Critical Race Theory peddlers won’t teach real history…the reason will shock you..

TheKobeStopper said:

WestlinnDuck said:

TheKobeStopper said:

All of this being based off a single cartoon panel is a pretty good summary of the rights criticisms of CRT.

So, Slobberer was are the good things about CRT and why do you support teaching the kiddies? Don't hurt yourself. Actually, the Tug conservatives have been factually nailing CRT for months.

https://www.americanbar.org/groups/crsj/publications/human_rights_magazine_home/civil-rights-reimagining-policing/a-lesson-on-critical-race-theory/

Recognition that race is not biologically real but is socially constructed and socially significant. It recognizes that science (as demonstrated in the Human Genome Project) refutes the idea of biological racial differences. According to scholars Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic, race is the product of social thought and is not connected to biological reality.

Acknowledgement that racism is a normal feature of society and is embedded within systems and institutions, like the legal system, that replicate racial inequality. This dismisses the idea that racist incidents are aberrations but instead are manifestations of structural and systemic racism.

Rejection of popular understandings about racism, such as arguments that confine racism to a few “bad apples.” CRT recognizes that racism is codified in law, embedded in structures, and woven into public policy. CRT rejects claims of meritocracy or “colorblindness.” CRT recognizes that it is the systemic nature of racism that bears primary responsibility for reproducing racial inequality

All of that looks pretty good to me.

What is being taught to children? Because I keep seeing parents freaking out at meetings where the district is explicitly saying they aren’t teaching CRT.

This is funny…OK…they say they aren’t teaching it…so there you go, case closed. Most educators aren’t the best or the brightest so if they are told they aren’t teaching it, they believe it and do no further analysis of what they are teaching.

What they are teaching is Critical Pedagogy. This is a much better name for what is actually being taught. Using the term CRT is overinclusive (it includes concepts not used in schools) and underinclusive (not all the ideas being taught in schools come from CRT)

“Critical pedagogy” is concepts, terms, practices, and theories that are being taught in schools. There is a connection to CRT, but also to “critical studies” and “critical theory,” which is a broader set of of ideas that have been influential with liberals (Not classical).

So school boards are right, it can be called something other than CRT. But that doesn’t mean it’s horribly damaging to kids of all races to have banged into their heads.

Shall I continue or would you prefer to remain ignorant?

TheKobeStopper said:

MikeDamone said:

TheKobeStopper said:

WestlinnDuck said:

TheKobeStopper said:

All of this being based off a single cartoon panel is a pretty good summary of the rights criticisms of CRT.

So, Slobberer was are the good things about CRT and why do you support teaching the kiddies? Don't hurt yourself. Actually, the Tug conservatives have been factually nailing CRT for months.

https://www.americanbar.org/groups/crsj/publications/human_rights_magazine_home/civil-rights-reimagining-policing/a-lesson-on-critical-race-theory/

Recognition that race is not biologically real but is socially constructed and socially significant. It recognizes that science (as demonstrated in the Human Genome Project) refutes the idea of biological racial differences. According to scholars Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic, race is the product of social thought and is not connected to biological reality.

Acknowledgement that racism is a normal feature of society and is embedded within systems and institutions, like the legal system, that replicate racial inequality. This dismisses the idea that racist incidents are aberrations but instead are manifestations of structural and systemic racism.

Rejection of popular understandings about racism, such as arguments that confine racism to a few “bad apples.” CRT recognizes that racism is codified in law, embedded in structures, and woven into public policy. CRT rejects claims of meritocracy or “colorblindness.” CRT recognizes that it is the systemic nature of racism that bears primary responsibility for reproducing racial inequality

All of that looks pretty good to me.

What is being taught to children? Because I keep seeing parents freaking out at meetings where the district is explicitly saying they aren’t teaching CRT.

This is funny…OK…they say they aren’t teaching it…so there you go, case closed. Most educators aren’t the best or the brightest so if they are told they aren’t teaching it, they believe it and do no further analysis of what they are teaching.

What they are teaching is Critical Pedagogy. This is a much better name for what is actually being taught. Using the term CRT is overinclusive (it includes concepts not used in schools) and underinclusive (not all the ideas being taught in schools come from CRT)

“Critical pedagogy” is concepts, terms, practices, and theories that are being taught in schools. There is a connection to CRT, but also to “critical studies” and “critical theory,” which is a broader set of of ideas that have been influential with liberals (Not classical).

So school boards are right, it can be called something other than CRT. But that doesn’t mean it’s horribly damaging to kids of all races to have banged into their heads.

Shall I continue or would you prefer to remain ignorant?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_pedagogy

Critical pedagogy is a philosophy of education and social movement that developed and applied concepts from critical theory and related traditions to the field of education and the study of culture.

It insists that issues of social justice and democracy are not distinct from acts of teaching and learning.

The horror.

JFC you’re stupid. Do you actual understand what any of that means ? But good google skills. So you’re good with critical theory, good to know. But not surprised based in the fact you’re a communist. But not a bad communist, one of the good ones who would create utopia.