Critical Race Theory peddlers won’t teach real history…the reason will shock you..
Comments
-
Speaking of communes . . . Didn’t Bernie live in one and get booted for being lazy?
-
Man how the tides change.TheKobeStopper said:The fact that you would get a boner if Trump installed himself as president tomorrow, via military coup, doesn’t speak well of your support for democracy.

-
Thank you for pointing out how I actually gave you guys a chance and have never been in the bag for the democrats.
Everything I said about the dems is still true, I just didn’t realize you guys were worse. -
How old are you, Kobe?
-
TheKobeStopper said:
Thank you for pointing out how I actually gave you guys a chance and have never been in the bag for the democrats.
Everything I said about the dems is still true, I just didn’t realize you guys were worse.
-
Nothing worse than a white woketard. That’s you. Own it.TheKobeStopper said:Thank you for pointing out how I actually gave you guys a chance and have never been in the bag for the democrats.
Everything I said about the dems is still true, I just didn’t realize you guys were worse. -
Democrats white wash their history. Should be kept somewhere as a cautionary tale about Democrats, the only party that led an actual armed revolt against the government
-
Great playbook on paper. As usual you are describing the need to tear down central government and an end result of a great society, with no middle step defined. Could be a seamless transition, could look a lot like Ghengis Khan.TheKobeStopper said:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian_socialismBob_C said:
Libertarian socialist as we know. Yet can’t explain how we get to the libertarian part.TheKobeStopper said:
I’m not a Marxist-Leninist.hardhat said:
How about Mao and Pol Pot?TheKobeStopper said:
Stalin was a pos. I just think people should own where they work.hardhat said:This suns up the left pretty well

Libertarian socialism generally rejects the concept of a state and asserts that a society based on freedom and justice can only be achieved with the abolition of authoritarian institutions that control certain means of production and subordinate the majority to an owning class or political and economic elite. Libertarian socialists advocate for decentralized structures based on direct democracy and federal or confederal associations such as citizens'/popular assemblies, cooperatives, libertarian municipalism, trade unions and workers' councils. This is done within a general call for liberty and free association through the identification, criticism and practical dismantling of illegitimate authority in all aspects of human life.
Seems pretty easy to explain to me. -
Speaking of Ghengis Khan, shouldn’t we hold Mongolians responsible for the rape, murder, and pillage? They should be forced to reconcile with their dark past and crimes against humanity.Bob_C said:
Great playbook on paper. As usual you are describing the need to tear down central government and an end result of a great society, with no middle step defined. Could be a seamless transition, could look a lot like Ghengis Khan.TheKobeStopper said:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian_socialismBob_C said:
Libertarian socialist as we know. Yet can’t explain how we get to the libertarian part.TheKobeStopper said:
I’m not a Marxist-Leninist.hardhat said:
How about Mao and Pol Pot?TheKobeStopper said:
Stalin was a pos. I just think people should own where they work.hardhat said:This suns up the left pretty well

Libertarian socialism generally rejects the concept of a state and asserts that a society based on freedom and justice can only be achieved with the abolition of authoritarian institutions that control certain means of production and subordinate the majority to an owning class or political and economic elite. Libertarian socialists advocate for decentralized structures based on direct democracy and federal or confederal associations such as citizens'/popular assemblies, cooperatives, libertarian municipalism, trade unions and workers' councils. This is done within a general call for liberty and free association through the identification, criticism and practical dismantling of illegitimate authority in all aspects of human life.
Seems pretty easy to explain to me.
-
Mostly peaceful rape, murder and pillage.hardhat said:
Speaking of Ghengis Khan, shouldn’t we hold Mongolians responsible for the rape, murder, and pillage? They should be forced to reconcile with their dark past and crimes against humanity.Bob_C said:
Great playbook on paper. As usual you are describing the need to tear down central government and an end result of a great society, with no middle step defined. Could be a seamless transition, could look a lot like Ghengis Khan.TheKobeStopper said:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian_socialismBob_C said:
Libertarian socialist as we know. Yet can’t explain how we get to the libertarian part.TheKobeStopper said:
I’m not a Marxist-Leninist.hardhat said:
How about Mao and Pol Pot?TheKobeStopper said:
Stalin was a pos. I just think people should own where they work.hardhat said:This suns up the left pretty well

Libertarian socialism generally rejects the concept of a state and asserts that a society based on freedom and justice can only be achieved with the abolition of authoritarian institutions that control certain means of production and subordinate the majority to an owning class or political and economic elite. Libertarian socialists advocate for decentralized structures based on direct democracy and federal or confederal associations such as citizens'/popular assemblies, cooperatives, libertarian municipalism, trade unions and workers' councils. This is done within a general call for liberty and free association through the identification, criticism and practical dismantling of illegitimate authority in all aspects of human life.
Seems pretty easy to explain to me.
The Khans were actually pretty tolerant rulers. They didn’t force religious beliefs or changes in cultures. It was all about turf and trade with those cats.






