Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
People in counties where > 70% voted for Trump are dying from Covid at 4 times the rate as . . .
Comments
-
Gosh, I can recall when the virus was racist and killing mostly poor black and brown folks. I guess the virus is now woke.pawz said:
The largest per capita group of unvaxxed is back and brown folks. Simple fact.MontlakeBridgeTroll said:
The analysis isn't saying Trump is the factor.MikeDamone said:Trump got the vaccine available in record time, took it, and recommends it. Trump isn’t a factor.
It is saying Trump voters are the factor.
Trump is smart enough to get vaccinated.
The same isn't true for a large % of his voting base.
Democrats tell us they all vote blue no matter who.
So how does this worthless fucking hit piece mean anything relevant again? -
In June 2020. Biden and every left mouth piece said, so what if we get vaccines. Is anyone gonna take them?
It was the Trump vaccine then.
And in 2 months when many people start to realize that they aren’t effective at stopping covid, they will be Trumps vaccine again.
And the resident ball washers won’t say a word. -
Just wait until Pfizermectin comes out.Kaepsknee said:In June 2020. Biden and every left mouth piece said, so what if we get vaccines. Is anyone gonna take them?
It was the Trump vaccine then.
And in 2 months when many people start to realize that they aren’t effective at stopping covid, they will be Trumps vaccine again.
And the resident ball washers won’t say a word. -
Hopefully they still are effective of keeping me out of the hospital
-
Bob_C said:
Just wait until Pfizermectin comes out.Kaepsknee said:In June 2020. Biden and every left mouth piece said, so what if we get vaccines. Is anyone gonna take them?
It was the Trump vaccine then.
And in 2 months when many people start to realize that they aren’t effective at stopping covid, they will be Trumps vaccine again.
And the resident ball washers won’t say a word.
NEW AND IMPROVED!!!
-
Lol. Pressing badly.MontlakeBridgeTroll said:
Says the sales person...Bob_C said:
Lol at your claim of what is statistically significant.MontlakeBridgeTroll said:
Which means nothing in reference to biostats.Bob_C said:
Recently laughed a sales guy out of the room that touted that 25% growth on a $50k customer was a huge success when he didn’t spend much time talking about the customer that grew 5% on a $2m base and had a 15% growth target.MontlakeBridgeTroll said:
I see that math and science aren't your strong points.Bob_C said:
Seems significant on the surface and framing, really isn’t when you are talking tiny numbers. Smart people avoid the % increase talking points on tiny baselines.MontlakeBridgeTroll said:
First doubting response that actually makes a valid point about whetther or not this analysis controlled for age. I've always suspected that not all Trump fans were dumbshits.Doogles said:
Or more Democrats are of the youthfulMontlakeBridgeTroll said:
The analysis isn't saying Trump is the factor.MikeDamone said:Trump got the vaccine available in record time, took it, and recommends it. Trump isn’t a factor.
It is saying Trump voters are the factor.
Trump is smart enough to get vaccinated.
The same isn't true for a large % of his voting base.
That said, I'd be surprised if age by itself was the main issue here -- I'd bet $100 that it is mainly due to vaccination rates.
4 x higher death rate is significant.
I’m a contribution dollar guy but maybe that’s just me.
47 / 100000 compared to 10 / 1000000 is stastically significant in science.
Sales guys might use numbers but there is a reason you're in sales and not in the sciences.
Be sure to upsell those folks at your drive up window the super size. -
Did someone really post this and think it makes them sound smart?MontlakeBridgeTroll said:
Which means nothing in reference to biostats.Bob_C said:
Recently laughed a sales guy out of the room that touted that 25% growth on a $50k customer was a huge success when he didn’t spend much time talking about the customer that grew 5% on a $2m base and had a 15% growth target.MontlakeBridgeTroll said:
I see that math and science aren't your strong points.Bob_C said:
Seems significant on the surface and framing, really isn’t when you are talking tiny numbers. Smart people avoid the % increase talking points on tiny baselines.MontlakeBridgeTroll said:
First doubting response that actually makes a valid point about whetther or not this analysis controlled for age. I've always suspected that not all Trump fans were dumbshits.Doogles said:
Or more Democrats are of the youthfulMontlakeBridgeTroll said:
The analysis isn't saying Trump is the factor.MikeDamone said:Trump got the vaccine available in record time, took it, and recommends it. Trump isn’t a factor.
It is saying Trump voters are the factor.
Trump is smart enough to get vaccinated.
The same isn't true for a large % of his voting base.
That said, I'd be surprised if age by itself was the main issue here -- I'd bet $100 that it is mainly due to vaccination rates.
4 x higher death rate is significant.
I’m a contribution dollar guy but maybe that’s just me.
47 / 100000 compared to 10 / 1000000 is stastically significant in science.
Sales guys might use numbers but there is a reason you're in sales and not in the sciences. -
Had some big belly laughs on this one last night. For multiple reasons.hardhat said:
Did someone really post this and think it makes them sound smart?MontlakeBridgeTroll said:
Which means nothing in reference to biostats.Bob_C said:
Recently laughed a sales guy out of the room that touted that 25% growth on a $50k customer was a huge success when he didn’t spend much time talking about the customer that grew 5% on a $2m base and had a 15% growth target.MontlakeBridgeTroll said:
I see that math and science aren't your strong points.Bob_C said:
Seems significant on the surface and framing, really isn’t when you are talking tiny numbers. Smart people avoid the % increase talking points on tiny baselines.MontlakeBridgeTroll said:
First doubting response that actually makes a valid point about whetther or not this analysis controlled for age. I've always suspected that not all Trump fans were dumbshits.Doogles said:
Or more Democrats are of the youthfulMontlakeBridgeTroll said:
The analysis isn't saying Trump is the factor.MikeDamone said:Trump got the vaccine available in record time, took it, and recommends it. Trump isn’t a factor.
It is saying Trump voters are the factor.
Trump is smart enough to get vaccinated.
The same isn't true for a large % of his voting base.
That said, I'd be surprised if age by itself was the main issue here -- I'd bet $100 that it is mainly due to vaccination rates.
4 x higher death rate is significant.
I’m a contribution dollar guy but maybe that’s just me.
47 / 100000 compared to 10 / 1000000 is stastically significant in science.
Sales guys might use numbers but there is a reason you're in sales and not in the sciences. -
MontlakeBridgeTroll said:
The analysis isn't saying Trump is the factor.MikeDamone said:Trump got the vaccine available in record time, took it, and recommends it. Trump isn’t a factor.
It is saying Trump voters are the factor.
Trump is smart enough to get vaccinated.
The same isn't true for a large % of his voting base.MontlakeBridgeTroll said:
The analysis isn't saying Trump is the factor.MikeDamone said:Trump got the vaccine available in record time, took it, and recommends it. Trump isn’t a factor.
It is saying Trump voters are the factor.
Trump is smart enough to get vaccinated.
The same isn't true for a large % of his voting base.
He said we needed to have experts across the country review Trump's vaccine before it should be rolled out nationwide. Then all of the dipshits here voted for Joey and his words went out the window.Kaepsknee said:In June 2020. Biden and every left mouth piece said, so what if we get vaccines. Is anyone gonna take them?
It was the Trump vaccine then.
And in 2 months when many people start to realize that they aren’t effective at stopping covid, they will be Trumps vaccine again.
And the resident ball washers won’t say a word.
If you voted for Joey, you're not only stupid and gullible, you're a colossal loser. Them's the facts BidenBros. -
Ask and you shall receive.Bob_C said:
Just wait until Pfizermectin comes out.Kaepsknee said:In June 2020. Biden and every left mouth piece said, so what if we get vaccines. Is anyone gonna take them?
It was the Trump vaccine then.
And in 2 months when many people start to realize that they aren’t effective at stopping covid, they will be Trumps vaccine again.
And the resident ball washers won’t say a word.
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/game-changer-merck-releasing-phenomenal-test-results-experimental-covid-pill
"This Is A Game-Changer" - Merck Releasing "Phenomenal" Test Results For Experimental COVID Pill
BY TYLER DURDEN
FRIDAY, OCT 01, 2021 - 07:45 AM
Looks like Merck just beat Pfizer to the punch.
Merck announced Friday that an experimental COVID pill it has developed reduced hospitalizations and deaths by 50% in people recently infected with COVID.
The company will soon ask health officials in the US and abroad to authorize use of the drug.
The news came as a welcome surprise to the public, although COVID cases are already waning in the US and in hard-hit economies in Asia, the drug could create "a real therapeutic advance" that could dramatically decrease the risk of death from COVID.
If approved (and odds are it will be) the drug would be the first treatment for COVID. Some compared it to tamiflu, in that patients should take it within 5 days of COVID infection (like those infected with the flu are instructed to take tamiflu early).
Former FDA Director Dr. Scott Gottlieb told CNBC that the trial results are clearly "profoundly" positive, even though researchers decided to stop the trial early because the drug showed significant success, meaning it would be unethical to keep giving patients placebos. To test the drug, they needed to test more than 700 unvaccinated people in a global study. The people were all considered in the "high risk" category due to factors like age, and other characteristics from their "health profile".
Per the results, 7% of volunteers in the group that received the drug were hospitalized, and none of them died, compared with a 14% rate of hospitalization and death (include eight who died) in the placebo group.
According to Dr. Gottlieb, "this is a phenomenal result. This is a profound game-changer that we have an oral pill that had this kind of effect on patients who are already symptomatic."
Dr. Gottlieb also pointed out that the team that developed the drug "also invented the first successful antibody against ebola so this is a very good drug-development team."
"And remember we have two other drugs in development one by Pfizer (where Dr. Gottlieb serves on the board) and the other by Roches," he said.
Patients won't be taking the drug for very long, typically around five days, which means "the safety profile is probably pretty good," Dr. Gottlieb said. -
Tyler Durden....Tyler Durden....
Where have I heard that name before? -
As I was saying. Are we entertained yet? They Cartel divided this pie long ago.WestlinnDuck said:
Ask and you shall receive.Bob_C said:
Just wait until Pfizermectin comes out.Kaepsknee said:In June 2020. Biden and every left mouth piece said, so what if we get vaccines. Is anyone gonna take them?
It was the Trump vaccine then.
And in 2 months when many people start to realize that they aren’t effective at stopping covid, they will be Trumps vaccine again.
And the resident ball washers won’t say a word.
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/game-changer-merck-releasing-phenomenal-test-results-experimental-covid-pill
"This Is A Game-Changer" - Merck Releasing "Phenomenal" Test Results For Experimental COVID Pill
BY TYLER DURDEN
FRIDAY, OCT 01, 2021 - 07:45 AM
Looks like Merck just beat Pfizer to the punch.
Merck announced Friday that an experimental COVID pill it has developed reduced hospitalizations and deaths by 50% in people recently infected with COVID.
The company will soon ask health officials in the US and abroad to authorize use of the drug.
The news came as a welcome surprise to the public, although COVID cases are already waning in the US and in hard-hit economies in Asia, the drug could create "a real therapeutic advance" that could dramatically decrease the risk of death from COVID.
If approved (and odds are it will be) the drug would be the first treatment for COVID. Some compared it to tamiflu, in that patients should take it within 5 days of COVID infection (like those infected with the flu are instructed to take tamiflu early).
Former FDA Director Dr. Scott Gottlieb told CNBC that the trial results are clearly "profoundly" positive, even though researchers decided to stop the trial early because the drug showed significant success, meaning it would be unethical to keep giving patients placebos. To test the drug, they needed to test more than 700 unvaccinated people in a global study. The people were all considered in the "high risk" category due to factors like age, and other characteristics from their "health profile".
Per the results, 7% of volunteers in the group that received the drug were hospitalized, and none of them died, compared with a 14% rate of hospitalization and death (include eight who died) in the placebo group.
According to Dr. Gottlieb, "this is a phenomenal result. This is a profound game-changer that we have an oral pill that had this kind of effect on patients who are already symptomatic."
Dr. Gottlieb also pointed out that the team that developed the drug "also invented the first successful antibody against ebola so this is a very good drug-development team."
"And remember we have two other drugs in development one by Pfizer (where Dr. Gottlieb serves on the board) and the other by Roches," he said.
Patients won't be taking the drug for very long, typically around five days, which means "the safety profile is probably pretty good," Dr. Gottlieb said. -
Funny how easy it is to clear out the room just by asking the Biden Dick Suckers to tell us what Joe has done right about anything including covid
Enter the crickets -
His campaign was he would "shut covid down" He didn't say through forced vaccinations by threatening the livelihoods of those who choose not to. In fact he said the opposite. But when a Tyrant see things are not going as planned, a Tyrant is gonna Tyrant.
Well done BidenBros. Congrats on electing your fantasized Trump.
-
You got schooled by someone in sales lulz.MontlakeBridgeTroll said:
Says the sales person...Bob_C said:
Lol at your claim of what is statistically significant.MontlakeBridgeTroll said:
Which means nothing in reference to biostats.Bob_C said:
Recently laughed a sales guy out of the room that touted that 25% growth on a $50k customer was a huge success when he didn’t spend much time talking about the customer that grew 5% on a $2m base and had a 15% growth target.MontlakeBridgeTroll said:
I see that math and science aren't your strong points.Bob_C said:
Seems significant on the surface and framing, really isn’t when you are talking tiny numbers. Smart people avoid the % increase talking points on tiny baselines.MontlakeBridgeTroll said:
First doubting response that actually makes a valid point about whetther or not this analysis controlled for age. I've always suspected that not all Trump fans were dumbshits.Doogles said:
Or more Democrats are of the youthfulMontlakeBridgeTroll said:
The analysis isn't saying Trump is the factor.MikeDamone said:Trump got the vaccine available in record time, took it, and recommends it. Trump isn’t a factor.
It is saying Trump voters are the factor.
Trump is smart enough to get vaccinated.
The same isn't true for a large % of his voting base.
That said, I'd be surprised if age by itself was the main issue here -- I'd bet $100 that it is mainly due to vaccination rates.
4 x higher death rate is significant.
I’m a contribution dollar guy but maybe that’s just me.
47 / 100000 compared to 10 / 1000000 is stastically significant in science.
Sales guys might use numbers but there is a reason you're in sales and not in the sciences.
Be sure to upsell those folks at your drive up window the super size.
And are hilariously off base on "statistically significant". -
too many contradictions to take it seroiuslyRoadDawg55 said:
This would get me to take Covid a little more seriously. Not for real seriously, but a little bit more.Pitchfork51 said:I am not dying and none of my friends are either. So fuck you
if you're 84 and have 10 co morbidities, scary
if you're under 50 and somewhat healthy, statistically you'll be fine -
Need to get @GreenRiverGatorz to weigh in on whether there is any statically significance to this.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
too many contradictions to take it seroiuslyRoadDawg55 said:
This would get me to take Covid a little more seriously. Not for real seriously, but a little bit more.Pitchfork51 said:I am not dying and none of my friends are either. So fuck you
if you're 84 and have 10 co morbidities, scary
if you're under 50 and somewhat healthy, statistically you'll be fine
