Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Jackson Stratton, 2022 3* QB, La Jolla (HS), CA (Committed)

245

Comments

  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,676 Swaye's Wigwam

    This kid is good. If we’re taking lower rate guys i’m taking a kid like this over a Haener 10 out of 10 times.

    It sounds like his story is this:
    -didnt really play much as a sophomore
    -had an amazing junior covid season

    Biggins bumped him from an unknown to the #34 qb based on his Jr season. Said he could grt another big bump if he continues to impress
    From what I've read it sounds like he got way bigger in a year and that had a lot to do with his improvement.
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098

    We were never getting a big time QB with Morris (still a R-FR) and 5* Huard coming in the year before.

    Have no idea if this guy is good, but if he even has legitimate P5 talent, it’s a win.

    Exactly

    If you get a QB in this class that is willing to work hard, develop so that IF his number is called he is ready, but embraces the playing school aspect so that he stays on the roster for 3-4 years (sort of like Magna Carta) ... that’s a win

    Problem with all of the transferring, particularly with QBs, is that there are only so many starting jobs out there
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098

    chuck said:

    https://www.hudl.com/video/3/11092924/607f09d9ab92961804fea263

    He's definitely not bad. At this point he's probably the best non committed QB we could get

    Jeez man I'm surprised more people aren't raving about his highlights. He's somewhere between Colson Yankoff and Cyler Miles as a runner, and that's good, but has plus arm strength. He also throws from different angles as the situation calls for, all with a quick release and velocity. He also throws some nice rainbows that drop right in.

    I dont see anything not to like. I'd be happy with him even if a top QB was considered a big priority this year.
    Yankoff seemed so fucking good based on his Hudl.

    The problem with Hudl is that it’s just a few minutes of highlights. I was a good (but white and slow) high school player, but my Hudl would have made me look like a legit baller. Any decent player looks good based on their 20 best plays.

    Some guys are so good, a Hudl is all you need to see. For most recruits tho, you won’t be able to form an educated opinion unless you watch the Hudl, see some testing numbers, look at their stats, and guess how tapped out their potential is.

    Truly elite guys are easy to see, but there is such a glut of guys in the 3 and 4 star rankings and evaluating those guys properly is crucial to a program like UW. A lot of those guys are over ranked because of their relationship with the TBS rankers, their high school team, inflated production, etc. 4 star guys without commutable offers from the elite schools seem to almost always suck.
    This is why for most players I don’t look at the surface level stuff ...

    For a QB can you play with nuance (for example don’t state down your receivers) and can you throw a ball that receivers catch in stride

    For RBs it’s do you have vision and whether or not you dance (works in HS but rarely in college) or are you willing to plant your foot, lower the pads, and get north/south (one of the reasons I loved Sunday’s film)

    For DL/OLBs it’s do you show hustle and keep pursuing the play even when it’s being run away from you

    Being successful at the highest level is executing the fundamentals over and over at the highest of levels
  • NorwegianHusky
    NorwegianHusky Member Posts: 3,425
    I really like his hudl, actually. Getting him in a year where we weren't going to get a highly rated kid is kind of huge.

    You never know how QBs are gonna pan out, but this kid for sure has a chance to be a starter.
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    Thread delivered
  • FireCohen
    FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823

    This kid is good. If we’re taking lower rate guys i’m taking a kid like this over a Haener 10 out of 10 times.

    It sounds like his story is this:
    -didnt really play much as a sophomore
    -had an amazing junior covid season

    Biggins bumped him from an unknown to the #34 qb based on his Jr season. Said he could grt another big bump if he continues to impress
    The huge improvement from sophomore to junior year is a good sign. The highlights looked good too. He looks like he has a good arm. I don’t hate the pick up at all.
    Waiting till he enrolls
  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,676 Swaye's Wigwam
    FireCohen said:

    This kid is good. If we’re taking lower rate guys i’m taking a kid like this over a Haener 10 out of 10 times.

    It sounds like his story is this:
    -didnt really play much as a sophomore
    -had an amazing junior covid season

    Biggins bumped him from an unknown to the #34 qb based on his Jr season. Said he could grt another big bump if he continues to impress
    The huge improvement from sophomore to junior year is a good sign. The highlights looked good too. He looks like he has a good arm. I don’t hate the pick up at all.
    Waiting till he enrolls
    You guys might as well hate him now. The dooging iver him is quiet now, but it will get loud this fall.
  • TommySQC
    TommySQC Member Posts: 5,813
    Dorothy Stratton's grandson?
  • theknowledge
    theknowledge Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 5,632 Founders Club
    TommySQC said:

    Dorothy Stratton's grandson?

    No man, Ricky's son.

  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,676 Swaye's Wigwam
  • animate
    animate Member Posts: 4,245
    Kackson ... classic.
  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,676 Swaye's Wigwam

    chuck said:

    I like this guy but am not a fan of the Asa Turner hair.
    Just think of it as the Trevor Lawerence hair
    You're not saying he's Lawremce, so I won't twist.

    Big mistake for anyone to sleep on this guy. He has a combination of abilities we haven't had at UW in a while as a big QB with an arm AND mobility. He's raw and a late bloomer, but watch out.
  • bananasnblondes
    bananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,508
    chuck said:

    chuck said:

    I like this guy but am not a fan of the Asa Turner hair.
    Just think of it as the Trevor Lawerence hair
    You're not saying he's Lawremce, so I won't twist.

    Big mistake for anyone to sleep on this guy. He has a combination of abilities we haven't had at UW in a while as a big QB with an arm AND mobility. He's raw and a late bloomer, but watch out.
    JackStrat is also a cool nickname
  • CarlosDanger
    CarlosDanger Member Posts: 206
    Washington, Brown, Columbia, FIU and Nevada. Forget about the low rankings.....with an offer list like that, people that get paid to coach and recruit for a living obviously see the immense potential in this big, rocket armed, mobile QB.

    The transition to Doogman 2.0 is complete.
  • whatshouldicareabout
    whatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 12,990
    TBF, we got Huard last year, so I doubt any highly ranked QB would jump at the opportunity to sit behind Sam for 2-3 years and transfer out
  • bananasnblondes
    bananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,508

    TBF, we got Huard last year, so I doubt any highly ranked QB would jump at the opportunity to sit behind Sam for 2-3 years and transfer out

    This is loser mentality thinking. Big dick programs get 4* qbs every year. Especially with the transfer portal the way it is now. I think this kid has the possibility of being a decent get in the same way that Daniel Bridge-Gadd and Jake Haener did but I think is more of our coaches thinking they are smarter than everyone else
  • Neighbor2972
    Neighbor2972 Member Posts: 4,330
    Yeah the benefit of taking a 3* QB is that they are more likely to stick around for 4-5 years even if they don't start. Although that hasn't been true for us recently.

    Ideally you take a 3* QB in the same class as your 5* so you know they really want to be in the program (Like Mac Jones and Tua).
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,129

    Yeah the benefit of taking a 3* QB is that they are more likely to stick around for 4-5 years even if they don't start. Although that hasn't been true for us recently.

    Ideally you take a 3* QB in the same class as your 5* so you know they really want to be in the program (Like Mac Jones and Tua).

    They still won’t but they have a lot higher chance of staying 3 years and getting a degree before bouncing.
  • Ice_Holmvik
    Ice_Holmvik Member Posts: 2,912
    Not sure why but I like this kid.