Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
US General: ‘Possible’ to Work With Taliban in Future

DerekJohnson
Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,558

in Tug Tavern
BY ZACHARY STIEBER September 1, 2021
The U.S. military may work with the Taliban terrorist group in the future, the military’s top officer said Wednesday.
Asked if the United States would coordinate with the Taliban against ISIS in the future, Gen. Mark Milley said that it was “possible.”
“Going going forward, I would not want to make any predictions,” added Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin.
“I would tell you that we’re going to do everything that we can to make sure we remain focused on ISIS-K—understand that network and, at the time of our choosing in the future, hold them accountable for what they’ve done,” he said, referring to an ISIS affiliate that has claimed responsibility for the Aug. 26 suicide bombing attack on U.S. troops in Kabul.
The Taliban gained control of Afghanistan in mid-August after defeating U.S.-backed Afghan forces, following the withdrawal of most U.S. troops from the country.
The United States rushed thousands of service members back into Kabul, but only to secure the airport there and enable the evacuation of what turned out to be some 122,000 people.
While U.S. troops held the airport during the evacuations, Taliban terrorists controlled the exterior of the facility. The United States openly cooperated with the terrorist group, even sharing the identities of some Americans who wanted to flee the country so they’d be let through checkpoints.
The United States was relying on the Taliban “to protect us,” Gen. Kenneth McKenzie Jr., the commander of U.S. Central Command, said in a briefing last week.
The Pentagon at one point confirmed that a small number of Americans were beaten by Taliban fighters.
The cooperation drew harsh criticism from Republicans.
“It’s outrageous to think that we would put the safety of Americans in the hands of the Taliban,” Sen. Steve Daines (R-Mont.) said last week.
U.S. officials have defended the arrangement, claiming it was necessary to ensure large numbers of people were evacuated.
“We don’t know what the future of the Taliban is. But I can tell you from personal experience, that this is a ruthless group from the past, and whether or not they change remains to be seen,” Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said Wednesday.
“And as far as our dealings with them at that airfield, or in the past year or so, in war, you do what you must in order to reduce risk to mission and force—not what you necessarily want to do,” he said.

The U.S. government and military has received criticism from both parties for leaving as many as 200 Americans in Afghanistan when troops left on Aug. 30, including up to 30 primary school students from California.
Austin, pressed on what could have been done better, acknowledged that no operation is perfect but hesitated to identify any shortcomings until an after-action review is done. Milley defended the Aug. 29 drone strike that left multiple civilians dead, calling it a “righteous strike” and asserting that procedures were followed and that at least one ISIS member was killed.
Officials also gave the first concrete number in days on how many Afghan refugees are now on U.S. soil after being flown from Kabul.
Approximately 20,000 Afghans are being housed at eight different military bases in the United States as of Wednesday morning.
Another 43,007 are at staging bases in nine different countries, including four European countries.
Austin called the evacuation “historic” and expressed pride for what U.S. troops accomplished.
“We have just concluded the largest air evacuation of civilians in American history. It was heroic. It was historic. And I hope that all Americans will unite to thank our service members for their courage and their compassion,” he said.
The U.S. military may work with the Taliban terrorist group in the future, the military’s top officer said Wednesday.
Asked if the United States would coordinate with the Taliban against ISIS in the future, Gen. Mark Milley said that it was “possible.”
“Going going forward, I would not want to make any predictions,” added Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin.
“I would tell you that we’re going to do everything that we can to make sure we remain focused on ISIS-K—understand that network and, at the time of our choosing in the future, hold them accountable for what they’ve done,” he said, referring to an ISIS affiliate that has claimed responsibility for the Aug. 26 suicide bombing attack on U.S. troops in Kabul.
The Taliban gained control of Afghanistan in mid-August after defeating U.S.-backed Afghan forces, following the withdrawal of most U.S. troops from the country.
The United States rushed thousands of service members back into Kabul, but only to secure the airport there and enable the evacuation of what turned out to be some 122,000 people.
While U.S. troops held the airport during the evacuations, Taliban terrorists controlled the exterior of the facility. The United States openly cooperated with the terrorist group, even sharing the identities of some Americans who wanted to flee the country so they’d be let through checkpoints.
The United States was relying on the Taliban “to protect us,” Gen. Kenneth McKenzie Jr., the commander of U.S. Central Command, said in a briefing last week.
The Pentagon at one point confirmed that a small number of Americans were beaten by Taliban fighters.
The cooperation drew harsh criticism from Republicans.
“It’s outrageous to think that we would put the safety of Americans in the hands of the Taliban,” Sen. Steve Daines (R-Mont.) said last week.
U.S. officials have defended the arrangement, claiming it was necessary to ensure large numbers of people were evacuated.
“We don’t know what the future of the Taliban is. But I can tell you from personal experience, that this is a ruthless group from the past, and whether or not they change remains to be seen,” Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said Wednesday.
“And as far as our dealings with them at that airfield, or in the past year or so, in war, you do what you must in order to reduce risk to mission and force—not what you necessarily want to do,” he said.

The U.S. government and military has received criticism from both parties for leaving as many as 200 Americans in Afghanistan when troops left on Aug. 30, including up to 30 primary school students from California.
Austin, pressed on what could have been done better, acknowledged that no operation is perfect but hesitated to identify any shortcomings until an after-action review is done. Milley defended the Aug. 29 drone strike that left multiple civilians dead, calling it a “righteous strike” and asserting that procedures were followed and that at least one ISIS member was killed.
Officials also gave the first concrete number in days on how many Afghan refugees are now on U.S. soil after being flown from Kabul.
Approximately 20,000 Afghans are being housed at eight different military bases in the United States as of Wednesday morning.
Another 43,007 are at staging bases in nine different countries, including four European countries.
Austin called the evacuation “historic” and expressed pride for what U.S. troops accomplished.
“We have just concluded the largest air evacuation of civilians in American history. It was heroic. It was historic. And I hope that all Americans will unite to thank our service members for their courage and their compassion,” he said.
Comments
-
Giving them our lunch money, and doing their homework. Now we want to do their laundry. Welcome to Kobe’s America!
-
We’re almost compelled to, at this point. Jesus, what a disaster….
-
This is why I have always said Liberals are soft
-
So now the generals are getting their kickback, too?
Did Cho Bai Den take a haircut on his 10% or did the Taliban have to pony up some additional cash to stay in the opium trade bidness?
-
Fucking clown country, bro.
-
Sometimes it’s prudent to dilute your own equity to avoid having nothing.PurpleThrobber said:So now the generals are getting their kickback, too?
Did Cho Bai Den take a haircut on his 10% or did the Taliban have to pony up some additional cash to stay in the opium trade bidness? -
I’d want some down round protection if I was Cho Bai DenBob_C said:
Sometimes it’s prudent to dilute your own equity to avoid having nothing.PurpleThrobber said:So now the generals are getting their kickback, too?
Did Cho Bai Den take a haircut on his 10% or did the Taliban have to pony up some additional cash to stay in the opium trade bidness?
-
Taliban was brilliant, let out isis so you are seen as the calm one to the idiot Biden administration
-
We need to bomb all the aircraft and vehicles we can find as well as any weapons.
-
They just want money, and China sees Afghanistan as a strategic foothold in the ME and another route into Europe.
The Taliban will gladly take ChiCom dollars.
It would be incredible to see this materialize, quite honestly. The only thing missing from this geopolitical gangbang is Russia.
Expect them to make their bid shortly. Winner gets to embarrass the US again….