Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

India Sue’s the WHO / history of ivermectin

2

Comments

  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,463 Founders Club
    thechatch said:

    For the life of me, I can’t understand why ivermectin use is so controversial.

    It’s clinically proven to reduce mortality rates for those testing positive in early intervention.

    It’s FDA approved as an inflammatory and anti-viral drug in humans. It’s been in use for almost 40 years.

    Seriously, what is the problem?

    EUA for the vaccines wouldn’t have been legally possible with a viable, widely available and cheap therapeutic. It’s really as simple as that.

  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 18,033 Standard Supporter
    thechatch said:

    For the life of me, I can’t understand why ivermectin use is so controversial.

    It’s clinically proven to reduce mortality rates for those testing positive in early intervention.

    It’s FDA approved as an inflammatory and anti-viral drug in humans. It’s been in use for almost 40 years.

    Seriously, what is the problem?

    $45 for a prescription.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    thechatch said:

    For the life of me, I can’t understand why ivermectin use is so controversial.

    It’s clinically proven to reduce mortality rates for those testing positive in early intervention.

    It’s FDA approved as an inflammatory and anti-viral drug in humans. It’s been in use for almost 40 years.

    Seriously, what is the problem?

    The is no real problem. Someone found out it was also used in animals the media and their hype men went nuts over it. Anything but a vaccine is sacrilege to the holy tenants of their leftist cult.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    thechatch said:

    For the life of me, I can’t understand why ivermectin use is so controversial.

    It’s clinically proven to reduce mortality rates for those testing positive in early intervention.

    It’s FDA approved as an inflammatory and anti-viral drug in humans. It’s been in use for almost 40 years.

    Seriously, what is the problem?

    $45 for a prescription.
    But it’s not APPROVED to be used for COVID!
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited September 2021
    jecornel said:




    I swear. Are this people just flat out stupid, willfully ignorant, or saying this shit on purpose.


    Dangerous horse dewormer not approved for humans!! JFC



    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3043740/

    Discovered in the late-1970s, the pioneering drug ivermectin, a dihydro derivative of avermectin—originating solely from a single microorganism isolated at the Kitasato Intitute, Tokyo, Japan from Japanese soil—has had an immeasurably beneficial impact in improving the lives and welfare of billions of people throughout the world. Originally introduced as a veterinary drug, it kills a wide range of internal and external parasites in commercial livestock and companion animals. It was quickly discovered to be ideal in combating two of the world’s most devastating and disfiguring diseases which have plagued the world’s poor throughout the tropics for centuries. It is now being used free-of-charge as the sole tool in campaigns to eliminate both diseases globally. It has also been used to successfully overcome several other human diseases and new uses for it are continually being found. This paper looks in depth at the events surrounding ivermectin’s passage from being a huge success in Animal Health into its widespread use in humans, a development which has led many to describe it as a “wonder” drug.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,796 Standard Supporter
    edited September 2021
    Animals use all the same antibiotics too.

    We should outlaw them!
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 18,033 Standard Supporter
    When a leftard condemns ivermectin as a possible chicom crud treatment based on the fact that this drug is also used to deworm horses, that's what is known as leftard science. The same science that says cloth masks with a pore filtration diameter much larger than a virus particle will magically filter out the chicom crud and then go on to site all those definitive mask studies (not).
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    thechatch said:

    For the life of me, I can’t understand why ivermectin use is so controversial.

    It’s clinically proven to reduce mortality rates for those testing positive in early intervention.

    It’s FDA approved as an inflammatory and anti-viral drug in humans. It’s been in use for almost 40 years.

    Seriously, what is the problem?

    Fauci doesn’t get Paid