ACLU Is Currently Recruiting Leftist Poll Workers to Run the Next Georgia Election Like the Last
Comments
-
Sounds like you’ve shifted from laptop exists to what’s on the laptop isn’t bad. Maybe should’ve started there.TheKobeStopper said:
I’m hearing this is bigger than Watergate. Print all the damning evidence. No one gives a fuck if Hunter Biden owned a laptop and had an email. What’s on them? Nothing, same story as the stolen election.PurpleThrobber said:
god, you're naive.TheKobeStopper said:If you’ve got a smoking gun, print it. Just print the emails in every paper.
No one ever said Hunter Biden never owned a laptop. No one ever said Hunter Biden didn’t have an email account. Print the emails. Show the country the disgusting evil corruption.
There’s nothing there. That’s why you’re playing this game of “the Hunter Biden laptop is real!” You don’t have shit.
Or maybe you’re saving it, just like all that proof that the election was stolen.
All this was inspired by the principle – which is quite true within itself – that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods.
It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying.
You know who said it. -
Totally. The original argument was that Hunter Biden has never owned a laptop or had an email account.Bob_C said:
Sounds like you’ve shifted from laptop exists to what’s on the laptop isn’t bad. Maybe should’ve started there.TheKobeStopper said:
I’m hearing this is bigger than Watergate. Print all the damning evidence. No one gives a fuck if Hunter Biden owned a laptop and had an email. What’s on them? Nothing, same story as the stolen election.PurpleThrobber said:
god, you're naive.TheKobeStopper said:If you’ve got a smoking gun, print it. Just print the emails in every paper.
No one ever said Hunter Biden never owned a laptop. No one ever said Hunter Biden didn’t have an email account. Print the emails. Show the country the disgusting evil corruption.
There’s nothing there. That’s why you’re playing this game of “the Hunter Biden laptop is real!” You don’t have shit.
Or maybe you’re saving it, just like all that proof that the election was stolen.
All this was inspired by the principle – which is quite true within itself – that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods.
It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying.
You know who said it. -
Sure it was. Joe said in the debate that the laptop was Russian disinformation. Fed the line by Psaki and Clapper. You supported that lying.TheKobeStopper said:
Totally. The original argument was that Hunter Biden has never owned a laptop or had an email account.Bob_C said:
Sounds like you’ve shifted from laptop exists to what’s on the laptop isn’t bad. Maybe should’ve started there.TheKobeStopper said:
I’m hearing this is bigger than Watergate. Print all the damning evidence. No one gives a fuck if Hunter Biden owned a laptop and had an email. What’s on them? Nothing, same story as the stolen election.PurpleThrobber said:
god, you're naive.TheKobeStopper said:If you’ve got a smoking gun, print it. Just print the emails in every paper.
No one ever said Hunter Biden never owned a laptop. No one ever said Hunter Biden didn’t have an email account. Print the emails. Show the country the disgusting evil corruption.
There’s nothing there. That’s why you’re playing this game of “the Hunter Biden laptop is real!” You don’t have shit.
Or maybe you’re saving it, just like all that proof that the election was stolen.
All this was inspired by the principle – which is quite true within itself – that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods.
It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying.
You know who said it. -
He wears his ignorance and his stupidity as a badge of honor.RaceBannon said:
Proudly ignorant as alwaysTheKobeStopper said:If you’ve got a smoking gun, print it. Just print the emails in every paper.
No one ever said Hunter Biden never owned a laptop. No one ever said Hunter Biden didn’t have an email account. Print the emails. Show the country the disgusting evil corruption.
There’s nothing there. That’s why you’re playing this game of “the Hunter Biden laptop is real!” You don’t have shit.
Or maybe you’re saving it, just like all that proof that the election was stolen. -
Who's argument was that my strawman ass fucking Kunt of friend?TheKobeStopper said:
Totally. The original argument was that Hunter Biden has never owned a laptop or had an email account.Bob_C said:
Sounds like you’ve shifted from laptop exists to what’s on the laptop isn’t bad. Maybe should’ve started there.TheKobeStopper said:
I’m hearing this is bigger than Watergate. Print all the damning evidence. No one gives a fuck if Hunter Biden owned a laptop and had an email. What’s on them? Nothing, same story as the stolen election.PurpleThrobber said:
god, you're naive.TheKobeStopper said:If you’ve got a smoking gun, print it. Just print the emails in every paper.
No one ever said Hunter Biden never owned a laptop. No one ever said Hunter Biden didn’t have an email account. Print the emails. Show the country the disgusting evil corruption.
There’s nothing there. That’s why you’re playing this game of “the Hunter Biden laptop is real!” You don’t have shit.
Or maybe you’re saving it, just like all that proof that the election was stolen.
All this was inspired by the principle – which is quite true within itself – that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods.
It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying.
You know who said it.