Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
United States can't stand up to the cartels and the Taliban
Comments
-
Trump killed them. HTHHHusky said: -
-
“Operation Allies Refuge”:
Number of troops deployed to Afghanistan to evacuate personnel safely: 5,000;
Number of U.S. troops in country when withdrawal announced in April 2021: 2,500.
CNN’s White House Reporter:
“Biden’s hands were tied (by Trump) . . .” -
To hell with the eyewitnesses who testified that the thug was the aggressor, actually stuck his head in the window of a police car and tried to pull the gun from a police officers belt.HHusky said:
I get it. Poking holes in your arguments is too "disingenuous".trublue said:LOL . . . You have?
Your one line snarky responses are legendary.
You have a problem admitting when you’re wrong and full of shit.
Our lengthy dialogue regarding the death of Michael Brown, the rioting in Ferguson, MO and the alleged culpability of (former) Officer Darrin Wilson is Exhibit 1.
I disagreed with you about the Michael Brown case. Still do. But I don't think you should admit you're wrong about it, because there are facts we can both point to to support our respective opinions. I don't think your opinion is batshit crazy. I just think it's a selective and inadequate processing of the available information.
Similarly, I think that Stalin's belief that China would be any less aggressive if Daddy was President is belied by lots of examples of how little support our allies could expect from Daddy. But I wouldn't ask him to admit he's wrong about something that cannot be proven or disproven. Stalin hid behind a the word "disingenuous" when I correctly understood his position. He didn't want a dialogue; to say he did was . . . disingenuous.
Know what there aren't any facts to support? That the 2020 Presidential election was tainted by widespread fraud that flipped the election to Biden. That Covid restrictions are part of a large scale authoritarian plot for the enslavement of the population. That George Soros is the evil puppet master controlling the world. That the Clintons have been systematically having people murdered for the past 30 years. If you believe any of those things, you merit being made fun of.
Jeezus, party over proof. Sad. -
Physical evidence (DNA). “I don’t know.”
Translation: If it interferes with my strong feelings, I don’t care. -
Even I can't imagine this level of stupid but Obama is the voice in his ear!
-
We know there was a confrontation at the car, lady. Your question went a lot further than that .trublue said:Physical evidence (DNA). “I don’t know.”
Translation: If it interferes with my strong feelings, I don’t care. -
The “witness” was the survivor of the confrontation. You lie so easily.Bendintheriver said:
To hell with the eyewitnesses who testified that the thug was the aggressor, actually stuck his head in the window of a police car and tried to pull the gun from a police officers belt.HHusky said:
I get it. Poking holes in your arguments is too "disingenuous".trublue said:LOL . . . You have?
Your one line snarky responses are legendary.
You have a problem admitting when you’re wrong and full of shit.
Our lengthy dialogue regarding the death of Michael Brown, the rioting in Ferguson, MO and the alleged culpability of (former) Officer Darrin Wilson is Exhibit 1.
I disagreed with you about the Michael Brown case. Still do. But I don't think you should admit you're wrong about it, because there are facts we can both point to to support our respective opinions. I don't think your opinion is batshit crazy. I just think it's a selective and inadequate processing of the available information.
Similarly, I think that Stalin's belief that China would be any less aggressive if Daddy was President is belied by lots of examples of how little support our allies could expect from Daddy. But I wouldn't ask him to admit he's wrong about something that cannot be proven or disproven. Stalin hid behind a the word "disingenuous" when I correctly understood his position. He didn't want a dialogue; to say he did was . . . disingenuous.
Know what there aren't any facts to support? That the 2020 Presidential election was tainted by widespread fraud that flipped the election to Biden. That Covid restrictions are part of a large scale authoritarian plot for the enslavement of the population. That George Soros is the evil puppet master controlling the world. That the Clintons have been systematically having people murdered for the past 30 years. If you believe any of those things, you merit being made fun of.
Jeezus, party over proof. Sad. -
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.voanews.com/south-central-asia/ordered-trump-us-down-2500-troops-afghanistan?amptrublue said:“Operation Allies Refuge”:
Number of troops deployed to Afghanistan to evacuate personnel safely: 5,000;
Number of U.S. troops in country when withdrawal announced in April 2021: 2,500.
CNN’s White House Reporter:
“Biden’s hands were tied (by Trump) . . .”
January 15, 2021
You got a little orange on your chin. -
Ever heard of physical evidence, e.g., DNA, blood, dumbfuck?HHusky said:
The “witness” was the survivor of the confrontation. You lie so easily.Bendintheriver said:
To hell with the eyewitnesses who testified that the thug was the aggressor, actually stuck his head in the window of a police car and tried to pull the gun from a police officers belt.HHusky said:
I get it. Poking holes in your arguments is too "disingenuous".trublue said:LOL . . . You have?
Your one line snarky responses are legendary.
You have a problem admitting when you’re wrong and full of shit.
Our lengthy dialogue regarding the death of Michael Brown, the rioting in Ferguson, MO and the alleged culpability of (former) Officer Darrin Wilson is Exhibit 1.
I disagreed with you about the Michael Brown case. Still do. But I don't think you should admit you're wrong about it, because there are facts we can both point to to support our respective opinions. I don't think your opinion is batshit crazy. I just think it's a selective and inadequate processing of the available information.
Similarly, I think that Stalin's belief that China would be any less aggressive if Daddy was President is belied by lots of examples of how little support our allies could expect from Daddy. But I wouldn't ask him to admit he's wrong about something that cannot be proven or disproven. Stalin hid behind a the word "disingenuous" when I correctly understood his position. He didn't want a dialogue; to say he did was . . . disingenuous.
Know what there aren't any facts to support? That the 2020 Presidential election was tainted by widespread fraud that flipped the election to Biden. That Covid restrictions are part of a large scale authoritarian plot for the enslavement of the population. That George Soros is the evil puppet master controlling the world. That the Clintons have been systematically having people murdered for the past 30 years. If you believe any of those things, you merit being made fun of.
Jeezus, party over proof. Sad.
Take the L . . . -
Whooshtrublue said:
Ever heard of physical evidence, e.g., DNA, blood, dumbfuck?HHusky said:
The “witness” was the survivor of the confrontation. You lie so easily.Bendintheriver said:
To hell with the eyewitnesses who testified that the thug was the aggressor, actually stuck his head in the window of a police car and tried to pull the gun from a police officers belt.HHusky said:
I get it. Poking holes in your arguments is too "disingenuous".trublue said:LOL . . . You have?
Your one line snarky responses are legendary.
You have a problem admitting when you’re wrong and full of shit.
Our lengthy dialogue regarding the death of Michael Brown, the rioting in Ferguson, MO and the alleged culpability of (former) Officer Darrin Wilson is Exhibit 1.
I disagreed with you about the Michael Brown case. Still do. But I don't think you should admit you're wrong about it, because there are facts we can both point to to support our respective opinions. I don't think your opinion is batshit crazy. I just think it's a selective and inadequate processing of the available information.
Similarly, I think that Stalin's belief that China would be any less aggressive if Daddy was President is belied by lots of examples of how little support our allies could expect from Daddy. But I wouldn't ask him to admit he's wrong about something that cannot be proven or disproven. Stalin hid behind a the word "disingenuous" when I correctly understood his position. He didn't want a dialogue; to say he did was . . . disingenuous.
Know what there aren't any facts to support? That the 2020 Presidential election was tainted by widespread fraud that flipped the election to Biden. That Covid restrictions are part of a large scale authoritarian plot for the enslavement of the population. That George Soros is the evil puppet master controlling the world. That the Clintons have been systematically having people murdered for the past 30 years. If you believe any of those things, you merit being made fun of.
Jeezus, party over proof. Sad.
Take the L . . . -
-
HHusky said:
We know there was a confrontation at the car, lady. Your question went a lot further than that .trublue said:Physical evidence (DNA). “I don’t know.”
Translation: If it interferes with my strong feelings, I don’t care.
Gawd, you’re an idiot. You thought Darrin Wilson should be prosecuted. Prosecutor screwed up handling of the Grand Jury, Wilson told different stories, blah, blah, blah.HHusky said:
Whooshtrublue said:
Ever heard of physical evidence, e.g., DNA, blood, dumbfuck?HHusky said:
The “witness” was the survivor of the confrontation. You lie so easily.Bendintheriver said:
To hell with the eyewitnesses who testified that the thug was the aggressor, actually stuck his head in the window of a police car and tried to pull the gun from a police officers belt.HHusky said:
I get it. Poking holes in your arguments is too "disingenuous".trublue said:LOL . . . You have?
Your one line snarky responses are legendary.
You have a problem admitting when you’re wrong and full of shit.
Our lengthy dialogue regarding the death of Michael Brown, the rioting in Ferguson, MO and the alleged culpability of (former) Officer Darrin Wilson is Exhibit 1.
I disagreed with you about the Michael Brown case. Still do. But I don't think you should admit you're wrong about it, because there are facts we can both point to to support our respective opinions. I don't think your opinion is batshit crazy. I just think it's a selective and inadequate processing of the available information.
Similarly, I think that Stalin's belief that China would be any less aggressive if Daddy was President is belied by lots of examples of how little support our allies could expect from Daddy. But I wouldn't ask him to admit he's wrong about something that cannot be proven or disproven. Stalin hid behind a the word "disingenuous" when I correctly understood his position. He didn't want a dialogue; to say he did was . . . disingenuous.
Know what there aren't any facts to support? That the 2020 Presidential election was tainted by widespread fraud that flipped the election to Biden. That Covid restrictions are part of a large scale authoritarian plot for the enslavement of the population. That George Soros is the evil puppet master controlling the world. That the Clintons have been systematically having people murdered for the past 30 years. If you believe any of those things, you merit being made fun of.
Jeezus, party over proof. Sad.
Take the L . . .
I loved some of the witness stories you offered up as some kind of proof. Particularly, liked the one of the two males that witnessed what you so badly wanted to believe. They were like a half mile away and looking through trees.
Obama’s DOJ was all over this case and didn’t charge Wilson with anything.
Obama did start having meetings with BLM at the White House shortly after this shooting, I believe.
Don’t woosh me you pathetic excuse for a barrister. You don’t know shit about criminal law.
You don’t start with the outcome you desire and cherry pick facts as your proof . . . Particularly the testimony of alleged “impartial” witnesses, dumbfuck.
People currently have due process rights in this country.
-
Welp. We all but stopped terrorism and violence in the Middle East and North Africa. Including the hottest of spots in Syria and Yemen.HHusky said:If you think we just started giving off the appearance of being an undependable ally since January, you really haven't been paying close attention.
Had Iran begging for mercy after killing Solemaini.
Saved thousands of lives by not allowing border proceedings within our borders, effectively disincentivizing those to make the deadly trek. During a Pandemic nonetheless.
Stonewalled Russia from moving further on the Ukraine by giving them the big guns.
More or less stabilized the world, while you cried about mean tweets.
And all of that is lost.
But USC respects us again.
Sounds worth it.
-
If I wanted an echo chamber, then why haven't I banned you?HHusky said:
And it's super mean to accurately state a poaster's position and disagree with him too.trublue said:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^DerekJohnson said:
You're disingenuous and that's why it's a waste of time to dialogue with youHHusky said:
So I'm being disingenuous by accurately capturing the precise argument you were making.DerekJohnson said:
I didn't say anything about an appearance of being undependable and you know it. You're being disingenuous and you know it.HHusky said:If you think we just started giving off the appearance of being an undependable ally since January, you really haven't been paying close attention.
If you think China would've made a move on Taiwan with Trump in office you haven't been paying close attention.
Imagine my embarrassment.
Truth
After all, without an echo chamber, how can we ever truly dialogue?
-
You need me. Gets the gals fired up and drives traffic.DerekJohnson said:
If I wanted an echo chamber, then why haven't I banned you?HHusky said:
And it's super mean to accurately state a poaster's position and disagree with him too.trublue said:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^DerekJohnson said:
You're disingenuous and that's why it's a waste of time to dialogue with youHHusky said:
So I'm being disingenuous by accurately capturing the precise argument you were making.DerekJohnson said:
I didn't say anything about an appearance of being undependable and you know it. You're being disingenuous and you know it.HHusky said:If you think we just started giving off the appearance of being an undependable ally since January, you really haven't been paying close attention.
If you think China would've made a move on Taiwan with Trump in office you haven't been paying close attention.
Imagine my embarrassment.
Truth
After all, without an echo chamber, how can we ever truly dialogue? -
What an imagination you have!Kaepsknee said:
Welp. We all but stopped terrorism and violence in the Middle East and North Africa. Including the hottest of spots in Syria and Yemen.HHusky said:If you think we just started giving off the appearance of being an undependable ally since January, you really haven't been paying close attention.
Had Iran begging for mercy after killing Solemaini.
Saved thousands of lives by not allowing border proceedings within our borders, effectively disincentivizing those to make the deadly trek. During a Pandemic nonetheless.
Stonewalled Russia from moving further on the Ukraine by giving them the big guns.
More or less stabilized the world, while you cried about mean tweets.
And all of that is lost.
But USC respects us again.
Sounds worth it. -
I don't understand why you guys even engage with H when he starts bringing up obvious deflections.
Maybe stop taking the bait...every....single...time. -
100% every authoritarian regime in the world is gearing up with Biden in office and the complete failure he just managed in Afghanistan will be used against us for generations.
The only silver lining may be that other countries realize that the US can't be depended upon for the world police anymore and our allies begin to arm up again finally. -
Bump city Bumpus again. Because a little more than 2 weeks ago, when I poasted this, Afghani wasn’t on hardly anyone’s radar.Kaepsknee said:
Welp. We all but stopped terrorism and violence in the Middle East and North Africa. Including the hottest of spots in Syria and Yemen.HHusky said:If you think we just started giving off the appearance of being an undependable ally since January, you really haven't been paying close attention.
Had Iran begging for mercy after killing Solemaini.
Saved thousands of lives by not allowing border proceedings within our borders, effectively disincentivizing those to make the deadly trek. During a Pandemic nonetheless.
Stonewalled Russia from moving further on the Ukraine by giving them the big guns.
More or less stabilized the world, while you cried about mean tweets.
And all of that is lost.
But USC respects us again.
Sounds worth it.
It had to be on purpose.
