Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Critical Race Theory peddlers won’t teach real history…the reason will shock you..
Comments
-
Speaking of communes . . . Didn’t Bernie live in one and get booted for being lazy?
-
Man how the tides change.TheKobeStopper said:The fact that you would get a boner if Trump installed himself as president tomorrow, via military coup, doesn’t speak well of your support for democracy.
-
Thank you for pointing out how I actually gave you guys a chance and have never been in the bag for the democrats.
Everything I said about the dems is still true, I just didn’t realize you guys were worse. -
How old are you, Kobe?
-
TheKobeStopper said:
Thank you for pointing out how I actually gave you guys a chance and have never been in the bag for the democrats.
Everything I said about the dems is still true, I just didn’t realize you guys were worse.
-
Nothing worse than a white woketard. That’s you. Own it.TheKobeStopper said:Thank you for pointing out how I actually gave you guys a chance and have never been in the bag for the democrats.
Everything I said about the dems is still true, I just didn’t realize you guys were worse. -
Democrats white wash their history. Should be kept somewhere as a cautionary tale about Democrats, the only party that led an actual armed revolt against the government
-
Great playbook on paper. As usual you are describing the need to tear down central government and an end result of a great society, with no middle step defined. Could be a seamless transition, could look a lot like Ghengis Khan.TheKobeStopper said:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian_socialismBob_C said:
Libertarian socialist as we know. Yet can’t explain how we get to the libertarian part.TheKobeStopper said:
I’m not a Marxist-Leninist.hardhat said:
How about Mao and Pol Pot?TheKobeStopper said:
Stalin was a pos. I just think people should own where they work.hardhat said:This suns up the left pretty well
Libertarian socialism generally rejects the concept of a state and asserts that a society based on freedom and justice can only be achieved with the abolition of authoritarian institutions that control certain means of production and subordinate the majority to an owning class or political and economic elite. Libertarian socialists advocate for decentralized structures based on direct democracy and federal or confederal associations such as citizens'/popular assemblies, cooperatives, libertarian municipalism, trade unions and workers' councils. This is done within a general call for liberty and free association through the identification, criticism and practical dismantling of illegitimate authority in all aspects of human life.
Seems pretty easy to explain to me. -
Speaking of Ghengis Khan, shouldn’t we hold Mongolians responsible for the rape, murder, and pillage? They should be forced to reconcile with their dark past and crimes against humanity.Bob_C said:
Great playbook on paper. As usual you are describing the need to tear down central government and an end result of a great society, with no middle step defined. Could be a seamless transition, could look a lot like Ghengis Khan.TheKobeStopper said:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian_socialismBob_C said:
Libertarian socialist as we know. Yet can’t explain how we get to the libertarian part.TheKobeStopper said:
I’m not a Marxist-Leninist.hardhat said:
How about Mao and Pol Pot?TheKobeStopper said:
Stalin was a pos. I just think people should own where they work.hardhat said:This suns up the left pretty well
Libertarian socialism generally rejects the concept of a state and asserts that a society based on freedom and justice can only be achieved with the abolition of authoritarian institutions that control certain means of production and subordinate the majority to an owning class or political and economic elite. Libertarian socialists advocate for decentralized structures based on direct democracy and federal or confederal associations such as citizens'/popular assemblies, cooperatives, libertarian municipalism, trade unions and workers' councils. This is done within a general call for liberty and free association through the identification, criticism and practical dismantling of illegitimate authority in all aspects of human life.
Seems pretty easy to explain to me.
-
Mostly peaceful rape, murder and pillage.hardhat said:
Speaking of Ghengis Khan, shouldn’t we hold Mongolians responsible for the rape, murder, and pillage? They should be forced to reconcile with their dark past and crimes against humanity.Bob_C said:
Great playbook on paper. As usual you are describing the need to tear down central government and an end result of a great society, with no middle step defined. Could be a seamless transition, could look a lot like Ghengis Khan.TheKobeStopper said:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian_socialismBob_C said:
Libertarian socialist as we know. Yet can’t explain how we get to the libertarian part.TheKobeStopper said:
I’m not a Marxist-Leninist.hardhat said:
How about Mao and Pol Pot?TheKobeStopper said:
Stalin was a pos. I just think people should own where they work.hardhat said:This suns up the left pretty well
Libertarian socialism generally rejects the concept of a state and asserts that a society based on freedom and justice can only be achieved with the abolition of authoritarian institutions that control certain means of production and subordinate the majority to an owning class or political and economic elite. Libertarian socialists advocate for decentralized structures based on direct democracy and federal or confederal associations such as citizens'/popular assemblies, cooperatives, libertarian municipalism, trade unions and workers' councils. This is done within a general call for liberty and free association through the identification, criticism and practical dismantling of illegitimate authority in all aspects of human life.
Seems pretty easy to explain to me.
The Khans were actually pretty tolerant rulers. They didn’t force religious beliefs or changes in cultures. It was all about turf and trade with those cats.
-
The Khans liked to tie their conquered enemies to the ground, and feast on top of them while they suffocated. Pretty chill bunch.PurpleThrobber said:
Mostly peaceful rape, murder and pillage.hardhat said:
Speaking of Ghengis Khan, shouldn’t we hold Mongolians responsible for the rape, murder, and pillage? They should be forced to reconcile with their dark past and crimes against humanity.Bob_C said:
Great playbook on paper. As usual you are describing the need to tear down central government and an end result of a great society, with no middle step defined. Could be a seamless transition, could look a lot like Ghengis Khan.TheKobeStopper said:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian_socialismBob_C said:
Libertarian socialist as we know. Yet can’t explain how we get to the libertarian part.TheKobeStopper said:
I’m not a Marxist-Leninist.hardhat said:
How about Mao and Pol Pot?TheKobeStopper said:
Stalin was a pos. I just think people should own where they work.hardhat said:This suns up the left pretty well
Libertarian socialism generally rejects the concept of a state and asserts that a society based on freedom and justice can only be achieved with the abolition of authoritarian institutions that control certain means of production and subordinate the majority to an owning class or political and economic elite. Libertarian socialists advocate for decentralized structures based on direct democracy and federal or confederal associations such as citizens'/popular assemblies, cooperatives, libertarian municipalism, trade unions and workers' councils. This is done within a general call for liberty and free association through the identification, criticism and practical dismantling of illegitimate authority in all aspects of human life.
Seems pretty easy to explain to me.
The Khans were actually pretty tolerant rulers. They didn’t force religious beliefs or changes in cultures. It was all about turf and trade with those cats.
-
The White Mountainhardhat said:
The Khans liked to tie their conquered enemies to the ground, and feast on top of them while they suffocated. Pretty chill bunch.PurpleThrobber said:
Mostly peaceful rape, murder and pillage.hardhat said:
Speaking of Ghengis Khan, shouldn’t we hold Mongolians responsible for the rape, murder, and pillage? They should be forced to reconcile with their dark past and crimes against humanity.Bob_C said:
Great playbook on paper. As usual you are describing the need to tear down central government and an end result of a great society, with no middle step defined. Could be a seamless transition, could look a lot like Ghengis Khan.TheKobeStopper said:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian_socialismBob_C said:
Libertarian socialist as we know. Yet can’t explain how we get to the libertarian part.TheKobeStopper said:
I’m not a Marxist-Leninist.hardhat said:
How about Mao and Pol Pot?TheKobeStopper said:
Stalin was a pos. I just think people should own where they work.hardhat said:This suns up the left pretty well
Libertarian socialism generally rejects the concept of a state and asserts that a society based on freedom and justice can only be achieved with the abolition of authoritarian institutions that control certain means of production and subordinate the majority to an owning class or political and economic elite. Libertarian socialists advocate for decentralized structures based on direct democracy and federal or confederal associations such as citizens'/popular assemblies, cooperatives, libertarian municipalism, trade unions and workers' councils. This is done within a general call for liberty and free association through the identification, criticism and practical dismantling of illegitimate authority in all aspects of human life.
Seems pretty easy to explain to me.
The Khans were actually pretty tolerant rulers. They didn’t force religious beliefs or changes in cultures. It was all about turf and trade with those cats.
You could see the bleached bones stacked up like cordwood from miles away -
You see, I’m right. All it takes to get to communist utopia is to just get the right benevolent leaders in place. I wonder why no one has dome that before?TheKobeStopper said:
Oh Jesus, you want details on how to get to a communist utopia? I don’t even think socialism is coming to America in my lifetime, dude. I’m happy to vote for harm reduction and hopefully get people to be less individualistic and more communal.hardhat said:
Seems pretty easy to get to utopiaTheKobeStopper said:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian_socialismBob_C said:
Libertarian socialist as we know. Yet can’t explain how we get to the libertarian part.TheKobeStopper said:
I’m not a Marxist-Leninist.hardhat said:
How about Mao and Pol Pot?TheKobeStopper said:
Stalin was a pos. I just think people should own where they work.hardhat said:This suns up the left pretty well
Libertarian socialism generally rejects the concept of a state and asserts that a society based on freedom and justice can only be achieved with the abolition of authoritarian institutions that control certain means of production and subordinate the majority to an owning class or political and economic elite. Libertarian socialists advocate for decentralized structures based on direct democracy and federal or confederal associations such as citizens'/popular assemblies, cooperatives, libertarian municipalism, trade unions and workers' councils. This is done within a general call for liberty and free association through the identification, criticism and practical dismantling of illegitimate authority in all aspects of human life.
Seems pretty easy to explain to me. -
He’s seriously ignorant. Low IQ and/or lacking in ambition as well.trublue said:
How old are you?TheKobeStopper said:Oh I know most Americans hate communism. Most Americans also can’t define it but propaganda works so 🤷♂️
Have you ever talked to refugees from Communist countries, e.g., Eastern Europe, Vietnam, Cuba, etc.?
Are you trolling or are you seriously this ignorant regarding the past 100+ years of world history?
Define communism for me, please . . . the theory and in practice?
Again, how old are you! -
Yestrublue said:Speaking of communes . . . Didn’t Bernie live in one and get booted for being lazy?
-
If everyone is being Libertarian, who enforces the aspects of socialism that require the threat of violence?TheKobeStopper said:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian_socialismBob_C said:
Libertarian socialist as we know. Yet can’t explain how we get to the libertarian part.TheKobeStopper said:
I’m not a Marxist-Leninist.hardhat said:
How about Mao and Pol Pot?TheKobeStopper said:
Stalin was a pos. I just think people should own where they work.hardhat said:This suns up the left pretty well
Libertarian socialism generally rejects the concept of a state and asserts that a society based on freedom and justice can only be achieved with the abolition of authoritarian institutions that control certain means of production and subordinate the majority to an owning class or political and economic elite. Libertarian socialists advocate for decentralized structures based on direct democracy and federal or confederal associations such as citizens'/popular assemblies, cooperatives, libertarian municipalism, trade unions and workers' councils. This is done within a general call for liberty and free association through the identification, criticism and practical dismantling of illegitimate authority in all aspects of human life.
Seems pretty easy to explain to me. -
The funny thing is all the people portrayed in the busts and statues are democrats! Can they now vote to remove the living democrats? America says DO IT!RaceBannon said:Democrats white wash their history. Should be kept somewhere as a cautionary tale about Democrats, the only party that led an actual armed revolt against the government
-
They were basically libertarian once they moved on to the next town.hardhat said:
The Khans liked to tie their conquered enemies to the ground, and feast on top of them while they suffocated. Pretty chill bunch.PurpleThrobber said:
Mostly peaceful rape, murder and pillage.hardhat said:
Speaking of Ghengis Khan, shouldn’t we hold Mongolians responsible for the rape, murder, and pillage? They should be forced to reconcile with their dark past and crimes against humanity.Bob_C said:
Great playbook on paper. As usual you are describing the need to tear down central government and an end result of a great society, with no middle step defined. Could be a seamless transition, could look a lot like Ghengis Khan.TheKobeStopper said:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian_socialismBob_C said:
Libertarian socialist as we know. Yet can’t explain how we get to the libertarian part.TheKobeStopper said:
I’m not a Marxist-Leninist.hardhat said:
How about Mao and Pol Pot?TheKobeStopper said:
Stalin was a pos. I just think people should own where they work.hardhat said:This suns up the left pretty well
Libertarian socialism generally rejects the concept of a state and asserts that a society based on freedom and justice can only be achieved with the abolition of authoritarian institutions that control certain means of production and subordinate the majority to an owning class or political and economic elite. Libertarian socialists advocate for decentralized structures based on direct democracy and federal or confederal associations such as citizens'/popular assemblies, cooperatives, libertarian municipalism, trade unions and workers' councils. This is done within a general call for liberty and free association through the identification, criticism and practical dismantling of illegitimate authority in all aspects of human life.
Seems pretty easy to explain to me.
The Khans were actually pretty tolerant rulers. They didn’t force religious beliefs or changes in cultures. It was all about turf and trade with those cats. -
Ah but Slobberer. Some of us know what communism is. When your economic background for communism is the labor theory of value - which is patently false on it face and the theory of value for classical capitalism is based on supply and demand then you have an economic lie which enslaves people versus the economic truth which has the American people living at the official poverty level having air conditioning and a high definition TV and billions of people living in corrupt socialist hell holes wanting to come here and no Americans wanting to go there. You can't explain the dire poverty of North Korea versus the first world status of South Korea. You are so stupid and intellectually incurious that you don't even try to think about it. Or think about what happened to Venezuela which has the world's largest oil reserves.TheKobeStopper said:Oh I know most Americans hate communism. Most Americans also can’t define it but propaganda works so 🤷♂️
-
TheKobeStopper said:
» show previous quotes
"Oh Jesus, you want details on how to get to a communist utopia? I don’t even think socialism is coming to America in my lifetime, dude. I’m happy to vote for harm reduction and hopefully get people to be less individualistic and more communal."
The problem is that people like the Slobberer have no powers of observation. People are not communal. Their priorities are themselves, their family and then the tribe or community. I'm going to work hard to take care of me and my family. I'm not going to work very hard for the Slobberer. And the Slobberer can't work hard period. I'm fine with some level of welfare for the truly needy and as a baseline of support. If you are healthy then no welfare. The work is available. If people wanted to work hard for the community first, then North Korea and Cuba would be economic powerhouses. They aren't. You have the rule of law and the protection of private property and that people can keep most of the money they earn then you get the US and the rest of the first world.
US per capita GDP is $65,300.
China per capita GDP is $10,200. -
So he was just as stupid 5 years ago as he is now.Kaepsknee said:
Man how the tides change.TheKobeStopper said:The fact that you would get a boner if Trump installed himself as president tomorrow, via military coup, doesn’t speak well of your support for democracy.
-
I'm betting he's dumber. Now a card carrying commie.SFGbob said:
So he was just as stupid 5 years ago as he is now.Kaepsknee said:
Man how the tides change.TheKobeStopper said:The fact that you would get a boner if Trump installed himself as president tomorrow, via military coup, doesn’t speak well of your support for democracy.
-
You guys really should let him talk more instead of ganging up and shouting him down. It's far more entertaining to hear what he has to say.MikeDamone said:
He’s seriously ignorant. Low IQ and/or lacking in ambition as well.trublue said:
How old are you?TheKobeStopper said:Oh I know most Americans hate communism. Most Americans also can’t define it but propaganda works so 🤷♂️
Have you ever talked to refugees from Communist countries, e.g., Eastern Europe, Vietnam, Cuba, etc.?
Are you trolling or are you seriously this ignorant regarding the past 100+ years of world history?
Define communism for me, please . . . the theory and in practice?
Again, how old are you! -
He is given the opportunity to talk here all the time. He mostly rapes strawman ass, cuts and pastes bullshit he Googles or runs and hides.UW_Doog_Bot said:
You guys really should let him talk more instead of ganging up and shouting him down. It's far more entertaining to hear what he has to say.MikeDamone said:
He’s seriously ignorant. Low IQ and/or lacking in ambition as well.trublue said:
How old are you?TheKobeStopper said:Oh I know most Americans hate communism. Most Americans also can’t define it but propaganda works so 🤷♂️
Have you ever talked to refugees from Communist countries, e.g., Eastern Europe, Vietnam, Cuba, etc.?
Are you trolling or are you seriously this ignorant regarding the past 100+ years of world history?
Define communism for me, please . . . the theory and in practice?
Again, how old are you! -
It's far more entertaining to show how ignorant and proud of it the Slobberer is.UW_Doog_Bot said:
You guys really should let him talk more instead of ganging up and shouting him down. It's far more entertaining to hear what he has to say.MikeDamone said:
He’s seriously ignorant. Low IQ and/or lacking in ambition as well.trublue said:
How old are you?TheKobeStopper said:Oh I know most Americans hate communism. Most Americans also can’t define it but propaganda works so 🤷♂️
Have you ever talked to refugees from Communist countries, e.g., Eastern Europe, Vietnam, Cuba, etc.?
Are you trolling or are you seriously this ignorant regarding the past 100+ years of world history?
Define communism for me, please . . . the theory and in practice?
Again, how old are you! -
Yup- they'd laid the wood like Kenny Easley and then made it known not to run the ball up the middle after that. Or they'd be back.Bob_C said:
They were basically libertarian once they moved on to the next town.hardhat said:
The Khans liked to tie their conquered enemies to the ground, and feast on top of them while they suffocated. Pretty chill bunch.PurpleThrobber said:
Mostly peaceful rape, murder and pillage.hardhat said:
Speaking of Ghengis Khan, shouldn’t we hold Mongolians responsible for the rape, murder, and pillage? They should be forced to reconcile with their dark past and crimes against humanity.Bob_C said:
Great playbook on paper. As usual you are describing the need to tear down central government and an end result of a great society, with no middle step defined. Could be a seamless transition, could look a lot like Ghengis Khan.TheKobeStopper said:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian_socialismBob_C said:
Libertarian socialist as we know. Yet can’t explain how we get to the libertarian part.TheKobeStopper said:
I’m not a Marxist-Leninist.hardhat said:
How about Mao and Pol Pot?TheKobeStopper said:
Stalin was a pos. I just think people should own where they work.hardhat said:This suns up the left pretty well
Libertarian socialism generally rejects the concept of a state and asserts that a society based on freedom and justice can only be achieved with the abolition of authoritarian institutions that control certain means of production and subordinate the majority to an owning class or political and economic elite. Libertarian socialists advocate for decentralized structures based on direct democracy and federal or confederal associations such as citizens'/popular assemblies, cooperatives, libertarian municipalism, trade unions and workers' councils. This is done within a general call for liberty and free association through the identification, criticism and practical dismantling of illegitimate authority in all aspects of human life.
Seems pretty easy to explain to me.
The Khans were actually pretty tolerant rulers. They didn’t force religious beliefs or changes in cultures. It was all about turf and trade with those cats.
-
