I'm not going to lie to you doogs
I said before the year we need to beat Michigan or Jimmy is not the guy.
No one foresaw the meltdown that was the Montana game. But if we end Harbaugh's Michigan career after losing to Montana at home, that is some seriously funny shit.
I do think the team is going to come out chippy and pissed and it will be an interesting game.
If we lose, fire Jimmy on the tarmac. If we win, win the north and get plungered by an undefeated Chip in the title game.
Yes, I am desperately looking for silver linings. I at least want to get some entertainment out of the season.
For PGOS, beat Michigan. Nothing else matters. Sorta. Fuck off.
Comments
-
I still think we win. Michigan plays by the script as well
-
What happens when a stoppable force meets a moveable object?Canadawg said:I still think we win. Michigan plays by the script as well
-
PostGameOrangeSlices said:
What happens when a stoppable force meets a moveable object?Canadawg said:I still think we win. Michigan plays by the script as well
-
Even if we lose to Michigan the Alamo bowl championship is still in play until it’s not.PostGameOrangeSlices said:If we beat Michigan I am going to laugh hysterically, and might, MIGHT adjust the season back to LIPO.
I said before the year we need to beat Michigan or Jimmy is not the guy.
No one foresaw the meltdown that was the Montana game. But if we end Harbaugh's Michigan career after losing to Montana at home, that is some seriously funny shit.
I do think the team is going to come out chippy and pissed and it will be an interesting game.
If we lose, fire Jimmy on the tarmac. If we win, win the north and get plungered by an undefeated Chip in the title game.
Yes, I am desperately looking for silver linings. I at least want to get some entertainment out of the season.
For PGOS, beat Michigan. Nothing else matters. Sorta. Fuck off. -
Week 1 is famous for being over reaction week but I don't think you can over react to losing to Montana.
I do think the talking honks could over react to a legendary bounce back win at the Big House by the Fighting Jimmies all the while sealing the fate of Harbaugh who would be a victim of an appropriate reaction to losing to our DAWGS.
Its a long sentence but its true -
If we beat Sark and Kwat in the Alamo Bowl this season would be the best since 2000 lolAtomicDawg said:
Even if we lose to Michigan the Alamo bowl championship is still in play until it’s not.PostGameOrangeSlices said:If we beat Michigan I am going to laugh hysterically, and might, MIGHT adjust the season back to LIPO.
I said before the year we need to beat Michigan or Jimmy is not the guy.
No one foresaw the meltdown that was the Montana game. But if we end Harbaugh's Michigan career after losing to Montana at home, that is some seriously funny shit.
I do think the team is going to come out chippy and pissed and it will be an interesting game.
If we lose, fire Jimmy on the tarmac. If we win, win the north and get plungered by an undefeated Chip in the title game.
Yes, I am desperately looking for silver linings. I at least want to get some entertainment out of the season.
For PGOS, beat Michigan. Nothing else matters. Sorta. Fuck off. -
PostGameOrangeSlices said:
If we beat Michigan I am going to laugh hysterically, and might, MIGHT adjust the season back to LIPO.
I said before the year we need to beat Michigan or Jimmy is not the guy.
No one foresaw the meltdown that was the Montana game. But if we end Harbaugh's Michigan career after losing to Montana at home, that is some seriously funny shit.
I do think the team is going to come out chippy and pissed and it will be an interesting game.
If we lose, fire Jimmy on the tarmac. If we win, win the north and get plungered by an undefeated Chip in the title game.
Yes, I am desperately looking for silver linings. I at least want to get some entertainment out of the season.
For PGOS, beat Michigan. Nothing else matters. Sorta. Fuck off.
Done in a car, 1-5, hooker blow, yada yada -
While I’d certainly enjoy the chaos that a win over UM would create, there is not a chance in hell this Huskies team is winning that game.
That Michigan defense is going to destroy the mighty John Donovans. Which is one of the reason I hope they save Huard for arky state. Because if they roll him out mid-game Saturday, he’s going to be seeing ghosts for the rest of his career. -
Probably the first time PGOS has ever been right about something.
These are college kids. They don't get up for FCS games and often the FCS teams are just as good as lower level FBS teams so its stupid to schedule them. Six FCS teams won vs. FBS teams last weekend. UW was a smaller favorite vs. Montana than UO was vs. Fresno State.
2007 Michigan, after being shocked by Appy State and crushed by Oregon, then rolled off eight wins in a row.
2010 Virginia Tech, after falling to James Madison to start the season 0-2, won 11 games in a row to win the ACC.
All that to say these aren't professional athletes they can come out hungover and unmotivated one weekend and then hungry and aggressive the next.
Lots of overreactions to one game- UW could easily beat Michigan this weekend.
They are probably still a terribly coached and managed team but the season isn't over. -
I'm looking for some top notch qb play
-
Even if they do beat Michigan it's gonna be a shitshow of 6-6 or 7-5. Everyone knows it.
-
Oregon won. 1-0FremontTroll said:Probably the first time PGOS has ever been right about something.
These are college kids. They don't get up for FCS games and often the FCS teams are just as good as lower level FBS teams so its stupid to schedule them. Six FCS teams won vs. FBS teams last weekend. UW was a smaller favorite vs. Montana than UO was vs. Fresno State.
2007 Michigan, after being shocked by Appy State and crushed by Oregon, then rolled off eight wins in a row.
2010 Virginia Tech, after falling to James Madison to start the season 0-2, won 11 games in a row to win the ACC.
All that to say these aren't professional athletes they can come out hungover and unmotivated one weekend and then hungry and aggressive the next.
Lots of overreactions to one game- UW could easily beat Michigan this weekend.
They are probably still a terribly coached and managed team but the season isn't over.
UW lost, 0-1
Fact check: True
Spin that. -
Now that was a doog post by the Troll. Lol.doogie said:
Oregon won. 1-0FremontTroll said:Probably the first time PGOS has ever been right about something.
These are college kids. They don't get up for FCS games and often the FCS teams are just as good as lower level FBS teams so its stupid to schedule them. Six FCS teams won vs. FBS teams last weekend. UW was a smaller favorite vs. Montana than UO was vs. Fresno State.
2007 Michigan, after being shocked by Appy State and crushed by Oregon, then rolled off eight wins in a row.
2010 Virginia Tech, after falling to James Madison to start the season 0-2, won 11 games in a row to win the ACC.
All that to say these aren't professional athletes they can come out hungover and unmotivated one weekend and then hungry and aggressive the next.
Lots of overreactions to one game- UW could easily beat Michigan this weekend.
They are probably still a terribly coached and managed team but the season isn't over.
UW lost, 0-1
Fact check: True
Spin that. -
Spin? Both sucked and either game could have gone either way.doogie said:
Oregon won. 1-0FremontTroll said:Probably the first time PGOS has ever been right about something.
These are college kids. They don't get up for FCS games and often the FCS teams are just as good as lower level FBS teams so its stupid to schedule them. Six FCS teams won vs. FBS teams last weekend. UW was a smaller favorite vs. Montana than UO was vs. Fresno State.
2007 Michigan, after being shocked by Appy State and crushed by Oregon, then rolled off eight wins in a row.
2010 Virginia Tech, after falling to James Madison to start the season 0-2, won 11 games in a row to win the ACC.
All that to say these aren't professional athletes they can come out hungover and unmotivated one weekend and then hungry and aggressive the next.
Lots of overreactions to one game- UW could easily beat Michigan this weekend.
They are probably still a terribly coached and managed team but the season isn't over.
UW lost, 0-1
Fact check: True
Spin that.
Yes, results are ultimately what matter.
But wins and losses are less predictive of the future than more fine-grained statistics.
Oregon went from 9 point dog to 14 @ ohio state. Washington went from +2.5 to +6.5 @ michigan. -
Michigan and VT at least were able to put up over 200 rushing yards against when they lost to their FCS opponents. We put up 65 against Montana. What makes our loss to Montana special is how badly their defense dominated our offense especially in the run game. I would be slightly more optimistic if we had lost in a shoot out instead of a defensive manhandle.FremontTroll said:Probably the first time PGOS has ever been right about something.
These are college kids. They don't get up for FCS games and often the FCS teams are just as good as lower level FBS teams so its stupid to schedule them. Six FCS teams won vs. FBS teams last weekend. UW was a smaller favorite vs. Montana than UO was vs. Fresno State.
2007 Michigan, after being shocked by Appy State and crushed by Oregon, then rolled off eight wins in a row.
2010 Virginia Tech, after falling to James Madison to start the season 0-2, won 11 games in a row to win the ACC.
All that to say these aren't professional athletes they can come out hungover and unmotivated one weekend and then hungry and aggressive the next.
Lots of overreactions to one game- UW could easily beat Michigan this weekend.
They are probably still a terribly coached and managed team but the season isn't over. -
Lake isn’t the guy, but I don’t think it’s a foregone conclusion we lose either. If we win the turnover battle, this will likely be a low scoring, to the wire game.FremontTroll said:Probably the first time PGOS has ever been right about something.
These are college kids. They don't get up for FCS games and often the FCS teams are just as good as lower level FBS teams so its stupid to schedule them. Six FCS teams won vs. FBS teams last weekend. UW was a smaller favorite vs. Montana than UO was vs. Fresno State.
2007 Michigan, after being shocked by Appy State and crushed by Oregon, then rolled off eight wins in a row.
2010 Virginia Tech, after falling to James Madison to start the season 0-2, won 11 games in a row to win the ACC.
All that to say these aren't professional athletes they can come out hungover and unmotivated one weekend and then hungry and aggressive the next.
Lots of overreactions to one game- UW could easily beat Michigan this weekend.
They are probably still a terribly coached and managed team but the season isn't over.
If we can’t complete any passes downfield, we have no shot. -
omg the pronouns hahahaRedRocket said:
Michigan and VT at least were able to put up over 200 rushing yards against when they lost to their FCS opponents. We put up 65 against Montana. What makes our loss to Montana special is how badly their defense dominated our offense especially in the run game. I would be slightly more optimistic if we had lost in a shoot out instead of a defensive manhandle.FremontTroll said:Probably the first time PGOS has ever been right about something.
These are college kids. They don't get up for FCS games and often the FCS teams are just as good as lower level FBS teams so its stupid to schedule them. Six FCS teams won vs. FBS teams last weekend. UW was a smaller favorite vs. Montana than UO was vs. Fresno State.
2007 Michigan, after being shocked by Appy State and crushed by Oregon, then rolled off eight wins in a row.
2010 Virginia Tech, after falling to James Madison to start the season 0-2, won 11 games in a row to win the ACC.
All that to say these aren't professional athletes they can come out hungover and unmotivated one weekend and then hungry and aggressive the next.
Lots of overreactions to one game- UW could easily beat Michigan this weekend.
They are probably still a terribly coached and managed team but the season isn't over. -
I just wanted to doog sooo bad last week. Now I feel I can only kinda doog if we? beat Michigan. Montana will be like when you fuck a fat girl, and part of her essence, fat, greasy essence, is with you forever. Fat girl slime you can never wash off. That Montana loss is the equivalent to that. It usually means you settle for more fatties because you 'survived that one time.'I'll still doog my heart out with a win.I'm not turning down any fatties.
-
This is a good point. UW has had close games with Eastern and they are high scoring affairs. The offense scores enough because D1 schools, especially power 5 should score at will even when they don’t care because of the talent discrepancy. It’s usually an uninterested defense that takes it on the chin when they are up against a revved up, smaller but game opponent. UW’s offense was handled completely. That should never happen in these big v little crossover abortions.RedRocket said:
Michigan and VT at least were able to put up over 200 rushing yards against when they lost to their FCS opponents. We put up 65 against Montana. What makes our loss to Montana special is how badly their defense dominated our offense especially in the run game. I would be slightly more optimistic if we had lost in a shoot out instead of a defensive manhandle.FremontTroll said:Probably the first time PGOS has ever been right about something.
These are college kids. They don't get up for FCS games and often the FCS teams are just as good as lower level FBS teams so its stupid to schedule them. Six FCS teams won vs. FBS teams last weekend. UW was a smaller favorite vs. Montana than UO was vs. Fresno State.
2007 Michigan, after being shocked by Appy State and crushed by Oregon, then rolled off eight wins in a row.
2010 Virginia Tech, after falling to James Madison to start the season 0-2, won 11 games in a row to win the ACC.
All that to say these aren't professional athletes they can come out hungover and unmotivated one weekend and then hungry and aggressive the next.
Lots of overreactions to one game- UW could easily beat Michigan this weekend.
They are probably still a terribly coached and managed team but the season isn't over. -
Dropped 3 bones on some retro home field gear. Received it on Monday. Threw it to the top of the closet. Too embarrassed to wear that shit in central TexASS. We’ll see how this weekend goes… going to LIPO.
-
Why? I'm not clear on why a close low-scoring game is a worse loss than a close high-scoring game.RedRocket said:
Michigan and VT at least were able to put up over 200 rushing yards against when they lost to their FCS opponents. We put up 65 against Montana. What makes our loss to Montana special is how badly their defense dominated our offense especially in the run game. I would be slightly more optimistic if we had lost in a shoot out instead of a defensive manhandle.FremontTroll said:Probably the first time PGOS has ever been right about something.
These are college kids. They don't get up for FCS games and often the FCS teams are just as good as lower level FBS teams so its stupid to schedule them. Six FCS teams won vs. FBS teams last weekend. UW was a smaller favorite vs. Montana than UO was vs. Fresno State.
2007 Michigan, after being shocked by Appy State and crushed by Oregon, then rolled off eight wins in a row.
2010 Virginia Tech, after falling to James Madison to start the season 0-2, won 11 games in a row to win the ACC.
All that to say these aren't professional athletes they can come out hungover and unmotivated one weekend and then hungry and aggressive the next.
Lots of overreactions to one game- UW could easily beat Michigan this weekend.
They are probably still a terribly coached and managed team but the season isn't over.
This is some narrative bullshit. The easiest way to make a big change from week to week is improved QB play. Morris doesn't throw three INTs this week we are right in it.theknowledge said:
This is a good point. UW has had close games with Eastern and they are high scoring affairs. The offense scores enough because D1 schools, especially power 5 should score at will even when they don’t care because of the talent discrepancy. It’s usually an uninterested defense that takes it on the chin when they are up against a revved up, smaller but game opponent. UW’s offense was handled completely. That should never happen in these big v little crossover abortions.RedRocket said:
Michigan and VT at least were able to put up over 200 rushing yards against when they lost to their FCS opponents. We put up 65 against Montana. What makes our loss to Montana special is how badly their defense dominated our offense especially in the run game. I would be slightly more optimistic if we had lost in a shoot out instead of a defensive manhandle.FremontTroll said:Probably the first time PGOS has ever been right about something.
These are college kids. They don't get up for FCS games and often the FCS teams are just as good as lower level FBS teams so its stupid to schedule them. Six FCS teams won vs. FBS teams last weekend. UW was a smaller favorite vs. Montana than UO was vs. Fresno State.
2007 Michigan, after being shocked by Appy State and crushed by Oregon, then rolled off eight wins in a row.
2010 Virginia Tech, after falling to James Madison to start the season 0-2, won 11 games in a row to win the ACC.
All that to say these aren't professional athletes they can come out hungover and unmotivated one weekend and then hungry and aggressive the next.
Lots of overreactions to one game- UW could easily beat Michigan this weekend.
They are probably still a terribly coached and managed team but the season isn't over. -
I said I was t buying any new UW hear a while ago and that I would buy a new t shirt until I was getting rid of 2 old ones.dirtysouwfdawg said:Dropped 3 bones on some retro home field gear. Received it on Monday. Threw it to the top of the closet. Too embarrassed to wear that shit in central TexASS. We’ll see how this weekend goes… going to LIPO.
81% of my current UW gear landed in the attic today. -
UW can’t run the ball on Montana. The end.FremontTroll said:
Why? I'm not clear on why a close low-scoring game is a worse loss than a close high-scoring game.RedRocket said:
Michigan and VT at least were able to put up over 200 rushing yards against when they lost to their FCS opponents. We put up 65 against Montana. What makes our loss to Montana special is how badly their defense dominated our offense especially in the run game. I would be slightly more optimistic if we had lost in a shoot out instead of a defensive manhandle.FremontTroll said:Probably the first time PGOS has ever been right about something.
These are college kids. They don't get up for FCS games and often the FCS teams are just as good as lower level FBS teams so its stupid to schedule them. Six FCS teams won vs. FBS teams last weekend. UW was a smaller favorite vs. Montana than UO was vs. Fresno State.
2007 Michigan, after being shocked by Appy State and crushed by Oregon, then rolled off eight wins in a row.
2010 Virginia Tech, after falling to James Madison to start the season 0-2, won 11 games in a row to win the ACC.
All that to say these aren't professional athletes they can come out hungover and unmotivated one weekend and then hungry and aggressive the next.
Lots of overreactions to one game- UW could easily beat Michigan this weekend.
They are probably still a terribly coached and managed team but the season isn't over.
This is some narrative bullshit. The easiest way to make a big change from week to week is improved QB play. Morris doesn't throw three INTs this week we are right in it.theknowledge said:
This is a good point. UW has had close games with Eastern and they are high scoring affairs. The offense scores enough because D1 schools, especially power 5 should score at will even when they don’t care because of the talent discrepancy. It’s usually an uninterested defense that takes it on the chin when they are up against a revved up, smaller but game opponent. UW’s offense was handled completely. That should never happen in these big v little crossover abortions.RedRocket said:
Michigan and VT at least were able to put up over 200 rushing yards against when they lost to their FCS opponents. We put up 65 against Montana. What makes our loss to Montana special is how badly their defense dominated our offense especially in the run game. I would be slightly more optimistic if we had lost in a shoot out instead of a defensive manhandle.FremontTroll said:Probably the first time PGOS has ever been right about something.
These are college kids. They don't get up for FCS games and often the FCS teams are just as good as lower level FBS teams so its stupid to schedule them. Six FCS teams won vs. FBS teams last weekend. UW was a smaller favorite vs. Montana than UO was vs. Fresno State.
2007 Michigan, after being shocked by Appy State and crushed by Oregon, then rolled off eight wins in a row.
2010 Virginia Tech, after falling to James Madison to start the season 0-2, won 11 games in a row to win the ACC.
All that to say these aren't professional athletes they can come out hungover and unmotivated one weekend and then hungry and aggressive the next.
Lots of overreactions to one game- UW could easily beat Michigan this weekend.
They are probably still a terribly coached and managed team but the season isn't over. -
I just don't see it, no way:
- The offense under this "OC", if you wanna call him that, is an unmitigated disaster and seems to be regressing by the day
- Defense will be gassed due to the offense not moving the ball
- 1st road game for Lake, the QB, and this 2021 team in general, in the Big House
- Meechigan>UW for roster, coaching, and home field
Considering we don't have a strong kicker, sure feels like a shutout is in play. Last time that happened... 2010 when the Harbaugh led Cardinal buttfucked us in our own front yard to the tune of 0-41. -
So take the under?digits said:I just don't see it, no way:
- The offense under this "OC", if you wanna call him that, is an unmitigated disaster and seems to be regressing by the day
- Defense will be gassed due to the offense not moving the ball
- 1st road game for Lake, the QB, and this 2021 team in general, in the Big House
- Meechigan>UW for roster, coaching, and home field
Considering we don't have a strong kicker, sure feels like a shutout is in play. Last time that happened... 2010 when the Harbaugh led Cardinal buttfucked us in our own front yard to the tune of 0-41. -
Harbaugh is done regardless ... he's playing out his contract before they go after Matt Campbell after this seasonPostGameOrangeSlices said:If we beat Michigan I am going to laugh hysterically, and might, MIGHT adjust the season back to LIPO.
I said before the year we need to beat Michigan or Jimmy is not the guy.
No one foresaw the meltdown that was the Montana game. But if we end Harbaugh's Michigan career after losing to Montana at home, that is some seriously funny shit.
I do think the team is going to come out chippy and pissed and it will be an interesting game.
If we lose, fire Jimmy on the tarmac. If we win, win the north and get plungered by an undefeated Chip in the title game.
Yes, I am desperately looking for silver linings. I at least want to get some entertainment out of the season.
For PGOS, beat Michigan. Nothing else matters. Sorta. Fuck off.
Sure we'll probably come out with sound and fury but it will be fake toughness and that will fade as the game goes on ... I'd be more excited if I saw that fake lawnmowers
Keep dooging it up -
What makes the loss to Montana pathetic is that the offensive stats against Montana almost entirely mirrored the offensive stats against Miami in 2001 ... a team on the short list of the best team of all time. Pretty sure Montana isn't going to be on that list. Also important to remember that that UW team was probably an above average team at best and you could start seeing the cracks in the armor that turned into 2002 and beyond ...RedRocket said:
Michigan and VT at least were able to put up over 200 rushing yards against when they lost to their FCS opponents. We put up 65 against Montana. What makes our loss to Montana special is how badly their defense dominated our offense especially in the run game. I would be slightly more optimistic if we had lost in a shoot out instead of a defensive manhandle.FremontTroll said:Probably the first time PGOS has ever been right about something.
These are college kids. They don't get up for FCS games and often the FCS teams are just as good as lower level FBS teams so its stupid to schedule them. Six FCS teams won vs. FBS teams last weekend. UW was a smaller favorite vs. Montana than UO was vs. Fresno State.
2007 Michigan, after being shocked by Appy State and crushed by Oregon, then rolled off eight wins in a row.
2010 Virginia Tech, after falling to James Madison to start the season 0-2, won 11 games in a row to win the ACC.
All that to say these aren't professional athletes they can come out hungover and unmotivated one weekend and then hungry and aggressive the next.
Lots of overreactions to one game- UW could easily beat Michigan this weekend.
They are probably still a terribly coached and managed team but the season isn't over.
But let's keep hoping and praying that Jimmy can turn shit around (he won't) -
Go back to doogman. Someone might care about what you think there.Tequilla said:
Harbaugh is done regardless ... he's playing out his contract before they go after Matt Campbell after this seasonPostGameOrangeSlices said:If we beat Michigan I am going to laugh hysterically, and might, MIGHT adjust the season back to LIPO.
I said before the year we need to beat Michigan or Jimmy is not the guy.
No one foresaw the meltdown that was the Montana game. But if we end Harbaugh's Michigan career after losing to Montana at home, that is some seriously funny shit.
I do think the team is going to come out chippy and pissed and it will be an interesting game.
If we lose, fire Jimmy on the tarmac. If we win, win the north and get plungered by an undefeated Chip in the title game.
Yes, I am desperately looking for silver linings. I at least want to get some entertainment out of the season.
For PGOS, beat Michigan. Nothing else matters. Sorta. Fuck off.
Sure we'll probably come out with sound and fury but it will be fake toughness and that will fade as the game goes on ... I'd be more excited if I saw that fake lawnmowers
Keep dooging it up -
Well good news if Harbaugh gets fired. UW will have 1 candidate for the open football job at the end of the yearsTequilla said:
Harbaugh is done regardless ... he's playing out his contract before they go after Matt Campbell after this seasonPostGameOrangeSlices said:If we beat Michigan I am going to laugh hysterically, and might, MIGHT adjust the season back to LIPO.
I said before the year we need to beat Michigan or Jimmy is not the guy.
No one foresaw the meltdown that was the Montana game. But if we end Harbaugh's Michigan career after losing to Montana at home, that is some seriously funny shit.
I do think the team is going to come out chippy and pissed and it will be an interesting game.
If we lose, fire Jimmy on the tarmac. If we win, win the north and get plungered by an undefeated Chip in the title game.
Yes, I am desperately looking for silver linings. I at least want to get some entertainment out of the season.
For PGOS, beat Michigan. Nothing else matters. Sorta. Fuck off.
Sure we'll probably come out with sound and fury but it will be fake toughness and that will fade as the game goes on ... I'd be more excited if I saw that fake lawnmowers
Keep dooging it up -
At least we know he’d climb trees, jump into pools, and have sleep overs to help close recruits.TheDude said:
Well good news if Harbaugh gets fired. UW will have 1 candidate for the open football job at the end of the yearsTequilla said:
Harbaugh is done regardless ... he's playing out his contract before they go after Matt Campbell after this seasonPostGameOrangeSlices said:If we beat Michigan I am going to laugh hysterically, and might, MIGHT adjust the season back to LIPO.
I said before the year we need to beat Michigan or Jimmy is not the guy.
No one foresaw the meltdown that was the Montana game. But if we end Harbaugh's Michigan career after losing to Montana at home, that is some seriously funny shit.
I do think the team is going to come out chippy and pissed and it will be an interesting game.
If we lose, fire Jimmy on the tarmac. If we win, win the north and get plungered by an undefeated Chip in the title game.
Yes, I am desperately looking for silver linings. I at least want to get some entertainment out of the season.
For PGOS, beat Michigan. Nothing else matters. Sorta. Fuck off.
Sure we'll probably come out with sound and fury but it will be fake toughness and that will fade as the game goes on ... I'd be more excited if I saw that fake lawnmowers
Keep dooging it up
