Hope this doesn’t muck up this thread because it’s “historical bullshit”:Total Tackles thru Week 4:Jackson Sirmon - 30No. 1 for UWRanked 6th in the PAC-12 ConferenceCFetters: When you see me post, how about ignoring it or simply downvoting it? Frankly, I don’t give a flying fuck about your critique. You’re a moderator. BBK and Psalm had great numbers too. Unfortunately they don't keep LB stats on how many YPC they allow versus should allow, if they were any good. Opposing RB YAC stats on BBK and Psalm were off the charts, also, as they piggybacked on RBs running by and over them for 8 YPC. BBK was very good, GTFO with this tired narrative. He spent two years overrunning the point of contact because he was fast, but not strong enough. When he could, he jumped on RBs backs a lot and got carried for several yards. He accumulated a lot of tackles, but gave up a lot of yards in critical situations. He became more disciplined over time, gained a few pounds and strength, and became more effective at pressuring the QB and collapsing the pocket in his final year. His angles got better as did his technique as he focused more on interrupting the backfield than hooking the QB for an arm tackle sack as he flew by. He was never an LB that blew up plays or that teams ran away from. He was fast and athletic but nothing "very good" until his last year. He really didn’t. He got dragged at times but he was always at least an above average PAC 12 LB, even as a sophomore. There aren’t many ways to run away from an ILB that plays sideline to sideline. When he was a junior there were posters that said he was only good because of Vea. Then when Vea left, he got even better. BBK bullshit was always strong group think led by Dennis. Jesus Roady. What BBK were you watching? He never got dragged. He got carried. Literally. On RBs backs. Repeatedly. Especially on 3rd down. He was very good at getting to the play, but not at executing it, because he lacked the size, strength and tackling ability to finish guys off without help. He got better his final year after sizing up and improving his techniques.I'm sure it irks you, Roady, but DDY was right about BBK. DDY's head was firmly up his ass on plenty of stuff, but not BBK. Or Browning. Or our shitty receivers. I remember my criticizing the pac12 defensive player of the year days. He had his flaws but was a good player. End of story. Special teams broken leg of the weak guy on a shitty team, now. Some awards don't mean a lot.
Hope this doesn’t muck up this thread because it’s “historical bullshit”:Total Tackles thru Week 4:Jackson Sirmon - 30No. 1 for UWRanked 6th in the PAC-12 ConferenceCFetters: When you see me post, how about ignoring it or simply downvoting it? Frankly, I don’t give a flying fuck about your critique. You’re a moderator. BBK and Psalm had great numbers too. Unfortunately they don't keep LB stats on how many YPC they allow versus should allow, if they were any good. Opposing RB YAC stats on BBK and Psalm were off the charts, also, as they piggybacked on RBs running by and over them for 8 YPC. BBK was very good, GTFO with this tired narrative. He spent two years overrunning the point of contact because he was fast, but not strong enough. When he could, he jumped on RBs backs a lot and got carried for several yards. He accumulated a lot of tackles, but gave up a lot of yards in critical situations. He became more disciplined over time, gained a few pounds and strength, and became more effective at pressuring the QB and collapsing the pocket in his final year. His angles got better as did his technique as he focused more on interrupting the backfield than hooking the QB for an arm tackle sack as he flew by. He was never an LB that blew up plays or that teams ran away from. He was fast and athletic but nothing "very good" until his last year. He really didn’t. He got dragged at times but he was always at least an above average PAC 12 LB, even as a sophomore. There aren’t many ways to run away from an ILB that plays sideline to sideline. When he was a junior there were posters that said he was only good because of Vea. Then when Vea left, he got even better. BBK bullshit was always strong group think led by Dennis. Jesus Roady. What BBK were you watching? He never got dragged. He got carried. Literally. On RBs backs. Repeatedly. Especially on 3rd down. He was very good at getting to the play, but not at executing it, because he lacked the size, strength and tackling ability to finish guys off without help. He got better his final year after sizing up and improving his techniques.I'm sure it irks you, Roady, but DDY was right about BBK. DDY's head was firmly up his ass on plenty of stuff, but not BBK. Or Browning. Or our shitty receivers. I remember my criticizing the pac12 defensive player of the year days. He had his flaws but was a good player. End of story.
Hope this doesn’t muck up this thread because it’s “historical bullshit”:Total Tackles thru Week 4:Jackson Sirmon - 30No. 1 for UWRanked 6th in the PAC-12 ConferenceCFetters: When you see me post, how about ignoring it or simply downvoting it? Frankly, I don’t give a flying fuck about your critique. You’re a moderator. BBK and Psalm had great numbers too. Unfortunately they don't keep LB stats on how many YPC they allow versus should allow, if they were any good. Opposing RB YAC stats on BBK and Psalm were off the charts, also, as they piggybacked on RBs running by and over them for 8 YPC. BBK was very good, GTFO with this tired narrative. He spent two years overrunning the point of contact because he was fast, but not strong enough. When he could, he jumped on RBs backs a lot and got carried for several yards. He accumulated a lot of tackles, but gave up a lot of yards in critical situations. He became more disciplined over time, gained a few pounds and strength, and became more effective at pressuring the QB and collapsing the pocket in his final year. His angles got better as did his technique as he focused more on interrupting the backfield than hooking the QB for an arm tackle sack as he flew by. He was never an LB that blew up plays or that teams ran away from. He was fast and athletic but nothing "very good" until his last year. He really didn’t. He got dragged at times but he was always at least an above average PAC 12 LB, even as a sophomore. There aren’t many ways to run away from an ILB that plays sideline to sideline. When he was a junior there were posters that said he was only good because of Vea. Then when Vea left, he got even better. BBK bullshit was always strong group think led by Dennis. Jesus Roady. What BBK were you watching? He never got dragged. He got carried. Literally. On RBs backs. Repeatedly. Especially on 3rd down. He was very good at getting to the play, but not at executing it, because he lacked the size, strength and tackling ability to finish guys off without help. He got better his final year after sizing up and improving his techniques.I'm sure it irks you, Roady, but DDY was right about BBK. DDY's head was firmly up his ass on plenty of stuff, but not BBK. Or Browning. Or our shitty receivers.
Hope this doesn’t muck up this thread because it’s “historical bullshit”:Total Tackles thru Week 4:Jackson Sirmon - 30No. 1 for UWRanked 6th in the PAC-12 ConferenceCFetters: When you see me post, how about ignoring it or simply downvoting it? Frankly, I don’t give a flying fuck about your critique. You’re a moderator. BBK and Psalm had great numbers too. Unfortunately they don't keep LB stats on how many YPC they allow versus should allow, if they were any good. Opposing RB YAC stats on BBK and Psalm were off the charts, also, as they piggybacked on RBs running by and over them for 8 YPC. BBK was very good, GTFO with this tired narrative. He spent two years overrunning the point of contact because he was fast, but not strong enough. When he could, he jumped on RBs backs a lot and got carried for several yards. He accumulated a lot of tackles, but gave up a lot of yards in critical situations. He became more disciplined over time, gained a few pounds and strength, and became more effective at pressuring the QB and collapsing the pocket in his final year. His angles got better as did his technique as he focused more on interrupting the backfield than hooking the QB for an arm tackle sack as he flew by. He was never an LB that blew up plays or that teams ran away from. He was fast and athletic but nothing "very good" until his last year. He really didn’t. He got dragged at times but he was always at least an above average PAC 12 LB, even as a sophomore. There aren’t many ways to run away from an ILB that plays sideline to sideline. When he was a junior there were posters that said he was only good because of Vea. Then when Vea left, he got even better. BBK bullshit was always strong group think led by Dennis.
Hope this doesn’t muck up this thread because it’s “historical bullshit”:Total Tackles thru Week 4:Jackson Sirmon - 30No. 1 for UWRanked 6th in the PAC-12 ConferenceCFetters: When you see me post, how about ignoring it or simply downvoting it? Frankly, I don’t give a flying fuck about your critique. You’re a moderator. BBK and Psalm had great numbers too. Unfortunately they don't keep LB stats on how many YPC they allow versus should allow, if they were any good. Opposing RB YAC stats on BBK and Psalm were off the charts, also, as they piggybacked on RBs running by and over them for 8 YPC. BBK was very good, GTFO with this tired narrative. He spent two years overrunning the point of contact because he was fast, but not strong enough. When he could, he jumped on RBs backs a lot and got carried for several yards. He accumulated a lot of tackles, but gave up a lot of yards in critical situations. He became more disciplined over time, gained a few pounds and strength, and became more effective at pressuring the QB and collapsing the pocket in his final year. His angles got better as did his technique as he focused more on interrupting the backfield than hooking the QB for an arm tackle sack as he flew by. He was never an LB that blew up plays or that teams ran away from. He was fast and athletic but nothing "very good" until his last year.
Hope this doesn’t muck up this thread because it’s “historical bullshit”:Total Tackles thru Week 4:Jackson Sirmon - 30No. 1 for UWRanked 6th in the PAC-12 ConferenceCFetters: When you see me post, how about ignoring it or simply downvoting it? Frankly, I don’t give a flying fuck about your critique. You’re a moderator. BBK and Psalm had great numbers too. Unfortunately they don't keep LB stats on how many YPC they allow versus should allow, if they were any good. Opposing RB YAC stats on BBK and Psalm were off the charts, also, as they piggybacked on RBs running by and over them for 8 YPC. BBK was very good, GTFO with this tired narrative.
Hope this doesn’t muck up this thread because it’s “historical bullshit”:Total Tackles thru Week 4:Jackson Sirmon - 30No. 1 for UWRanked 6th in the PAC-12 ConferenceCFetters: When you see me post, how about ignoring it or simply downvoting it? Frankly, I don’t give a flying fuck about your critique. You’re a moderator. BBK and Psalm had great numbers too. Unfortunately they don't keep LB stats on how many YPC they allow versus should allow, if they were any good. Opposing RB YAC stats on BBK and Psalm were off the charts, also, as they piggybacked on RBs running by and over them for 8 YPC.
Hope this doesn’t muck up this thread because it’s “historical bullshit”:Total Tackles thru Week 4:Jackson Sirmon - 30No. 1 for UWRanked 6th in the PAC-12 ConferenceCFetters: When you see me post, how about ignoring it or simply downvoting it? Frankly, I don’t give a flying fuck about your critique. You’re a moderator.
Hope this doesn’t muck up this thread because it’s “historical bullshit”:Total Tackles thru Week 4:Jackson Sirmon - 30No. 1 for UWRanked 6th in the PAC-12 ConferenceCFetters: When you see me post, how about ignoring it or simply downvoting it? Frankly, I don’t give a flying fuck about your critique. You’re a moderator. BBK and Psalm had great numbers too. Unfortunately they don't keep LB stats on how many YPC they allow versus should allow, if they were any good. Opposing RB YAC stats on BBK and Psalm were off the charts, also, as they piggybacked on RBs running by and over them for 8 YPC. BBK was very good, GTFO with this tired narrative. He spent two years overrunning the point of contact because he was fast, but not strong enough. When he could, he jumped on RBs backs a lot and got carried for several yards. He accumulated a lot of tackles, but gave up a lot of yards in critical situations. He became more disciplined over time, gained a few pounds and strength, and became more effective at pressuring the QB and collapsing the pocket in his final year. His angles got better as did his technique as he focused more on interrupting the backfield than hooking the QB for an arm tackle sack as he flew by. He was never an LB that blew up plays or that teams ran away from. He was fast and athletic but nothing "very good" until his last year. He really didn’t. He got dragged at times but he was always at least an above average PAC 12 LB, even as a sophomore. There aren’t many ways to run away from an ILB that plays sideline to sideline. When he was a junior there were posters that said he was only good because of Vea. Then when Vea left, he got even better. BBK bullshit was always strong group think led by Dennis. Jesus Roady. What BBK were you watching? He never got dragged. He got carried. Literally. On RBs backs. Repeatedly. Especially on 3rd down. He was very good at getting to the play, but not at executing it, because he lacked the size, strength and tackling ability to finish guys off without help. He got better his final year after sizing up and improving his techniques.I'm sure it irks you, Roady, but DDY was right about BBK. DDY's head was firmly up his ass on plenty of stuff, but not BBK. Or Browning. Or our shitty receivers. I remember my criticizing the pac12 defensive player of the year days. He had his flaws but was a good player. End of story. Special teams broken leg of the weak guy on a shitty team, now. Some awards don't mean a lot. Dude did BBK plow your mother?? Why the negative view on him. We had some shifty LB at UW, he was not one of them
Hope this doesn’t muck up this thread because it’s “historical bullshit”:Total Tackles thru Week 4:Jackson Sirmon - 30No. 1 for UWRanked 6th in the PAC-12 ConferenceCFetters: When you see me post, how about ignoring it or simply downvoting it? Frankly, I don’t give a flying fuck about your critique. You’re a moderator. BBK and Psalm had great numbers too. Unfortunately they don't keep LB stats on how many YPC they allow versus should allow, if they were any good. Opposing RB YAC stats on BBK and Psalm were off the charts, also, as they piggybacked on RBs running by and over them for 8 YPC. BBK was very good, GTFO with this tired narrative. He spent two years overrunning the point of contact because he was fast, but not strong enough. When he could, he jumped on RBs backs a lot and got carried for several yards. He accumulated a lot of tackles, but gave up a lot of yards in critical situations. He became more disciplined over time, gained a few pounds and strength, and became more effective at pressuring the QB and collapsing the pocket in his final year. His angles got better as did his technique as he focused more on interrupting the backfield than hooking the QB for an arm tackle sack as he flew by. He was never an LB that blew up plays or that teams ran away from. He was fast and athletic but nothing "very good" until his last year. He really didn’t. He got dragged at times but he was always at least an above average PAC 12 LB, even as a sophomore. There aren’t many ways to run away from an ILB that plays sideline to sideline. When he was a junior there were posters that said he was only good because of Vea. Then when Vea left, he got even better. BBK bullshit was always strong group think led by Dennis. Jesus Roady. What BBK were you watching? He never got dragged. He got carried. Literally. On RBs backs. Repeatedly. Especially on 3rd down. He was very good at getting to the play, but not at executing it, because he lacked the size, strength and tackling ability to finish guys off without help. He got better his final year after sizing up and improving his techniques.I'm sure it irks you, Roady, but DDY was right about BBK. DDY's head was firmly up his ass on plenty of stuff, but not BBK. Or Browning. Or our shitty receivers. I remember my criticizing the pac12 defensive player of the year days. He had his flaws but was a good player. End of story. Special teams broken leg of the weak guy on a shitty team, now. Some awards don't mean a lot. Dude did BBK plow your mother?? Why the negative view on him. We had some shifty LB at UW, he was not one of them Here we go with the relativity bullshit. Go home, collectivist. Your fragile ego that cannot withstand opposing opinions is embarrassing. I now know who you voted for.
Hope this doesn’t muck up this thread because it’s “historical bullshit”:Total Tackles thru Week 4:Jackson Sirmon - 30No. 1 for UWRanked 6th in the PAC-12 ConferenceCFetters: When you see me post, how about ignoring it or simply downvoting it? Frankly, I don’t give a flying fuck about your critique. You’re a moderator. BBK and Psalm had great numbers too. Unfortunately they don't keep LB stats on how many YPC they allow versus should allow, if they were any good. Opposing RB YAC stats on BBK and Psalm were off the charts, also, as they piggybacked on RBs running by and over them for 8 YPC. BBK was very good, GTFO with this tired narrative. He spent two years overrunning the point of contact because he was fast, but not strong enough. When he could, he jumped on RBs backs a lot and got carried for several yards. He accumulated a lot of tackles, but gave up a lot of yards in critical situations. He became more disciplined over time, gained a few pounds and strength, and became more effective at pressuring the QB and collapsing the pocket in his final year. His angles got better as did his technique as he focused more on interrupting the backfield than hooking the QB for an arm tackle sack as he flew by. He was never an LB that blew up plays or that teams ran away from. He was fast and athletic but nothing "very good" until his last year. He really didn’t. He got dragged at times but he was always at least an above average PAC 12 LB, even as a sophomore. There aren’t many ways to run away from an ILB that plays sideline to sideline. When he was a junior there were posters that said he was only good because of Vea. Then when Vea left, he got even better. BBK bullshit was always strong group think led by Dennis. Jesus Roady. What BBK were you watching? He never got dragged. He got carried. Literally. On RBs backs. Repeatedly. Especially on 3rd down. He was very good at getting to the play, but not at executing it, because he lacked the size, strength and tackling ability to finish guys off without help. He got better his final year after sizing up and improving his techniques.I'm sure it irks you, Roady, but DDY was right about BBK. DDY's head was firmly up his ass on plenty of stuff, but not BBK. Or Browning. Or our shitty receivers. I remember my criticizing the pac12 defensive player of the year days. He had his flaws but was a good player. End of story. Special teams broken leg of the weak guy on a shitty team, now. Some awards don't mean a lot. The award means he was the best defensive player in the league. The rest of what you said doesn't mean anything at all as far as this debate goes.And I'm all for insulting the players. BBK was pretty good but limited for much of his career. As a senior he stepped it up and was just plain good. It got him drafted. What is there to argue about?
Hope this doesn’t muck up this thread because it’s “historical bullshit”:Total Tackles thru Week 4:Jackson Sirmon - 30No. 1 for UWRanked 6th in the PAC-12 ConferenceCFetters: When you see me post, how about ignoring it or simply downvoting it? Frankly, I don’t give a flying fuck about your critique. You’re a moderator. BBK and Psalm had great numbers too. Unfortunately they don't keep LB stats on how many YPC they allow versus should allow, if they were any good. Opposing RB YAC stats on BBK and Psalm were off the charts, also, as they piggybacked on RBs running by and over them for 8 YPC. BBK was very good, GTFO with this tired narrative. He spent two years overrunning the point of contact because he was fast, but not strong enough. When he could, he jumped on RBs backs a lot and got carried for several yards. He accumulated a lot of tackles, but gave up a lot of yards in critical situations. He became more disciplined over time, gained a few pounds and strength, and became more effective at pressuring the QB and collapsing the pocket in his final year. His angles got better as did his technique as he focused more on interrupting the backfield than hooking the QB for an arm tackle sack as he flew by. He was never an LB that blew up plays or that teams ran away from. He was fast and athletic but nothing "very good" until his last year. He really didn’t. He got dragged at times but he was always at least an above average PAC 12 LB, even as a sophomore. There aren’t many ways to run away from an ILB that plays sideline to sideline. When he was a junior there were posters that said he was only good because of Vea. Then when Vea left, he got even better. BBK bullshit was always strong group think led by Dennis. Jesus Roady. What BBK were you watching? He never got dragged. He got carried. Literally. On RBs backs. Repeatedly. Especially on 3rd down. He was very good at getting to the play, but not at executing it, because he lacked the size, strength and tackling ability to finish guys off without help. He got better his final year after sizing up and improving his techniques.I'm sure it irks you, Roady, but DDY was right about BBK. DDY's head was firmly up his ass on plenty of stuff, but not BBK. Or Browning. Or our shitty receivers. I remember my criticizing the pac12 defensive player of the year days. He had his flaws but was a good player. End of story. Special teams broken leg of the weak guy on a shitty team, now. Some awards don't mean a lot. Dude did BBK plow your mother?? Why the negative view on him. We had some shifty LB at UW, he was not one of them Here we go with the relativity bullshit. Go home, collectivist. Your fragile ego that cannot withstand opposing opinions is embarrassing. I now know who you voted for. Hahaha jokes on you. I don’t have the right to vote. bBK was not perfect, but his senior year he was better than Azim and Keyshawn
Hope this doesn’t muck up this thread because it’s “historical bullshit”:Total Tackles thru Week 4:Jackson Sirmon - 30No. 1 for UWRanked 6th in the PAC-12 ConferenceCFetters: When you see me post, how about ignoring it or simply downvoting it? Frankly, I don’t give a flying fuck about your critique. You’re a moderator. BBK and Psalm had great numbers too. Unfortunately they don't keep LB stats on how many YPC they allow versus should allow, if they were any good. Opposing RB YAC stats on BBK and Psalm were off the charts, also, as they piggybacked on RBs running by and over them for 8 YPC. BBK was very good, GTFO with this tired narrative. He spent two years overrunning the point of contact because he was fast, but not strong enough. When he could, he jumped on RBs backs a lot and got carried for several yards. He accumulated a lot of tackles, but gave up a lot of yards in critical situations. He became more disciplined over time, gained a few pounds and strength, and became more effective at pressuring the QB and collapsing the pocket in his final year. His angles got better as did his technique as he focused more on interrupting the backfield than hooking the QB for an arm tackle sack as he flew by. He was never an LB that blew up plays or that teams ran away from. He was fast and athletic but nothing "very good" until his last year. He really didn’t. He got dragged at times but he was always at least an above average PAC 12 LB, even as a sophomore. There aren’t many ways to run away from an ILB that plays sideline to sideline. When he was a junior there were posters that said he was only good because of Vea. Then when Vea left, he got even better. BBK bullshit was always strong group think led by Dennis. Jesus Roady. What BBK were you watching? He never got dragged. He got carried. Literally. On RBs backs. Repeatedly. Especially on 3rd down. He was very good at getting to the play, but not at executing it, because he lacked the size, strength and tackling ability to finish guys off without help. He got better his final year after sizing up and improving his techniques.I'm sure it irks you, Roady, but DDY was right about BBK. DDY's head was firmly up his ass on plenty of stuff, but not BBK. Or Browning. Or our shitty receivers. I remember my criticizing the pac12 defensive player of the year days. He had his flaws but was a good player. End of story. Special teams broken leg of the weak guy on a shitty team, now. Some awards don't mean a lot. The award means he was the best defensive player in the league. The rest of what you said doesn't mean anything at all as far as this debate goes.And I'm all for insulting the players. BBK was pretty good but limited for much of his career. As a senior he stepped it up and was just plain good. It got him drafted. What is there to argue about? Jesus, Chuck! That's exactly what I wrote, above. His senior year was markedly better, obviously. Fuck! The hypersensitivity on these boreds is off-the-charts sometimes.
Can we stop arguing over how good or bad BBK was and get back to discussing how dum @trublue is?So dumb he doesn’t even deserve the correct spelling of the word. Gladly. Just had to dispense with the sensitive woketivists first. Odd how expressing a negative opinion about a player generates so much worry and bruises so many egos. Perhaps some youngsters on these boreds are too invested in this mediocre program to see reality.
Can we stop arguing over how good or bad BBK was and get back to discussing how dum @trublue is?So dumb he doesn’t even deserve the correct spelling of the word.
Can we stop arguing over how good or bad BBK was and get back to discussing how dum @trublue is?So dumb he doesn’t even deserve the correct spelling of the word. Gladly. Just had to dispense with the sensitive woketivists first. Odd how expressing a negative opinion about a player generates so much worry and bruises so many egos. Perhaps some youngsters on these boreds are too invested in this mediocre program to see reality. You’re a weirdo with this woke shit. I’m not consumed by it like you. Most here aren’t. He was good. I watched him play many games. This board, myself included has no problem saying a player sucks.
Can we stop arguing over how good or bad BBK was and get back to discussing how dum @trublue is?So dumb he doesn’t even deserve the correct spelling of the word. Gladly. Just had to dispense with the sensitive woketivists first. Odd how expressing a negative opinion about a player generates so much worry and bruises so many egos. Perhaps some youngsters on these boreds are too invested in this mediocre program to see reality. You’re a weirdo with this woke shit. I’m not consumed by it like you. Most here aren’t. He was good. I watched him play many games. This board, myself included has no problem saying a player sucks. Fuck your hypersensitivity. It is patently woke and a hallmark of your generation. Thank you for ostensibly speaking for "this board" Mr. Group-Think. You couldn't have done a better job of proving my point.
This really isn't that complicated BBK had an amazing senior season and was the man.BBK was runny dog shit evey other year BBK should of got. RS year Sirmon has cinder block feet and wouldnt be BBK if he was here a decade Can we all agree ane move on?
Can we stop arguing over how good or bad BBK was and get back to discussing how dum @trublue is?So dumb he doesn’t even deserve the correct spelling of the word. Gladly. Just had to dispense with the sensitive woketivists first. Odd how expressing a negative opinion about a player generates so much worry and bruises so many egos. Perhaps some youngsters on these boreds are too invested in this mediocre program to see reality. You’re a weirdo with this woke shit. I’m not consumed by it like you. Most here aren’t. He was good. I watched him play many games. This board, myself included has no problem saying a player sucks. Fuck your hypersensitivity. It is patently woke and a hallmark of your generation. Thank you for ostensibly speaking for "this board" Mr. Group-Think. You couldn't have done a better job of proving my point. I’m not sensitive at all about it. Thinking BBK is good, because he was, is not sensitive. Save the woke shit for the tug. We talk football and black women vs Native American women over here.
Can we stop arguing over how good or bad BBK was and get back to discussing how dum @trublue is?So dumb he doesn’t even deserve the correct spelling of the word. Gladly. Just had to dispense with the sensitive woketivists first. Odd how expressing a negative opinion about a player generates so much worry and bruises so many egos. Perhaps some youngsters on these boreds are too invested in this mediocre program to see reality. You’re a weirdo with this woke shit. I’m not consumed by it like you. Most here aren’t. He was good. I watched him play many games. This board, myself included has no problem saying a player sucks. Fuck your hypersensitivity. It is patently woke and a hallmark of your generation. Thank you for ostensibly speaking for "this board" Mr. Group-Think. You couldn't have done a better job of proving my point. I’m not sensitive at all about it. Thinking BBK is good, because he was, is not sensitive. Save the woke shit for the tug. We talk football and black women vs Native American women over here. And you defend mediocrity. Shit takes and low expectations have ruined a once elite fanbase and a dominating program.Keep up the good work, chumps. Shit-Tier bowls until 2030 will be your reward.
Can we stop arguing over how good or bad BBK was and get back to discussing how dum @trublue is?So dumb he doesn’t even deserve the correct spelling of the word. Gladly. Just had to dispense with the sensitive woketivists first. Odd how expressing a negative opinion about a player generates so much worry and bruises so many egos. Perhaps some youngsters on these boreds are too invested in this mediocre program to see reality. You’re a weirdo with this woke shit. I’m not consumed by it like you. Most here aren’t. He was good. I watched him play many games. This board, myself included has no problem saying a player sucks. Fuck your hypersensitivity. It is patently woke and a hallmark of your generation. Thank you for ostensibly speaking for "this board" Mr. Group-Think. You couldn't have done a better job of proving my point. Geez, we get it. You’re on the Alex Jones supplement plan. Nobody cares.
Can we stop arguing over how good or bad BBK was and get back to discussing how dum @trublue is?So dumb he doesn’t even deserve the correct spelling of the word. Gladly. Just had to dispense with the sensitive woketivists first. Odd how expressing a negative opinion about a player generates so much worry and bruises so many egos. Perhaps some youngsters on these boreds are too invested in this mediocre program to see reality. You’re a weirdo with this woke shit. I’m not consumed by it like you. Most here aren’t. He was good. I watched him play many games. This board, myself included has no problem saying a player sucks. Fuck your hypersensitivity. It is patently woke and a hallmark of your generation. Thank you for ostensibly speaking for "this board" Mr. Group-Think. You couldn't have done a better job of proving my point. I’m not sensitive at all about it. Thinking BBK is good, because he was, is not sensitive. Save the woke shit for the tug. We talk football and black women vs Native American women over here. And you defend mediocrity. Shit takes and low expectations have ruined a once elite fanbase and a dominating program.Keep up the good work, chumps. Shit-Tier bowls until 2030 will be your reward. Aren't you the guy that bought Tyee tickets during the Ty era?Was that to show your appreciation for his hire? Nice work, elite fan.
Can we stop arguing over how good or bad BBK was and get back to discussing how dum @trublue is?So dumb he doesn’t even deserve the correct spelling of the word. Gladly. Just had to dispense with the sensitive woketivists first. Odd how expressing a negative opinion about a player generates so much worry and bruises so many egos. Perhaps some youngsters on these boreds are too invested in this mediocre program to see reality. You’re a weirdo with this woke shit. I’m not consumed by it like you. Most here aren’t. He was good. I watched him play many games. This board, myself included has no problem saying a player sucks. Fuck your hypersensitivity. It is patently woke and a hallmark of your generation. Thank you for ostensibly speaking for "this board" Mr. Group-Think. You couldn't have done a better job of proving my point. I’m not sensitive at all about it. Thinking BBK is good, because he was, is not sensitive. Save the woke shit for the tug. We talk football and black women vs Native American women over here. And you defend mediocrity. Shit takes and low expectations have ruined a once elite fanbase and a dominating program.Keep up the good work, chumps. Shit-Tier bowls until 2030 will be your reward. Aren't you the guy that bought Tyee tickets during the Ty era?Was that to show your appreciation for his hire? Nice work, elite fan. Fuck off bottom-feeder. How's the view from General Admission?
Can we stop arguing over how good or bad BBK was and get back to discussing how dum @trublue is?So dumb he doesn’t even deserve the correct spelling of the word. Gladly. Just had to dispense with the sensitive woketivists first. Odd how expressing a negative opinion about a player generates so much worry and bruises so many egos. Perhaps some youngsters on these boreds are too invested in this mediocre program to see reality. You’re a weirdo with this woke shit. I’m not consumed by it like you. Most here aren’t. He was good. I watched him play many games. This board, myself included has no problem saying a player sucks. Fuck your hypersensitivity. It is patently woke and a hallmark of your generation. Thank you for ostensibly speaking for "this board" Mr. Group-Think. You couldn't have done a better job of proving my point. Geez, we get it. You’re on the Alex Jones supplement plan. Nobody cares. Or I simply know what good linebacker play looks like, but carry on. Soft fanbase = soft program.
Can we stop arguing over how good or bad BBK was and get back to discussing how dum @trublue is?So dumb he doesn’t even deserve the correct spelling of the word. Gladly. Just had to dispense with the sensitive woketivists first. Odd how expressing a negative opinion about a player generates so much worry and bruises so many egos. Perhaps some youngsters on these boreds are too invested in this mediocre program to see reality. You’re a weirdo with this woke shit. I’m not consumed by it like you. Most here aren’t. He was good. I watched him play many games. This board, myself included has no problem saying a player sucks. Fuck your hypersensitivity. It is patently woke and a hallmark of your generation. Thank you for ostensibly speaking for "this board" Mr. Group-Think. You couldn't have done a better job of proving my point. Geez, we get it. You’re on the Alex Jones supplement plan. Nobody cares. Or I simply know what good linebacker play looks like, but carry on. Soft fanbase = soft program. You think BBK sucked, so that's not it.
Can we stop arguing over how good or bad BBK was and get back to discussing how dum @trublue is?So dumb he doesn’t even deserve the correct spelling of the word. Gladly. Just had to dispense with the sensitive woketivists first. Odd how expressing a negative opinion about a player generates so much worry and bruises so many egos. Perhaps some youngsters on these boreds are too invested in this mediocre program to see reality. You’re a weirdo with this woke shit. I’m not consumed by it like you. Most here aren’t. He was good. I watched him play many games. This board, myself included has no problem saying a player sucks. Fuck your hypersensitivity. It is patently woke and a hallmark of your generation. Thank you for ostensibly speaking for "this board" Mr. Group-Think. You couldn't have done a better job of proving my point. Geez, we get it. You’re on the Alex Jones supplement plan. Nobody cares. Or I simply know what good linebacker play looks like, but carry on. Soft fanbase = soft program. You think BBK sucked, so that's not it. That's not at all what I wrote. Be better than that.
