Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Even more TBS

Comments

  • bananasnblondes
    bananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,515
    Doogman isn't impressed. Not the kind of kid Sark would have gone after.
  • TTJ
    TTJ Member Posts: 4,827
    6-2, 4.4
    Who'd want a guy like that?
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    edited July 2014
  • RaccoonHarry
    RaccoonHarry Member Posts: 2,161
    TTJ said:

    6-2, 4.4
    Who'd want a guy like that?

    Only 3 stars, can't be any good. The star system is infallible, don't ya know. Sark only brought in 4 and 5 star guys.
  • Meek
    Meek Member Posts: 7,031
    didn't Sark just get a 3 star qb who only got hot during the 7 on 7 fantasy camp shit parade where no defense is charging?
  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,739 Founders Club
    There is some pressing here.
  • Meek
    Meek Member Posts: 7,031

    Didn't sark offer a kid and have him committed only to have him decommit and go to San Jose st? Too bad he wasn't here still. Eason would have totally come here.

    Yup, you're thinking of Joseph Gray from Class of 2010.

    Funny you bring his name up and how dmc loves twisting it in favor of Sark with the Browne/Eason exchange. The only reason we offered Gray was because we already lost out on Kyle Boehm, Max Wittek, Cody Kessler, Marcus Mariota, and Brett Hundley. And then when Sark nabbed Brown from Utah, he pulled Gray's scholarship and forced him to scramble for a scholarship in the 11th hour and end up at SJSU.

    Someone should make a list of all the times Sark recruited dirty, pressured kids to commit and pulled scholarships o linemen.
    crisped
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208

    Didn't sark offer a kid and have him committed only to have him decommit and go to San Jose st? Too bad he wasn't here still. Eason would have totally come here.

    When Browne didn't commit here it was because the system was not a good fit and he would make more sense at bama Stanford or sc.

    When Eason doesn't commit it's because ccp can't recruit. Some of you need to learn the difference.

    Nobody ever said Peterman can't recruit. He just can't recruit at this level.

  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Meek said:

    Didn't sark offer a kid and have him committed only to have him decommit and go to San Jose st? Too bad he wasn't here still. Eason would have totally come here.

    Yup, you're thinking of Joseph Gray from Class of 2010.

    Funny you bring his name up and how dmc loves twisting it in favor of Sark with the Browne/Eason exchange. The only reason we offered Gray was because we already lost out on Kyle Boehm, Max Wittek, Cody Kessler, Marcus Mariota, and Brett Hundley. And then when Sark nabbed Brown from Utah, he pulled Gray's scholarship and forced him to scramble for a scholarship in the 11th hour and end up at SJSU.

    Someone should make a list of all the times Sark recruited dirty, pressured kids to commit and pulled scholarships o linemen.
    crisped
    Here's the list:

    Atoe
  • bananasnblondes
    bananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,515
    One thing I will agree with the Doogman idiots on is that CP's recruiting thus far has not been that spectacular. However, if he starts winning in a way Sark couldn't he will get athletes in just fine.

    Where these dumbfucks show their complete and utter stupidity, however is in the whole "things were a lot better under Sark". Sark handed out offers to MWC kids like candy and struck out on big name kids at Romar-like levels. Kim and Ektard did a great job of selling this story of "now the big-time kids are paying attention to Sark. It won't be long before they start committing to him" while with Pete it has been "he has to prove he can recruit with the big boys" ad naseum. Even though Pete is taking the exact same caliber of kid as Sark he's getting shit on for it where Sark got praised for it. Every Darien Washington or Sifa Tufunga that committed to Sark got a round of "Good job on Sark for getting this kid before the rest of the Pac offers (which they are sure to do)".
  • TTJ
    TTJ Member Posts: 4,827

    ...with Pete it has been "he has to prove he can recruit with the big boys" ad naseum...

    Like Romar? Like Kiffin?
  • whatshouldicareabout
    whatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 12,991

    One thing I will agree with the Doogman idiots on is that CP's recruiting thus far has not been that spectacular. However, if he starts winning in a way Sark couldn't he will get athletes in just fine.

    If you examined Petersen's recruiting only 8 months into his tenure versus all the other UW coaches 8 months into their tenures, I don't see how you could argue that Petersen isn't the best (only looking at available data).