The Obvious Voting-Rights Solution That No Democrat Will Propose

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

https://twitter.com/notaxation/status/1431695804243316740?s=20

So a guy moved two years ago and thinks the registrar should have noticed.

Some deep/surveillance state, huh?

States can and should update the voter rolls at least once a year, no? Or is it racist voter purging, as it was called by Stacey Abrams in Georgia.

Update the rolls by telepathy?

Is that how it's done?

I'm asking you. You think the registrar should have understood the voter's intent?

It's the state's responsibility to keep up to date and accurate voter rolls. I thought you were the expert on civics here. Sheesh.

I'm sure he'll be dropped before long, assuming he hasn't been casting his California ballots.

The presumption is in favor of an existing state citizenship in the absence of a clear intent to change one's state citizenship.

A really simple solution is to remove himself from the rolls by notifying the registrar.

Someone moves out of state, California finds them, and sends them a ballot. No problem there.

Doubt they "found him" anymore than any other address forwarding system "finds" someone.

Simple solution, if he intended a change of state citizenship, don't vote the California ballot.

If only there were ways for a state to flag things like that proactively. Well shoots, I reckon we'll just wait for everyone that moves to notify us.

People move across state lines all the time without intending to change their citizenship.

And voter rolls will always be imperfect.

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

https://twitter.com/notaxation/status/1431695804243316740?s=20

So a guy moved two years ago and thinks the registrar should have noticed.

Some deep/surveillance state, huh?

States can and should update the voter rolls at least once a year, no? Or is it racist voter purging, as it was called by Stacey Abrams in Georgia.

Update the rolls by telepathy?

Is that how it's done?

I'm asking you. You think the registrar should have understood the voter's intent?

It's the state's responsibility to keep up to date and accurate voter rolls. I thought you were the expert on civics here. Sheesh.

I'm sure he'll be dropped before long, assuming he hasn't been casting his California ballots.

The presumption is in favor of an existing state citizenship in the absence of a clear intent to change one's state citizenship.

Attaboy. But you do see the problem. No state sits back passively and waits to be notified. But we are talking about California here, and so it's not surprising.

He doesn't have to vote his ballot. It's not much of a problem.

It is a problem, because he/she/they can. So can anyone who gets the ballots, mailed to dead people and so on. But as long as they vote democrat, no biggie I guess.

It's a good thing we actually police things like that. At least a couple of Daddy's voters learned that the hard way.

We?

You're not American?

You eat pieces of shit for breakfast?

Oh good.

Then "We the people" is familiar to you.

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

https://twitter.com/notaxation/status/1431695804243316740?s=20

So a guy moved two years ago and thinks the registrar should have noticed.

Some deep/surveillance state, huh?

States can and should update the voter rolls at least once a year, no? Or is it racist voter purging, as it was called by Stacey Abrams in Georgia.

Update the rolls by telepathy?

Is that how it's done?

I'm asking you. You think the registrar should have understood the voter's intent?

It's the state's responsibility to keep up to date and accurate voter rolls. I thought you were the expert on civics here. Sheesh.

I'm sure he'll be dropped before long, assuming he hasn't been casting his California ballots.

The presumption is in favor of an existing state citizenship in the absence of a clear intent to change one's state citizenship.

Attaboy. But you do see the problem. No state sits back passively and waits to be notified. But we are talking about California here, and so it's not surprising.

He doesn't have to vote his ballot. It's not much of a problem.

It is a problem, because he/she/they can. So can anyone who gets the ballots, mailed to dead people and so on. But as long as they vote democrat, no biggie I guess.

It's a good thing we actually police things like that. At least a couple of Daddy's voters learned that the hard way.

We?

You're not American?

You eat pieces of shit for breakfast?

Oh good.

Then "We the people" is familiar to you.

Movie quote whoosh.

Okay

What movie?