Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
The Obvious Voting-Rights Solution That No Democrat Will Propose
Comments
-
He doesn't have to vote his ballot. It's not much of a problem.hardhat said:
Attaboy. But you do see the problem. No state sits back passively and waits to be notified. But we are talking about California here, and so it's not surprising.HHusky said:
I'm sure he'll be dropped before long, assuming he hasn't been casting his California ballots.hardhat said:
It's the state's responsibility to keep up to date and accurate voter rolls. I thought you were the expert on civics here. Sheesh.HHusky said:
I'm asking you. You think the registrar should have understood the voter's intent?hardhat said:
Is that how it's done?HHusky said:
Update the rolls by telepathy?hardhat said:
The presumption is in favor of an existing state citizenship in the absence of a clear intent to change one's state citizenship. -
It is a problem, because he/she/they can. So can anyone who gets the ballots, mailed to dead people and so on. But as long as they vote democrat, no biggie I guess.HHusky said:
He doesn't have to vote his ballot. It's not much of a problem.hardhat said:
Attaboy. But you do see the problem. No state sits back passively and waits to be notified. But we are talking about California here, and so it's not surprising.HHusky said:
I'm sure he'll be dropped before long, assuming he hasn't been casting his California ballots.hardhat said:
It's the state's responsibility to keep up to date and accurate voter rolls. I thought you were the expert on civics here. Sheesh.HHusky said:
I'm asking you. You think the registrar should have understood the voter's intent?hardhat said:
Is that how it's done?HHusky said:
Update the rolls by telepathy?hardhat said:
The presumption is in favor of an existing state citizenship in the absence of a clear intent to change one's state citizenship. -
Someone moves out of state, California finds them, and sends them a ballot. No problem there.HHusky said:
I'm sure he'll be dropped before long, assuming he hasn't been casting his California ballots.hardhat said:
It's the state's responsibility to keep up to date and accurate voter rolls. I thought you were the expert on civics here. Sheesh.HHusky said:
I'm asking you. You think the registrar should have understood the voter's intent?hardhat said:
Is that how it's done?HHusky said:
Update the rolls by telepathy?hardhat said:
The presumption is in favor of an existing state citizenship in the absence of a clear intent to change one's state citizenship.
A really simple solution is to remove himself from the rolls by notifying the registrar. -
Doubt they "found him" anymore than any other address forwarding system "finds" someone.hardhat said:
Someone moves out of state, California finds them, and sends them a ballot. No problem there.HHusky said:
I'm sure he'll be dropped before long, assuming he hasn't been casting his California ballots.hardhat said:
It's the state's responsibility to keep up to date and accurate voter rolls. I thought you were the expert on civics here. Sheesh.HHusky said:
I'm asking you. You think the registrar should have understood the voter's intent?hardhat said:
Is that how it's done?HHusky said:
Update the rolls by telepathy?hardhat said:
The presumption is in favor of an existing state citizenship in the absence of a clear intent to change one's state citizenship.
A really simple solution is to remove himself from the rolls by notifying the registrar.
Simple solution, if he intended a change of state citizenship, don't vote the California ballot.
-
It's a good thing we actually police things like that. At least a couple of Daddy's voters learned that the hard way.hardhat said:
It is a problem, because he/she/they can. So can anyone who gets the ballots, mailed to dead people and so on. But as long as they vote democrat, no biggie I guess.HHusky said:
He doesn't have to vote his ballot. It's not much of a problem.hardhat said:
Attaboy. But you do see the problem. No state sits back passively and waits to be notified. But we are talking about California here, and so it's not surprising.HHusky said:
I'm sure he'll be dropped before long, assuming he hasn't been casting his California ballots.hardhat said:
It's the state's responsibility to keep up to date and accurate voter rolls. I thought you were the expert on civics here. Sheesh.HHusky said:
I'm asking you. You think the registrar should have understood the voter's intent?hardhat said:
Is that how it's done?HHusky said:
Update the rolls by telepathy?hardhat said:
The presumption is in favor of an existing state citizenship in the absence of a clear intent to change one's state citizenship.
-
If only there were ways for a state to flag things like that proactively. Well shoots, I reckon we'll just wait for everyone that moves to notify us.HHusky said:
Doubt they "found him" anymore than any other address forwarding system "finds" someone.hardhat said:
Someone moves out of state, California finds them, and sends them a ballot. No problem there.HHusky said:
I'm sure he'll be dropped before long, assuming he hasn't been casting his California ballots.hardhat said:
It's the state's responsibility to keep up to date and accurate voter rolls. I thought you were the expert on civics here. Sheesh.HHusky said:
I'm asking you. You think the registrar should have understood the voter's intent?hardhat said:
Is that how it's done?HHusky said:
Update the rolls by telepathy?hardhat said:
The presumption is in favor of an existing state citizenship in the absence of a clear intent to change one's state citizenship.
A really simple solution is to remove himself from the rolls by notifying the registrar.
Simple solution, if he intended a change of state citizenship, don't vote the California ballot. -
We?HHusky said:
It's a good thing we actually police things like that. At least a couple of Daddy's voters learned that the hard way.hardhat said:
It is a problem, because he/she/they can. So can anyone who gets the ballots, mailed to dead people and so on. But as long as they vote democrat, no biggie I guess.HHusky said:
He doesn't have to vote his ballot. It's not much of a problem.hardhat said:
Attaboy. But you do see the problem. No state sits back passively and waits to be notified. But we are talking about California here, and so it's not surprising.HHusky said:
I'm sure he'll be dropped before long, assuming he hasn't been casting his California ballots.hardhat said:
It's the state's responsibility to keep up to date and accurate voter rolls. I thought you were the expert on civics here. Sheesh.HHusky said:
I'm asking you. You think the registrar should have understood the voter's intent?hardhat said:
Is that how it's done?HHusky said:
Update the rolls by telepathy?hardhat said:
The presumption is in favor of an existing state citizenship in the absence of a clear intent to change one's state citizenship. -
You're not American?hardhat said:
We?HHusky said:
It's a good thing we actually police things like that. At least a couple of Daddy's voters learned that the hard way.hardhat said:
It is a problem, because he/she/they can. So can anyone who gets the ballots, mailed to dead people and so on. But as long as they vote democrat, no biggie I guess.HHusky said:
He doesn't have to vote his ballot. It's not much of a problem.hardhat said:
Attaboy. But you do see the problem. No state sits back passively and waits to be notified. But we are talking about California here, and so it's not surprising.HHusky said:
I'm sure he'll be dropped before long, assuming he hasn't been casting his California ballots.hardhat said:
It's the state's responsibility to keep up to date and accurate voter rolls. I thought you were the expert on civics here. Sheesh.HHusky said:
I'm asking you. You think the registrar should have understood the voter's intent?hardhat said:
Is that how it's done?HHusky said:
Update the rolls by telepathy?hardhat said:
The presumption is in favor of an existing state citizenship in the absence of a clear intent to change one's state citizenship. -
You eat pieces of shit for breakfast?HHusky said:
You're not American?hardhat said:
We?HHusky said:
It's a good thing we actually police things like that. At least a couple of Daddy's voters learned that the hard way.hardhat said:
It is a problem, because he/she/they can. So can anyone who gets the ballots, mailed to dead people and so on. But as long as they vote democrat, no biggie I guess.HHusky said:
He doesn't have to vote his ballot. It's not much of a problem.hardhat said:
Attaboy. But you do see the problem. No state sits back passively and waits to be notified. But we are talking about California here, and so it's not surprising.HHusky said:
I'm sure he'll be dropped before long, assuming he hasn't been casting his California ballots.hardhat said:
It's the state's responsibility to keep up to date and accurate voter rolls. I thought you were the expert on civics here. Sheesh.HHusky said:
I'm asking you. You think the registrar should have understood the voter's intent?hardhat said:
Is that how it's done?HHusky said:
Update the rolls by telepathy?hardhat said:
The presumption is in favor of an existing state citizenship in the absence of a clear intent to change one's state citizenship. -
People move across state lines all the time without intending to change their citizenship.hardhat said:
If only there were ways for a state to flag things like that proactively. Well shoots, I reckon we'll just wait for everyone that moves to notify us.HHusky said:
Doubt they "found him" anymore than any other address forwarding system "finds" someone.hardhat said:
Someone moves out of state, California finds them, and sends them a ballot. No problem there.HHusky said:
I'm sure he'll be dropped before long, assuming he hasn't been casting his California ballots.hardhat said:
It's the state's responsibility to keep up to date and accurate voter rolls. I thought you were the expert on civics here. Sheesh.HHusky said:
I'm asking you. You think the registrar should have understood the voter's intent?hardhat said:
Is that how it's done?HHusky said:
Update the rolls by telepathy?hardhat said:
The presumption is in favor of an existing state citizenship in the absence of a clear intent to change one's state citizenship.
A really simple solution is to remove himself from the rolls by notifying the registrar.
Simple solution, if he intended a change of state citizenship, don't vote the California ballot.
And voter rolls will always be imperfect. But if our Virginia pal will stop voting his California ballots, I'm sure California will remove him.
