Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Manchin caves. Feds to Seize elections
doogie
Member Posts: 15,072
in Tug Tavern
I suppose this means the forensic audits can finally end now.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/06/22/joe-manchin-caves-to-chuck-schumer-will-vote-to-advance-federal-takeover-of-elections/
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/06/22/joe-manchin-caves-to-chuck-schumer-will-vote-to-advance-federal-takeover-of-elections/
Comments
-
-
wait so what happened
-
They so desperately want to keep stealing the election The real question is how many have they stolen?
-
For those that didn't catch it, Rats had to lie to the public this week and tell their idiot voters that the ID to vote was never an issue with them and that it was Republicans who were making an issue of it. They did it because they made a deal with Manchin who would not vote for this sham of a voting act it if it didn't have the Voter ID mandate in it.
Rats lie, its what they do. -
So do they need 50 or 60?
I hear the filibuster is racist -
Senate Republicans block voting rights bill in a 50-50 vote
In a 50-50 procedural vote along party lines, Senate Republicans blocked House Resolution 1 - also known as the For the People Act - which Democrats argued would have strengthened voting rights and access across the US. Vice President Kamala Harris presided over the vote, which would have opened debate on the legislation before an actual vote. To pass the bill into debate, 60 votes were needed.
So its all meaningless malarkey to get twitter talking -
Tough to say. The evidence has only been presented in the Court of Twitter. The ruling is pending.Sledog said:They so desperately want to keep stealing the election The real question is how many have they stolen?
-
No malarkey!RaceBannon said:Senate Republicans block voting rights bill in a 50-50 vote
In a 50-50 procedural vote along party lines, Senate Republicans blocked House Resolution 1 - also known as the For the People Act - which Democrats argued would have strengthened voting rights and access across the US. Vice President Kamala Harris presided over the vote, which would have opened debate on the legislation before an actual vote. To pass the bill into debate, 60 votes were needed.
So its all meaningless malarkey to get twitter talking -
Every single one since the (S)elections process began, in all NWO nations. Every US governor is selected, not elected. CEOs of the USA Corp are selected, not elected. There is no other way but to install selected puppets to streamline and synchronize the agendas, so they are timed to go operational around the globe simulataneously, from 5g, to Convid 1984, to 'climate change.'Sledog said:They so desperately want to keep stealing the election The real question is how many have they stolen?
