narrative.
This. Right Here. Is TDS. -
You pretend daily, Dazzler.HHusky said:
You really want to pretend that 4 US deaths from the J&J > number of unvaccinated US 30 somethings killed, injured, or who have spread Covid to others?PurpleThrobber said:
You mean like the odds of surviving COVID in the first place?HHusky said:Cause of death confirmed. Sad whether that part was true or not. We'll never vaccinate anyone if vaccines have to be absolutely safe for absolutely everyone.
The rest of that obit is just argument. Who placed it?
We'll never come out of lockdowns if living has to be absolutely safe for absolutely everyone.
You voted for this, Dazzler.
Good luck with that.
-
@HHusky fucking stupidhardhat said:
Oh please, it's now even being reported in the Seattle Times. And why would anyone who doesn't know the person attend the mass? What an idiotic statement, is that the only reason for an obituary? And you're saying obits that support the lefty narrative and don't even honor the deceased aren't shared around? Get some integrity.HHusky said:
Do you know who wrote it? Do you know who submitted it?hardhat said:
On point, is it an anonymous obituary? What the fuck does that even mean?HHusky said:
More to the point, was it someone who knew what the fuck he/she/they were talking about?hardhat said:
Big fascist energyHHusky said:Cause of death confirmed. Sad whether that part was true or not. We'll never vaccinate anyone if vaccines have to be absolutely safe for absolutely everyone.
The rest of that obit is just argument. Who placed it?
It wasn't submitted to inform anyone about attending her mass. But it supported a certain political narrative.
https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/king-county-woman-in-late-30s-becomes-first-person-in-washington-to-die-of-jj-vaccine-complication/
-
Sounds like a very nice white Catholic lady.
Her husband sounds like a dick. -
How would we know what's true, what's false and what's been omitted?TurdBomber said:
Are you saying it's fake, @HHusky?HHusky said:
anonymous obituary = the truthpawz said:
We? endorse truth.HHusky said:
So you whole heartedly endorse a fucking screed posing as an obituary and you're concerned about selectively disseminated information.Bob_C said:
So we should allow all information to be seen and let people decide right or wrong for themselves, or allow partial, selected information to be out there which influences people’s choices in the direction that government/corporations want?HHusky said:
My interest in further information is a call for censorship?Bob_C said:
Sounds like you believe in censorship. That’s on brand.HHusky said:Cause of death confirmed. Sad whether that part was true or not. We'll never vaccinate anyone if vaccines have to be absolutely safe for absolutely everyone.
The rest of that obit is just argument. Who placed it?
Got logic?
Can't make this shit up.
It's Sad! that the truth must come from an obituary.
What is clear is you don't care about truth. At all.
pawz said so
Cause of death has been confirmed. That's how much we know. -
noncommittal, i seePurpleThrobber said:
You pretend daily, Dazzler.HHusky said:
You really want to pretend that 4 US deaths from the J&J > number of unvaccinated US 30 somethings killed, injured, or who have spread Covid to others?PurpleThrobber said:
You mean like the odds of surviving COVID in the first place?HHusky said:Cause of death confirmed. Sad whether that part was true or not. We'll never vaccinate anyone if vaccines have to be absolutely safe for absolutely everyone.
The rest of that obit is just argument. Who placed it?
We'll never come out of lockdowns if living has to be absolutely safe for absolutely everyone.
You voted for this, Dazzler.
Good luck with that. -
No shit!hardhat said:
Oh please, it's now even being reported in the Seattle Times.HHusky said:
Do you know who wrote it? Do you know who submitted it?hardhat said:
On point, is it an anonymous obituary? What the fuck does that even mean?HHusky said:
More to the point, was it someone who knew what the fuck he/she/they were talking about?hardhat said:
Big fascist energyHHusky said:Cause of death confirmed. Sad whether that part was true or not. We'll never vaccinate anyone if vaccines have to be absolutely safe for absolutely everyone.
The rest of that obit is just argument. Who placed it?
It wasn't submitted to inform anyone about attending her mass. But it supported a certain political narrative.
Please try to catch-up. -
Congrats ladies!pawz said:
@HHusky fucking stupidhardhat said:
Oh please, it's now even being reported in the Seattle Times. And why would anyone who doesn't know the person attend the mass? What an idiotic statement, is that the only reason for an obituary? And you're saying obits that support the lefty narrative and don't even honor the deceased aren't shared around? Get some integrity.HHusky said:
Do you know who wrote it? Do you know who submitted it?hardhat said:
On point, is it an anonymous obituary? What the fuck does that even mean?HHusky said:
More to the point, was it someone who knew what the fuck he/she/they were talking about?hardhat said:
Big fascist energyHHusky said:Cause of death confirmed. Sad whether that part was true or not. We'll never vaccinate anyone if vaccines have to be absolutely safe for absolutely everyone.
The rest of that obit is just argument. Who placed it?
It wasn't submitted to inform anyone about attending her mass. But it supported a certain political narrative.
https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/king-county-woman-in-late-30s-becomes-first-person-in-washington-to-die-of-jj-vaccine-complication/
You and hardhat are doing some stellar detective work.