Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Critical Race Theory peddlers won’t teach real history…the reason will shock you..

1234579

Comments

  • trublue
    trublue Member Posts: 3,042
    Speaking of communes . . . Didn’t Bernie live in one and get booted for being lazy?
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,919

    The fact that you would get a boner if Trump installed himself as president tomorrow, via military coup, doesn’t speak well of your support for democracy.

    Man how the tides change.



  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    Thank you for pointing out how I actually gave you guys a chance and have never been in the bag for the democrats.

    Everything I said about the dems is still true, I just didn’t realize you guys were worse.
  • trublue
    trublue Member Posts: 3,042
    How old are you, Kobe?
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,919

    Thank you for pointing out how I actually gave you guys a chance and have never been in the bag for the democrats.

    Everything I said about the dems is still true, I just didn’t realize you guys were worse.


  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344

    Thank you for pointing out how I actually gave you guys a chance and have never been in the bag for the democrats.

    Everything I said about the dems is still true, I just didn’t realize you guys were worse.

    Nothing worse than a white woketard. That’s you. Own it.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,460 Founders Club
    Democrats white wash their history. Should be kept somewhere as a cautionary tale about Democrats, the only party that led an actual armed revolt against the government

  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,240 Founders Club

    Bob_C said:

    hardhat said:

    hardhat said:

    This suns up the left pretty well

    Stalin was a pos. I just think people should own where they work.
    How about Mao and Pol Pot?
    I’m not a Marxist-Leninist.
    Libertarian socialist as we know. Yet can’t explain how we get to the libertarian part.
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian_socialism

    Libertarian socialism generally rejects the concept of a state and asserts that a society based on freedom and justice can only be achieved with the abolition of authoritarian institutions that control certain means of production and subordinate the majority to an owning class or political and economic elite. Libertarian socialists advocate for decentralized structures based on direct democracy and federal or confederal associations such as citizens'/popular assemblies, cooperatives, libertarian municipalism, trade unions and workers' councils. This is done within a general call for liberty and free association through the identification, criticism and practical dismantling of illegitimate authority in all aspects of human life.

    Seems pretty easy to explain to me.
    Great playbook on paper. As usual you are describing the need to tear down central government and an end result of a great society, with no middle step defined. Could be a seamless transition, could look a lot like Ghengis Khan.
  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    Bob_C said:

    Bob_C said:

    hardhat said:

    hardhat said:

    This suns up the left pretty well

    Stalin was a pos. I just think people should own where they work.
    How about Mao and Pol Pot?
    I’m not a Marxist-Leninist.
    Libertarian socialist as we know. Yet can’t explain how we get to the libertarian part.
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian_socialism

    Libertarian socialism generally rejects the concept of a state and asserts that a society based on freedom and justice can only be achieved with the abolition of authoritarian institutions that control certain means of production and subordinate the majority to an owning class or political and economic elite. Libertarian socialists advocate for decentralized structures based on direct democracy and federal or confederal associations such as citizens'/popular assemblies, cooperatives, libertarian municipalism, trade unions and workers' councils. This is done within a general call for liberty and free association through the identification, criticism and practical dismantling of illegitimate authority in all aspects of human life.

    Seems pretty easy to explain to me.
    Great playbook on paper. As usual you are describing the need to tear down central government and an end result of a great society, with no middle step defined. Could be a seamless transition, could look a lot like Ghengis Khan.
    Speaking of Ghengis Khan, shouldn’t we hold Mongolians responsible for the rape, murder, and pillage? They should be forced to reconcile with their dark past and crimes against humanity.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,500 Standard Supporter
    hardhat said:

    Bob_C said:

    Bob_C said:

    hardhat said:

    hardhat said:

    This suns up the left pretty well

    Stalin was a pos. I just think people should own where they work.
    How about Mao and Pol Pot?
    I’m not a Marxist-Leninist.
    Libertarian socialist as we know. Yet can’t explain how we get to the libertarian part.
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian_socialism

    Libertarian socialism generally rejects the concept of a state and asserts that a society based on freedom and justice can only be achieved with the abolition of authoritarian institutions that control certain means of production and subordinate the majority to an owning class or political and economic elite. Libertarian socialists advocate for decentralized structures based on direct democracy and federal or confederal associations such as citizens'/popular assemblies, cooperatives, libertarian municipalism, trade unions and workers' councils. This is done within a general call for liberty and free association through the identification, criticism and practical dismantling of illegitimate authority in all aspects of human life.

    Seems pretty easy to explain to me.
    Great playbook on paper. As usual you are describing the need to tear down central government and an end result of a great society, with no middle step defined. Could be a seamless transition, could look a lot like Ghengis Khan.
    Speaking of Ghengis Khan, shouldn’t we hold Mongolians responsible for the rape, murder, and pillage? They should be forced to reconcile with their dark past and crimes against humanity.
    Mostly peaceful rape, murder and pillage.

    The Khans were actually pretty tolerant rulers. They didn’t force religious beliefs or changes in cultures. It was all about turf and trade with those cats.